Viral ‘honor' killing in southwest Pakistan triggers national outrage
While hundreds of so-called honor killings are reported in Pakistan each year, often with little public or legal response, the video of a woman and man accused of adultery being taken to the desert by a group of men to be killed has struck a nerve.
The video shows the woman, Bano Bibi, being handed a Qur'an by a man identified by police as her brother. 'Come walk seven steps with me, after that you can shoot me,' she says, and she walks forward a few feet and stops with her back to the men.
The brother, Jalal Satakzai, then shoots her three times and she collapses. Seconds later he shoots and kills the man, Ehsan Ullah Samalani, whom Bano was accused of having an affair with.
Once the video of the killings in Pakistan's Balochistan province went viral, it brought swift government action and condemnation from politicians, rights groups and clerics.
Civil rights lawyer Jibran Nasir said, though, the government's response was more about performance than justice.
'The crime occurred months ago, not in secrecy but near a provincial capital, yet no one acted until 240 million witnessed the killing on camera,' he said.
'This isn't a response to a crime. It's a response to a viral moment.'
Police have arrested 16 people in Balochistan's Nasirabad district, including a tribal chief and the woman's mother.
The mother, Gul Jan Bibi, said the killings were carried out by family and local elders based on 'centuries-old Baloch traditions,' and not on the orders of the tribal chief.
'We did not commit any sin,' she said in a video statement that also went viral. 'Bano and Ehsan were killed according to our customs.'
She said her daughter, who had three sons and two daughters, had run away with Ehsan and returned after 25 days.
Police said Bano's younger brother, who shot the couple, remains at large.
Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti said it was a 'test' case and vowed to dismantle the illegal tribal courts operating outside the law.
Police had earlier said a jirga, an informal tribal council that issues extrajudicial rulings, had ordered the killings.
#JusticeForCouple
The video sparked online condemnation, with hashtags like #JusticeForCouple and #HonourKilling trending. The Pakistan Ulema Council, a body of religious scholars, called the killings 'un-Islamic' and urged terrorism charges against those involved.
Dozens of civil society members and rights activists staged a protest on Saturday in the provincial capital Quetta, demanding justice and an end to parallel justice systems.
'Virality is a double-edged sword,' said Arsalan Khan, a cultural anthropologist and professor who studies gender and masculinity.
'It can pressure the state into action, but public spectacle can also serve as a strategy to restore ghairat, or perceived family honor, in the eyes of the community.'
Pakistan outlawed honor killings in 2016 after the murder of social media star Qandeel Baloch, closing a loophole that allowed perpetrators to go free if they were pardoned by family members. Rights groups say enforcement remains weak, especially in rural areas where tribal councils still hold sway.
'In a country where conviction rates often fall to single digits, visibility – and the uproar it brings – has its advantages,' said constitutional lawyer Asad Rahim Khan.
'It jolts a complacent state that continues to tolerate jirgas in areas beyond its writ.'
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan reported at least 405 honor killings in 2024. Most victims are women, often killed by relatives claiming to defend family honor.
Khan said rather than enforcing the law, the government has spent the past year weakening the judiciary and even considering reviving jirgas in former tribal areas.
'It's executive inaction, most shamefully toward women in Balochistan,' Khan said.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in recent months has asked senior ministers to evaluate proposals to revive jirgas in Pakistan's former tribal districts, including potential engagement with tribal elders and Afghan authorities.
The Prime Minister's Office and Pakistan's information minister did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Viral and then forgotten?
The Balochistan killings were raised in Pakistan's Senate, where the human rights committee condemned the murders and called for action against those who convened the jirga. Lawmakers also warned that impunity for parallel justice systems risked encouraging similar violence.
Activists and analysts, however, say the outrage is unlikely to be sustained.
'There's noise now, but like every time, it will fade,' said Jalila Haider, a human rights lawyer in Quetta.
'In many areas, there is no writ of law, no enforcement. Only silence.'
Haider said the killings underscore the state's failure to protect citizens in under-governed regions like Balochistan, where tribal power structures fill the vacuum left by absent courts and police.
'It's not enough to just condemn jirgas,' Haider said.
'The real question is: why does the state allow them to exist in the first place?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Special Coverage Five years on: Beirut Port blast victims still seek justice in Lebanon
Five years after one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history devastated Beirut's port and surrounding neighborhoods, victims' families and survivors are still fighting for justice as a long-stalled investigation slowly resumes under Lebanon's new government. In an apartment near the Lebanese capital's ravaged port, Paul and Tracy Naggear cradle their two young children born from a determination to keep living after losing everything that mattered most. Their three-year-old daughter Alexandra was among the more than 200 people killed when thousands of tons of ammonium nitrate exploded on August 4, 2020. Half a decade later, the Naggears' grief remains as raw as their anger over a stalled investigation that has yielded no answers, accountability, norjustice for their daughter. 'Our lives were destroyed on the fourth of August when my daughter Alexandra passed away,' Paul Naggear said during an exclusive interview with Al Arabiya English. 'Everything was destroyed, our apartment, our neighborhoods, our future. This is as tragic and traumatizing as you can imagine.' The couple's home on one of Beirut's main thoroughfares bore the full force of the blast that devastated much of the Lebanese capital. On that summer day, the Naggears found themselves among hundreds of thousands of residents living unknowingly in the shadow of a ticking time bomb, the improperly stored ammonium nitrate that had sat in a port warehouse for years. 'My wife and I decided on the day of our daughter's passing that we would continue living. We made the choice to live and to fight for her justice,' Naggear explained. The couple has since welcomed two sons, Axel and Rafael, who 'saved us, definitely, to some extent, and allow us to continue on this path.' But their determination to rebuild their lives has been shadowed by a maddening lack of answers about what caused the explosion that shattered their world. 'There is still no justice, which means that our daughter was taken from us, and still today, there is no accountability. There is no one behind bars,' Naggear said, his voice heavy with frustration. 'We have no idea of the truth of what happened that day.' Haunting questions The questions that haunt the Naggears reflect the broader mystery that continues to engulf Lebanon's deadliest peacetime disaster. They want to know why the ammonium nitrate was stored in front of potentially 300,000 people and households, and why nobody took action to remove the dangerous cargo or safeguard its location. Naggear's account of that chaotic day reveals the human cost of the government's unpreparedness. 'I had to take our daughter to the hospital on a scooter because you can imagine the situation she was in, because there was no immediate relief effort planned,' he recalled. His wife Tracy, who suffered three broken ribs, three broken vertebrae, and a severe head injury, 'had to walk for a very long time until she found a vehicle that took her to the hospital in a very, very bad condition.' In addition to the suffering, the family for four years watched as the investigative judge responsible for the case was systematically obstructed, due to what he described as government harassment. Though Naggear noted that 'the situation now, since earlier this year, has been better,' the fundamental questions about their daughter's death – and the deaths of more than 200 others – remain unanswered. Resuming an investigation Judge Tarek Bitar resumed his investigation into the incident in January after being forced to suspend it in 2021 due to intense political pressure. His renewed probe comes as Lebanon attempts to rebuild credibility under President Joseph Aoun and reformist Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, both of whom have pledged to uphold judicial independence. For Carmen Geha, an academic and consultant who witnessed the blast firsthand, the lack of accountability became unbearable. She left Lebanon three years ago, driven not by the explosion itself, but by what followed – or rather, what didn't. 'I left specifically because of the aftermath of the explosion, specifically because nothing happened after that, and it's been five years and nothing has happened,' Geha told Al Arabiya English. A fellow at Chatham House who was teaching at the American University of Beirut at the time, Geha participated in community cleanup efforts in the weeks following the disaster. 'I was at home, the building shook. I was in Beirut. Everybody thought it was in their own neighborhood,' she recalled of that August afternoon. 'And then we quickly realized that nothing was going to happen.' Investigation faces continued obstacles The devastating port blast was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where tons of ammonium nitrate fertilizer had been unsafely stored for years after arriving by ship, despite repeated warnings to senior officials. Multiple investigations have revealed that high-ranking Lebanese officials, including the president at the time, knew about the dangerous materials stored near residential areas. Bitar was accused of bias by several officials named in the probe, including former interior minister Nohad Machnouk, who is suspected of 'negligence and misconduct.' These officials launched a series of legal proceedings against the judge, effectively paralyzing the investigation. The probe was further hampered when Hezbollah, long a dominant force in Lebanese politics but now weakened by its recent war with Israel, accused Bitar of bias and demanded his removal. The militant group's opposition effectively brought the investigation to a halt for over two years. On April 11, two former top security officials appeared before Bitar for the first time since the investigation's resumption. 'Nothing has happened' Yaarob Sakher, a now retired Lebanese army brigadier, anxiously awaited the investigation into the explosion by the state but expresses disappointment, saying that Hezbollah's interference prevented any meaningful results. 'They blocked the investigation and nothing happened until now,' he said. For Geha, the scope of inaction extends far beyond the courtroom. 'Nobody went to jail. There's yet to be a court investigation. There has not been a trial. No victim compensation, bodies and debris and remains were continued to be identified months later.' The explosion was particularly devastating because of its scope and the prior knowledge of officials. 'There were public officials, including the president at the time, that he knew that there was explosive material at the port,' Geha said. 'So that idea that it was kind of building up that creepiness of it. So that's number one very particular kind of crime, second, the level of negligence and corruption that can cover up for something so big.' In the immediate aftermath of the blast, Beirut witnessed an extraordinary outpouring of community solidarity. Geha participated in academic-led initiatives to assess environmental damage and support collapsed small businesses, while volunteers across the city organized cleanup efforts and aid distribution. 'The one positive thing was the short lived, like, community efforts, sort of hope, the hope and the dark that emerges when, when a disaster happens, right?' she said. 'People really, you know, shunned, politicians, called for justice, helped each other, building restaurants, collecting glass, raising money, bringing medicine.' But this grassroots response couldn't compensate for institutional failures. 'That short lived elation could only be short lived, because people cannot fix a country. You need structures,' Geha explained. In addition to what was happening, international aid largely failed to materialize due to lack of trust in Lebanese government institutions. 'The aid didn't come in, and rightfully so, because government institutions couldn't be trusted,' she said. 'The government institutions entrusted with that process of organizing the aid failed, but there was a caretaker government that bulls****ed their way month after month.' Even the volunteer cleanup efforts later proved problematic. 'We realized later that actually, we shouldn't have been cleaning the debris, and that there's asbestos everywhere,' recalled, saying that it 'hurtthe eyes of the young people that were carrying broomsticks.'. Lasting trauma, continuing crisis The explosion occurred against the backdrop of Lebanon's ongoing economic collapse and followed massive anti-government protests in 2019. Rather than spurring meaningful reform, the blast's aftermath saw conditions worsen, culminating in another devastating war with Israel in 2023. 'That early elation then turned to frustration, emigration and increased tensions in the country, because it's a country of misery, of a million refugees that can't work. You have refugee camps that are armed. You have people with school dropouts. You have drug addiction, narcotic state, all on top of the initial elation turned into just horrible,' Geha said. Despite the new government's promises, Geha remains skeptical about prospects for justice. When asked what she hoped to see in the next five years, she called for 'a public trial, a proper process of indictment, a traditional investigation that wins people's hearts and minds. Maybe it's not going to [bring back] the dead, but it might create an impediment for level of evil again.' She said that Lebanon is not unique in experiencing political crimes and crimes against humanity, pointing to international models for truth commissions and transitional justice. 'There is a way to model this. There is a way that we can learn on setting up tools commissions, and there is a way…I really don't know whether there's no inertia.' The current government, led by President Aoun and Prime Minister Salam, has made the right statements about judicial independence, according to Geha. 'Now there is a government that says all the right things…and you know, it looks good, but I don't see why there isn't that destination.' Sakher all but shares Geha's concerns, fearing that the new government could ultimately turn out to be not so different from previous ones. Yet, he keeps wishing for real change and results regarding the investigation. 'Hope is there' The port blast investigation has broader implications for Lebanon's relationship with international partners and its prospects for recovery from multiple crises. The explosion occurred amid a severe economic collapse that has pushed millions into poverty and triggered massive emigration. As Lebanon marks the fifth anniversary of the explosion, the contrast between the scale of the tragedy and the absence of accountability remains unforgiveable said Geha, adding that the lack of progress represents not just a failure of justice, but a fundamental breach of the social contract. 'It's an insult. Honestly.' 'Like a city after war' Farea al-Muslimi, Research Fellow at Chatham House's Middle East and North Africa Program, reflected on how the Beirut port blast fundamentally changed his understanding of conflict and governance in Lebanon. 'Personally, since I was there, first and foremost, the second day after the blast, Beirut looked like a city after a war,' al-Muslimi told Al Arabiya English. The scene, he said, reminded him of war-torn cities in Yemen and elsewhere, leading him to a broader realization about the nature of what Lebanese people were experiencing. 'The explosion made me rethink the very concept of war,' he said, adding what was being done to the Lebanese people constituted a war, but 'they did not have the right to call it a war or even the benefit of a war.' Instead, it was 'a war by their bankers, a war by the system, a war by the sectarian formula in the country – essentially a conflict with many criminals but where 'no one was called a criminal.' Al-Muslimi argued that the situation exemplifies what happens under Lebanon's power-sharing system andhe warned of its real consequences: 'You have a bunch of criminals, a bunch of warlords, and instead of them being in jail, you award them with a political formula that basically gives them new ways to continue launching these wars against civilians.' The researcher emphasized that Lebanon's dignity had been 'shattered' because those in power faced no accountability despite their failures. This lack of consequences, he suggested, stems from the need to maintain the country's sectarian power-sharing balance. Looking ahead, al-Muslimi expressed uncertainty about Lebanon's path forward. Five years after the blast, he questioned how the country could 'pull things together and move forward' without holding anyone accountable for what happened.
Arab News
11 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistani opposition alliance says government trying to ‘eliminate' rivals, calls for joint strategy
ISLAMABAD: A coalition of prominent Pakistani opposition leaders on Friday called for a unified political strategy to address what they described as a systematic effort to eliminate dissent, condemning recent convictions related to the May 9, 2023, riots and rejecting the legitimacy of the 2024 general elections. The two-day multiparty conference was convened by the Tehreek-e-Tahafuz-e-Ayeen-e-Pakistan (TTAP) — or Movement for the Protection of Pakistan's Constitution — a newly formed alliance of politicians, lawyers and civil society leaders advocating for constitutional supremacy and civilian rule. Established earlier this year, TTAP is chaired by veteran Pashtun leader Mahmood Khan Achakzai and held its gathering in Islamabad at the residence of former senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar, who said the capital administration had attempted to block the event by sealing off its original venue. 'There is a clear attempt to eliminate the opposition in this country,' Khokhar said toward the end of the gathering, adding: 'All parties at the conference unanimously agreed that a comprehensive and joint strategy is urgently needed to steer the country out of this crisis.' The conference condemned the convictions handed down to the leaders and supporters of the country's jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party over their alleged role in the May 9 unrest. The protests, triggered by Khan's brief detention by paramilitary rangers on corruption charges, turned violent, with attacks on military installations across the country. An anti-terrorism court in Pakistan convicted the leaders of the opposition in the National Assembly and Senate on charges of being involved in the unrest, though the PTI has frequently described such cases and convictions as politically motivated. The government, however, said all those who were sentenced were given fair trials within the legal and constitutional framework. 'Fair trials were conducted in the May 9 cases in accordance with the law,' Information Minister Ata Tarar asserted in a televised statement following the opposition alliance's news conference. 'The proceedings lasted two full years, during which the prosecution presented its arguments and evidence.' The multiparty conference participants also denounced the imprisonment of Khan and his wife, Bushra Imran, and demanded their immediate release. The declaration agreed at the gathering also accused the government of 'fascism and political victimization' and rejected the outcome of the 2024 elections as fraudulent. It also called for repealing the 26th Amendment, which curtailed judicial autonomy by expanding parliamentary oversight of appointments, saying it had undermined judicial independence in Pakistan, and expressed solidarity with six Islamabad High Court judges who had spoken out against institutional interference. Tarar, however, dismissed the opposition's assertions, saying the participants of the conference 'had neither arguments nor facts.' 'Whenever a foreign visit to Pakistan is about to begin, especially by a foreign head of state, such actions are taken to sabotage it and damage the country's economy,' he added, noting that the conference came just ahead of the Iranian president's visit to Pakistan on Saturday.
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Syria forms committee to investigate violence in Sweida province
Syria's justice ministry announced on Thursday the formation of a committee to investigate deadly violence in the southern Druze-majority province of Sweida. The week-long clashes which began on July 13 killed scores of people. In a decree issued Thursday, the justice ministry said it sought to shed light on 'the circumstances and conditions that led to the events,' investigate 'attacks and violations against citizens' and refer any culprits to the judiciary. A seven-member committee, including four judges, two lawyers and a brigadier general, would present its findings within three months, the decree said. Justice Minister Mazhar al-Wais said the committee was formed to 'bring those involved to justice.' Al-Wais expressed his hope that the investigation 'will lead to the preservation of the rights of all citizens ... and the protection of national unity and civil peace.' The violence in Sweida had initially pitted local Druze fighters against Bedouin tribes, but rapidly escalated and saw the involvement of Syrian government forces as well as Israel, which has claimed it was acting to protect the Druze minority.
