logo
US: New ICE memo puts reinstated international students in danger zone again

US: New ICE memo puts reinstated international students in danger zone again

Time of India01-05-2025

International students whose
SEVIS
records were recently restored may find themselves in precarious situations again due to a newly released internal memo from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), The Times of India reported on May 1. The
ICE
has not 'unrevoked' the SEVIS registration back to the original date of the error (the date when the record was terminated), ToI's report (by Lubna Kably) said quoting Charles Kuck, a founding partner at Kuck Baxter, an immigration law firm.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
A Chinese shadow falls on Pahalgam terror attack case probe
How India can use water to pressure Pakistan
Buzzkill: How India can dissolve the Pakistan problem, not just swat it
"Instead, they reinstated it effective April 24. As a result, these international students now have a gap in their SEVIS records, which, according to ICE's updated policy, places them out of status during that period,' it said.
Being classified as out of status can have severe repercussions. Such consequences may include a prohibition on re-entry for a specified duration (either 3 or 10 years), potential deportation, and complications with future visa applications. A memo reviewed by TOI outlines specific instructions for Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) managers regarding the termination of SEVIS records.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
She Was Everyone's Dream Girl In 90's, This Is Her Recently.
Boite A Scoop
Undo
Termination can occur for various reasons, including failure to report employment while on Optional Practical Training (OPT), approval of a change of status from F-1, non-compliance with F-1 visa requirements, withdrawal from an educational institution, and 'revocation of a visa by the Department of State (DOS).'
(Join our
ETNRI WhatsApp channel
for all the latest updates)
The memo specifies, 'A terminated record in SEVIS could signify that the non-immigrant no longer holds F or M status.' F visas are designated for academic studies, while M visas are intended for vocational training.
Live Events
It is important to note, however, that termination does not automatically lead to negative consequences. This interpretation has faced legal challenges, leading several district courts to grant temporary restraining orders in favor of international students.
According to the memo, ICE may undertake additional investigations or commence removal proceedings following a SEVIS termination.
Moreover, the memo indicates that 'DOS may revoke an alien's visa at any time, at its discretion.' The DOS can consider negative information provided by ICE and other U.S. law enforcement agencies when deciding on visa revocation for an individual. If DOS revokes a visa immediately, ICE is instructed to take measures to initiate removal proceedings.
The memo also asserts that should DOS revoke a non-immigrant visa with immediate effect, SEVP is mandated to terminate the SEVIS record since such a revocation can serve as grounds for removability.
Greg Siskind, founding partner of Siskind Susser, an immigration law firm, said, 'We anticipate that many individuals who were reinstated will once again experience SEVIS terminations. Essentially, ICE has indicated that they will terminate records whenever DOS revokes a visa. Furthermore, DOS may revoke a visa for vague reasons without providing due process to explain the rationale behind the revocation. The
Trump
Administration relies on the argument that DOS's decisions are not subject to judicial review.'
As previously reported by TOI on April 26, the SEVIS records of some international students that had been terminated suddenly appeared as 'active.' SEVIS is the online information system utilized by U.S. agencies to track and monitor international students throughout their studies.
Following the SEVIS terminations that began in late March and early April, many students, particularly those from India, were advised by their Designated School Officials (DSOs) to leave the United States. Some students chose to remain and have since pursued legal action.
During various court hearings, ICE officials claimed that the agency was restoring the SEVIS records and was in the process of developing a policy framework for SEVIS record terminations. 'Until such a policy is issued, SEVIS records will remain active or will be reactivated. ICE will not alter the SEVIS records solely based on the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) findings that led to the recent SEVIS terminations…' the agency stated.
It may be noted here that the NCIC is a central repository for crime-related data maintained by the Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) of the FBI, providing access to various US law enforcement entities.
However, the newly issued ICE memo has introduced additional complexities. Key questions now confronting international students include whether the SEVIS reactivations will be treated as retroactive, whether the time between termination and reinstatement is considered unlawful presence, and whether students still face the risk of detention or deportation.
Immigration attorneys anticipate that class action lawsuits and individual legal actions will be initiated in the coming days to seek clarity on these issues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump , but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.

Jaishankar says India, China ‘civilisational states'; dubs bilateral ties as ‘incredibly complicated matrix'
Jaishankar says India, China ‘civilisational states'; dubs bilateral ties as ‘incredibly complicated matrix'

First Post

time27 minutes ago

  • First Post

Jaishankar says India, China ‘civilisational states'; dubs bilateral ties as ‘incredibly complicated matrix'

Jaishankar said there was a parallel rise of the Indian and Chinese economies, but he acknowledged that China started reforms and modernisation much ahead of India read more Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said Wednesday (June 11) that India and China were two rising powers that helped create a new equilibrium between them and the world. He also accused previous governments of not doing 'what they should have done' in terms of market modernisation. '… The Chinese began their modernisation earlier than us, largely because our governments at the time did not do what they should have done… India and China are both rising powers that are creating a new equilibrium…" Jaishankar said while speaking at the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Brussels Forum 2025. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The foreign minister was asked how New Delhi sought to take advantage of China's economy while navigating tensions, and how Beijing's actions affected policies in India. Jaishankar in response said both India and China were civilisational states and dubbed bilateral ties as an 'incredibly complicated matrix". '…China is an immediate neighbour. It's a neighbour with whom we've had unsettled boundaries. So that's a big factor in our relations. We have a situation where China and India stand out because they're the only two countries with over a billion people but also because they are two civilisational states in a way," Jaishankar said. Jaishankar said there was a parallel rise of the Indian and Chinese economies, but he acknowledged that China started reforms and modernisation much ahead of India. 'You have the rise of China, you have the rise of India. Now, each one is creating a certain new equilibrium between them and the world. And then much more complex equilibrium between the two rising powers, who also happen to be neighbours that sometimes have common neighbours as well. So, it is an incredibly complicated matrix and there are different dimensions to it," he said. 'There is the boundary dimension to it, there's the balances if you would, there are economic issues, trade issues, there are concerns – we have different economic social values, political models." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When asked about Europe's perception towards China, Jaishankar said there has been an evolution and change in stance. 'But I would also make the point that not all of Europe is obviously moving at the same speed and wavelength, so there are some who have different views, some who are more hard-headed. I would make that distinction vis-a-vis China," the top diplomat added.

I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive: US President Donald Trump
I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive: US President Donald Trump

Economic Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive: US President Donald Trump

President Trump asserted his pride in assisting Los Angeles during protests, attributing the unrest to radical leftists and praising the deployment of the National Guard and Marines. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt condemned the riots as attacks on American culture, citing violence against law enforcement and anti-American sentiment. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrive to view opening night of "Les Miserables," at the Kennedy Center, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump while attending 'Les Miserables' Opening Night at Kennedy Center with US First Lady Melania Trump said that he was proud of the work done in Los Angeles in curbing the said that the protests were caused by the radical said, "I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive... If we didn't bring the National Guard and the Marines, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground, and that's not over yet... These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They are tough, smart. They are probably paid many of them.""What happened in Los Angeles was caused by gross incompetence. They did not have the police to handle it, the police were asking us to come handle it," he in the day, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during her press briefing too echoed Trump's remarks on radicals."What we have seen transpire in Los Angeles, California in recent days is shameful. Left-wing radicals waving foreign flags viciously attacked ICE and Border Patrol agents as well as Los Angeles police officers," she said."These criminals injured police, threw rocks at police, cars and officers, burned vehicles, shut down freeways and lobbed Molotov cocktails- all because the Trump administration was removing violent criminal illegal aliens from the city," she said that these attacks were aimed at American society itself."These attacks were aimed not just at law enforcement, but at American culture and society itself. Rioters burned American flags, chanted death to ICE and spray painted anti-American slogans on buildings," she said that the mob rule will never prevail in the Trump administration."But President Trump will never allow mob rule to prevail in America. The most basic duty of government is to preserve law and order and this administration embraces that sacred responsibility," she against the Trump administration's deportation crackdown are taking place beyond California as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conduct raids. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested that Trump's order to federalize the National Guard in California to respond to the protests could extend to other states, as per CNN.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store