logo
Mass. Democrats promised a more efficient, transparent Legislature. So far, it's been a lot of jabs and ‘bravado.'

Mass. Democrats promised a more efficient, transparent Legislature. So far, it's been a lot of jabs and ‘bravado.'

Boston Globe5 hours ago

Asked how he'd categorize his interactions with Senate leaders, House Speaker Ron Mariano said recently that he wouldn't 'even attempt to try.'
Advertisement
'There's always a healthy tension, but that's on everything. That's from the simplest bill to the rules,' the Quincy Democrat said.
Pressed if that means House and Senate leaders have a good, working relationship, Mariano offered 'yeah,' before adding: 'I don't think much has changed, to be honest with you.'
Statewide, there is no shortage of demands on lawmakers. Advocates and everyday voters are pressing lawmakers to offer concrete responses to the Trump administration's
its first offering, a
Advertisement
Legislators have simultaneously faced pressure to be more transparent, in part after voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot question
in November
Lawmakers in the coming weeks also must agree on their
'For them to pass
[six] bills in five months when we're facing a crisis of unprecedented levels from the federal administration, it boggles the mind,' said Scotia Hille, executive director of Act on Mass, a progressive advocacy organization.
Hille said she was encouraged initially when legislative leaders said they'd usher
'But with five months in the rearview,' she said, 'it seems more like bravado and just another development in this epic battle between the House and Senate.'
The public jabbing has indeed continued. When the House voted last month to replenish the budget of the health insurance agency for state employees
Advertisement
'We are glad that the House decided to take action on this bill, which was filed five weeks ago,' she said in a statement.
The same day, Spilka took a second swipe
at the House after she said Senator Jacob Oliveira was blocked from testifying remotely at a joint House-Senate hearing, a decision based on a House rule that requires committee members to participate in person. Oliveira, a Ludlow Democrat, was meeting with childcare providers in his district at the time, Spilka's office said.
'The notion that one branch's rules can bind the operations of joint committees is without merit,' she charged.
In a statement Thursday to the Globe, a spokesperson for Spilka said the two chambers have an 'amicable relationship,' noting that 'differences in policy areas are a natural and healthy part of the legislative process in any bicameral legislature.'
'While policy differences are to be expected, leaders on both sides engage in good faith to deliver results for Massachusetts,' said Gray Milkowski, Spilka's spokesperson.
Mariano and Spilka both vowed in the winter to
But the Senate and House remain divided on several details. Following a public meeting last month of the panel negotiating a final rules package, Senate Majority Leader Cynthia S. Creem and House Majority Leader Michael Moran engaged in a lengthy session with reporters during which they openly disagreed, particularly over the House's push to keep 'attendance' records for committees.
Advertisement
Creem, a Newton Democrat, said she didn't understand why it was important. Moran charged that Senate members often miss hearings, noting that the Senate chair of one committee
last month for
the committee he oversees
'There's no reason to this. I don't know whether it's a grudge or what it is,' Creem said of the push to track attendance. She later added that, despite the naked disagreement, she and Moran, a Brighton Democrat, actually 'have a nice personal relationship.'
'It may not look like that,' she said, 'but no, we do.'
Advocates for various causes said they, too, are looking to Beacon Hill for urgent help.
Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts, for example, is bracing for impact if a federal budget reconciliation bill now moving through the US Senate slashes funding for Planned Parenthood or Medicaid. While the state budget currently under negotiation could dedicate $2 million to Planned Parenthood, a loss of more than $14 million in federal funding is at stake, according to a Planned Parenthood spokesperson.
The MIRA coalition, which represents New England groups advocating for immigrants and refugees, is feeling similarly threatened by the Trump administration, which has been actively cracking down on immigrants across the country, including
The group lobbied for $10 million in the state budget to back a legal defense fund to help immigrants pay for lawyers in immigration court. The House included $5 million in its budget plan, which state lawmakers are still negotiating.
Advertisement
'It's an intense moment and everyone has so many asks of the Legislature,' Sarang Sekhavat, MIRA's chief of staff, said. 'It gets difficult asking for anything, but not only is this important, it's the moral thing to do.'
Some lawmakers said the underlying tensions in the building are, in fact, less intense than in past years. There is irritation and exasperation among legislators, but 'not outright animosity,' said one lawmaker who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity between the two chambers. But still, without visible efforts of collaboration, the lawmaker said important debates are still being held up.
'We didn't learn our lesson from bad relations of last session and the bad press that followed,' the lawmaker said.
When it comes to budget talks, Michlewitz's Senate counterpart, Michael Rodrigues, brushed off the idea that inter-chamber disputes are holding up negotiations, which usually stretch into the summer. Massachusetts hasn't opened the fiscal year that begins in July
with a budget in place
'The House passed a very responsible budget balance that reflects the priority of its members, we in the Senate will pass an equally balanced and responsible budget reflecting the priorities of the Senate members,' he said. 'And we'll sit down at the conference table and we'll get it done. I'm confident of that.'
Samantha J. Gross can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal
Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal

San Francisco Chronicle​

time16 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Officers who cover their faces could be charged with a misdemeanor under California proposal

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Local, state, and federal law enforcement officers who cover their faces while conducting official business could face a misdemeanor charge in California under a new proposal announced Monday. The bill would require all law enforcement officials show their faces and be identifiable by their uniform, which should carry their name or other identifier. It would not apply to the National Guard or other troops and it exempts SWAT teams and officers responding to natural disasters. State Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco, and State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, a Democrat representing Berkeley and Oakland, said the proposal seeks to boost transparency and public trust in law enforcement. It also looks to protect against people trying to impersonate law enforcement, they said. 'We are seeing more and more law enforcement officers, particularly at the federal level, covering their faces entirely, not identifying themselves at all and, at times, even wearing army fatigues where we can't tell if these are law enforcement officers or a vigilante militia,' Wiener said. 'They are grabbing people off our streets and disappearing people, and it's terrifying,' he added. In Los Angeles, a series of immigration raids June 6 by federal officers, some with face coverings, triggered days of turbulent protests across the city and beyond and led President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines to the LA area. More than 100 people were detained during those raids and immigrant advocates say they have not been able to contact them. The state senators said that in recent months, federal officers have conducted raids while covering their faces, and at times their badges and names, in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Concord, Downey and Montebello. 'Law enforcement officers are public servants and people should be able to see their faces, see who they are, know who they are. Otherwise, there is no transparency and no accountability,' Wiener said.

Allred says he'd ‘run differently' if he launches new Texas Senate campaign
Allred says he'd ‘run differently' if he launches new Texas Senate campaign

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Allred says he'd ‘run differently' if he launches new Texas Senate campaign

Former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) said he would 'run differently' if he launches a second Senate campaign, including being in Texas full time. 'I'm proud that in the last campaign we had the most ticket splitters of any state in the country,' Allred told NBC 5 Dallas on Sunday. 'We outperformed by votes, the presidential nominee on my same ticket by more than any Senate candidate in the country. 'I'm proud that we had that crossover and made that difference, but it wasn't good enough,' he continued. 'And so obviously I would run differently, and I feel different. I feel much more relaxed about it.' Allred said running for Senate while serving in the House did not give him the time he wanted to 'dig in' on the campaign trail. 'And so I look forward and I'm excited about the opportunity that if I did run again, that I'd be here full time and could do that differently,' he said. Allred is actively considering launching a second campaign for Senate in the state ahead of 2026. The then-congressman lost to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) last year by just more than 8 points. However, Democrats say they see an opportunity to flip Sen. John Cornyn's (R-Texas) seat as he faces an uphill primary challenge from state Attorney General Ken Paxton (R ). 'I'm seriously considering it,' Allred said. 'I've been looking at the Senate race because of my experience at the federal level. … I look at that and I see someone in Ken Paxton who is historically corrupt, was impeached by a Republican Legislature because of that, and I see a John Cornyn who I don't really recognize a somebody who I think has lost any semblance of independence,' he said. Most polls show Paxton leading Cornyn ahead of the February primary. Other polls show Democrats within striking distance of Paxton in a general election. Democrats have begun to ramp up their spending in the city ahead of 2026. Texas Majority PAC and the Texas Democratic Party launched an eight-figure campaign dubbed 'Blue Texas' last week aimed at electing Democrats up and down the ballot in the Lone Star State next year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Senate version of Trump agenda cuts more from Medicaid: GOP aides
Senate version of Trump agenda cuts more from Medicaid: GOP aides

The Hill

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate version of Trump agenda cuts more from Medicaid: GOP aides

The Senate's version of a bill to enact President Trump's agenda goes further than a House-passed bill to reduce Medicaid spending, according to GOP aides familiar with the legislation. GOP aides say it will go further to tighten Medicaid eligibility requirements and to restrict states from using health care provider taxes to draw down more federal Medicaid funding. 'It's still f'd up,' said a GOP aide about the Senate's Medicaid legislation, which does nothing to alleviate the concerns of several Senate Republicans who raised objections to the Medicaid language in the House-passed bill. At least four Republican senators have publicly raised concerns that Medicaid spending cuts passed by the House could hurt their constituents: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (R), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska). Senate GOP leaders can afford to lose only three votes and still pass the party-line bill. A broad range of GOP senators, including Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Sens. Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mike Lee (Utah) and Rick Scott (Fla.) had called for more deficit reduction in the bill, which is expected to spend roughly $150 billion on border security and immigration enforcement and increase defense spending by another $150 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store