
GM stock slumps on tariff fears even as revenues exceed expectations
General Motors' earnings have exceeded Wall Street's forecasts, but investors are still dumping the stock broadly on fears of tariffs that will make it hard for the carmaker to hit its 2025 targets.
Shares dropped more than 10 percent on Tuesday, putting it on track for its worst day since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Investors and analysts said GM's outlook is clouded by United States President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and reduced support for electric vehicles.
Trump on Monday evening again threatened tariffs on a broad array of goods, including steel, aluminium and copper, all materials critical to building automobiles. He has also threatened heavy levies on allies Mexico and Canada, which are key to the US automotive supply chain.
The automaker projected net income of $11.2bn to $12.5bn for 2025. That's ahead of expectations for $10.8bn, and numerous analysts termed that outlook optimistic.
'There's just a lot of uncertainty between tariffs as well as the rules and regulations around EVs and tax incentives. With that uncertainty, that really isn't baked into GM's guidance at this point,' said Jeff Windau, financial analyst at Edward Jones.
GM CEO Mary Barra told investors on a conference call Tuesday that she believes Trump 'wants to use policy and regulations in ways that will strengthen not harm domestic manufacturers like GM'. Trump has said he wants to use tariffs to push companies to move operations back to the US – but such moves can take years.
In the meantime, GM has an 'extensive playbook' pulled together in the event tariffs are imposed, GM's CFO Paul Jacobson told reporters on Monday prior to Trump's statements. The company had already started to bring vehicles in its international inventory in Mexico and Canada to the US, Jacobson said.
'Every delivery that we can make before a tariff is instituted, it's that much better, rather than sitting on inventory,' he said.
He did say, however, that they would not be able to make some decisions until they understand what the tariff environment will look like. 'There's things that we can do to balance plants, etc, and then there are things that cost a lot more money going forward,' he said.
EV losses
GM's fourth-quarter revenue of $47.7bn surpassed analyst expectations of $43.9bn. Adjusted earnings per share of $1.92 also exceeded analyst forecasts of $1.89 per share.
It earlier had said it sold 2.7 million vehicles for the year, up 4 percent from 2023.
GM sold vehicles at an average price of $50,000 in 2024, and executives see a 1 percent to 1.5 percent drop in North American pricing power and a modest decline in gas-powered vehicle volume in 2025.
The company expects losses will narrow with its battery-powered vehicles, reorganisation of its China business, and the end of robotaxi development at Cruise, its autonomous vehicle unit.
The Detroit carmaker does not break down its EV losses, but said in 2024 that revenue was higher than fixed costs including labour and material costs, a metric that it calls positive variable profitability. The figure does not include costs such as building assembly lines, but indicates financial progress in the EV rollout.
GM did not meet its goal of producing and wholesaling 200,000 EVs in North America in the year, instead ending up at 189,000 units wholesale, Jacobson said. EV inventory fell from 100 days at the end of the third quarter to 70 days.
GM previously had forecast EV operating losses would narrow by between $2bn and $4bn this year from undisclosed levels, although Jacobson said the decline in losses was likely to be closer to $2bn.
GM reported pre-tax profit of $2.5bn in the quarter but reported a $3bn net loss, mostly because of $4bn in restructuring charges in China where it lost $4.4bn in the year. The China business did return to profitability before restructuring charges in the fourth quarter, Jacobson said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best
It's official: United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person, Elon Musk, have broken up. At the end of last month, Musk departed from his post as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he oversaw the mass firing of federal employees and dismantling of various government agencies – all the while benefitting from his own companies' lucrative contracts with the government. Anyway, US 'democracy' has never met a conflict of interest it didn't like. Musk's service at the White House initially appeared to end on an amicable note as Trump praised him for the 'colossal change' he had achieved 'in the old ways of doing business in Washington'. The former head of DOGE in turn thanked the president for the opportunity. But soon after his departure, Musk publicly criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a tax and spending bill that Trump is currently obsessed with passing, slamming it as a 'disgusting abomination'. There ensued predictably dramatic social media exchanges between the two right-wing billionaires with Trump pronouncing Musk 'so depressed and so heartbroken' after leaving the White House and offering the additional coherent analysis: ' It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Musk has repeatedly taken credit for Trump's 2024 election victory on account of the gobs of money he donated to the president's campaign and those of other Republican candidates. Now that the relationship is over, Trump has wasted no time in warning Musk that he'll face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to fund Democratic campaigns in the future. But some Democratic ears, at least, have perked up at the possibility of getting the planet's richest person back on their side – which he abandoned in favour of Trump after having extended support to Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The political switcheroo was hardly extreme. At the end of the day, ideology matters little when you're just in the business of buying power. California Congressman Ro Khanna, for example, recently opined that Democrats should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk in light of their shared opposition to Trump's big beautiful bill. As per Khanna's view, 'we should ultimately be trying to convince [Musk] that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with.' He went on to list a few of these alleged values: 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Never mind that Musk's main 'value' is a commitment to controlling as much of the earth – not to mention the whole solar system – as he possibly can for the benefit of himself and himself alone. Beyond his mass firing activities while head of DOGE, a brief review of Musk's entrepreneurial track record reveals a total lack of the 'values' that Democrats purport to espouse. Over recent years, reports have abounded of sexual harassment and acute racism at Musk's Tesla car factories. In October 2021, a federal jury in San Francisco ordered Tesla to pay $137m to a Black former employee who claimed he was told to 'go back to Africa' among other abuses suffered at his workplace. Along with violating federal labour laws, Musk as chief executive of Tesla threatened workers over the prospect of unionisation. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, he violated local regulations to keep his factories up and running, underscoring a general contempt for human life that, again, should not be a 'value' that anyone aspires to. To be sure, not all Democrats are on board with the proposal to woo Musk back into the Democratic camp – but he may be getting a growing cheering squad. In addition to Khanna's advocacy on his behalf, New York Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres seems prepared to give Musk his vote as well: 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the [big beautiful] legislation.' Anthony Scaramucci, Trump's former White House director of communications, has, meanwhile, suggested that Democrats could 'bring Elon Musk back into the fold as a prodigal son' by foregoing more left-wing policies – as if there's anything truly left-wing about the Democratic Party in the first place. Newsweek's write-up of Scaramucci's comments observed that 'It would be a coup for Democrats if they could court the influence of the world's richest man once more.' It would not, obviously, be a coup for democracy, which is supposed to be rule by the people and not by money. And yet a longstanding bipartisan commitment to plutocracy means the US has never been in danger of true democracy. Instead, billions upon billions of dollars are spent to sustain an electoral charade and ensure that capital remains concentrated in the hands of the few – while Americans continue to literally die of poverty. Now it remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk breakup will drive Democrats into Musk's arms. But either way, the country's plutocratic values remain rock solid – and that is nothing less than a 'disgusting abomination'. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.


Qatar Tribune
16 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
‘Clean energy investment to be twice that of fossil fuels'
Agencies A surge in clean energy spending is expected to drive a record $3.3 trillion in global energy investment in 2025, despite economic uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Thursday. Clean energy technologies, including renewables, nuclear, and energy storage, are set to attract $2.2 trillion in investment, twice the amount expected for fossil fuels, the IEA said in its annual World Energy Investment report. 'The fast-evolving economic and trade picture means that some investors are adopting a wait-and-see approach to new energy project approvals, but in most areas we have yet to see significant implications for existing projects,' IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said. Solar power is expected to be the biggest beneficiary, with investment forecast to reach $450 billion in 2025, while spending on battery storage is predicted to surge to around $66 billion, the report said. Batteries are seen as a way to mitigate the intermittency of renewable energy projects, by storing power during peak supply and discharging during peak demand, but investments in the technology have lagged behind solar and wind power. In contrast, investment in oil and gas is expected to decline, with upstream oil investment set to fall by 6% in 2025, driven by lower oil prices and demand expectations and the first drop since the COVID crisis in 2020. The IEA also warned that investment in grids of $400 billion per year is lower than spending on generation and electrification, which could pose a risk to electricitysecurity.


Qatar Tribune
16 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Is there further upside for gold prices?
Gold occupies a unique role in modern investing. It generates no cash flow, incurs storage costs, and has limited industrial utility – yet it continues to hold enduring appeal among households, sovereigns, and institutional investors. Gold's historical legacy as a monetary anchor has recently intersected with a more contemporary function: risk mitigation. This demand for gold has been supported by the idea that the yellow metal provides a key utility as a portfolio diversifier protecting against inflation, financial crisis, international conflicts and civil strife. Importantly, gold's resilience in the face of economic shocks, such as the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008-09 or the Covid-19 pandemic, underscores its role as a hedge against systemic risks and macroeconomic instability. In recent years, gold has rallied significantly, a process that has accelerated over the last few months. In fact, before the most recent pullback, gold prices reached $3,500 per ounce, making sequential all-time highs for months. After such significant rally, which amounts to 114 percent in price appreciation since the pandemic and 92 percent since the Russo-Ukrainian conflict began, it is natural that analysts and investors would question whether there is still more upside for gold over the coming years. In fact, gold has decisively outperformed all major asset classes, challenging the perception that it merely serves as a defensive hedge. A sustained outperformance highlights that gold, while traditionally valued for its safety during crisis, can also generate robust returns under different macroeconomic conditions. Gold's consistent gains relative to equities, bonds, and commodities since early 2020 suggest that it merits consideration not only as protective allocation but as strategic, return-enhancing asset within a diversified portfolio. This dual characteristic – providing resilience during uncertainty while also delivering meaningful capital appreciation during periods of higher investor risk appetite – further strengthens the case for gold as a core holding. This is especially valid for environments of elevated inflation, currency de-basement, foreign exchange depreciation, or systematic market volatility. In our view, despite the surge in prices, there is still further upside for prices over the medium-term, as global macro conditions are favourable for gold. Two main factors sustain our position. First, gold's appeal has been further bolstered by secular or long-term geopolitical trends, including the intensifying economic rivalry between West and East, a decline in international cooperation, escalating trade disputes, increasing political polarization, and the 'weaponization' of economic relations via sanctions. This has particularly intensified after the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and the US-driven 'trade wars.' In an era marked by more geopolitical instability, gold's status as a tangible, jurisdictionally neutral asset that can serve as collateral in various markets becomes increasingly significant. Reflecting this movement, central banks globally have been accumulating gold at a rate unseen in generations. According to the World Gold Council, after the Russo-Ukrainian conflict in 2022, central bank additional demand for gold more than doubled from 450 tons per year to more than one thousand tons per year. Surprisingly, despite the increase in official demand for gold from central banks, there is still a lot of room for a much longer process of gold accumulation or portfolio rebalancing towards the precious metal. While large advanced economies tend to hold around 25 percent of their foreign exchange (FX) reserves in gold, large EM-based central banks hold only less than 8 percent of their FX reserves in gold. Given that these EM-based central banks hold around $6 trillion in FX reserves, there is scope for a continued multi-year process of portfolio rebalancing from these reserve managers. This supports a steady long-term institutional demand for gold. Second, foreign exchange (FX) movements are poised to lend additional support to gold prices. Historically, gold has shown a strong inverse correlation with the USD – typically rising when the USD weakens and falling when it strengthens. The USD has already depreciated by more than 6.9 percent against a basket of major currencies so far this year. Moreover, despite this sharp depreciation, currency valuations still suggest that the USD remains overvalued by more than 15 percent, indicating further room for depreciation ahead. A softer USD is likely to support gold prices going forward, as it enhances global purchasing power for USD-denominated commodities like gold, stimulating demand and providing an additional tailwind for prices. Moreover, as investors seek protection against the erosion of purchasing power associated with USD depreciation, they often turn to gold as an alternative store of value. Consequently, a declining USD typically drives higher demand and upward price momentum for gold. All in all, despite sharp rally in recent months, there is still further upside for gold over the medium-term. This is supported by strong momentum across different macro regimes, long-term geopolitical trends with central bank portfolio rebalancing, and FX movements. — By QNB Economics