logo
Harry Potter TV series to be filmed in £1bn mini-city

Harry Potter TV series to be filmed in £1bn mini-city

Daily Mirror17-05-2025

Warner Bros are splashing out on a new mini-town to film their upcoming Harry Potter TV series - with a school and medical centre being built for hundreds of young actors
The forthcoming Harry Potter TV series is set to be filmed in a £1billion mini-town, complete with its own school and medical centre. The producers are investing heavily in the rapidly expanding Warner Bros' studio complex at Leavesden, just outside Watford, Herts. The development will feature new roads, multi-storey car parks and enormous hangars for the sets.
A school is being constructed for the hundreds of young actors who will be committed to years of filming, while facilities are also being created for the various animals that will appear, including dogs, birds of prey, rodents, snakes, spiders and horses.

It is reported that executives are even utilising wasteland adjacent to the studios to construct an updated version of Privet Drive, the street where the young wizard Harry spent his early years.

A source from the television industry revealed: "Warner Bros are making a huge commitment to the new TV show, looking at creating multiple, lengthy series over the next decade. They see this significant upfront investment in infrastructure as a worthwhile venture that will eventually yield returns. What they'll have is a small metropolis which will not only provide the backdrop for the show but all the facilities the large cast and crew need, too."
The series, touted by producers as a faithful adaptation of JK Rowling's books, is being produced by US TV behemoth HBO. The three lead roles have yet to be announced, but more than 32,000 hopefuls have submitted audition tapes, hoping to follow in the footsteps of Daniel Radcliffe, now 35, Emma Watson, also 35, and Rupert Grint, 36, who starred as Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley.
The wizarding trio of Harry, Hermione and Ron brought magic to life in the eight iconic films, accompanied by beloved animals like Harry's loyal snowy owl Hedwig, Hermione's mischievous cat Crookshanks, and Ron's ill-fated pet rat Scabbers.
A statement from Warner Bros Studios assures, "No animals are housed overnight for this, or any other production." The iconic Privet Drive, Harry's humble home, was originally filmed at a house in Bracknell, Berkshire. However, a meticulous replica now stands within the immersive Harry Potter attraction on the 200-acre studio site.
Interestingly, Warner Bros initially leased the site for a decade starting in 2000 to produce the films, before acquiring it outright in 2010.

The recreated Privet Drive, nestled in the fictional Surrey town of Little Whinging, features homes that have been upgraded with charming Tudor features, injecting a touch of whimsy and nostalgia for fans of the boy wizard.
In casting news, t he HBO Original TV series, which sees creator JK Rowling take on the role of executive producer, has not yet cast its young stars, however many of the surrounding cast have already been revealed. We don't yet know who will be taking on the major role of Harry Potter, who had been played by British actor Daniel Radcliffe in the films, as well as Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley.
The series will feature a brand new cast while staying authentic to the original books, to bring the wizarding adventures to new audiences. It has now been confirmed British actors Nick Frost and Paapa Essiedu and US star John Lithgow will be part of the brand new show. 3rd Rock From The Sun star Lithgow, 79, who won an Olivier earlier this month for playing children's author Roald Dahl in Giant in the West End, will play Hogwarts headmaster Professor Albus Dumbledore.
Theatre star Essiedu, known for Gangs Of London and I Will Destroy You, will portray the cruel Professor Severus Snape, while Frost takes on the role of friendly groundskeeper Rubeus Hagrid in the decade-long series.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Charles 'won't make first move with Harry because of whispers from close circle'
Charles 'won't make first move with Harry because of whispers from close circle'

Daily Mirror

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Charles 'won't make first move with Harry because of whispers from close circle'

Prince Harry's feud with his father King Charles has gone from bad to worse following Harry's extraordinary outburst in a BBC interview - and now palace insiders have revealed one of the reasons why the monarch is unlikely to make first move in repairing their rift Palace insiders have revealed one of the key factors that could be stopping King Charles from making the first move in reconciling with estranged son Prince Harry. The feud between father and son is believed to have gone from bad to worse in recent weeks after Harry gave an explosive interview to the BBC after losing another court battle over his security arrangements in the UK. In that interview, he confirmed that things had got so bad between him and his father, that the King, who is still having cancer treatment, will not speak to him and he does not know "how much longer my father has" left. It comes after Harry railed against his family in his memoir Spare, where he criticised his father, branded his stepmother Queen Camilla dangerous and claimed older brother Prince William physically attacked him. ‌ ‌ Some have suggested that if father and son are to get their relationship back on track, it should be the King to reach out and make the first move. However, a palace insider has told PEOPLE magazine one of the reasons why this has not been the case so far - and they claimed it is because those around the King have not "encouraged reconciliation". According to the publication, William has shown "no interest" in repairing the rift, Camilla "stays out of it" while even the King's most personal aide, private secretary Sir Clive Alderton is "unlikely to push for a personal outreach". Respected royal correspondent and author Valentine Low told PEOPLE of Charles: "There is not a good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move'." Talking about Harry's bombshell BBC interview, he added: "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one. It makes Charles reach out even harder." In his bombshell interview after losing his security case at the Court of Appeal, Harry admitted: "Of course, some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book. Of course, they will never forgive me for lots of things." And speaking previously to the Mirror, editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine Ingrid Seward, said any apology from Harry for his actions in the past will be a long time coming, despite his plea for reconciliation. ‌ She said: "By now Charles is used to Harry's disloyalty and contradictions. But what he will not be prepared to put up with is his youngest son's stubborn conviction that he is always right. Harry's ego is so fragile he thinks the world is against him. He refuses to take responsibility for his actions. If he wants reconciliation, why does he still attack his family? "If he did say sorry to his father and those he has hurt, he would be admitting he was wrong. Harry has such a weak sense of self he appears incapable of doing this. Harry's stubbornness will almost certainly prevent him from bringing his wife and children to the UK. At least in the immediate future. "He said he realised he had upset the 'family' but never once offered to apologise. The King knows this. But he also understands that under Harry's accusatory exterior, he is extremely vulnerable." As King, Charles needs total trust. He is head of state and monarch and that has to come first as Charles vowed at his Coronation. He will be very sad it has come to this. But if he can't trust Harry, he has to avoid him until such time things change. If they ever do." Get Royal Family updates straight to your WhatsApp!

The Last of Us fans hit with disappointing update for season three release date
The Last of Us fans hit with disappointing update for season three release date

Daily Record

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Record

The Last of Us fans hit with disappointing update for season three release date

The Last of Us fans may be expected to wait a lot time for the release of season three of the hit HBO show... Fans of the HBO hit series The Last of Us can likely expect a long wait for the third season of the critically acclaimed post-apocalyptic drama television series. Season two of the drama finished last week, with some fans branding it as "disappointing". The season finale ended with Bella Ramsey's character Ellie confronting vengeful killer Abby, who is played by Kaitlyn Dever. The series is based on the video game franchise developed by Naughty Dog, which was released in 2013 on Xbox and Playstation. ‌ The show quickly became a fan favourite due to viewers enjoyment of the game. Despite mixed reviews for the season finale, it was already renewed for a third season ahead of the season two release date. Similar to the game, the next season is expected to shift to Abby's perspective. ‌ At a press conference last month, according to Vulture, co-creator Craig Mazin and Neil Druckmann admitted they still aren't sure how much viewers can expect to see characters Ellie, Dina (Isabela Merced), Tommy (Gabriel Luna), and Jesse (Young Mazino) in the next season. This led fans to believe the creators haven't completed writing the season yet. This theory was later appeared to be confirmed by Bella, who recently told Variety that they hadn't "seen any scripts," yet. When Bella was asked whether their character would take on a smaller role in the third season, the 21-year-old said: "I haven't seen any scripts, but yes, I do expect that. I think that I'm going to be there, but not a whole bunch." ‌ Although they did not give anything away, they continued: "We've had conversations about that. I sort of have a rough idea of what it's going to be, but I can't tell you." However, creator Craig revealed: "All I can say is we haven't seen the last of Kaitlyn Dever and we haven't seen the last of Bella Ramsey, and we haven't seen the last of Isabela Merced, and we haven't seen the last of a lot of people who are currently dead in the story." As Neil teased: "Whether you will see them on screen or not, their presence will be there throughout." ‌ Speaking previously about the show's future, Craig assured viewers that they were "not going to go past the game." He told The Hollywood Reporter: "I'll just say that flat out. So if people are thinking, 'Oh, these guys are planning the old cash grab thing… ‌ "I'm basically setting a decade of my rapidly dwindling life on fire to tell this story. The show is so hard to make. It has to have an end. So I'm not going to go past." Fans of the show could not be more upset with the long wait for season three, as they took to social media to discuss their upset. One fan wrote on Reddit: "I don't understand why they didn't just film season 2 and 3 at the same time or at least make season 10 episodes and have parts of 5. Honestly and a lot of people agree with me on this 2027 to see another 7 or 8 episodes is a joke." Which promoted another viewer to reply: "They should have made season 2 as long as it took. 15 or 20 episodes. Just f*****g do it." As a third replied, showing their distrust to HBO: "The current head of HBO sucks and is making terrible decisions."

Have your say on Prince Harry changing his surname to Spencer
Have your say on Prince Harry changing his surname to Spencer

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Have your say on Prince Harry changing his surname to Spencer

The Duke of Sussex has reportedly been exploring ways to change his surname from Mountbatten-Windsor to Spencer - and we want to hear your thoughts on Prince Harry's latest move Prince Harry reportedly consulted Princess Diana's brother about the possibility of changing his surname from Mountbatten-Windsor to Spencer - and we want to hear your thoughts on the topic. During a rare visit to the UK, the Duke of Sussex is believed to have discussed the matter with his uncle Earl Spencer, but was advised that the legal hurdles involved were too significant to overcome, reports the Mail on Sunday. The dramatic move would mean giving up the Mountbatten-Windsor surname, which is also used by his children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three. His current surname is only available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, which combines the Royal Family 's title of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname. ‌ Following her accession to the throne in 1952, Queen Elizabeth confirmed the Royal Family name of Windsor. In 1960, the Queen and then Duke of Edinburgh elected for their direct descendants to carry the surname Mountbatten-Windsor - a name cherished by King Charles. ‌ Sources have claimed that Harry has been keenly exploring ways to adopt his late mother's surname, as a friend of the Duke told MailOnline: "They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step". Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer. According to the Government, you do not have to follow a legal process to start using a new name, but it suggests on its official website using a 'deed poll' to apply for, or to change official documents such as a passport or driving licence. This move could mean that Harry's children, Archie and Lilibet, would also lose their existing surname of Mountbatten-Windsor, sources suggest. However, it is widely believed that the family use the surname Sussex, to reflect Harry and Meghan's roles as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. During an episode of her Netflix show, Meghan corrected her friend Mindy Kaling saying: "It's so funny you keep saying Meghan Markle – you know I'm Sussex now. You have kids and you go, 'No, I share my name with my children'. I didn't know how meaningful it would be to me but it just means so much to go 'This is our family name. Our little family name.'" Get Prince Harry updates straight to your WhatsApp! While Harry was reportedly told that the legalities surrounding the name change were too great to overcome, his request reflects the Sussexes' expanding rift with the Firm after stepping down from royal duties in 2020. Following revelations that the Duke reached out to his uncle to discuss changing his family name, we want to know if you think Harry should switch to Spencer. Vote in our poll HERE to have your say.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store