Honduran singer and politician Aurelio Martínez among 12 killed in Caribbean plane crash
Tributes have been paid to Aurelio Martínez, a congressman and Garifuna singer who was among the victims of the tragic incident on Monday.
The plane had taken off from the island of Roatan but made 'a sharp turn to the right of the runway and fell into the water,' civil aviation official Carlos Padilla said, according to CBS.
Five people were rescued from the crash, the fire department said, after emergency responders waded through the water to pull survivors from the wreckage.
Martínez's record label confirmed he was among those killed.
'Aurelio was more than just a musician — he was a statesman, a spokesperson and vital saviour of the culture of the Garifuna people of Honduras,' Real World Records said in a statement.
The music label said Martínez began performing when he was just a boy and became an 'innovative artist', before joining the Honduran national assembly as one of the first congressmen of African descent.
There were 15 passengers and two crew aboard the small Jetstream 32 plane, the New York Times reports.
Fishermen were among the first on the scene, according to local media reports, spotting bodies and survivors in the water before going to the rescue of some of the people crying out for help.
Honduran President Xiomara Castro said she activated an emergency taskforce to respond to the crash, which included the Honduran fire department, the army, national police and the Red Cross.
'They have immediately arrived at the scene of the plane crash that occurred 1 km from Roatán International Airport and are tirelessly assisting in the unfortunate incident,' she wrote in a translated post on X.
'The public hospitals in San Pedro Sula and La Ceiba are now ready to treat injured passengers.
'May God protect people's lives.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Heiress who sold CBS News says she was secretly pleased by Trump attacks on its slanted broadcasts
An heiress who used to own CBS's parent company Paramount says she welcomed Donald Trump suing the broadcaster over alleged biased coverage on its flagship news show. Shari Redstone, 71, conceded to The New York Times that 'We needed more balance' - although she and the president had been offended by different broadcasts. Trump sued CBS after claiming the network's flagship current affairs show 60 Minutes had deceptively edited a Kamala Harris interview to make her look better. Meanwhile, Redstone said she'd been offended by a separate 60 Minutes episode on the Israel-Hamas war she felt was too slanted in favor of the Palestinian cause. She said: 'Part of me thought, maybe Trump could accomplish what I never got done.' Redstone, the daughter of the late entertainment magnate Sumner Redstone, says she realized she wanted to sell Paramount in the wake of Hamas ' October 7 2023 massacre in Israel, that saw 1,200 Israelis murdered. She explained: 'Once that happened, I wanted out. I wanted to support Israel, and address issues around antisemitism and racism.' Shortly after that, another heir called David Ellison contacted her asking if she'd sell to Skydance, the production company he'd set up. Redstone closed the sale for $8 billion last month and took home an estimated $2.8 billion of that payout. That deal was struck around the same time CBS settled with Trump for $16 million over the Kamala Harris interview he said was deceptive. Lawyers said the network had strong grounds to contest Trump's claims. But Redstone's sale of Paramount had to be rubber-stamped by Trump's Federal Communications Commission - with the settlement seen by critics as a dirty deal to grease the wheels. Redstone told The Times that she found 60 Minutes veteran journalist Lesley Stahl's criticism of the settlement 'particularly hurtful.' The heiress insisted she'd just wanted to get the deal done to help give CBS News a secure future. 'We needed more balance,' Redstone went on to tell the Times, suggesting such segments - including others that were no specified were slanted. 'Part of me thought, maybe Trump could accomplish what I never got done' Simultaneously, Redstone was secretly thyroid battling cancer. The billionairess, who trained as a social worker, underwent surgery in May after the disease spread to her coal cords. Asked how she came the decision, Redstone said: 'My legacy was to create security for my family and to put the company in good hands.' She added how despite 'many challenges... we did what we set out to do.'
Edinburgh Reporter
18 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Edinburgh International Book Festival: Lindsey Hilsum and Edward Wong
As part of the Edinburgh International Book Festival's The Front List series (run in partnership with Underbelly) Lindsey Hilsum and Edward Wong discussed the state of the media, journalism, and the dangerous state of the world. They did so in front of a packed out audience at the McEwan Hall. Hilsum had stepped in to replace the historian and author Anne Applebaum, who had to withdraw due to ill health. In her opening remarks, the director of the Book Festival Jenny Niven informed the audience that Applebaum 'was in good hands, getting good treatment'. Niven thanked Hilsum for 'stepping into the breach' at short notice (so short that there were no copies of Hilsum's book to be signed). A very good substitute Both speakers had extensive experience of reporting on conflicts, and of commentating on world events. Acclaimed journalist Lindsey Hilsum is best known as International Editor for Channel 4 News. Her books include In Extremis: The Life and Death of the War Correspondent Marie Colvin and, more recently, I Brought the War with Me: Stories and Poems from the Front Line. Wong is Diplomatic Correspondent for the New York Times, focuusing particularly on American foreign policy and its impact. He's the author of At the Edge of Empire. Both have reported from countries undergoing turmoil, such as Iraq, Rwanda and Ukraine. Wong also brought to the discussion and in-depth understanding of China, which he had explored in relation to his parents. Hilsum apologized 'for not being an Anne Applebaum', but was able to bring plenty to the discussion. A very good substitute. The conversation was chaired by the investigative journalist James West, executive editor of Mother Jones, the American progressive magazine. The dialogue between the three was engaging and well-informed, with a large degree of consensus between the speakers, though not total unanimity on all themes. USA – WTF West began by summarizing the introduction he had prepared as simply 'USA – WTF'. The changing character of the United States and its role within the international order was the dominant theme of the discussion, with the figure of Trump looming over every topic. They began by looking at the recent meeting in Alaska between Putin and Trump. Hilsum felt that Trump had 'bought Putin's line', that the 'root cause' of the conflict was not Russia's invasion. In short, tacit acceptance of Putin's narrative that Ukraine isn't really a proper country, but just 'a little Russia, populated by little Russians'. In recent trips to Ukraine, she had sensed optimism declining, with many 'fearing betrayal' by Trump. Wong felt that, in the main, Trump was a fairly 'transparent' figure who generally means what he says. This included his undoubted admiration for some autocrats, and a desire to join that club as they decided the fate of the world. Wong felt that Trump's anti-China rhetoric should be taken with a pinch of salt and that, at root, he was prepared to be 'transactional' with Xi Jinping. This was what lay behind Trump's turning his back on the international institutions that grew out of World War Two. In their discussion of Gaza, the speakers felt that the US was no longer performing its role of acting as a controlling influence on the Israeli government. There was, according to Wong, little sense of the USA 'reigning in Israel'. Wong outlined that foreign policy in the US was being controlled by a very tight circle, 'almost like a medieval court', with loyalty and ideological purity valued over all else. In contrast to the first Trump term, there were fewer moderate voices being heard by the President. More generally, there was a sense of a return to the dominance of great powers with separate 'spheres of interest'. Hilsum talked of parallels with the Yalta conference at the end of the Second World War, in which Europe was divided up. There was some sense of a return to some elements of the imperial era, but 'in a post imperial World'. This disjuncture lay behind much of the international tension at present, with the old world order breaking up but a new one yet to be established. Sucking attention Both Hilsum and Wong have spent a lot of time covering genocides, this was another major theme of the discussion. There was a sense for both that some major crises, such as in Sudan, were not getting the attention they deserved. This was partly because 'Trump sucks attention'. Though Applebaum was not present, one of her major themes (as outlined in books such as The Twilight of Democracy) was covered. This was, Wong outlined, the sense that we are seeing, in established democracies, elements of 'escalating authoritarianism' or, at the very least, some 'backsliding'. There was plenty of evidence of 'erosion of norms' and people in various sectors 'bowing down to threats'. There were, in the US, signs of governmental power eroding institutions which normally kept the state in check. Ideological purity However, Wong was quick to add that the US is still some distance away from properly authoritarian States such as Russia or China, where the entire system was dominated by the government, building on many decades of authoritarianism. What particularly worried Wong here was increasing evidence of an increasingly ideological aspect to the United States. He cited examples of 'party cells' embedded within key institutions trying to make sure that they operated in accord with Trumpian values. This raised the question of how resilient the US was and also what role the media and journalism could play. Is the media capable of keeping Trump in check? Media literacy Hilsum felt that the teaching of 'media literacy' was greatly needed. As she noted, people are increasingly getting their news from very different sources, not the large established media organizations which dominated until fairly recently. She was aware that the media organisations she and Wong were most associated with (Channel 4 and the New York Times), were no longer as influential as they once were. As the media environment evolved, how can good quality, verified news and comment be maintained? For Hilsum, being able to distinguish between high quality news and comment and material filled with conspiracy theories was critical in maintaining healthy democracies. She was aware that she was speaking to an audience who had grown up on the BBC and serious newspapers, but this was changing. Younger generations were consuming media differently, she noted. She paused and looked around at the rather 'mature' audience, asking rhetorically 'if there is anyone under 30 here'. There was an 'atomisation of information', with many only consuming media by those they shared an ideological viewpoint with. This was all adding to polarised politics. In awe They ended by looking at the role played by journalists on the ground in conflict zones, with reference to the recent deaths of Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza. Hilsum was 'in awe' of the Gazan journalists still working there. She and Wong noted that those most in danger were local journalists, who were often considered fair game by combatants. Marie Colvin, who was killed in Syria, was an exception to this. Wong talked movingly about the local teams he had worked alongside in Iraq. Pretty gloomy The questions from the audience were sharp and succinct. That's not always the case at Book Festival events, when there's a tendency for audience members to make mini speeches and not ask actual questions. The final questioner noted that the conversation had been 'pretty gloomy', so asked whether there were things the panellists felt optimistic about. Hilsum felt that while the withdrawal of some international aid agencies from parts of Africa was regrettable, she did feel that it was helping countries move away from a 'patronising idea of aid'. Instead, things were being organised by those from the countries affected, not western saviours. Wong felt that despite the drift to authoritarianism (including in countries such as Hungary and the US), 'the brand of democracy' was 'still strong'. Most countries wanted to be part of the democratic club, even if they often paid lip service to some aspects of it. Hilsum ended by praising the 'intellectual and creative ferment' in Edinburgh in August. That for her, was a reason to be hopeful. Praising the audience is always likel to go down well! Like this: Like Related
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
CBS News plans major 'tweak' to its ailing nightly news show after two-anchor format sent ratings into freefall
CBS Evening News is set to experiment with yet another format change after adding another anchor to the mix back in January - a strategy widely panned as a 'disaster' at the time. The new strategy, insiders told Variety, will see one of the anchors more frequently thrust into the field to report on major, breaking events. The other will stay on-set to oversee the broadcast solo, as Norah O'Donnell, Katie Couric, Dan Rather, and Walter Cronkite did previously. It could be seen last week when John Dickerson was on the ground in Alaska to report on Donald Trump 's summit with Vladimir Putin. As he delivered breaking news, Maurice DuBois stayed behind in Manhattan. Making use of both cohosts in such a way appears to thrust the idea of having two anchors side-by-side to the wayside. The show has lost more than 1.2million viewers since it strayed from the format. People familiar with CBS's news division further told Variety how staffers there are scared of rumored layoffs. Executives from Skydance signaled earlier this month they intended to continue with Paramount's plans to cut $2 billion in costs from the company. Streaming continues to take away from revenue brought by traditional advertising and distribution. CBS News, however, has found itself in a tougher spot - last-place of the legacy news stations in both primetime and mornings. Most notably, the gap is growing on the evening front. O'Donnell, less than a year ago, had reeled in an average of roughly 5million total viewers, as well as 721,000 viewers aged 25 to 54 for her broadcast. Those numbers were down to 3.744 million total viewers and 516,000 viewers in the advertiser-coveted demographic as of August 4, seemingly in response to the dual-anchor experiment. Aside from doing away with a single host after decades, the strategy saw staffers take a more magazine-style, 60 Minutes-esque approach to the evening's news. The vision - masterminded by now-ex-60 Minutes boss Bill Owens and then-CBS News and Stations CEO Wendy McMahon - was promptly rejected by viewers within a matter of weeks, according to Nielsen data. The show debuted with the Dickerson-Dubois pairing on January 27 to 5.2 million total viewers, the data showed. By its third week, the show was receiving just under 4.5 million total viewers, the data showed. A former CBS News exec told Daily Mail at the time, 'It's a disaster,' referring to the two anchors and their feature, long-form style 'It's been critically panned, ratings down week by week and from this time last year,' they said, under condition of anonymity. '[Executive Producer] Bill Owens is also overstretched and feeling the pressure with this lawsuit from [Trump].' The suit, centered around a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris that aired in October, was settled just last month, after Owens and McMahon has both left the company. Both had been vocal about their opposition to a settlement, after Trump claimed the sit-down was 'deceptively edited.' The suit was seen by many as a sticking point in the merger between Paramount and Skydance, which was approved by the FCC - after more than a year in limbo - last month as well. Last week, Paramount Studios new CEO, 42-year-old scion David Ellsion, previewed his plans for the new company, which he said will include CBS News. 'We're an entertainment company first, and I genuinely believe if you're breathing, you're our audience,' the son of MAGA billionaire Larry Ellison explained. 'I don't want to politicize this company.' 'We want to be in the business of speaking to everybody,' he continued, after months of being accused of bribery and playing a part in Paramount's decision to cancel the show of prominent Trump critic Stephen Colbert. 'One of our biggest priorities is actually restoring Paramount as the No. 1 destination for the most talented artists and filmmakers in the world. 'Very simply, great filmmakers make great movies.' He also talked up CBS' relationship with the NFL, Masters golf tournament and the NCAA's March Madness. His COO Andy Gordon added, 'I actually think every asset is underappreciated here.' Ellison also mentioned how the Tiffany Network ended the regular television season in first place in primetime among broadcast networks for the 17th straight year. 'Legacy media kind of swam out to the middle of the lake, but wasn't exactly sure how to get to the other side,' he said of plans to embrace technology to make his vision possible. Jeff Shell, the new president of what's being called Paramount Skydance, said any cuts and reductions needed to make that vision a reality will be disclosed by the company's next quarterly report to investors in November.
