
Who's Observing The Observers—Cleaning Up The AI Mess In Aisle Seven
Today's news, that Coralogix closed a $115M funding round at a $1B valuation to disrupt observability with agentic AI, made we wonder — shouldn't C-Suite Leaders know who is observing the observers?
For some, it's been exciting to watch AI progress at lightning speed over the past few years. For others, the pace is exhausting, including those covering it, enterprises aiming to put it to productive work, and vendors striving to develop the tech or integrate it into their stacks.
Investors have been pouring in money at an impressive rate. A Crunchbase report documented the rise in startup funding last year which was dominated by investments in AI. According to their data: 'Close to a third of all global venture funding went to companies in AI-related fields, making artificial intelligence the leading sector for funding. Funding to AI-related companies reached over $100B — up more than 80% year over year from $55.6B in 2023.'
About a third of this went to foundation model companies. The rest flowed to related sectors like IT infrastructure needed to run AI, and those segments that rely on AI: autonomous vehicles, healthcare, robotics, etc. Want details? Stanford University reported that GenAI funding soared in 2024. Look for these numbers to jump again, with a continued march of funding rounds and M&A deals ahead.
These trends are probably not surprising. After all, even though the category has seen strong investments over the last ten years, close to $.5T, AI innovation presents a major inflection that is having a ripple effect across most all sectors. And GenAI and LLMs are the poster kids for the leaps we are seeing.
But news from IT observability vendor Coralogix, about a $115M E Round at +$1B valuation, showed that some smart money is finding its way to the technology needed to manage the mess we are creating. Yes, there can be some delight at the nexus of the less sexy areas of IT performance and AI safety - both of which are linchpins to further maturation and adoption of AI in the enterprise.
Why Observing The Observers Really Matters
The news relates to an area of IT that some may not be familiar with; so, I'll explain. Observability is the ability to understand the state of a system by examining the data it generates. The tech emerged from the software engineering and network monitoring worlds, as a response to the challenges of managing increasingly complex environments driven by the growth of cloud and distributed computing.
Basically, what it does is hoover in all the data 'exhaust fumes' generated by logs, metrics and traces, to make better sense of what is happening and help site reliability engineers (SREs) reduce outages and improve system health and reliability. The technology has evolved to take on more tasks, including application performance monitoring and security - encroaching on these spaces and sometimes integrating with the technologies.
Today, IT observability is a dynamic, highly competitive, and rapidly growing segment of enterprise IT. According to Gartner, the market is expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 15%, with projections placing its total size at around $11.2 billion by 2026
I said that its evolution is a result of growing IT complexity and that AI adds an inflection, and some would argue, more complexity to the enterprise. At the same time, we all know that AI can help in managing things and drive better understanding of complex issues. What happens when AI meets observability?
Taking On The Big Dogs Of Observability
This brings us to today's news, which is a shot across the bow by Coralogix against the big dogs, not just metaphorically but also literally: e.g., Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk and Acceldata.
These vendors help manage AI and use some form of it (e.g., machine learning or LLMs) in their stacks. They are also bullish about combining AI and observability. For example, on recent earning calls, Datadog CEO Josh Pomel said, "We continue to see rising customer [demand]
It seems Coralogix is taking a more aggressive approach. The company acquired AI observability provider Aporia last year, which resulted in the launch of their AI Center; the first solution to treat AI as a separate observability stack. Their AI Center helps manage not only AI performance, as some others do, but also its content, enabling businesses to detect hallucinations, toxicity, prompt injection (yeah that's a thing), and more.
Now, Coralogix has secured a major investment that should fuel its drive to disrupt the space with the first AI agent that extends observability value across the enterprise.
Why is this significant to C-Suite Leaders? First, from a sheer numbers PoV, it is a big round. While not the largest in AI by any stretch, it is an impressive amount for an up-and-comer that is not aiming to move mountains in the capital-intensive LLM and chips arenas.
I spoke with Coralogix CEO Ariel Assaraf about the news and their current status. He did not provide hard revenue numbers but said that the company has achieved impressive 72% YoY growth for the last three years. Customers include well-known logos like Adobe Systems, Ferrari and DoorDash.
This round was led by CA-based venture growth firm NewView Capital. Ariel shared that all existing investors including Advent International, Brighton Park Capital, Revaia, and Greenfield Partners, returned to support Coralogix's continued growth and launch into agentic AI observability.
'Decoder Ring' Knocks Down Tower Of Babel Separating Business And IT
Interestingly, they issued a second and related announcement at the same time: 'Coralogix Unveils Industry's First AI Agent That Extends Observability Value Across the Enterprise.'
When I asked Ariel Assaraf to connect the dots; he said: "We have this unique architecture that allows teams to ingest more data, analyze the data in-stream, and make informed decisions for optimization. Traditional observability is super-expensive and doesn't scale; we fixed that. Now we're adding agentic AI, and people can make informed decisions across business units without being experts."
He further explained: "AI introduces new challenges around data security, accuracy, and scale, demanding a new approach. Agentic AI can enable smarter observability that minimizes manual effort and makes it easier for teams to surface and act on insights from their data.'
According to the press release, their agent, called 'Olly,' is an agentic AI that transcends the more typical event alerts observability platforms generate to answer questions and provide guidance.
This sounds like they are tackling the disconnect that can occur between the business and IT sides. It's the old business and IT alignment challenge that has yet to be solved. One of the biggest barriers is the translation gap — non-technical stakeholders can't easily understand 'geek speak' or explore how backend systems impact business outcomes.
With Olly, both technical and non-technical users can ask questions in plain English, from 'What is wrong with the payment flow?' or 'Why do some users struggle with logging in?' to more holistic questions like 'Which service is frustrating our users the most?' In short, democratizing insights available from observability, to better connect IT performance and drive smarter outcomes, is what enterprises need now.
As AI-enabled observability becomes more mainstream in the enterprise, look for impacts across the organization — from frontline performers to boardroom risk mitigators. Like other tech trends I've unpacked, which are critical for the next generation of C-Suiters to lead their organizations, keep an eye on the observers to help you better align the tech and business goals — and hopefully boost results across your enterprise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
9 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Verizon told to clarify ambiguous advertising claims after T-Mobile complaint
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR The National Advertising Division (NAD) has recommended that Verizon change its marketing language about satellite texting based on a complaint from T-Mobile. T-Mobile has also challenged Verizon's claim of being 'America's largest network,' with the watchdog calling Verizon's advertising 'ambiguous.' Verizon has said that it'll comply with NAD's recommendations. Verizon is once again under the lens for its inconspicuous advertising claims. This time, the Big Red has been pulled up over claims about its satellite texting service and network size following a challenge from rival T-Mobile. The National Advertising Division (NAD), an industry watchdog under BBB National Programs, found some of Verizon's claims to be supported but recommended that the carrier make its advertising clearer for the benefit of consumers. NAD said Verizon's slogan 'conquering dead zones with satellite' is not misleading on its own, but warned that Verizon must improve its disclosures. Specifically, the NAD says Verizon failed to clarify that the satellite texting service only works on select new phone models and under certain conditions. Moreover, T-Mobile also took issue with Verizon's 'America's largest network' claim. While Verizon has based that claim on the number of postpaid subscribers, T-Mobile said the phrase could mislead consumers into thinking it refers to coverage area or geographic reach. NAD recommended Verizon clarify what Verizon means by 'largest.' 'NAD found the phrase 'largest network' to be ambiguous, potentially conveying different messages to consumers. NAD also determined that the term 'postpaid phone connections' may not clearly communicate that it refers to Verizon subscribers,' the organization wrote in a press release shared with Android Authority. NAD made similar recommendations to those of Verizon last year and asked the carrier to discontinue or modify its satellite texting claims based on a previous complaint by T-Mobile. Verizon stated it would comply with the NAD's recommendations. While the NAD does not have the power to enforce changes, companies often follow its guidance to avoid legal or regulatory issues. For customers, the ruling means Verizon ads may soon become more transparent, especially regarding satellite texting and what its 'largest network' claims really mean.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's bleak job update exposes major AI warning for Aussie workers: 'Will reduce'
Thousands of office workers at Amazon and Microsoft could soon be without a job as the two companies invest more heavily in artificial intelligence and outsourcing. Major warnings have been issued in recent months about how AI could create high levels of unemployment in Australia and around the world. Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy wrote a memo to staff that cautioned this tech takeover would likely hit its workforce in the coming years. But he suggested that some who lose their jobs could find new roles in other sectors. 'As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' he said. AI warning following 'extraordinary' prediction of job wipe out Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 $1,000 ATO school fees tax deduction that Aussies don't realise they can claim 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Meanwhile, Bloomberg is reporting Microsoft is gearing up for another round of 'thousands' of job cuts after getting rid of 6,000 roles just last month. During that blitz, the tech company slashed the product and engineering departments; however, this potential new round of cuts could focus more on the sales teams. Microsoft warned back in April that it was looking to use third-party firms to take on software sales rather than do things of Australian companies have started throwing big sums of cash into AI to help improve their products, backend operations, and customer services. But Telstra recently admitted roles would likely be cut in the future due to this new focus. 'Our workforce will look different in 2030 as we develop new capabilities, find new ways to leverage technology, including AI, and we have to stay focused on becoming more efficient,' Vicki Brady said. 'We don't know precisely what our workforce will look like in 2030, but it will be smaller than it is today.' The head of AI leader Anthropic, Dario Amodei, suggested half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could get the flick in the US by 2030. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) said late last year that one in three workers were at risk from AI. Australia's productivity commissioner Danielle Wood isn't convinced the AI bloodbath will be that bad. Still, she didn't deny the workforce matrix we're familiar with now will inevitably go through some big changes. 'Am I going to sit here and say, 'No jobs are going to go?' No, clearly not. There will be some impacts," she told the ABC. She hoped AI would allow people to have more time for "the uniquely human parts of jobs". The Prime Minister has announced a huge summit in August a bid to fix the country's lagging productivity. The government believes AI could be a game-changer in this realm and is keen to explore ways the technology can be deployed across multiple sectors. While the ACTU is on board with AI in certain scenarios, it wants assurances for workers' rights. 'To achieve good adoption of AI, Australia needs responsible regulation which both protects Australian workers and Australian industries from malicious use and theft by overseas big tech," ACTU secretary Sally McManus said. The union is pushing for workers to have the right to refuse to use AI in fields where it would be 'inappropriate or carry undue risk', like in medical decision-making. Finance Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano, who has been carefully watching Australia's banking industry adopt new tech, said the roundtable will be a good opportunity to set up some ground rules. 'AI is a fundamental and growing part of the finance sector, but this growth is happening in an almost entirely unregulated and uncontrolled way,' she said. 'The economic benefits and productivity gains of AI must flow on to workers, and not just improve the profits of banks and major companies.' Australian Services Union national secretary Emeline Gaske went as far as saying workers should be 'fairly compensated' for using AI. 'AI will undoubtedly reshape the way we work, but we can't lose sight of the people behind the progress,' she said. 'Workers whose knowledge, experience and judgement are used to train and refine these systems deserve to be recognised."Sign in to access your portfolio


Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Auto Tariffs Seen Hiking Car Prices by Nearly $2,000 Per Vehicle
Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump's tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump's tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration's anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.