Foote announces mayoral candidacy
OTTUMWA — Ben Foote stood under the marquee outside the Ottumwa Theater, using the hallowed landmark as a symbol of his candidacy for mayor.
It was also a symbol for what he believes Ottumwa once was, and could be again.
In front of about 20 people, Foote became the first known candidate to launch a run for Ottumwa mayor Thursday, looking to succeed Rick Johnson, who is not seeking re-election. Foote, 53, said the city, like the theater, lost its core identity and needs restoration.
"This was built in 1942 to replace the one that was burned down, and when it was rebuilt, it was built with the greatest creativity and innovation," he said. "It's just one of the examples that we have here in our city that gives us the identity of who we should be.
"From generation to generation, we've been given an identity. The problem is we've allowed that identity to shift and move into an identity of confusion or mediocrity. Frankly, we've lost our identity."
Foote, who owns Faith-Built Architecture, first moved to Ottumwa in 1980 and graduated from Ottumwa High School, left for a spell, and returned in 2011. Even when he was gone, however, the city was close to his heart.
"I've always stayed in touch," he said.
Foote did not specify what he thought Ottumwa's identity is, but said the community "is in this place of transition."
"We definitely want to honor who we were, because that's something we can build on. If we let go of that, then we just stay where we've been," he said. "It's just pieces all over the place and you need coherency.
"I mean downtown ... 15 years ago it wasn't like this at all and we've seen huge improvements," he said. "We need to keep building on it."
Foote, who vowed transparency and integrity if elected, credited the Bridge View Center area with the hotel, as well as the Ottumwa Community School District, as showing a way forward.
"The school district is just going crazy," he said. "I know there are a lot of questions about how we've spent money. My question is, 'How are we going to use it to the best of our ability?'"
In Ottumwa, the mayor's role is largely ministerial because the position doesn't have a vote. Many, however, have used the office to sway opinions, not only of the city council, but also the public.
So why not run for a seat where he could have a direct influence on charting the city's path forward? Foote, a born-again Christian, said it was his Christian principles that brought him to this point.
"I've been praying for the city for many years. I love the city," he said. "[To me] the mayor is the one who drives vision. Even though the mayor doesn't have a vote, that doesn't mean the mayor doesn't have influence, right? I'm a vision guy.
"That's the architect. I work on planning, city development. I work on teams, and all that sort of aspect. But we do this together. We put one foot in front of the other, and we have to put our best foot forward."
The mayor's seat and three city council seats will be up for election in November; it'll be the first election held under the city's new ordinance that removed the primary and runoff processes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2000s rock band bans Trump supporters from attending all shows: ‘It's not for you'
Ronnie Winter, frontman of the emo rock band The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, has prohibited all Donald Trump supporters from attending any of their shows. The singer, 42, reiterated his stance against the president and his supporters in a recent Instagram Video, saying: 'I thought I was pretty clear about all this stuff in 2020. As you notice on my Instagram, I did not remove any of that stuff from the Stay Woke campaign. 'Look, man, the thing about being woke is you're awake. And once you're awake, you can never go to sleep. And not only has nothing changed, but everything they said was going to happen, the woke people, has happened. You have done nothing but prove them right,' he said. Reintroducing himself as the lead singer of the 2000s band, Winter continued: 'I actually follow what Jesus says. If you're a Christian and you're watching this and you voted for Donald Trump, shame on you. 'You are not allowed to come to my shows. I don't want you there. Don't come to my shows. It's awesome that you love 'Face Down.' It's not for you. It's not your song. It is not your song,' he added of the group's number one hit. 'If you voted for Donald Trump, do not come to my shows or ever, not just these four years,' he added, warning, 'Don't come to my shows because you're going to hear a lot of woke propaganda, and you're going to hear the actual words of Jesus. You're going to see a lot of acceptance from all areas of life and races, and you're just going to see a lot of harmony. That's not what you're about. Don't come. Refunds are available. Forever, don't come. Goodbye.' The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus were formed in 2001 by childhood friends Winter and guitarist Duke Kitchens, who left the group in 2011 to focus on his personal life. The five-piece band are best known for their 2006 song 'Face Down,' from their debut studio album Don't You Fake It. They've gone on to release four more albums: Lonely Road (2009), Am I the Enemy (2011), 4 (2014), and The Awakening (2018). The current lineup includes Winter, his brother Randy Winter on rhythm guitar, bassist Joey Westwood, lead guitarist Josh Burke, and drummer John Espy. The group's firm stance against Trump and his supporters comes shortly after fellow rock band Green Day reportedly called on their crowd to label the president a 'fat bastard' during their June 13 headline slot at Download Festival. 'Ladies and gentlemen, we are slipping into fascism… It's up to us to fight back!' lead singer Billie Joe declared.
Atlantic
5 hours ago
- Atlantic
Pope Leo and the Next ‘Industrial Revolution'
The pope didn't take long to explain why he picked the name Leo. Two days after his election, he cited his inspiration: the preceding Pope Leo, who led the Church while the West confronted the social and economic disruptions of the Industrial Revolution. The world now faces 'another industrial revolution,' Leo XIV said last month, spurred not by mechanized manufacturing but by artificial intelligence. In particular, he noted the challenges that AI poses to 'human dignity, justice, and labor,' three concerns that his 19th-century namesake prioritized as he responded to the technological transformations of his time. In 1891, Leo XIII published Rerum Novarum, a moral and intellectual framework that addressed the growing inequality, materialism, and exploitation ushered in by the Industrial Revolution. The current pope has signaled that AI's arrival demands a similar intervention; if the earlier Leo's tenure is any indication, it could be the most ambitious and enduring project of Leo XIV's papacy. Rerum Novarum will be a guiding influence. Leo XIII insisted in Rerum Novarum that labor is both 'personal' and 'necessary' for each individual, and that societies should protect the dignity of their workers as they pursue economic growth. Idolizing capital widens inequality, hence the 'misery and wretchedness' that many employers inflicted on much of the working class during the Industrial Revolution. The pope stated that socialism was no solution, but that employers must guarantee their workers reasonable hours, just wages, safe workplaces, and the right to unionize. Randy Boyagoda: The pope's most revealing choice so far These statements by the Church gave crucial backing to workers' movements and civic organizations fighting for labor protections. In Europe, Rerum Novarum consolidated Catholic support for workers and bolstered the political influence of labor unions, many of which adopted Christian principles to advance their cause. Leo XIII's interventions played a significant role in the United States as well. The pope supported American worker movements such as the Knights of Labor, and inspired Catholic reformers including Monsignor John Ryan, whose advocacy for a universal living wage influenced architects of the New Deal. Leo XIII also commissioned the likes of Saint Frances Cabrini and Saint Katharine Drexel to expand their missionary work, ultimately seeding hospitals, schools, orphanages, and public-housing complexes that addressed injustices faced particularly by immigrants, Black Americans, and Native Americans. Rerum Novarum also had a profound influence on the Catholic Church itself. The document inaugurated what's now known as modern Catholic social teaching, an expansive intellectual tradition that emphasizes the common good, social justice, human dignity, and concern for the poor. Now Leo XIV has an opportunity to update this tradition for the age of AI. Like his namesake, he could marshal the Church's intellectual, cultural, and institutional resources, helping build a moral consensus about how to use a new technology that threatens to degrade humanity rather than serve it. Vice President J. D. Vance recently conceded that America is not equipped to provide this kind of leadership, but that the Catholic Church is. Leo has plenty of material to work with. Earlier this year, two administrative bodies within the Vatican produced an advisory document called Antiqua et Nova, which uses the Catholic intellectual tradition to argue that AI cannot engage with the world as a human can. For one thing, no technology has the capacity 'to savor what is true, good, and beautiful,' the authors write. Lacking interiority and a conscience, AI cannot authentically grasp meaning, assume moral accountability, or form relationships. As a result, the document contends, developers and users must take responsibility for AI products, ensuring that they don't exacerbate inequality, impose unsustainable environmental costs, or make decisions in war that could result in the indiscriminate loss of life. Tyler Austin Harper: What happens when people don't understand how AI works Both of us have contributed to initiatives that seek to better understand AI in the context of Catholic social teaching. Mariele is a member of an AI research group within the Vatican that recently published a book, Encountering Artificial Intelligence, that considers the ethical impacts of AI in politics, education, the family, and other spheres of life. In health care, for example, AI can help improve access to certain kinds of assessment and treatment, but it can also perpetuate disparities through biases reflected in data, or disrupt the relationship between patients and health-care professionals. We are both part of a cohort at the University of Southern California investigating the ethical and social implications of transhumanism, especially as it intersects with AI. The group consists mostly of theologians and Catholic bioethicists, but we have found that many scholars working outside the Catholic tradition are eager to engage with the Church's thinking on these issues. Encouraging such collaboration will be crucial for Leo. As was true of the technology of the Industrial Revolution, AI will become most dangerous when economies prioritize profit and technological development over human flourishing and the dignity of labor. Left unregulated, markets will continually choose efficiency at the expense of workers, risking widespread unemployment and the dehumanization of the kinds of work that manage to survive. If the social order does not put technology at the service of people, markets will put the latter at the service of the former. Although the Church may not have the same influence in the secular 21st century that it did in the 19th, there are signs of a possible Catholic resurgence —particularly among young people—that could help Leo reach a wider audience. Just as it did during the first Industrial Revolution, the Church has a chance to help safeguard work that is dignified, justly paid, and commensurate with human flourishing. The pope's new name is a hopeful sign that this responsibility won't go unmet.
The Intercept
7 hours ago
- The Intercept
A Harvard Commencement Speaker Mentioned Gaza. The School Refused to Publish Her Speech.
Support Us © THE INTERCEPT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Harvard University's campus in Cambridge, Mass., on May 27, 2025. Photo: Sophie Park/Bloomberg via Getty Images Harvard Divinity School broke precedent by refusing to publish a video of its commencement speech after a speaker went off-script to call attention to the perilous conditions in Gaza, The Intercept has learned. 'There are no safe zones left in Gaza after 600 days and 77 years of genocide,' said Zehra Imam, who graduated from the Harvard Divinity School this spring and participated in the embattled Religion and Public Life program. Imam, who is Muslim, was speaking with two other students from Christian and Jewish faiths who had cleared a draft of their planned remarks with the school — and agreed that Imam should go off-script to address the ongoing genocide. 'I center Palestine today, not just because of its scale of atrocity but because of our complicity in it,' Imam said. 'Class of 2025, Palestine is waiting for you to arrive. And you must be courageous enough to rise to the call because Palestine will keep showing up in your living rooms until you are ready to meet its gaze.' Harvard did not publish a video of the speech on its website or YouTube page, as it did with commencement speeches in past years. When Imam and her co-speakers asked why, the school told them the decision was made due to 'security concerns.' The decision runs counter to the public perception that Harvard is crusading against President Donald Trump's threats to cut university funding to crush speech, according to seven Harvard Divinity School students and staff who spoke to The Intercept. While the university has been publicly praised for fighting back against Trump, its efforts to censor Imam's speech and wipe out the civic engagement she took part in have raised concerns among students and staff that the school is actually capitulating to pressure from the White House. The school made a password-protected version of the speech temporarily available to people with a Harvard login, a Harvard spokesperson confirmed to The Intercept. But choosing not to release it publicly 'feels to a lot of students suspicious and just contradictory,' said Perlei Toor, a second-year divinity school student. 'That's not what happened last year or the year before that.' Behind the scenes, the school has been quietly dismantling the Religion and Public Life program from which Imam graduated. Until recently led by the Divinity School's only Palestinian staff member, the program has drawn Trump's ire — and criticism from some alumni, campus leaders, and students. Imam ended her portion of the speech with a poem from a student in Gaza — one of several refugees to whom she offers poetry lessons via an organization she founded connecting U.S. students with students in refugee camps. She and her co-speakers received a standing ovation. 'I had a dream / I went back home / slept in my bed / felt warmth again,' she read. 'I had a dream / My eyes forgot the blood, the loss, the patience … My nose forgot the smoke smell, the deaths, the corpse rotten … My body skipped what I had lived.' Read our complete coverage The suppression of Imam's speech capped off a chaotic year for the Divinity School's Religion and Public Life program. As of last month, Harvard had pushed out the program's three leaders, canceled a class, suspended one of its initiatives, and cut most of its staff. The program itself is still relatively new: Harvard launched Religion and Public Life in late 2020, following worldwide protests against police brutality to focus on 'educating leaders to understand the civic consequences of religion, in service of building a just world at peace.' During a time of uncertainty, the program would 'shape our character and trajectory both in the years to come as well as in our tumultuous present.' After the October 7 attacks, the program's troubled trajectory began to take shape. Program leaders, faculty, and staff sent a newsletter urging affiliates of the Divinity School to 'challenge single story narratives' that justified retaliation against Palestinians. Harvard Divinity School Dean David F. Holland disavowed the statement, as the Harvard Crimson reported, saying it did not represent the school and described it as 'unproductive.' The following year, the group Students Against Antisemitism sued Harvard over claims that the school had failed to stop antisemitism on campus. The suit criticized the Religion and Public Life program for hosting a screening of the film 'Israelism,' which documents changing Jewish attitudes toward Israel, and took aim at the program's flagship course, which took students on a trip to Israel and the West Bank. Harvard agreed to a confidential settlement in the suit last month. Last May, the Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance released a report on campus antisemitism that took further aim at the letter program faculty sent after the October 7 attacks. It also criticized the program's Religion, Conflict, and Peace Initiative, which ran the flagship course and examines how religion can promote peace in situations of violent conflict and mass displacement. The initiative, the report claims, 'appears to focus entirely on the Palestinians.' According to Toor, the second-year student, this framing is emblematic of misconceptions about the Religion and Public Life program. News stories and discourse about the program often miss 'just how much Religion and Public Life does besides Palestine and Israel,' she told The Intercept. The program provides opportunities for students to connect religious studies to the public sphere through tracks in government, journalism, and humanitarian aid, among other topics, and to take on related internships. It also plans more than half of the school's programming and events. Late last year, facing political pressure and security concerns, program leaders decided not to take students on the trip to Israel and the West Bank or offer the flagship course this spring. Shortly after, the departures of several program leaders were announced. In January, Assistant Dean Diane Moore, who built the program and taught the course, announced she would leave the program early. The next day, Assistant Dean Hussein Rashid announced he would leave the program at the end of the academic year because of what he described as the school's anti-Muslim bias and a 'hostile environment to Muslims and Arabs.' Moore did not respond to a request for comment. Rashid declined to comment on the record. According to Toor, the program has been a necessary home for people of all faiths. 'Because of the diversity of the staff and because of the range of topics that students were able to explore,' Toor said, 'especially since the inauguration of Trump, [the program] has been a real space of ministerial comfort.' But in April, Harvard's much-anticipated report on antisemitism presented a narrative closer to the one from the Jewish Alumni Alliance. Released just after the school said it would not comply with a letter with Trump's demands, the April report was a result of the efforts of Trump's antisemitism task force. The school had just pushed out leaders of its Center for Middle Eastern Studies and ended its partnership with Birzeit University in the West Bank. The new report identified the Religion and Public Life program as one of several offenders that contributed to the 'frequency and intensity of treatment of Israel as an oppressor state and the Palestinians as an oppressed people in courses and public events throughout the campus.' This, according to the report, was 'indicative of institutional bias and hostility.' 'While the program was publicly launched with what seemed like a broad mandate to explore the intersection of religion and various aspects of public life, in practice, it focused heavily on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, presenting a perspective widely perceived as consistently anti-Israeli and aligned very narrowly with a strand of pro-Palestinian politics,' the report read. 'This narrow focus on this exceptionally polarizing topic appears to have stemmed from the decision, made soon after RPL's founding, to center its programming around a multi-year case study on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.' The program focuses on a wide range of topics like the economy, democracy and voting rights, education, and humanitarian aid, said Toor. Topics related to Israel and Palestine are a fraction of the work it does on campus. The program continued to shrink, this time with cuts. Shortly after the report was published, the school began notifying staff and other program leaders — including its only Israeli professor — that their contracts would not be renewed due to budget cuts. The school also announced it was pausing the program's Religion, Conflict, and Peace Initiative. One of the staff cut was Hilary Rantisi, the program's Palestinian American associate director who co-taught the flagship course. 'They terminated the only Palestinian employee that they had,' said Preston Iha, a first-year student in the Masters of Divinity program. 'Which is, again, signaling and makes people wonder who is really welcome at a school that claims to welcome everybody.' Last month, the day after the commencement, the school notified program staff about additional cuts. Four staff members' jobs were eliminated, and a fifth staffer was given a three-month extension of their contract, which is set to end June 30. A new program director, Terrence L. Johnson, will take over at the end of June — but students and staff told The Intercept it's not clear what the program will consist of after its staff was gutted. 'It seems like, yes, there could be budget cuts,' said Toor. 'But for you to target one program so specifically, and for that program to also be heavily mentioned in the antisemitism report and the Islamophobia report, it seems like too much of a coincidence.' Imam, the commencement speaker, was one of three students who told The Intercept the Religion and Public Life program was one of the major reasons she attended Harvard in the first place. 'It's very, very frustrating to see this censorship and attack on academic freedom,' Imam said. Shir Lovett-Graff, a Jewish spiritual leader who graduated from the Divinity School last year, said the attacks on the program were part of a long-running pattern at Harvard. 'Far before the Trump administration targeted Harvard and any university, far before Trump was elected into office for his second term, Harvard itself, internally, has a legacy of cracking down on pro-Palestine voices,' said Lovett-Graff, who helped found the student group Jews for Liberation, the largest Jewish student organization at Harvard Divinity School. 'It is not out of the ordinary or unexpected in any way for Harvard to crack down on pro-Palestine or even Israel-critical spaces on campus. That is part of Harvard's legacy,' Lovett-Graff said. They said they were grateful the program had been 'a place of connection for Jewish students, staff, alumni and faculty who are not represented by the Jewish mainstream of Harvard and beyond.' Toor, the second-year student, told The Intercept she feared that with the program gutted, students would lose a comforting space on campus. 'Students have been flocking to the office just to hang out and vent and have a safe space where they could be a person of color, where they can be Muslim, where they can be an international student in times when that is really needed and has felt really limited,' Toor said. 'This is a home that's being lost for a lot of students.' 'It's definitely sending the wrong message for Harvard Divinity School,' said Iha, the first-year student, 'which touts itself as being a moral center, to capitulate to these really immoral demands.' Imam said given everything she'd seen Harvard do to gut the program and censor speech on Palestine, she was concerned that the school would not approve her speech if she showed them what she planned to say about Gaza. 'Having seen everything in my time at Harvard Divinity School, I was worried that if I had shared those exact things in my speech and submitted that version, that I would not have been allowed to actually share what I wanted to,' Imam said. 'I wanted Gaza to have the last word. I wanted to center Palestine.' Join The Conversation
