Coal mine stalled in 'groundbreaking' climate decision
A community environment group from the NSW Hunter region successfully challenged an Independent Planning Commission decision to allow the expansion of the Mount Pleasant open-cut mine, near Muswellbrook.
Operator MACH Energy applied to deepen the mine and double its output, extending its life for 22 years to enable the extraction of an additional 406 megatonnes of coal.
The commission consented to the expansion in September 2022 and a judicial review brought by the community group was dismissed by the Land and Environment Court two years later.
Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group took its fight to the Court of Appeal, arguing the environment court had erred and the commission failed to consider the likely climate effects in the region.
The Court of Appeal on Thursday found the commission had accepted the project's emissions would contribute to global climate change, but there was nothing in its reasons to indicate it had considered the local impacts.
The commission's consent referred to Australia's obligations under the Paris Agreement, noting that the mine's emissions would be "accounted for" in the countries where the coal was burnt.
"The commission's obligation to consider the likely impacts of the development on the natural and built environment in the locality of the mine ... required it to address the potentially adverse effects of climate change in the locality," the judgment said.
"This obligation could not be discharged by general references to the effects of global warming on the planet generally."
Environmental lawyer Elaine Johnson, the director of the firm that represented the community group, said the court's decision was groundbreaking.
"The NSW Court of Appeal has just confirmed that the local impacts of climate change on communities are a direct consequence of continued fossil fuel production in NSW," Ms Johnson said in a statement.
"From today, climate harm must be specifically considered when deciding proposals for fossil fuel expansions."
NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson also said it was a significant legal breakthrough.
"With this decision, the government must now reckon with the fact that they have a responsibility to the whole planet when it comes to allowing more coal to be dug up and burnt," Ms Higginson said.
"The status quo of setting emissions reduction targets domestically and then exporting the climate crisis is now broken with this decision."
The case will be returned to the Land and Environment Court to consider and MACH Energy was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
The company was contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why Barnaby's war on net zero's already sunk
The abiding image of the first day of the new parliament will not be the horde of new Labor MPs spilling into the depleted opposition benches, nor of Sussan Ley asking her first question as the first female Liberal leader. It will be of a Barnaby Joyce sideshow in a parliamentary corridor in which he announced he would introduce a private member's bill to dump Australia's goal to reach net zero by 2050. Joyce and his former political foe Michael McCormack had apparently arrived in Canberra having cooked up a plan to carve up the spoils of the Coalition's comprehensive election loss. 'This is a hell of crowd,' Joyce chirped as he lobbed up to the press pack he had gathered. He gave three main reasons for dumping the target, all of which are wrong. First, he said, net zero and the deployment of renewable energy infrastructure are to blame for the rise in Australia's electricity prices over recent years. Nonsense, says Tony Wood, energy and climate change senior fellow at the Grattan Institute. Energy prices surged in the first years of the 2020s because Australia's clapped-out fleet of coal-fired power stations kept on failing, Wood explains. In central Queensland, a unit of the Callide power station blew up in May 2021, causing an immediate loss of power to half a million people and prolonged shortages across the east coast. In June, flooding in the Latrobe Valley saw power production cut at the Yallourn power station, causing more long-term east coast shortages. The nearby Hazelwood plant had closed a few years earlier after a fire. Across the grid, the operators of coal power stations stepped up their maintenance schedules, decreasing supply and increasing cost. With coal-generated electricity scarce, gas was tapped as a replacement at prices driven up by a global shortage caused by Putin's invasion of Ukraine, in turn inflating household electricity bills. Australia is in the process of replacing these coal plants with renewables – backed by gas, hydro and batteries – not just to reach net zero, but because wind and solar power are now far cheaper than coal power. Second, Joyce says most of the world has abandoned the effort to reach net zero under the Paris Agreement, citing as examples countries including China, Brazil, Indonesia and the United States. Nonsense, says Tim Buckley, director of Climate Energy Finance. China's staggering deployment of renewable energy continues to shock analysts around the world, Buckley says.
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
Why Barnaby's war on net zero's already sunk
The abiding image of the first day of the new parliament will not be the horde of new Labor MPs spilling into the depleted opposition benches, nor of Sussan Ley asking her first question as the first female Liberal leader. It will be of a Barnaby Joyce sideshow in a parliamentary corridor in which he announced he would introduce a private member's bill to dump Australia's goal to reach net zero by 2050. Joyce and his former political foe Michael McCormack had apparently arrived in Canberra having cooked up a plan to carve up the spoils of the Coalition's comprehensive election loss. 'This is a hell of crowd,' Joyce chirped as he lobbed up to the press pack he had gathered. He gave three main reasons for dumping the target, all of which are wrong. First, he said, net zero and the deployment of renewable energy infrastructure are to blame for the rise in Australia's electricity prices over recent years. Nonsense, says Tony Wood, energy and climate change senior fellow at the Grattan Institute. Energy prices surged in the first years of the 2020s because Australia's clapped-out fleet of coal-fired power stations kept on failing, Wood explains. In central Queensland, a unit of the Callide power station blew up in May 2021, causing an immediate loss of power to half a million people and prolonged shortages across the east coast. In June, flooding in the Latrobe Valley saw power production cut at the Yallourn power station, causing more long-term east coast shortages. The nearby Hazelwood plant had closed a few years earlier after a fire. Across the grid, the operators of coal power stations stepped up their maintenance schedules, decreasing supply and increasing cost. With coal-generated electricity scarce, gas was tapped as a replacement at prices driven up by a global shortage caused by Putin's invasion of Ukraine, in turn inflating household electricity bills. Australia is in the process of replacing these coal plants with renewables – backed by gas, hydro and batteries – not just to reach net zero, but because wind and solar power are now far cheaper than coal power. Second, Joyce says most of the world has abandoned the effort to reach net zero under the Paris Agreement, citing as examples countries including China, Brazil, Indonesia and the United States. Nonsense, says Tim Buckley, director of Climate Energy Finance. China's staggering deployment of renewable energy continues to shock analysts around the world, Buckley says.
The Age
3 days ago
- The Age
Australia faces ‘inescapable' legal risk after historic climate ruling
Countries besieged by the effects of climate change can legally pursue their neighbours for reparations if they fail to uphold their obligations to curb global emissions, in a ruling that could have far-reaching implications for fossil fuel-exporting nations such as Australia. The International Court of Justice handed down the historic advisory ruling, paving the way for massive compensation claims in a case brought by a group of law students from Vanuatu. In a case that drew unprecedented international involvement, including from 96 states and 11 international organisations, The Hague-based court's advisory opinion found countries were bound to uphold international treaties such as the Paris Agreement, a commitment to prevent global temperatures from rising 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. 'Failure of a State to take appropriate action to protect the climate system from greenhouse gas emissions – including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel consumption, the granting of fossil fuel exploration licences or the provision of fossil fuel subsidies – may constitute an internationally wrongful act which is attributable to that State,' the ruling said. Any breach of its obligations meant the country could be liable to pay 'full reparation to injured States in the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction'. The Australian government was among several countries that argued that complying with climate treaties such as the Paris Agreement was all that international law required and there were no relevant obligations when it came to fossil fuel exports. The court found 'the argument according to which the climate change treaties constitute the only relevant applicable law cannot be upheld'. Relevant international laws included a 'customary duty to prevent significant harm to the environment and the duty to co-operate for the protection of the environment, and international human rights law'. Australian Conservation Foundation general counsel Adam Beeson said this meant the Australian government would need to properly assess the consequences of exporting fossil fuels.
