PAP member pens open letter urging Ng Chee Meng to address Income-Allianz deal, reaffirm mission
In a Facebook post, Leong urged Ng to publicly address concerns regarding two major controversies: the failed sale of NTUC Income to Allianz, and the use of 1 Marina Boulevard, a prime asset intended to benefit workers.
Leong's open letter closely followed a similar call by Tan Suee Chieh, former CEO of NTUC Income.
Tan had earlier urged Jalan Kayu voters to question Ng's leadership, emphasising the importance of accountability, governance, and citizen responsibility.
Both letters reflect increasing pressure on Ng to clarify his role in decisions affecting workers' welfare and public trust.
Concerns over failed NTUC Income-Allianz deal
In his letter, Leong questioned why Ng had held back from clarifying his position regarding the controversial sale of NTUC Income to Allianz. He criticised Ng's silence during the critical period, stating that constituents were left craving strong, decisive leadership.
Leong stressed that Ng's leadership clarity was vital to restoring public trust ahead of the upcoming election.
Ng earlier defends actions amid mounting scrutiny
Earlier on 26 April, responding to media queries, Ng defended his involvement in the Income-Allianz deal. He stated that the proposed sale had been conducted in good faith.
Ng explained that a review had been initiated following the government's decision to halt the sale, aimed at learning lessons from the episode. 'We will learn the proper lesson out of this episode and see how we can do better,' Ng told reporters during a media interview.
He emphasised that the review would help guide future improvements, better meeting business needs and responding to public feedback.
Reflection on Ng's electoral deployment
Leong suggested that Ng's candidacy in Jalan Kayu SMC, rather than in a Group Representation Constituency (GRC), reflected both his resilience and the significant challenge ahead.
He noted Ng's loss in Sengkang GRC in 2020 and speculated that carrying him again in a GRC team could strain party dynamics. Jalan Kayu, carved from volatile blocs near Sengkang and Punggol, now represents Ng's new political battleground.
Drawing comparisons to historical battles, Leong highlighted Ng's military background as a former lieutenant-general in the Singapore Armed Forces. He argued that while Ng understood the principles of battlefield strategy, he had yet to fully apply them in the political arena.
Using examples such as the Battle of Stalingrad and Wellington at Waterloo, Leong urged Ng to better anticipate alternative parties' narratives and to actively engage Jalan Kayu residents with a compelling vision.
Leong described Ng's opponent, Andre Low of the Workers' Party, as relatively untested and less formidable compared to more seasoned alternative party candidates. However, he cautioned that silence could allow Low's narrative to dominate.
He advised Ng to leverage his NTUC leadership experience, warning that these advantages would be meaningless without vocal engagement and public reassurance.
Risks posed by NTUC Income's social mission shift
Leong further criticised the proposed sale of NTUC Income to Allianz, suggesting it risked undermining Income's mission as a social enterprise supporting vulnerable communities.
He urged Ng to acknowledge any misjudgement, reaffirm NTUC Income's social commitment, and transparently outline how future actions would better serve policyholders and workers.
1 Marina Boulevard asset use under spotlight
Leong also raised concerns about 1 Marina Boulevard, a prestigious Grade A office property intended to serve worker welfare initiatives.
Instead, it now houses NTUC leadership offices, sparking criticism that it is detached from workers' needs.
'This prime asset, granted to the Singapore Labour Foundation to advance workers' welfare, has become a symbol of disconnect, ' Leong said.
Leong questioned why such a valuable asset was not leased out to fund worker retraining and support programmes.
'Why reside in such an exclusive enclave when those funds could uplift the needy? Why not lease it and channel the proceeds to retraining initiatives or financial aid?'
Leong warned that Ng's silence could have wider political consequences.
With Sengkang led by Lam Pin Min and Punggol GRC closely contested, he cautioned that any further erosion of public trust could consolidate alternative parties' hold in these key areas.
He described Jalan Kayu as a critical extension of the battleground, where strong leadership and transparency were urgently needed.
Concluding his letter, Leong offered Ng a series of strategic recommendations:
Issue a public statement addressing the NTUC Income-Allianz controversy, acknowledging concerns and reaffirming commitment to Income's social mission. Recommit publicly to NTUC's founding purpose and consider revising policies to prioritise social objectives. Review the use of 1 Marina Boulevard, exploring leasing options to fund welfare programmes. Engage directly with Jalan Kayu residents through town halls and door-to-door outreach. Support allied efforts in Sengkang and Punggol to bolster the broader electoral front.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
10 hours ago
- AsiaOne
'Principled, steadfast, indomitable': Lee Hsien Yang bids farewell to sister, scatters ashes in Scotland sea, Singapore News
Dr Lee Wei Ling, the daughter of founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, has a wish fulfilled nearly a year after her death. In a Facebook post on Thursday (Aug 14), Lee Hsien Yang said that he took his sister "on one last boat ride" from Edinburgh, Scotland to scatter her ashes out at sea. "Farewell Ling. My principled, steadfast and indomitable sister," he added. Dr Lee, a neurologist, died at the age of 69 on Oct 9, 2024, four years after she was diagnosed with a rare, degenerative brain disease. Lee described the country where he strewn Dr Lee's ashes upon the waves as one that held deep significance for both of them. He recalled: "Ling and I went to Scotland on our own when we were still in school. We toured the countryside, and stayed in Edinburgh, climbed Arthur's Seat, and visited Edinburgh castle. "She returned by herself from time to time over the years for her medical exams, and to hike the rugged hills she loved so much." While Dr Lee's funeral was arranged by Lee and his son Huanwu, he was not seen at the wake, which was held from Oct 10 to 12, 2024. Lee was under investigation by the police for allegedly giving false evidence in judicial proceedings over Lee Kuan Yew's will. Lee and his wife, lawyer, Lee Suet Fern, left Singapore amid the investigations, the police said in March last year. In Oct 2024, Lee said that he had gained asylum in the United Kingdom as a political refugee. [[nid:705332]] Chingshijie@
Online Citizen
12 hours ago
- Online Citizen
Lee Hsien Yang fulfils sister Lee Wei Ling's final wish with sea burial in Edinburgh
On 14 August 2025, Lee Hsien Yang shared that he had fulfilled the final wish of his late sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, by scattering her ashes at sea off the coast of Edinburgh. In a brief and emotional Facebook post titled 'Farewell,' Lee described taking his sister on 'one last boat ride,' to honour her request for a sea burial. He wrote, 'Ling and I went to Scotland on our own when we were still in school. We toured the countryside, and stayed in Edinburgh, climbed Arthur's Seat, and visited Edinburgh castle.' He noted that Dr Lee often returned to the country alone in later years for medical examinations and hiking trips in the Scottish hills. Calling her 'principled, steadfast, and indomitable,' Lee's post marked a deeply personal farewell to the last surviving resident of the family home at 38 Oxley Road. Dr Lee Wei Ling passed away on 9 October 2024, aged 69, following a long battle with progressive supranuclear palsy, a rare neurological disorder she had been diagnosed with in 2020. Her will, which reiterated the explicit wish of her parents—Singapore's founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and Kwa Geok Choo—for the demolition of their house at 38 Oxley Road, has since been granted probate. Lee Hsien Yang, along with his sons Li Shengwu and Li Huanwu, was named executor of her estate. Due to their prolonged absence from Singapore, driven by fears of political persecution, it was Li Huanwu who oversaw Dr Lee's funeral arrangements. In 2023, British authorities confirmed that Lee Hsien Yang and his wife Lee Suet Fern had been granted political asylum in the United Kingdom. Following the probate, Lee Hsien Yang filed a formal application on 21 October 2024 with the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) to demolish 38 Oxley Road. He cited both his parents' and Dr Lee's wishes, which are explicitly outlined in their respective wills, as the motivation for the application. 'As the only living executor of my father Lee Kuan Yew's estate, it is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law,' he stated. He also expressed plans to build a small private dwelling in place of the original structure, with the property to remain within the family in perpetuity. The URA application triggered renewed scrutiny of 38 Oxley Road's status. The National Heritage Board (NHB) launched a fresh assessment to determine whether the site should be preserved as a National Monument. The house, once the residence of Lee Kuan Yew and his family, has long been the subject of debate over its heritage value versus private wishes. Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong clarified that while the 2018 Ministerial Committee report did include NHB research, it had not been formally evaluated by the Preservation of Monuments Advisory Board. The current review, he said, aims to ensure that 'objective criteria are applied' in any recommendation for national preservation. This renewed assessment has drawn criticism from opposition Members of Parliament. Progress Singapore Party Secretary General Leong Mun Wai and Workers' Party MP Chua Kheng Wee Louis questioned the necessity of duplicating prior research already documented in 2018. They also raised concerns about whether the current government was acting in contradiction to Lee Kuan Yew's repeatedly stated preference that the house be demolished to prevent it becoming a public shrine. Public sentiment has largely supported the demolition of the house. Surveys and public commentary indicate that many Singaporeans believe that preserving 38 Oxley Road would contravene Lee Kuan Yew's personal principles, including his emphasis on modesty and aversion to personality cults. Supporters of Lee Hsien Yang's stance argue that to uphold Lee Kuan Yew's legacy is to respect his explicit instructions. The government's efforts to explore preservation, however, continue to fuel speculation about political motivations, especially in light of past tensions within the Lee family. Despite these developments, the final decision regarding the property's future remains pending.
CNA
12 hours ago
- CNA
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behaviour has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual', generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people'. These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards", the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviours when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behaviour by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. "INCONSISTENT WITH OUR POLICIES" 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualises children and sexualised role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend'. They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot "to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics". Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. "TAYLOR SWIFT HOLDING AN ENORMOUS FISH" Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualised fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as 'Taylor Swift with enormous breasts', 'Taylor Swift completely naked,' and 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labelled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disembowelling a woman', Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.
