
Nebraska Republicans sought to weaken voter-backed paid sick leave. A Democrat helped them do it.
Backers of the bill overcame a filibuster on Wednesday with the exact number of votes needed — 33 — thanks to the support of a Democrat in the officially nonpartisan Legislature, Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln.
Raybould, whose family owns several grocery store chains in the state, was also the main sponsor of another bill that sought to restrict a voter-backed minimum wage law. That bill suffered an unexpected defeat earlier this session when a freshman lawmaker failed to show up for a vote on it. Raybould's attempt to attach it to the paid sick leave measure on Wednesday also failed.
By a nearly 3-to-1 margin, Nebraska voters in November approved a ballot measure that requires all Nebraska employers to provide at least some paid sick leave to their employees.
The ballot language, which had been set to take effect Oct. 1, required businesses to provide workers with one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to seven days at businesses with more than 20 employees. Employees at smaller businesses could accrue up to five days' worth of paid sick leave a year. The leave could be used for the employees themselves or to tend to a family member.
But the bill passed Wednesday and expected to be signed into law by Gov. Jim Pillen carves out exceptions. It allows businesses to withhold paid sick leave from 14- and 15-year-olds, as well as from temporary and seasonal agricultural workers. Businesses with 10 or fewer employees would not need to provide paid sick leave at all.
More concerning, opponents say, is a provision that strips from the new law the ability of workers to sue employers who retaliate against them for using paid sick leave. The removal of that enforcement language would 'essentially gut' the paid leave measure, said Sen. John Cavanaugh, who opposed the bill. Cavanaugh reiterated that paid sick leave received nearly 75% approval — more support than most lawmakers got at the polls.
'The voters wanted this more than they wanted you here,' he said, addressing fellow lawmakers. 'This is about respect for the will of the voters.'
Nebraska joins other states leading efforts to counter voter-approved policies on everything from paid sick leave to abortion. Some states are seeking to limit the voter initiative process itself, leading to pushback from voters.
Supporters of the Nebraska paid sick leave rollback say they're seeking to protect both workers and businesses. Raybould has said throughout debate this session that teens under 16 will find themselves unable to get an after-school or summer job without changes to both minimum wage and paid sick leave measures. She says no one will hire teens with limited experience and federal child labor restrictions at $15 per hour — the minimum wage set to take effect Jan. 1.
'We have to find that balance between business and labor,' Raybould said during debate Wednesday. 'We have to be competitive, and we have to be flexible.'
Others went further, with Republican Sen. Mike Jacobson saying that government telling businesses what wages and benefits they must offer employees 'threatens democracy.' If employees don't like the terms of their employment, he said, it's incumbent on them to find a different job.
Sen. Robert Hallstrom is another Republican who supported restrictions on both the minimum wage and paid sick leave. He said the Legislature has the right to make changes to voter-backed measures, asking if young or seasonal workers who would be affected by those changes would 'rather have a $10-an-hour job or no job?'
The Paid Sick Leave for Nebraskans coalition, which was behind the effort to get paid sick leave on the Nebraska ballot last year, said the bill passed Wednesday would remove paid sick leave protections for 140,000 workers in the state.
'Despite thousands of Nebraskans demanding that our Legislature honor the clear will of voters, 33 senators ignored those calls yet again today," the coalition said in a statement. "It will prevent thousands of Nebraskans from being able to access the good life.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump shares First Lady Melania's letter to Putin as he rages over coverage of Alaska summit
President Trump has posted the full text of a letter from First Lady Melania Trump that he delivered to Russia's Vladimir Putin as part of the pair's Friday summit in Alaska. In the letter, which Putin reportedly read 'immediately' in front of delegates at the summit, the First Lady urged the Russian leader to remember the innocence of the children caught in the middle of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone — you serve humanity itself,' the letter reads. 'Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with the stroke of the pen today. It is is time.' The president revealed the letter on Truth Social, after making multiple posts criticizing media coverage of the Alaska summit, which did not result in any lasting deal to end the Ukraine war. "It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me," Trump wrote in an earlier post. "There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me." "If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal,' he said in another.


The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Confederate statue dedicated to ‘faithful slaves' targeted in class-action lawsuit
A federal lawsuit filed in Columbia, North Carolina is targeting a Confederate monument outside a courthouse that bears an inscription with the line "IN APPRECIATION OF OUR FAITHFUL SLAVES." The lawsuit is calling for that portion of the inscription to be removed or covered up. 'I just remember thinking that slaves had to be so-called faithful or they would be punished or even worse,' Sherryreed Robinson, one of the members of the lawsuit, told the New York Times. 'As an adult, the words sitting on the grounds of a courthouse made me question whether Blacks could really receive justice there.' Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that a portion of the lawsuit could move forward. Tyrrell County officials have been resistant to taking action themselves, citing state monument protection laws that, they say, bars them from making any changes to the monument. The challenge to the statue — which sits on the lawn of the Tyrrell County Courthouse — comes at a time when President Donald Trump and his administration are restoring Confederate names and monuments after many were demolished and destroyed during or in response to racial justice protests in 2020. In June, Trump demanded that the military restore Confederate names that had been previously removed from military bases. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered that a Confederate sculpture removed from Arlington National Cemetery be re-installed. The lawsuit in North Carolina was launched last year — before Trump returned to office — by the Concerned Citizens of Tyrrell County, which is made up primarily of older Black residents. The filing argues that the "faithful slave" portion of its inscription constitutes racial discrimination in government speech, which the litigants argue is a violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. It calls for the county to remove or cover the message. Tyrrell County officials moved to have the lawsuit dismissed in 2024, arguing that county officials cannot change the monument based on a state law limiting how an "object of remembrance" on state property can be changed or moved. 'The North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled that county commissioners are bound by this statute, and that commissioners who are bound by this statute are not motivated by a discriminatory intent,' the motion reads. 'Tyrrell County should not be subject to liability based on its decision to follow state law.' The statue was one of many Confederate monuments erected during the Jim Crow era in the wake of the U.S. Civil War. The Tyrell Monument Association, founded by former Confederate Army lieutenant colonel William Fessenden Beasley, gifted the monument to the county. It has stood on the courthouse lawn since 1902. It depicts a Confederate soldier standing on a base that includes a bust of General Robert E Lee. There are inscriptions on each of the base's four sides, one of which includes the reference to "faithful slaves." Mark Snell Brickhouse, whose great-great-grandfather's name is one of many Confederates' etched on the monument, said he visits the monument and the family cemetery because it honors his family, but he told the Times he agrees that the "faithful slave" portion should be covered. 'I love the statue because it honors my family members,' Brickhouse, 72, told the paper. 'But I can see how the words are offensive to some people. I think the statue should stay because it reflects our history, but those words should be covered.' The Concerned Citizens of Tyrell County tried in the 1990's to have the statue removed completely, but have since changed their course, only asking for the reference to slaves to be removed or covered. Ian Mance, a lawyer with Emancipate North Carolina, a racial justice and advocacy group, told the Times that the statue outside the Tyrrell County Courthouse is the only known Confederate monument that directly endorses or shows an appreciation for, slavery. 'This is the only monument of its kind at a courthouse with that language of appreciation, or an endorsement, of slavery on it,' he said. 'You are talking about families who have been here since before the Civil War. For them, there is this feeling that this monument is offering commentary about their families.' According to Mance, the lawsuit is not seeking damages.


Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Marco Rubio 'humiliates' CBS host in clash over Putin
Secretary of State Marco Rubio took on the mainstream media Sunday during a slew of appearances following President Trump's bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rubio sparred with CBS host Margaret Brennan as she pushed him to divulge details about Trump's meeting with Putin, which took place in Alaska on Friday, as well as the forthcoming White House meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy. 'This is such a stupid media narrative that [European leaders] are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks... We invited them to come,' Rubio told Brennan. 'To have a deal ... to reach the end of this conflict, both sides are going to have to make concessions,' Rubio said of the agreement America is working to broker between Russia and Ukraine. Brennan pushed Rubio on whether he, and by extension the rest of the Trump administration's leadership, were 'demanding withdrawal' of Russian troops from land that Putin 'has already seized land by force.' 'This is about what Ukraine can accept. And what Russia can accept. They both have to accept it, otherwise, there won't be a peace deal,' Rubio told Brennan. 'If there aren't concessions, if one side gets everything they want, that's called surrender. That's called the end of the war through surrender. And that's not what we're close to doing, because neither side here is on the verge of surrender or anything close to it,' the Secretary of State continued. X users piled on the praise for Rubio's CBS performance, and a similar takedown he offered on ABC Sunday as well. 'Can you name any concessions that Vladimir Putin made during this meeting?' ABC host Martha Raddatz asked Rubio on Sunday. 'I wouldn't name them on your program,' Rubio fired back. 'Why would I do that?' Conservative commentator and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk wrote 'bravo to Sec. Marco Rubio this morning for embarrassing CBS and ABC News. Impressive he didn't just walk out of those interviews.' 'Imagine hating President Trump so much that you actively root for peace talks to fail. What vile, ghoulish creatures,' Kirk added, doubling down on his disapproval of Brennan and ABC host Martha Raddatz. 'I don't care if you're Republican or Democrat—anyone should be able to see how blatantly the mainstream media twists the narrative in this interview alone,' wrote an X user posting under the handle @jaimewildshark. Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich chimed in that the 'news media and the 'expert' analysts and commentators are making fools of themselves over the Trump-Putin meeting.' 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio had it just right when he said the press literally had no idea what was said in the meetings. President Trump is a great negotiator and Alaska was just the opening act in a multi act play. Patience and calm would be a wise approach for the time being,' Gingrich added in his analysis. X user @VigilantFox noted that Marco Rubio absolutely 'humiliated CBS' Margaret Brennan after she melted down over Trump not achieving a ceasefire or slapping new sanctions.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House on Monday, and leaders of other European nations, including Britain, France, and Germany are expected to be in attendance.