Rosen Law Firm Urges Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) Investors with Large Losses to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights
For more information, submit a form, email attorney Phillip Kim, or give us a call at 866-767-3653.
The Allegations: Rosen Law Firm is Investigating the Allegations that Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) Misled Investors Regarding its Business Operations.
According to the lawsuit, the registration statement was false and/or misleading and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Lineage was then experiencing sustained weakening in customer demand, as additional cold-storage supply had come on line, Lineage's customers destocked a glut of excessive inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and Lineage's customers shifted to maintaining leaner cold-storage inventories on a go-forward basis in response to changed consumer trends; (2) Lineage had implemented price increases in the lead-up to the IPO that could not be sustained in light of the weakening demand environment facing Lineage; (3) Lineage was unable to effectively counteract the adverse trends listed above through the use of minimum storage guarantees or as a result of operational efficiencies, technological improvements, or its purported competitive advantages; (4) as a result, rather than enjoying stable revenue growth, high occupancy rates, and steady rent escalation as represented in the registration statement, Lineage was in fact suffering from stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices; and (5) consequently, Lineage's financial results, business operations, and prospects were materially impaired. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Lineage, Inc. Stockholders who want to serve as lead plaintiff for the class must file their motions with the court by September 30, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here.
All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.
About Rosen Law Firm: Some law firms issuing releases about this matter do not actually litigate securities class actions. Rosen Law Firm does. Rosen Law Firm is a recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improving corporate governance structures, and holding company executives accountable for their wrongdoing. Since its inception, Rosen Law Firm has obtained over $1 billion for shareholders.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program
As Gwen Polk prepares the budget she will present to the Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 Board of Education in September, she has learned that she has approximately $6.2 million in additional revenue courtesy of the State of Illinois' evidence-based funding program. Though every school district receives some of the $9.25 billion appropriated by the Illinois General Assembly, Tier 1 districts like Waukegan and North Chicago School District 187 face a harder time adequately funding education, including a smaller property tax base, and receive the most. When the Illinois General Assembly approved the final $350 million in May — $43 million was held for distribution at a later time — Lake County's 13 Tier 1 districts and the Regional Office of Education were awarded 87.5% of the county's total, with District 60 getting 38% — $6.2 million. Polk, District 60's associate superintendent for business and financial services, said the proposed budget currently sits at slightly less than $327 million. With COVID-19 federal relief funds no longer available, the additional money from the state is a big help. 'We're all affected by the fiscal cliff,' Polk said, referring to the federal money schools received nationwide. 'The increase (from the state) is going to help.' Lake County's 47 school districts and the Regional Office of Education collectively received just under $16.3 million in additional evidence-based funding earlier this month from the state, bringing its total to more than $562 million to augment their budgets. For the Waukegan public schools, Polk said evidence-based funding provides for more than half of its total revenue, which also includes property tax income. The approximate district-wide enrollment for the 2025-2026 school year is 14,000. By contrast, Barrington Community Unit School District 220, a Tier 4 district — they receive the smallest amount of evidence-based funding — with approximately 8,100 students, received just over $6.5 million. State Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said evidence-based funding became law in Illinois in 2017 to help all schools get to a level of funding to adequately educate youngsters. 'Education is the great equalizer,' Johnson said, 'If students' schools are adequately funded they they get the support and resources they need. This helps students in low-income areas get those resources.' Originally proposing $550 million for the final round of evidence-based funding, Johnson said that with a tight state budget, $350 million was the most she and her colleagues could get passed. In Waukegan, like most school districts, the bulk of the budget goes toward salaries and benefits for teachers, staff, and administrators. The current evidence-based funding is 4.1% more than a year ago, but not close to full adequacy. With the largest share of evidence-based funding in Lake County, District 60's adequacy level is 72%, well below the ideal amount. Barrington's adequacy level is 119%. Some of the highest adequacy levels are found where the property values are also high. Leading Lake County in adequacy is Rondout School District 72 at 255% which includes parts of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, and Mettawa. Bannockburn School District 106 is at 202% while Lake Forest High School District 115 is at 193% and Township High School District 113 serving Deerfield and Highland Park High Schools is at 190%. District 187 Principal John Price said the adequacy level in North Chicago dropped from 78% to 71%. A year ago, there was a large influx of migrant children that is not the case this year. The district is receiving $1.67 million, the second-highest amount in Lake County. Price said District 187's budget is approximately $80 million, and its evidence-based funding totals just under $40.1 million.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Dedham developer plans $500 million lab, housing project off Route 128
The project, which is tentatively called 'The Campus at 128,' has not yet been formally proposed to the town, and is in its 'infancy,' said Peter Zahka, an attorney representing Supreme Cos. But given its scale and scope, he and Petruzziello wanted to start the public process early; they gave a preliminary presentation to the Dedham Select Board last month. 'It's very important that you're here in front of us. It's not typical at all for you to be coming in ... but this is not a real typical project,' said Dedham Select Board Vice Chair Dimitria Sullivan at the July meeting. 'Something of this magnitude (is) really different than what we have seen.' Advertisement Large-scale campus development proposals have been rare in Greater Boston since the COVID-19 pandemic upended the global commercial real estate market. The Select Board last month wrestled with potential benefits and drawbacks of a project of such magnitude: while it could bring much-needed commercial tax revenue and create local jobs and housing, it would also generate substantial change for an area that has historically been a quiet suburban residential enclave. Advertisement Bringing in commercial development and multifamily apartments to a town with a majority residential tax base would be a boon to Dedham's municipal finances, particularly the town's 'operational deficit,' Rosenberger said. In Dedham, commercial owners pay more than twice the residential property tax rate: a commercial property Still, he said he's heard from neighbors concerned about potential negative environmental impacts and more traffic. 'The more commercial we can provide, the better off the residential tax base can be,' he said. ' It's human nature to be concerned about a project of this magnitude. ... There's going to be impacts that are going to be to direct abutters, to traffic, that will need to be figured out.' Early plans shown to the Select Board last month show a possible 400,000 square feet of lab space, 470,000 square feet of research and development space, and 644 apartments on the acreage. Petruzziello later told the Globe he would also plan to include at least one residential building reserved for people age 55 and older. Creating hundreds of apartments would both help ease Advertisement 'It's a project that we think, if done correctly ... could be a grand slam for everybody,' Zahka said. Also at the July meeting, abutting landowner David Newman asked what consideration Supreme Cos. has given to neighbors at this stage of the development process. 'I, frankly, don't see any consideration to the abutters,' Newman said. 'I know we're early on in the project, but you're obviously out of the gate, causing a lot of sleepless nights to most residents on our street.' Select Board Chair Erin Boles Welch said the Planning Board will hold regular meetings that would include public comment. A 2022 Town Meeting vote allowed for a planned commercial development on land within a specific residential zoning district, if that commercial development met certain restrictions. At least 60 percent of the project would need to meet the definition of 'laboratory, research and development' standards and front Route 128/Interstate 95. That vote sparked the idea that the vacant land could host something substantial, Petruzziello said. Three years ago, when Dedham voters approved future lab campuses in residential areas with highway frontage, the life-science lab market in Greater Boston was peaking in demand and development. These days, however, the landscape looks very different. In an interview, Petruzziello and Zacha said that 57 acres off Route 128 is an ideal location for a planned commercial development. The campus could be home to 'tough tech' labs, or labs for artificial intelligence or robotics companies, rather than life-science labs, Petruzziello said. Commercial real estate markets can change swiftly — and he wants to be ready with a project when tenants are once again ready to lease up. Advertisement 'It's going to take us two years to permit, and we want to be ready … when they're knocking on our door,' Petruzziello said. Petruzziello said the mix of potential uses for The Campus at 128 is still in flux, but he would aim to formally propose a project with town officials 'sometime in 2026, for sure.' Catherine Carlock can be reached at
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, LEADING TRIAL ATTORNEYS, Encourages Flywire Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - August 16, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Flywire Corporation (NASDAQ: FLYW) between February 28, 2024 and February 25, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important September 23, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Flywire securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Flywire class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 23, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the strength and sustainability of Flywire's revenue growth was overstated; (2) the negative impact that permit- and visa-related restrictions were having and were likely to have on Flywire's business was understated; and (3) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Flywire class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit
