
Iran using social media to recruit spies ‘at scale'
Social media platforms are being widely used by intelligence services across the Middle East to recruit spies, counter-intelligence specialists have said.
The platforms, which unlike traditional media are not generally liable for the content they publish, are being exploited by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to ensnare vulnerable Israelis like 'sardines', said a former Israeli spy chief.
Iranian authorities in turn allege that Israeli intelligence services are using Persian-language social media platforms to recruit and gather intelligence from Iranian citizens.
'The b------s have infiltrated everywhere,' an Iranian official told The Telegraph this week.
Israeli police and Shin Bet internal security agents arrested three Israelis suspected of spying on Iran's behalf last week – the latest in a string of espionage incidents linked to the Islamic Republic over the past two years.
The three had no known connection to one another and are said, like dozens of others, to have been recruited via social media.
One of the suspects, Dmitri Cohen, a 28-year-old from Haifa, gathered intelligence on the future daughter-in-law of Benjamin Netanyahu, local media reported last Monday.
The wedding of Avner Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister's son, and Amit Yardeni, his partner, was supposed to have taken place two weeks ago but was postponed following the outbreak of open conflict with Iran.
Talking to The Telegraph on Friday, Oded Ailam, a former head of the counter-terrorism division of the Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency, said Iran had adopted a 'new concept' in spy recruitment, which targeted tens of thousands of Israelis via social media.
Historically, spymasters of the 'Le Carré mould' would spend months, sometimes years, identifying potential recruits. However, social media platforms have allowed Iran to turn recruitment into a 'numbers game,' said Mr Ailam, who spent 24 years in the Mossad and is now a researcher at the Jerusalem Centre for Security and Foreign Affairs.
'Their concept, their basic concept, is big numbers,' he said. 'They say, 'OK, we are going to approach 10,000 different targets, in Israel or abroad'. Out of the 10,000 targets, maybe 30 per cent will respond to the initial approach, and from that maybe 10 per cent will be willing to move forward, and 2 to 5 per cent will say 'yes'.'
He added: 'It's big numbers; statistics rather than pinpoint. In that sense, you are not a fisherman. You are a hunter … they're not going after sharks. They're going after sardines.'
Mr Ailam, who learnt his trade-craft in the old school, warned that the dragnet concept was 'primitive' but a real threat.
It was 'cheap and cost-effective' and the Iranians did not worry about failure because they were not concerned about diplomatic blowback, he said.
Targets were normally Jewish immigrants to Israel from lower socio-economic groups who did not have an 'ideological affiliation to Israel' and needed money, he added.
Mr Ailam warned that, once ensnared in conversation on social media, the 'ladder was quick' and the chances of being caught 'enormous' because of the digital trail that social media leaves.
'It's instant, it's fast food … the assets are dispensable. The Iranians don't care if [the] asset is caught. They don't even care if he double crossed them … it's just numbers,' he said.
There was an element of grooming, he said, adding: 'They start with soft assignments, just to see, to feel the guy, to see whether he's willing to cross online. It usually starts with graffiti, against Netanyahu or against whatever. Then it starts with small sabotage of puncturing [tyres] and stuff like this.
'They go from the soft one to the harder one, and then it goes to actually providing intelligence on Israeli bases, Israeli strategic places, and even the assassination of Israelis.'
Mr Ailam said he had no doubt that those recruited know what they are getting into but that clever defence lawyers were muddying the water at trials and court sentences were too lenient at seven years on average, reduced by 30 per cent for good behaviour.
'We face an existential crisis … [but] the court is looking on those poor, miserable people who are standing in front of them with their head down and saying, 'I'm sorry. I didn't know' … they buy this bulls---,' he said.
But at least Israel has due process and a transparent legal system. In Iran, the security forces arrested more than 700 people accused of various forms of collaboration with Israeli intelligence services during the recent 12-day conflict alone, and executed at least six people that they alleged were spies.
Three men – Idris Aali, Azad Shojaei and Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul – were executed at dawn at Urmia prison on charges of 'corruption on Earth through cooperation with hostile foreign states in favour of Israel', according to state media.
Iranian officials also reported the execution of Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shaysteh, described as 'the leader of a cyber network linked to Mossad,' last Monday.
An Iranian official told The Telegraph: 'There's a lot of concern, which is why they had cut off the internet. Many of those who had been working with the enemy were still connected like that [through social media].
'No one even thought they would become as reckless as to come and target everyone in their homes, but in the past day, they've arrested some people from within the IRGC itself. The b------s have infiltrated everywhere.'
According to Iranian security officials, Israeli intelligence services are using Persian-language social media platforms to recruit spies and gather intelligence from Iranian citizens.
Iranian authorities say Israel's military Unit 8200, known for its cyber warfare capabilities, has intensified operations across Persian-language social media channels and messaging apps since the war between the two countries began.
The unit creates fake accounts to pose as ordinary Iranians while seeking to collect sensitive information about military installations and government activities, according to Iranian media.
'These individuals establish fake accounts and present themselves as ordinary people while seeking to gather information,' an Iranian security official told the state-run Mehr news agency.
The sophistication of Israel's social media espionage extends beyond simple intelligence gathering, they added.
Iranian officials describe a methodical approach where Israeli operatives spend months or even years building authentic-looking online personas before activating them for intelligence purposes.
'Some of these fake accounts have been established for a long time and have undergone what we call identity building,' one security official said. 'They have had normal activity on Persian-language social networks for months to create a track record of activity so they can be recognised and trusted as ordinary citizens.'
This patient approach allows Israeli intelligence to embed deeply within Iranian social media circles, gaining access to information that might be shared casually among trusted community members, it is claimed.
The accounts often share cultural content, participate in discussions about daily life, and slowly build networks of followers who view them as legitimate Iranian citizens.
Iranian authorities say they have documented cases where the operatives engage in seemingly normal conversations about local events, gradually steering discussions toward topics of intelligence value such as military movements, government facilities, or economic conditions.
Beyond creating fake personas, Iranian officials say Mossad operatives hack accounts to directly message individual Iranian users on social networks, particularly Telegram.
Iranian security services have warned citizens to 'never open links received from unknown accounts' and to immediately block any accounts that send unsolicited messages or links.
Threatening text messages
Iran's response has been swift and severe. Citizens reported receiving threatening text messages from the judiciary on the first day of a US-brokered ceasefire, warning they could face prosecution for 'following or joining pages affiliated with Israel'.
The authorities have warned about espionage risks from Meta applications, including WhatsApp and Facebook, urging citizens to be aware that 'the results of information gathering by the Zionist regime could lead to assassination, bombing, or new crimes against Iran.'
Others suspect the Iranian crackdown has more to do with stifling internal descent than genuine fears over spying. Legal experts have criticised the threats to Iranian citizens as having 'no judicial or legal value' and designed primarily to 'create fear and terror and suppression' among the population.
During the peak of the recent Israeli strikes, only 3 per cent of Iranians had access to the global internet, as some opposition groups outside Iran were calling for people to 'rise against the regime.'
Iran has repeatedly cut internet access during major protests, using digital blackouts to hide the scale of violence against demonstrators and prevent documentation of human rights violations. The pattern emerged during fuel price protests in November 2019, when Iranian authorities implemented a near-total internet shutdown that lasted for days.
During that blackout, security forces killed at least 304 protesters, according to Amnesty International, though the real death toll is believed to be much higher – some rights groups say the number is 1,500.
The government used the same tactic during the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom protests that erupted after 22-year-old Mahsa Amini died while being held in custody by the morality police.
In a post on its Persian-language X account on Thursday, the Mossad offered medical assistance to ordinary Iranian citizens hurt in the recent conflict, encouraging them to reach out via WhatsApp, Telegram, or Signal for assistance.
'At this moment, the regime is focused on its senior percentages, not on caring for its citizens,' read the message. 'We stand with you and have formed a team of specialized doctors, including experts in cardiology, diabetes, pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, oncology, as well as support for pregnant women and psychological support.
'All doctors speak Persian, and you can communicate with them in Persian or English. However, we suggest that you reach out to us via VPN [an online technology that masks the user's location]'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt for missing uranium
VIENNA, June 29 (Reuters) - The U.S. and Israeli bombing of Iranian nuclear sites creates a conundrum for U.N. inspectors in Iran: how can you tell if enriched uranium stocks, some of them near weapons grade, were buried beneath the rubble or had been secretly hidden away? Following last weekend's attacks on three of Iran's top nuclear sites - at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan - President Donald Trump said the facilities had been "obliterated" by U.S. munitions, including bunker-busting bombs. But the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, which monitors Tehran's nuclear program, has said it's unclear exactly what damage was sustained at Fordow, a plant buried deep inside a mountain that produced the bulk of Iran's most highly enriched uranium. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday it was highly likely the sensitive centrifuges used to enrich uranium inside Fordow were badly damaged. It's far less clear whether Iran's 9 tonnes of enriched uranium - more than 400 kg of it enriched to close to weapons grade - were destroyed. Western governments are scrambling to determine what's become of it. Reuters spoke to more than a dozen current and former officials involved in efforts to contain Iran's nuclear program who said the bombing may have provided the perfect cover for Iran to make its uranium stockpiles disappear and any IAEA investigation would likely be lengthy and arduous. Olli Heinonen, previously the IAEA's top inspector from 2005 to 2010, said the search will probably involve complicated recovery of materials from damaged buildings as well as forensics and environmental sampling, which take a long time. "There could be materials which are inaccessible, distributed under the rubble or lost during the bombing," said Heinonen, who dealt extensively with Iran while at the IAEA and now works at the Stimson Center think-tank in Washington. Iran's more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% purity - a short step from the roughly 90% of weapons grade - are enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Even a fraction of that left unaccounted for would be a grave concern for Western powers that believe Iran is at least keeping the option of nuclear weapons open. There are indications Iran may have moved some of its enriched uranium before it could be struck. IAEA chief Grossi said Iran informed him on June 13, the day of Israel's first attacks, that it was taking measures to protect its nuclear equipment and materials. While it did not elaborate, he said that suggests it was moved. A Western diplomat involved in the dossier, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue, said most of the enriched uranium at Fordow would appear to have been moved days in advance of the attacks, "almost as if they knew it was coming". Some experts have said a line of vehicles including trucks visible on satellite imagery outside Fordow before it was hit suggests enriched uranium there was moved elsewhere, though U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved it. Trump has also dismissed such concerns. In an interview due to air on Sunday with Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures", he insisted the Iranians "didn't move anything." "It's very dangerous to do. It is very heavy - very, very heavy. It's a very hard thing to do," Trump said. "Plus we didn't give much notice because they didn't know we were coming until just, you know, then." The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The State Department referred Reuters to Trump's public remarks. A second Western diplomat said it would be a major challenge to verify the condition of the uranium stockpile, citing a long list of past disputes between the IAEA and Tehran, including Iran's failure to credibly explain uranium traces found at undeclared sites. "It'll be a game of cat and mouse." Iran says it has fulfilled all its obligations towards the watchdog. Before Israel launched its 12-day military campaign aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities, the IAEA had regular access to Iran's enrichment sites and monitored what was inside them around the clock as part of the 191-nation Non-Proliferation Treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, to which Iran is a party. Now, rubble and ash blur the picture. What's more, Iran has threatened to stop working with the IAEA. Furious at the non-proliferation regime's failure to protect it from strikes many countries see as unlawful, Iran's parliament voted on Wednesday to suspend cooperation. Tehran says a resolution this month passed by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks, which began the next day, by providing an element of diplomatic cover. The IAEA denies that. Iran has repeatedly denied that it has an active program to develop a nuclear bomb. And U.S. intelligence - dismissed by Trump before the airstrikes - had said there was no evidence Tehran was taking steps toward developing one. However, experts say there is no reason for enriching uranium to 60% for a civilian nuclear program, which can run on less than 5% enrichment. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its stock of enriched uranium. The IAEA then has to verify Iran's account by means including inspections, but its powers are limited - it inspects Iran's declared nuclear facilities but cannot carry out snap inspections at undeclared locations. Iran has an unknown number of extra centrifuges stored at locations the U.N. nuclear watchdog is unaware of, the IAEA has said, with which it might be able to set up a new or secret enrichment site. That makes hunting down the material that can be enriched further, particularly that closest to bomb grade, all the more important. "Iran's stockpile of 60% enriched uranium may not have been part of the 'mission' but it is a significant part of the proliferation risk - particularly if centrifuges are unaccounted for," Kelsey Davenport of the Washington-based Arms Control Association said on X on Friday. The IAEA can and does receive intelligence from member states, which include the United States and Israel, but says it takes nothing at face value and independently verifies tip-offs. Having pummelled the sites housing the uranium, Israel and the U.S. are seen as the countries most likely to accuse Iran of hiding it or restarting enrichment, officials say. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office did not respond to a request for comment for this story. U.N. inspectors' futile hunt for large caches of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which preceded the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, showed the enormous difficulty of verifying foreign powers' assertions about hidden stockpiles of material when there is little tangible information to go on. As in Iraq, inspectors could end up chasing shadows. "If the Iranians come clean with the 400 kg of HEU (highly enriched uranium) then the problem is manageable, but if they don't then nobody will ever be sure what happened to it," a third Western diplomat said. The IAEA, which answers to 180 member states, has said it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear development is entirely peaceful, but has no credible indications of a coordinated weapons program. The U.S. this week backed the IAEA's verification and monitoring work and urged Tehran to ensure its inspectors in the country are safe. It is a long journey from there to accounting for every gram of enriched uranium, the IAEA's standard. The above-ground plant at Natanz, the smaller of the two facilities enriching uranium up to 60 percent, was flattened in the strikes, the IAEA said, suggesting a small portion of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile may have been destroyed. Fordow, Iran's most deeply buried enrichment plant, which was producing the bulk of 60%-enriched uranium, was first seriously hit last weekend when the United States dropped its biggest conventional bombs on it. The damage to its underground halls is unclear. An underground area in Isfahan where much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium was stored was also bombed, causing damage to the tunnel entrances leading to it. The agency has not been able to carry out inspections since Israel's bombing campaign began, leaving the outside world with more questions than answers. Grossi said on Wednesday the conditions at the bombed sites would make it difficult for IAEA inspectors to work there - suggesting it could take time. "There is rubble, there could be unexploded ordnance," he said. Heinonen, the former chief IAEA inspector, said it was vital the agency be transparent in real time about what its inspectors have been able to verify independently, including any uncertainties, and what remained unknown. "Member states can then make their own risk assessments," he said.


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New satellite photos show secret activity at Iran nuclear site after US bombing
New satellite photos have revealed that Iran is trying to piece together its nuclear site after the US sensationally bombed it last week. Heavy machinery was seen at the Fordow site as it appeared Iran has intensified its construction and excavation of the nuclear site after US B-2 bombers struck it last Saturday in Operation Midnight Hammer. Activity was seen near the tunnel entrances and near the points where the American buster bombs struck in Trump's early-morning attack. It is unclear how much uranium was left at the site during the bomb, but officials said there is no contamination after the strikes. Earthwork also showed signs tunnel entrances might have been sealed off before the attacks, Newsweek reported. Similar construction activity was seen at the Fordow site prior to the strikes, where Iranians were seen shipping contents from the nuclear site to another location a half a mile away. Despite the extent of the damage being up to question, International Atomic Energy Agency - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Fordow's centrifuges were 'no longer operational' and suffered 'enormous damage.' A leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency , a US government intelligence group, suggested there was 'low confidence' that that Middle Eastern country's program had been set back. Even Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said the United States hit Tehran's nuclear sites but achieved 'nothing significant.' 'Anyone who heard [Trump's] remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words - they could do nothing,' the 86-year-old Iranian leader said. The Trump Administration - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard - pushed back on the report. Hegseth slammed the media for diminishing the strikes, which Trump compared to Hiroshima. 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he said at a press conference. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. Trump has threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN for reporting on the preliminary report. The Times reported Thursday that Trump's personal lawyer Alejandro Brito had reached out to the newspaper and said the article had damaged the president's reputation. The letter demanded The Times 'retract and apologize for' the story, calling it 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic.' The newspaper's lawyer responded by noting that Trump administration officials had confirmed the existence of the report after The Times published its findings. 'No retraction is needed,' The Times' lawyer David McCraw said in a letter. 'No apology will be forthcoming. We told the truth to the best of our ability. We will continue to do so.' A spokesperson for CNN told The Times that the cable news network had responded to Trump's lawyer in a similar fashion. Operation Midnight Hammer marked the end of a 45-year stand-off between the United States and Iran. Trump warned Iran not to try and rebuild its nuclear program. 'I don't think they'll ever do it again,' he said while attending a NATO summit. 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich.' But the president also didn't rule out another airstrike if necessary. When asked whether the US would strike again if Iran built its nuclear enrichment program, he replied: 'Sure.' In total, the US launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Iran was building warheads ‘capable of blitzing London' as twisted regime raced to have world's biggest missile arsenal
IRAN'S twisted regime was attempting to produce a terrifying two-tonne warhead which could obliterate London, Israel has warned. Tehran was said to be trying to build up the world's biggest ballistic missile arsenal to help them launch a global tirade of destruction, according to the Israeli foreign ministry. 7 7 7 Officials in Tel Aviv said they successfully thwarted Iran's plan to become the largest ballistic missile producer on the planet in tactical airstrikes alongside Donald Trump on June 13. The US struck Iran's nuclear programme and hit key nuke sites which were ordered by Trump who said they had "obliterated" the targets. But Israeli officials, who helped to orchestrate the "bunker buster" bombs with the US, have now revealed they also had a second objective in the weekend strikes. Oren Marmorstein, a spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry said: "We actually acted because of two existential threats. "One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat." Tehran already boasted a concerning number of ballistic weapons prior to the conflict with US intelligence saying they had around 3,000 at their disposal. The latest Israeli intelligence though had pointed towards a much more dire figure emerging if Iran wasn't stopped. They claimed the regime was actively working on increasing production to over 20,000 ballistic missiles. Some even had a payload of one or two tonnes, Marmorstein said. The spokesman detailed the destruction which one missile could cause saying just last week, prior to the agreed ceasefire, four people were killed in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba in a missile strike. Inside Op Red Wedding – Israel's fierce wave of assassinations killing 30 Iran generals in first MINUTES of 12-day war "Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those," Marmorstein added. "That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb. "They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the number one ballistic missile producer in the world. "Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us." He claimed these would have been able to reach into Europe with capitals such as London, Berlin and Paris all at risk. "They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return," Marmorstein said. Israel managed to wipe out dozens of missiles with more than half of their 300 missile-launchers also destroyed. A strike also targeted the military facility in Yazd which houses Iran's heaviest missile, known as the Khorramshahr. 7 7 7 The weapon is regarded as a copy of a North Korean missile carrying a two-ton warhead. The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites. The attacks helped to end the war with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight - despite Iran suffering a major blow to their nuclear capabilities. Despite a ceasefire being agreed, Trump has said he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed. He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels. It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war. The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day. By Chief Foreign Reporter, Katie Davis BRITAIN will never be safe until Iran's nuclear scheme is completely wiped out, Israel's ambassador told The Sun. Tzipi Hotovely said Israel did the UK a "huge service" by wiping out the rogue state's efforts to create a nuke weapon. The diplomat said: "The Israeli people know they're facing a very radical enemy like the British people were fighting in the Second World War and that they must get to the point where it's being defeated. The Iranians have proven they have no interest in diplomacy. They were just using diplomacy to keep on running their nuclear programme. "And President Trump kind of lost patience with this type of behaviour. He said it clearly, I don't want Iran to have nuclear weapons. "We gave a chance to diplomacy. We backed up the American diplomatic plan - 60 days expired. "They didn't come to the table. That's what the Prime Minister said, they want to blow up the table, not to sit next to it. "And we are now certain that once this military operation is over, the world, the Middle East, Israel, Europe, everyone will have a safer world. "This is a war to end wars, not to begin wars." 7