Justin Bieber Impersonator Removed from Vegas Nightclub
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
FOX News Radio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fox News Hosts' Texts Revealed in Lawsuit—5 Bombshells
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Newly unredacted filings in the $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit brought by voting technology company Smartmatic against Fox News have revealed private messages sent by Fox personalities and executives in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election. The communications, disclosed through court filings, shed light on how some of the network's most prominent figures discussed the fraud claims they later covered on air. Fox News has consistently denied Smartmatic's allegations. In court filings and public statements, the network has argued that it was reporting on "newsworthy" statements made by the president and his lawyers, not endorsing them. Why It Matters The newly disclosed text messages go to the heart of Smartmatic's defamation case against Fox News, highlighting a disconnect between the private doubts of network hosts and the on-air amplification of election fraud claims. For Smartmatic, the contrast supports its argument that Fox acted with "actual malice" by prioritizing ratings and audience retention over verified reporting. For Fox, the lawsuit tests its defense that covering statements from a sitting president and his lawyers was protected, newsworthy journalism. The case follows Fox's earlier $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023, which also centered on the network's coverage of election fraud claims. Unlike Dominion, Smartmatic operates primarily outside the United States, but the company alleges that Fox's broadcasts caused significant reputational and financial harm. The outcome could have broad implications for how courts weigh press freedom against accountability for misinformation in high-stakes political coverage. What the Texts Showed Fox News host Jesse Watters appears on air during the Fox News Special prior to President Trump's Joint Address to Congress. Waters was broadcasting from Fox News' D.C. Bureau on March 4, 2025 in Washington,... Fox News host Jesse Watters appears on air during the Fox News Special prior to President Trump's Joint Address to Congress. Waters was broadcasting from Fox News' D.C. Bureau on March 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. MoreJesse Watters on Ratings and "Stop the Steal" One of the most widely cited revelations concerns Fox News host Jesse Watters. On December 5, 2020, Watters allegedly texted colleague Greg Gutfeld: "Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL." The comment, included in Smartmatic's filings, appears to suggest Watters was weighing the ratings implications of amplifying election fraud narratives. According to The Washington Post, Watters later testified under oath that he had seen "no evidence that Smartmatic Technology switched votes in the 2020 Election in the United States." In another November 2020 exchange with producer Megan Albano, Watters described "an audience uprising vs. Fox like I've never seen" after the network's decision to call Arizona for Joe Biden. In separate texts to colleagues, he referred to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell as having "lost it" and being "radioactive now" because "[w]hat she is peddling is out there." The now-U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro holds a press conference at the Patrick Henry Building on August 12, 2025 in Washington. The now-U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro holds a press conference at the Patrick Henry Building on August 12, 2025 in Pirro Texts About 'Helping Trump' Smartmatic's filings also reference messages from other Fox figures. Jeanine Pirro, then hosting Justice with Judge Jeanine, allegedly texted in November 2020 about "helping Trump while at Fox News," according to the company's motion. "I work so hard for the party across the country," Pirro texted then-Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel, according to the court filing. "I'm the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party." Bret Baier's Desire to 'Fact-Check' Bret Baier, anchor of Special Report, expressed concerns over misinformation, the court filing said. In a November 2020 text, Baier wrote Fox News Media president and executive editor Jay Wallace that "None of that is true as far as we can tell," when confronted with fraud allegations being promoted on-air. "We need to fact-check this crap." Fox News Skepticism Other hosts expressed skepticism about Powell. According to the filings, Sean Hannity referred to her assertions as "insane," while Laura Ingraham texted Hannity and Tucker Carlson that Powell was "a complete nut" and said, "no one will work with her." Maria Bartiromo shared claims from Trump's legal team about Smartmatic with Fox colleagues while acknowledging privately that the information was "not verified." Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Fox Corporation, texted an executive in November 2020 that it was "really bad" Giuliani was allowed on air with unverified claims about Smartmatic. Fox's Response In court filings and public statements, Fox has argued that it was reporting on "newsworthy" statements made by the president and his lawyers, not endorsing them. In May 2025, the Associated Press reported that a New York appeals court allowed Fox to access Smartmatic records related to a bribery case in the Philippines, which the network has argued supports its defense that Smartmatic's reputational issues predate its 2020 election coverage. What People Are Saying Fox News said in a statement: "The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on FOX News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech. Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms." Smartmatic alleges the network: "amplified false election fraud claims as a strategic response to viewer backlash" after calling Arizona for Joe Biden. What Happens Next The case, still moving through New York courts, will test the limits of defamation law as it intersects with political coverage and press freedom. No trial date has yet been set, but proceedings could extend into 2026 given the scope of evidence and pre-trial motions.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seth Meyers mourning loss of his beloved dog Frisbee
Seth Meyers is mourning the loss of his beloved dog, Frisbee. The Late Night With Seth Meyers host's Italian Greyhound has passed away at the age of 14. Sharing a series of pictures of his furry friend over the years, he captioned his Instagram tribute: 'RIP to Frisbee, our OG IG who I was happy to go grey with. 'She was at her best curled in your lap and patient when we dressed her up like a pilgrim. Thanks for 14 amazing years, girl.' Bizarrely, Frisbee was locked in a feud with former Saturday Night Live star Andy Samberg. Speaking on an episode of the Good Hang with Amy Poehler podcast, the host played a prank on Samberg by breaking the news to him that Frisbee had died, on Meyers' request. His response was: "Don't even play, 'cause I'll be so happy." After the pair giggled, Samberg continued: "I will never back off that. That dog sucks, dude." He added: "That dog is like a rat carcass." One year, Samberg "scratched out" the dog's face on a Christmas card he received from the Meyers family. He recalled on a previous episode of his late-night talk show: "Here's a true thing he [Samberg] did. "I sent our Christmas card - Frisbee's in it every year. He scratched out her face like a serial killer and mailed it back." Samberg's disliking of the mutt goes way back. Meyers insisted: "He really hates my dog and he's hated my dog since she was little and now she's 14." He previously jokingly confessed he started to "cares less" about his dog after becoming a father. The 51-year-old funnyman and his wife Alexi Ashe became parents for the first time to a son named Ashe in 2016, now aged nine, before going on to have Axel, seven, and three-year-old Adelaide. He quipped on Live! With Kelly and Ryan: "The dog was the practice child. The dog has figured out that we care less about it, I will say. We're trying very hard, but you know, when you have a kid the dog is very secondary." But the host said Frisbee hadn't given up hope on being the family's favourite, as she was still eager to give Meyers plenty of hugs. He added: "I will say sometimes to the baby, 'Hey, will you give me a hug,' and the speed in which the dog runs into my arms, before the baby can get there. She's like 'Look, I know these words too!'"
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I sold $3K in gold via wire transfer, but then the buyer got their bank to reverse the payment. What can I do?
Buyer-beware scams are in the headlines every day, but a growing number of buyers are ripping off businesses by reversing charges on their purchases. This is a seller-beware scenario. Imagine you run a precious metals store and a customer wants to buy $3,000 worth of gold via wire transfer. You verify their identity, complete the sale and hand over the gold. All by the book, right? Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Not quite. A month later, the customer calls their bank to dispute the charge, claiming they were tricked into buying the gold by a third party. The bank is convinced by the customer's story, cancels the wire transfer and withdraws money from your merchant account, leaving you without payment — and your store down $3,000 worth of gold, which is hard to trace. The same thing can happen with customers who request the reversal of electronic fund transfers (EFTs) or credit card charges. Such transactions are called 'friendly fraud" or "chargeback fraud." The customer may indeed have been the victim of a scam, or be pulling off a scam themselves. Either way, your business is left with a loss. Unfortunately, it's not an uncommon occurrence, particularly for businesses dealing in precious gems and metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. Here's what happens and how to protect your business. Banks often side with customers in cases of alleged fraud Banks typically allow chargebacks or payment reversals only under certain conditions: Unauthorized transactions. The customer claims they didn't authorize the purchase. Billing errors. The charge was duplicated, incorrect, or charged in the wrong amount. Fraudulent activity. The purchase was made under false pretenses or through deception. Failure to receive goods or services. The item was never delivered, was defective, or didn't match the description. In many cases, banks default to protecting the consumer, especially when fraud is alleged. However, with wire transfers, often considered final and irreversible, the rules are more complicated and the reversal takes more time. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Some banks will allow customers to file a complaint and launch an investigation, especially if they claim they were defrauded or coerced into making a purchase. If the bank believes the customer acted in good faith, it may choose to reverse the charge, even if the merchant did nothing wrong. That's what makes this type of situation so frustrating for business owners. What to do if your business falls victim to this scam Once a bank reverses a wire transfer, it's tough to undo. So be proactive. If a bank contacts your business about potential fraud, respond promptly. Providing proof, such as receipts, can help your case before the funds are reversed. After funds are reversed, you still have a few options: Dispute the reversal. Provide documentation showing the customer authorized the purchase and received the goods. This could include signed receipts, invoices, tracking data, or even video footage. File a police report. If the customer's story involves criminal fraud, getting law enforcement involved may help clarify who's actually at fault. Seek legal action. If the bank won't reverse its decision, the business may consider small claims court or civil litigation to recover the funds. Consult with the bank. Each bank has its own internal process. Sometimes, escalating the issue to a higher level of review can change the outcome. To avoid issues in the future, consider implementing more advanced due diligence processes for high-dollar sales — especially for gems and precious metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. You can leverage technology in your business's fight against friendly fraud. A number of companies offer AI-based fraud prevention software, including Signifyd — designed to protect online retailers — and Arctic Intelligence. Arctic Intelligence advises training staff to identify questionable purchases. They should ask for proof of the source of funds for any big transaction, particularly with a new client, and report suspected money laundering to law enforcement. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
