White House says Trump's tariffs 'legally sound' amid mounting court defeats
US President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order after delivering remarks on reciprocal tariffs, on April 2, 2025. – AFP photo
WASHINGTON (May 30): The White House on Thursday defended President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs as 'legally sound' after a three-judge panel unanimously ruled that he overstepped his powers when he declared emergencies to implement his global trade duties.
The legal defeat was quickly followed by another, hours later on Thursday, according to Anadolu Ajansi (AA).
Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the judges who issued the first ruling 'brazenly abused their judicial power' when they struck down the tariffs.
The judges, Leavitt said, 'failed to acknowledge that the President of the United States has core foreign affairs powers and authority given to him by Congress to protect the United States economy and national security.'
'The United States has run a trade deficit of goods every year since 1975. In 2024, our trade deficit in goods exceeded US$1 trillion. Everybody agrees this is unacceptable,' Leavitt told reporters.
'The president's rationale for imposing these powerful tariffs was legally sound and grounded in common sense. President Trump correctly believes that America cannot function safely long-term if we are unable to scale advanced domestic manufacturing capacity,' she added.
A three-judge trade court panel ruled Wednesday that Trump did not have the proper authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement worldwide tariffs on April 2, when he imposed steep import duties on countries around the world.
The president cited the IEEPA when he initiated the duties, said his action was designed to target fentanyl trafficking into the US and to correct trade imbalances.
The Trump administration has appealed the decision, but another ruling Thursday from US District Judge Rudolph Contreras also blocked the tariffs. Contreras imposed a narrow injunction that only affected the two companies that brought the suit. – Bernama-Anadolu donald trump Foreign Affairs injunction tariff
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Philippines eyes India, Thailand rice to cut Vietnam reliance
A man rests on sacks of rice along a street in Manila on May 9, 2024. Vietnam supplies 90 per cent of the Philippines' rice imports - AFP MANILA: The Philippines, the world's top rice importer, plans to look beyond its dominant supplier, Vietnam, to ensure steady supplies and competitive prices at home. The agriculture department is in talks with private importers on purchases from producers like India, Pakistan, Cambodia and Myanmar, Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel said in an interview on Friday (May 30). There may also be a "deal' with Indonesia and Thailand, he added. "We are trying to diversify sources to keep a level playing field,' Laurel said. Vietnam is "the most reliable' supplier, but the fact that its shipments account for 90 per cent of the Philippines' rice imports could be a "problem' in case of supply shocks, he said. The price of all rice varieties sold by Vietnam rose to a three-month high in April because of an "uptick in buying interest from domestic and offshore traders,' according to data from the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation. Affordable prices of the staple grain are central to the agenda of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who also helmed the agriculture department before appointing Laurel in November 2023. His government slashed import tariffs from 35 per cent to 15 per cent last year and declared a food security emergency in February to tame runaway prices. That's helped slow overall inflation to its lowest level since 2019, giving the central bank room to further cut interest rates. Laurel expects this year's rice imports will be lower than in 2024 and won't exceed 4.5 million tonnes. His outlook compares with a forecast from the US Department of Agriculture that sees the Southeast Asian nation importing 5.4 million tonnes in 2025. Domestically, the country is on track to produce a record of 20.46 million tonnes in rough rice output this year, the secretary said. Meanwhile, the Philippines is facing a 17 per cent duty on its goods to the US, the lowest rate in South-East Asia - after Singapore - under President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff agenda. Laurel said this presents an opportunity as it could make Filipino shipments to the US, particularly seafood products like tilapia and shrimp, more competitive than those of its neighbors. "If our competitors are slapped with higher tariffs than us, it's fine,' he said. - Bloomberg
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US asks Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5pc of GDP
SYDNEY: Australia's prime minister said on Monday his government would decide its defence capability needs before announcing defence spending, after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth asked Australia to lift its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product. "What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters, adding his government had already committed to accelerate A$10 billion in defence spending for the next four years. "We're continuing to lift up," he said, citing a 2.3 per cent goal for 2033 previously set by his government. Hegseth and Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles discussed security issues including accelerating US defence capabilities in Australia and advancing industrial base cooperation during a meeting on Friday, a Pentagon statement said on Sunday. "On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible," the statement said. The ministers' meeting on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security forum, is only the second between the security allies since U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. Albanese, who was re-elected in May and is yet to meet Trump, did not raise defence spending in this year's national budget, saying his government had already announced a A$50 billion boost over a decade. Peter Dean, director of foreign policy and defence at the University of Sydney's United States Studies Centre, said Albanese was positioning ahead of his first meeting with Trump, where the pair are also expected to discuss tariffs. Albanese would want the decision on a defence boost to be seen as a sovereign one not imposed by Trump, after the election showed standing up for Australia was popular domestically, he said. Australia's defence spending in 1987 was around 3 per cent of GDP or 10 per cent of the national budget, compared to 2 per cent of GDP or 6 per cent of the budget in 2025, he said. "To achieve self-reliance in the modern era, with the threat from China, and within our region, it is going to cost more money," Dean said. The US would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence this year, he added. Australia has comitted to spend A$368 billion over three decades on the AUKUS programme to acquire and build nuclear powered submarines, and is also boosting missile acquisition and manufacture. - Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Asian stocks rally as Trump's ‘Liberation Day' tariffs hit court hurdle
Investors reacted to the US court blocking tariffs by moving to safe havens, lifting the dollar, S&P 500, and Nasdaq futures. (AP pic) SYDNEY : Asian shares and Wall Street futures climbed in Asia on Thursday after a US federal court blocked President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs from going into effect, sending the dollar up on safe haven currencies. The Manhattan-based Court of International Trade ruled that Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the US than they buy. The White House quickly appealed the decision, and could take it all the way to the Supreme Court if needed, but in the meantime it offered some hope that Trump might back away from the highest tariff levels he had threatened. 'We're just trying to work out what it might mean basically but obviously the market is doing a knee-jerk reaction,' said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at NAB. 'So this may be an absolute storm in a teacup or potentially something more significant.' Investors reacted by embracing risk assets and Japan's Nikkei quickly rose 1%, while South Korea's shares added 0.8%. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan edged up, awaiting the opening of Chinese markets. S&P 500 futures climbed 1.5%, while Nasdaq futures rose 1.8%. The latter had already been lifted by relief over earnings from Nvidia, which beat sales estimates. The chipmaker and AI darling also projected strong revenues for the current quarter, sending its shares up 4.4% after hours. That news helped offset a Financial Times report that the White House had ordered US firms that offer software used to design semiconductors to stop selling their services to Chinese groups. The New York Times separately reported the US had suspended some sales to China of critical US technologies, including those related to jet engines, semiconductors and certain chemicals. Pushing out rate cuts The news of the court decision hit traditional safe havens, lifting the dollar 0.8% on the Swiss franc to 0.336. It gained 0.6% on the Japanese yen to 145.76 yen, while the euro dipped 0.5% to US$1.1230. Yields on 10-year Treasuries rose 3 basis points to 4.51% and markets further shaved the chance of a Federal Reserve rate cut anytime soon. Minutes of the last Fed meeting showed 'almost all participants commented on the risk that inflation could prove to be more persistent than expected' due to Trump's tariffs. A rate cut in July is now seen as just a 22% chance, while September has come into around 60% having been more than fully priced a month ago. In commodity markets, gold slipped 0.9% to US$3,259 an ounce. Oil prices extended a rally begun on supply concerns as Opec+ agreed to leave their output policy unchanged and as the US barred Chevron from exporting Venezuelan crude.
