
Nostalgia in Singapore: Why do we always long for the past and what does that say about us?
When Isetan announced it would close its Tampines Mall outlet in November 2025 after almost three decades in operation, it wasn't just a regular business winding up. It signalled to me the death of the Singaporean shopping mall template I have a love-hate relationship with, where a department store is the anchor tenant.
This wasn't the only change in the past few years to the Singapore I grew up with. Each loss was made more pronounced against the post-pandemic landscape, where practically nothing was familiar anymore.
Several longtime or heritage businesses shuttered too, with a string of notable closures in expatriate enclave Holland Village, like the 80-year institution Thambi magazine store, party shop Khiam Teck and furniture business Lim's Holland Village.
Then there was the slow death of cinemagoing, once a classic Singaporean pastime. Filmgarde Cineplexes exited the market in March after 18 years, while Cathay's operator mm2 Asia in the same month continued its slew of closures, shutting down its sixth theatre in three years.
No matter the change, public reactions, perhaps predictably, centred around nostalgia. But this prevailing sentiment isn't mere romanticism of the past.
I've found it masks deeper, unspoken anxieties about our shifting identity. Do we miss the physical entity that's vanishing, or do we really miss the time and people we used to be that it represents?
Plus, what does it even mean to be Singaporean?
OUR NATIONAL IDENTITY
Some might say that it's our penchant for 'chope-ing' (reserving) seats at hawker centres with tissue packets. Others might highlight our world class airport and Singlish – two hallmarks of Singaporean efficiency.
There's also our multiculturalism, 'kiasu' mentality (being afraid to lose), cookie-cutter shopping malls, grouchy taxi uncles, standardised Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats, and a peculiar belief that our food is better than Malaysia's.
The way I see it, however, the crux of our national identity is less about these tangible anchors than our existential need for them.
This desire is most evident in nostalgia – increasingly common and inevitable in a country where change and progress are synonyms.
As a millennial digital native, I recognise that social media makes nostalgia more contagious too, creating an algorithm-aggravated collective pining for a past we never knew.
It's captured in one popular Facebook group, for starters: Heritage SG Memories. Pictures of Wisma Atria's iconic giant aquarium, for example, tend to see many members reminiscing about the days it was the standard meeting spot.
The aquarium, demolished in 2008, only featured occasionally as a gathering point in my memory – but I can't be certain. Like plenty on social media, nostalgia also gets reduced to the most relatable anecdote, and I end up inheriting and remembering experiences I didn't quite live through.
And this cultural yearning is only likely to increase, with rapid urban evolution the norm in a land scarce nation.
Hobbyist photographer Jonathan Tan noticed a similar sentiment when he started Lepak Downstairs – a photo series of old-school stools and tables found at HDB void decks.
Some people told him they appreciated his effort to 'capture history in photos', the 36-year-old said. Without such quaint designs anymore, newer Build-to-Order (BTO) flats 'don't have character'.
'I think people get emotional when these things disappear because there isn't really a replacement. It feels like the disappearance isn't justified. You're taking a piece of their childhood … their memories away, but there's nothing put in place for it,' he added.
THE 'TENSION' IN NOSTALGIA
So, it seems to many that being Singaporean – or at least having a sense of belonging to this country – lies in constantly navigating the gap between preservation and progress.
It's a process often steeped in nostalgia.
The creator behind the Instagram account @hdb_mrt, whose film photos reflect a familiar overtone of longing, said he started the account almost a decade ago partly because he was 'searching for this idea of home'.
Syafiq, who requested to only use his first name, said he didn't just want to capture the older parts of Singapore that may soon disappear, but to 'remember what we have now and to contemplate what it means to live in this country, to live as Singaporeans, to experience the world as we do'.
'Within that is also a sense of nostalgia,' the 36-year-old said. 'Because the search for home is nostalgic in nature.'
To him, nostalgia is a 'longing for a place, time, event or feeling that we cannot go back to'. It's an emotion that 'only exists when we have loss' and has to do with 'how things have changed so much so quickly within our lifetime', such as realising our childhood neighbourhoods are no longer the same.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Suburban Singapore (@hdb_mrt)
Heritage educator and millennial Ho Yong Min has similarly observed that his generation is starting to wonder: 'Are the places that I'm growing up in starting to be lost?'
The 'trade-offs' create a 'tension in our hearts', believes the 41-year-old founder of The Urbanist Singapore, a content platform dedicated to heritage storytelling amid urban design.
'In Singapore where every square metre is optimised, it tightens the sense of how spaces are so precious. I think it becomes psychological angst for folks who are growing up and witnessing change, (knowing) that obviously has to be balanced out with the need for change. So it's very complex.'
There is 'a bit of a paradox' to negotiate living in Singapore, added Dr Felicity Chan from the Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities at the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD).
'To enjoy Singapore, you must be very adaptable to change, but we also know that people like stability,' said the deputy director for the Master of Science in Urban Science, Policy and Planning.
Perhaps then, as Syafiq suggested, our nostalgia is also an 'inability to be satisfied with what we have now' and a 'reckoning of the present'. His photography, although it may resemble vignettes of a simpler Singapore, thus compels viewers to reflect on what it means to 'be in the now'.
HOW WE CAN EMBRACE NOSTALGIA'S INFLUENCE
Some may argue the cure for nostalgia is not to get overly attached to anything – a neighbourhood shop, a local business, a daily path you take to work – in the first place.
SUTD's Dr Chan noted that it has become "quintessential Singaporean to rationalise and not hold onto things too tightly".
"We've learnt to accept that one cannot expect things to stay the same way for a long time … And because things change so quickly, you don't even realise that you haven't had enough time to develop the depth of emotions before (a place) is gone.'
Yet, forming attachment is only human nature. To deny ourselves that experience in exchange for an easier time letting go in future isn't pragmatism, just cynicism.
And despite our best efforts, nostalgia resurfaces time and again. Even youth may start experiencing nostalgia at a much younger age too, being exposed to increasing online content about urban change in Singapore.
As a full-time educator, Syafiq said his students, most in their mid-teens, aren't often 'given credit' for the nostalgic feelings they have for their childhood. But he believes this nostalgia will inadvertently mould their Singaporean identity as they grow up.
Seeing nostalgia as integral to nation-building may hence better reveal what anchors our sense of belonging from an earlier age.
After all, as Dr Chan observed, the search for identity among youths is a lot more "acute" than in someone older, when there is more identity "stability".
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Yong | The Urbanist Singapore (@urbanist.singapore)
With physical symbols of heritage, Ho from The Urbanist Singapore believes it's important to take a 'more nuanced view' to get people thinking about what heritage means to them. He focuses on how to respect and pay homage to our heritage rather than the 'total loss' whenever a building or business disappears.
'Because heritage actually comes from the word 'inheritance'. It's something that we can steward from generation to generation,' he said.
'So while there is a feeling of loss, there's also a recognition that there are government agencies like HDB and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) that do what they can to try to infuse heritage and history into urban planning or a new estate that's being developed.
'The question isn't whether to develop, but how to integrate memory into progress. I feel that is the more constructive way forward – and obviously the 'how' to integrate is important. It should not be something cursory.'
Ultimately, things don't have to last forever to leave a mark, even if that runs counter to the Singaporean instinct for stability.
While knowing this may not dull the weight of our perennial nostalgia, it just means nostalgia is as baked into our DNA as a desire for economic progress. For in a country where change is the only constant, loss is too.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
9 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Should I stay in my government job, or should I look for a new one?
SINGAPORE: A young Singaporean sought career advice online, writing that they've been working in a government role for the past three years but now wonder if it's time to move on to the next job. In a post on r/askSingapore on Thursday (June 5), u/chicky-mcnuggys wrote that they're now 26 years old and have been at the job since graduating. 'First ranking was ungraded, second and latest grades were C+. My ex-boss, with whom I had good relations, was pushing for me to get a B and had given me multiple stretch assignments, but someone else instead got the B because she was 'due' for promotion. Before my ex-boss left, she gave me additional assignments to justify a better grade for the next ranking, and I've completed them, with good reviews from Senior Management,' the post author wrote. They added that they hoped to get a rating of B in the next two years, which would qualify them for a promotion. See also How businesses can leverage their perks via skill swapping The problem appears to be their new boss, who seems less than generous with rankings. 'Let's just say that hope is out the window because s/he had no good feedback at all for me,' they wrote. While their supervisor disagrees with the feedback the new boss gave, in the end, what the boss says carries the most weight. This is causing the post author to worry that the next time they could be promoted would be in three or four years, and by then, they will be between 29 and 30 years old. 'Which is quite slow, no?… Is this normal, or should I just look elsewhere?' they asked, adding that they're due for rotation soon, which means they'll need to start again in a new division. 'I feel like I'm putting in 101% effort, but it sucks knowing it goes unacknowledged especially since I had to do way more than I'm expected to (since I was given stretch assignments),' they added, asking for advice as to whether or not they should keep their job, given the current job market. Commenters were sympathetic toward the post author, with many becoming upset on their behalf over someone else being due for promotion getting the 'B' rating instead of the post author. One advised them to manage their expectation about promotions. 'Title promotion can be fast, like with a senior/lead tagged to your current title. Usually comes with a little pay bump. Grade promotion is the one that takes longer. This one got a considerable bump in pay and usually takes three to four years from starting the position…unless you are chosen by heaven.' 'I always say, want to climb fast and high, go private sector to chiong, but also risk getting sacked for no reason. Gov't is slow and steady (unless you're a scholar) but (confirmed) will have a job through hell and back,' opined another. Others reassured her that for their age, their career progression is normal and that they shouldn't worry about it too much. See also Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 'Gov't job good. Think thrice and understand private sector risks. Have a good financial plan for your career before any move,' urged a Reddit user. /TISG Read also: 'Just get your foot in the door,' Singaporeans tell new grad who's worried their starting salary isn't so high


CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
Surge in number of enquiries about Vehicle Entry Permit applications
Firms helping with Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) applications are seeing 10 times more enquiries from Singapore drivers since Jun 4. Malaysia had announced then that enforcement action on foreign vehicles entering without activated VEP tags will begin on Jul 1. The firms say they are prepared to put in the extra hours to handle the surge. Claudia Lim with more.


CNA
12 hours ago
- CNA
About 300 employees laid off by China-linked Singapore firm facing US sanctions over Iranian oil shipments
SINGAPORE: A China-linked, Singapore-based firm has laid off hundreds of employees and is going into liquidation after it was slapped with sanctions by the United States last month. CCIC Singapore was among 15 companies blacklisted by the US on May 13 for helping to conceal the origins of Iranian oil being shipped to China. The cargo inspection firm is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Certification & Inspection Group (CCIC), a Chinese state-owned enterprise headquartered in Beijing. Speaking to CNA on Friday (Jun 6), three affected employees said that staff across all departments of CCIC Singapore were notified of their retrenchments on May 30, and the terminations took effect the next day. Two of the employees said CCIC Singapore has over 400 workers in Singapore and Malaysia, with the majority based in Singapore. A third employee said the firm has more than 300 workers in Singapore alone. The employees, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the company had delayed the payment of salaries owed for May. Retrenchment notices attributed this to the firm's "pending liquidation". They also took issue with the severance pay of two weeks' salary for every year of service completed, especially for surveyors who rely on overtime pay and allowances to supplement their basic salaries. Junior surveyors earn less than S$1,000 in basic salary a month, while more senior surveyors may earn between S$1,000 and S$1,500, two of the employees said. According to the employees, CCIC Singapore is not unionised. Individual workers have reached out to the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) for assistance. CNA has contacted CCIC Singapore, its parent company CCIC, the Ministry of Trade and Industry and NTUC for comment. US SANCTIONS CCIC Singapore was set up in 1989 and has its registered address at Singapore Science Park. Its customers include Shell, BP, Total, Exxon Mobil and major Chinese petrochemical corporations, according to CCIC's website. Parent company CCIC was established in 1980 and is part of China's State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council. The US blacklisted CCIC Singapore for helping to obscure the origins of Iranian oil, which is typically done through numerous ship-to-ship transfers, oil blending and false documentation. Sepehr Energy, which is a front company of Iran's military, "consistently relied" on CCIC Singapore for cargo inspections of oil being delivered to China, according to the US Treasury Department. In 2024, CCIC Singapore provided inspection services during a ship-to-ship transfer of about 2 million barrels of Iranian oil from a sanctioned vessel. That same year, the firm also "likely provided" falsified documents to conceal the identity of another sanctioned vessel and certify its cargo of Iranian oil as Malaysian crude. According to the US Treasury Department, Iran's illicit oil trade funds the development of ballistic missiles and drones as well as regional terrorist groups. The sanctions freeze all US-linked assets of the blacklisted companies and individuals. Any company that is at least half-owned by those sanctioned is also blocked from transactions engaging US businesses or the US financial system. ANGER AMONG EMPLOYEES Two of the affected employees denied knowledge of the activities for which the US sanctioned CCIC Singapore, saying that their departments were not involved. Both employees told CNA they only learnt their firm had been blacklisted when customers started cancelling job orders on May 13, citing the sanctions. The severity of the sanctions did not sink in at first, they said. Over time, their concern over the blacklisting morphed into anger at how the management was communicating with employees. They criticised the firm's "flip-flop" on the impact of the sanctions, and what they called a lack of responsibility and transparency from CCIC Singapore's managing director. "If you really treasure or appreciate ... our efforts (that) we have put into this company, I think probably he has to come and thank us, or say sorry, this type of unfortunate thing happened," said one of the employees. But there was no such expression of apology or regret, he said, adding that before Friday, the company also did not give affected employees any support for job placement or career guidance. "This is a foreign company. They act like high and mighty, they leave us in the lurch, just like that. And I'm very mad because the top man doesn't even see us, talk to us," said the employee. While the company's US-linked assets have been frozen, the employees questioned why its assets in Singapore, including property and equipment, could not be used to pay salaries and retrenchment benefits. They also questioned why the parent company was not helping to ensure that employees were paid. "When your children are in trouble, rightfully, the parents should rescue them, right? Why aren't the HQ rescuing us?" the employee asked. INTERNAL EMAILS The employees showed CNA their retrenchment notices as well as internal company emails, which mark a timeline of how the impact of the sanctions played out for employees. On May 14, CCIC Singapore employees received an email from a human resources (HR) officer acknowledging concerns over the sanctions. The email stated that the company's headquarters was "fully committed to supporting our operations" and it had engaged legal counsel to appeal against the sanctions. "In response to the situation, a new company - fully backed by our HQ - will be established within this month," stated the email. "All employees will be smoothly transferred to the new entity, and operations will continue as usual. There will be no disruption to your roles, responsibilities, or employment terms." However, a day later, employees received another email from the HR department asking them to "disregard" the email from the day before. It made reference to an "internal restructuring initiative" but continued to assure employees that they would receive their salaries and claims as usual. On May 16, heads of department were asked to identify key staff members in preparation for a downsizing exercise. They were also informed that CCIC Singapore was "not in a position" to pay retrenchment benefits as its bank accounts had been frozen. A week later, a company-wide email said that salaries would also be delayed due to the freezing of accounts, and that the firm's managing director was going to Beijing for "high-level discussions". Employees received their retrenchment notices on May 30. These notices stated that the company was going into liquidation and retrenchment benefits would only be fully paid after that process was complete, with an estimated date of Jun 30, 2026.