logo
Liberal candidate co-authored inquiry submission suggesting Hazaras not persecuted for ethnicity in Afghanistan

Liberal candidate co-authored inquiry submission suggesting Hazaras not persecuted for ethnicity in Afghanistan

The Guardian11-04-2025
The Liberal candidate for Bruce co-authored a parliamentary submission suggesting the Hazara community in Afghanistan was not persecuted on the basis of its ethnicity, contradicting the Australian government and drawing rebuke from international human rights groups.
Zahid Safi co-authored a submission to a 2021 parliamentary inquiry into Australia's involvement in the Afghanistan war, which incorrectly cited a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report to allege Hazara 'warlords' had 'cut the breasts of women' and watched 'live delivery of pregnant women' during the early 1990s. The 2005 HRW report does not mention these acts.
The allegations led members of the Hazara community, which has a significant presence in the electorate of Bruce, to lodge their own dissenting submissions to the inquiry, alleging the claims relied on 'racist tropes' and sought to erase the 'well-documented persecution of an entire ethnic group'.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Safi did not directly comment on those allegations when contacted by Guardian Australia, instead stating he was 'a staunch advocate for freedom of religion or belief for all individuals worldwide'.
'As someone who fled the country because of war, I know everyone under the Taliban suffered, and my advocacy for human rights is shaped by those experiences,' Safi said.
The Senate submission co-authored by Safi said, in reference to conflict in Afghanistan, 'that victims of war are not based on ethnicity'.
'The victims of war are targeted based on ideology,' the joint submission said. 'This means, whoever opposes the Taliban and their ideology, is perceived as the Taliban's enemy. Therefore, their perceived animosity is not based on ethnic division.'
A 2022 briefing paper on Afghanistan, prepared by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, states the Hazara community are an ethnic group that represents an estimated 10-20% of the country's population. It states the Hazara face 'a high risk of harassment and violence (…) on the basis of their ethnicity and sectarian affiliation'.
The department notes the Hazara community has been historically persecuted, noting it was subjected to 'the worst single recorded massacre in the country's recent history' in August 1998, when the Taliban, a predominantly Pashtun organisation, 'massacred at least 2,000 Hazaras'.
The submission co-authored by Safi also expressed frustration that other ethnic groups from Afghanistan had allegedly been 'sidelined' by the Australian government and media, due to an alleged prioritisation of the Hazara community.
'Pashtuns have had the most casualties compared to others and this needs to be acknowledged by the Australian government as the 20 years' war existed mostly in the Pashtun provinces,' the submission stated.
Thousands of Hazaras who fled Afghanistan after persecution from the Taliban in the 1990s settled in Melbourne's south-eastern suburbs, within the federal electorate of Bruce. The electorate is also home to other Afghan ethnic groups.
Safi said: 'A full and fair reading of my submission makes clear that I advocated for every single living individual at risk from the national atrocity and humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan under the Taliban.'
Guardian Australia has spoken to other co-authors of the report who stand by its claims.
Bruce is held by the incumbent Labor MP, Julian Hill. A margin of 6.6% at the 2022 election has been reduced to 5.3% after a redistribution. .
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The submission has been criticised by HRW's Afghanistan researcher, Fereshta Abbasi, who accused the authors of misrepresenting a report by the organisation to imply brutal violence in Kabul between 1992 and 1995 was conducted exclusively by Hazaras.
'Among these atrocities were those carried out by ethnically Pashtun militia forces and ethnically Hazara militia forces against civilians of these respective ethnic groups, in tit-for-tat kidnappings, rapes and killings,' Abbasi said.
'Attributing them exclusively towards Hazaras is misleading. It is our finding that these attacks were in fact based on ethnicity – in that the victims were targeted because of their ethnicity.'
A dissenting submission made by members of the Hazara community, who asked for the Senate to withhold their names, said the submission co-authored by Safi had 'the effect of amplifying racist tropes'.
'It highlights the actions of a few actors in a past civil war, drawing attention to ethnicity to imply the guilt of entire ethnic groups, or to imply that people who belong to ethnic groups other than Pashtun are violent in nature,' the dissenting submission said.
A separate dissenting report by two academics specialising in Afghanistan at La Trobe University and Deakin University, along with solicitors and PhD candidates, accused the submission of containing 'a series of factually incorrect statements and racist prejudices'.
'Instead of acknowledging the historical and current persecution of the Hazaras, and the significant risks faced by Hazaras in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime; the authors deliberately blame the Hazaras for the general violence and human rights abuses that were perpetrated during several phases of the war in Afghanistan,' the academics and lawyers said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US military vets helping Afghans fight deportation
The US military vets helping Afghans fight deportation

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

The US military vets helping Afghans fight deportation

As a journalist in Afghanistan, Abdul says he helped promote American values like democracy and freedom. That work, he said, resulted in him being tortured by the Taliban after the US withdrew from the country in he's in California applying for political asylum, amid the looming threat of deportation."We trusted those values," he said. "We came here for safety, and we don't have it, unfortunately."But when Abdul walked into a San Diego court to plead his case, he wasn't veterans showed up for his hearing – unarmed, but dressed in hats and shirts to signify their military credentials as a "show of force", said Shawn VanDiver, a US Navy vet who founded 'Battle Buddies' to support Afghan refugees facing deportation."Masked agents of the federal government are snatching up our friends, people who took life in our name and have done nothing wrong," he 200,000 Afghans relocated to the US after Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, as the US left the country in chaos after two decades fighting the war on terror. Many say they quickly felt embraced by Americans, who recognised the sacrifices they had made to help the US military and fight for human since the Trump administration has terminated many of the programmes which protected them from deportation, Afghans now fear they will be deported and returned to their home country, which is now controlled by the Taliban. Mr VanDiver, who also founded #AfghanEvac in 2021 to help allies escape the Taliban when the US withdrew, said US military veterans owe it to their wartime allies to try and protect them from being swept up in President Trump's immigration raids."This is wrong."The Battle Buddies say they have a moral and legal obligation to stand and support Afghans. They now have more than 900 veteran volunteers across the of the federal agents working for ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are veterans themselves, he said, and the Battle Buddies think their presence alone might help deter agents from detaining a wartime ally."Remember, don't fight ICE," Mr VanDiver told his fellow Battle Buddies outside court before Abdul's hearing, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE."If somebody does fight ICE, capture it on video. Those are the two rules."As Abdul and his lawyer went into court, the veterans stood in the corridor outside in a quiet and tense faceoff with half a dozen masked federal agents. It was the same hallway where an Afghan man, Sayed Naser, a translator who says he worked for the US military, was detained 12 June. "This individual was an important part of our Company commitment to provide the best possible service for our clients, who were the United States Military in Afghanistan," says one employment document submitted as part of Naser's asylum application and reviewed by the BBC's news partner in the US, CBS News."I have all the documents," Mr Naser told the agents as he was handcuffed and taken away, which a bystander captured on video. "I worked with the US military. Just tell them."Mr Naser has been in detention since that day, fighting for political asylum from behind bars. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told the BBC that there is nothing in his immigration records "indicating that he assisted the US government in any capacity".Whichever way Mr Naser's case is decided, his detention is what inspired veterans to form the Battle Buddies. They say abandoning their wartime allies will hurt US national security because the US will struggle to recruit allies in the future."It's short sighted to think we can do this and not lose our credibility," said Monique Labarre, a US Army veteran who showed up for Abdul's hearing. "These people are vetted. They put themselves at substantial risk by supporting the US government." President Trump has repeatedly blamed President Biden for a "disgraceful" and "humiliating" retreat from the the US's withdrawal from Afghanistan was initially brokered by President Trump during his first term. In their wake, American troops left behind a power vacuum that was swiftly and easily filled by the Taliban, who took control of the capital city, Kabul, in August 2021. Afghans, many who worked with the US military and NGOs, frantically swarmed the airport, desperate to get on flights along with thousands of US the ensuing years, almost 200,000 Afghans would relocate to the US - some under special programmes designed for those most at risk of Taliban retribution. The Trump administration has since ended this programme, called Operation Enduring Welcome. It also ended the temporary protections which shielded some Afghans, as well as asylum seekers from several other countries, from deportation because of security concerns back home."Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilising economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about terminating Temporary Protected Status for added that some Afghans brought in under these programmes "have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security".Afghans in the United States scoff at the suggestion that they'd be safe going back, saying their lives would be in danger."I couldn't work," said Sofia, an Afghan woman living in Virginia. "My daughters couldn't go to school."With the removal of temporary protected status, the Trump administration could deport people back to Afghanistan. Although that is so far rare, some Afghans have already begun to be deported to third countries, including Panama and Costa and other members of her family were among the thousands of Afghans who received emails in April from the Department of Homeland Security saying: "It is time for you to leave the United States." The email, which was sent to people with a variety of different kinds of visas, said their parole would expire in 7 panicked. Where would she go? She did not leave the United States, and her asylum case is still pending. But the letter sent shockwaves of fear throughout the Afghan asked about protecting Afghan wartime allies on 30 July, President Trump said: "We know the good ones and we know the ones that maybe aren't so good, you know some came over that aren't so good. And we're going to take care of those people – the ones that did a job." Advocates have urged the Trump administration to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led are hopeful that Naser will soon be released. They say he passed a "credible fear" screening while in detention, which can allow him to pursue political asylum because he fears persecution or torture if returned to Battle Buddies say they plan to keep showing up for wartime allies at court. It's not clear if their presence made a difference at Abdul's hearing – but he wasn't detained and is now a step closer to the political asylum he says he was promised."It's a relief," he said outside court while thanking the US veterans for standing with him. But he said he still fears being detained by ICE, and he worries that the US values he believed in, and was tortured for, might be eroded."In Afghanistan, we were scared of the Taliban," he said. "We have the same feeling here from ICE detention."

Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains

The Guardian

time8 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains

One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.

Israel revokes visas for some Australian diplomats
Israel revokes visas for some Australian diplomats

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Israel revokes visas for some Australian diplomats

TEL AVIV/SYDNEY, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Israel's foreign minister said on Monday he had revoked the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority, following a decision by Canberra to recognise a Palestinian state and cancel an Israeli lawmaker's visa. The Australian government said it had cancelled the visa of a lawmaker from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition who has advocated against Palestinian statehood and called for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Australia's ambassador to Israel had been informed that the visas of representatives to the Palestinian Authority had been revoked. Like many countries, Australia maintains an embassy to Israel in Tel Aviv and a representative office to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank city of Ramallah. "I also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel," Saar wrote on X, describing Australia's refusal to grant visas to some Israelis as "unjustifiable". Australia's government did not immediately comment. The Palestinian foreign ministry issued a statement condemning Israel's decision as illegal and "in violation of international law. Australia is set to recognise a Palestinian state next month, a move it says it hopes will contribute to international momentum towards a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages held by Palestinian militants in Gaza. Simcha Rothman, a parliamentarian from the Religious Zionism party led by far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, had been scheduled to visit Australia this month at the invitation of a conservative Jewish organisation. Rothman said he was told his visa had been cancelled over remarks the Australian government considered controversial and inflammatory, including his assertion that Palestinian statehood would lead to the destruction of the state of Israel and his call for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank. "Nothing that I said personally has not been said over and over again by the vast majority of the public in Israel and the Government of Israel," Rothman told Reuters by phone. Rothman said he had been informed that his views would cause unrest among Australian Muslims. Asked about Canberra's decision on Palestinian statehood, Rothman said that would be a "grave mistake and a huge reward for Hamas and for terror". Australia's Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke said in an emailed statement that the government takes a hard line on those who seek to spread division in Australia, and that anyone coming to promote a message of hate and division was not welcome. "Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe," he said. The Home Affairs Ministry declined further comment. Rothman had been invited by the Australian Jewish Association to meet members of the Jewish community and show solidarity in the face of "a wave of antisemitism," AJA Chief Executive Robert Gregory said. In June, Australia and four other countries imposed sanctions on Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir over accusations of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store