logo
EU plots tax on British tourists to pay off Covid debts

EU plots tax on British tourists to pay off Covid debts

Telegraph5 hours ago

The EU is 'plotting' to increase fees on British tourists entering the bloc to help Brussels pay off its Covid lockdown debts.
Officials are considering hitting non-EU travellers with an increased levy to help reduce the €350 billion common debt accrued by pandemic-era shutdowns.
British holidaymakers are already set to pay a £5.98 fee when the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) comes into force in autumn next year.
That €7 sum, which was first agreed in 2018, could now be further increased to boost tax revenues, diplomatic sources have revealed.
The increased charge could cause tensions with London and some 60 other countries with visa-free travel agreements with the EU – including the US.
However, influential Germany is opposed to the fee increase, arguing that it will discourage travel to the European continent.
The EU move also comes after Sir Keir Starmer was accused of making a series of 'surrenders' to Brussels, including a controversial fishing deal that would allow European fishermen to raid British waters until 2038.
A European Commission spokesman told Politico that 'a possible adjustment of the fee' was being considered.
'It seems that there is a possibility of a gradual increase of the fee, strengthening the long-term revenue potential,' the Polish rotating Council presidency of the EU wrote in an internal note.
The more expensive fee is gaining traction in talks ahead of the European Commission formal budget proposal, which is expected on July 16.
Supporters of the idea argue that the EU's €7 fee is far cheaper than the UK and US equivalent charges. The UK charges £16 for its Electronic Travel Authorisation, while the US levies £15.61 under its ESTA system.
British travellers faced long queues at passport control after Brexit, but Sir Keir claimed his reset deal with Brussels would make travel to Europe easier by enabling UK tourists to use e-gates again.
Mark Francois, the chairman of the European Research Group of Tory Brexiteers, said: 'This just adds insult to injury over the Government's so-called Brexit reset.
'Not only has it become apparent that promises of British tourists being fast-tracked through e-gates in EU countries were largely illusory, even when they do get through immigration, they will now pay extra for the privilege.
'This increasing tourist tax is another example of what a dangerous PR sham the fish surrendering, rule-taking 'reset' actually is.'
The European Commission estimates that up to 50 million travellers will pay the charge in 2027.
The fee only needs to be paid once for the lifetime of each ETIAS approval, which lasts for three years and grants short-term stays in the bloc's Schengen area of passport-free movement.
Politico reported the revenue from the increased charge would be less than €1 billion a year. The EU faces annual debt repayments of up to €30 billion from 2028 to pay off its joint coronavirus debt.
ETIAS was originally meant to come into force in 2022, but has been repeatedly delayed after technical issues.
One complication is the need for the system to interconnect with a new entry/exit system due in October this year.
That digital border system will replace the wet-stamping of passports with electronic registration and will collect fingerprints and facial images.
In January, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, said British tourists would have to pay more to visit the Louvre to help fund a dedicated room for the Mona Lisa and a 'grand new entrance' to the world's most visited museum.
The current entry fee is €22 (£18.45), but Mr Macron said that non-EU visitors, including British tourists, would face a higher fee from Jan 1 next year to pay for the renovation to an attraction visited by almost nine million people last year.
Speaking in front of the Mona Lisa, he insisted that the overhaul, estimated to cost up to £671 million, would not cost the French taxpayer ' a single centime '.
After the announcement, Bruges, Madrid, Amsterdam and Berlin ruled out introducing their own ' Brexit tourist tax ' on UK citizens.
But in cities such as Barcelona there has been a backlash against Airbnb, with residents blaming short-term holiday rentals for pricing them out of affordable accommodation and creating a housing crisis.
Venice has introduced a €5 charge in an effort to reduce overcrowding and improve the quality of life for residents swamped by tourist numbers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Pernod Ricard launches restructuring plan as spirits sales slide
Exclusive: Pernod Ricard launches restructuring plan as spirits sales slide

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: Pernod Ricard launches restructuring plan as spirits sales slide

PARIS/LONDON, June 18 (Reuters) - Pernod Ricard ( opens new tab is streamlining its business by grouping brands into two main divisions, according to internal presentation slides seen by Reuters on Wednesday, as European spirits makers grapple with a downturn in sales. The French spirits maker told Reuters it had announced an "internal project to create a more agile and simplified organisation". "These changes imply the launch of local consultation processes with our social partners and employees where necessary," Pernod Ricard said. It did not comment on the number of jobs affected or the plan to group brands into two units.

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says
UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

The Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

Britain's benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs. Kendall published her welfare reform bill on Wednesday, confirming it would lead to benefit cuts for 950,000 people by 2030. She said the country's £326bn social security net might cease to exist if costs continued to escalate. The bill includes several concessions designed to win over fractious Labour MPs as ministers look to ward off the biggest rebellion of Keir Starmer's premiership. But the efforts were met with hostility by many in the party, who said they still intended to vote against the bill next month. Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth.' The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers' support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition. The cuts are at the heart of an overall package of nearly £5bn in welfare savings which ministers argue are necessary to protect the financial sustainability of the benefits system. Kendall has tried to dispel widespread anger in the Labour party over the plans by introducing new concessions. Under the terms of the bill, people losing their disability benefits will get additional financial support for 13 weeks, while those with severe conditions such as heart disease or spinal injuries will not have to face reassessments. The work and pensions secretary has set out a separate £1bn plan to help unemployed people get back to work, but this is not related to Pips, which are unconnected to employment status. Whips are also issuing threats, and the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, refused on Wednesday to rule out the possibility of suspending any Labour rebels when the bill is put to a vote next month. The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published. Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, said: 'Having read the bill, it is clear that disabled people will lose significant support. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'The explanatory notes set out that 800,000 will not receive the daily living component of Pip by 2029/2030 and 150,000 will also lose their carers allowance. Poverty will be the legacy of this bill.' Andy McDonald, the MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said the bill was 'a huge attack on the incomes of disabled people'. 'MPs are being expected to vote these through whilst the green paper consultation continues, before the Pip assessment review is conducted, and without any evidence the separate employment support package – which is not in this bill – will work. 'This bill will be a yes or no on impoverishing disabled people. It's a no from me.' Those feelings were echoed by disability campaign groups and charities. James Taylor, the director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope said: 'This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people. Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from Pip. 'It will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.'

Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'
Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'

The future of the Notting Hill Carnival could be in doubt without "urgent funding" from the government, its organisers said in a letter leaked to the chair Ian Comfort has written to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to request the funding, which he said was "essential to safeguarding the future and public safety of this iconic event".It follows a review of the festival, which attracts about two million people over the August Bank Holiday weekend, that identified "critical public safety concerns" that needed additional funding to address, the letter Met Police's Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist previously raised concerns of a "mass casualty event" due to crowd density. Funding 'essential' The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has been contacted for a independent safety review was commissioned by the carnival's organisers and paid for at a cost of £100,000 by the Greater London Authority (GLA), Kensington and Chelsea Council and Westminster the leaked letter, Mr Comfort said: "The April 2025 London Assembly report highlights the increasing strain placed on the Metropolitan Police during large-scale public events. "Limited resourcing has restricted the police service's ability to respond to growing operational pressures."The carnival chair said that increased investment in stewarding and crowd management was "now essential to allow the police to focus on their primary role of crime prevention and public protection".Mr Comfort added that a failure to secure "immediate" additional funding "risks compromising public safety and jeopardising the future of the carnival".He did not put a number on the level of funding safety review's full findings and recommendations have not been made public. Mr Comfort said that while the GLA and the two councils had provided "substantial support" for stewarding during past festivals, they could no longer "meet the growing operational requirements identified in the review".The government has supported Carnival through bodies such as Arts Council it is understood that if the organisers' request is granted, it would mark the first time direct government funding has been provided. Mr Comfort added: "A co-ordinated, well-resourced safety approach is essential to protect attendees and meet the operational demands of this major national event." As part of its policing operation for the 2024 carnival, the Met had about 7,000 officers on duty, drawn from local policing teams as well as specialist units, with a total of around 14,000 officer shifts across the whole evidence to the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee in September, Mr Twist said: "While we acknowledge that crime often gets the headlines, the thing that worries me most is the crowd density and the potential for a mass casualty event."The committee's report - separate to the safety review commissioned by Carnival organisers - found that while the force was being put under increasing strain by Carnival, "this has not been matched with an increase in funding from the government".Speaking in April at the report's publication, committee chair Susan Hall said: "It is absolutely essential that the Met is on hand to carry out its duties, and not fill in for a lack of stewarding from the organisers."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store