
Jillian Shriner, wife of Weezer bassist, pleads not guilty to two felony charges after officer involved shooting
Jillian Shriner, the wife of the bassist for rock band Weezer, is facing two felony charges after a backyard shooting involving police in Los Angeles last month.
Shriner pleaded not guilty to two felony charges, the discharge of a firearm with gross negligence and assault with a semi-automatic firearm. The charges each carry aggravating factors of great violence, great bodily harm, cruelty, viciousness or callousness, according to the criminal complaint.
Though Shriner was originally booked on suspicion of attempted murder by the police, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office did not file an attempted murder charge against Shriner.
In the state of California, attempted murder is a specific intent crime which requires an intent to kill by the defendant.
Shriner didn't have any comment after court but appeared in good spirits as she left with her team.
Shriner was involved in a confrontation with police on April 8 that resulted in her being shot by law enforcement and subsequently arrested on suspicion of attempted murder, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.
Shriner was released from custody after posting $1 million bond, according to the Associated Press.
The incident occurred in the East LA neighborhood of Eagle Rock, when officers attempting to track a suspect of an unrelated hit-and-run were in the rear yard of a residence and observed a woman in a 'neighboring residence armed with a handgun,' according to an LAPD news release. The woman was later identified as Jillian Shriner.
Videos of the incident that were edited by the LAPD were released last month.
A compilation of surveillance and body-worn camera videos, the footage showed officers peering over a large wooden fence yelling at Shriner to 'put down the gun' repeatedly, while pointing their guns over the top of the fence into her backyard. In the video, one officer screams, 'Ma'am we're trying to help you!' Another says, 'You're going to get shot; it's the police!' An officer then identifies himself as a California Highway Patrol officer.
An edited surveillance video from the LAPD that appears to be taken from Shriner's home showed the moment she is shot, though it is from a distance and the view is from behind Shriner.
In a slowed down and zoomed in clip that has no audio, she is seen lifting her gun with both hands, pointing it and then a smoke cloud appears to the right of her body. After the gunfire, Shriner calmly walks back into her home. The LAPD said she 'was struck by gunfire and fled into her residence.'
A 911 call placed by an unknown woman who was with Shriner after she was shot was also released by the LAPD. It appears from the call that both the caller and Shriner believed that one of the hit-and-run suspects was behind the fence and was the one who shot her. (One of the three suspects from the hit-and-run was detained and released but two others were never found, according to the LAPD.)
Shortly after, Shriner can be heard on the call, explaining to the dispatcher that she was shot by the hit-and-run suspect. 'I had my gun… and he said 'Put down that gun, put down that gun,' and I said 'Put down your f**king gun.' And then he shot me.'
Shriner and the unknown woman make no mention of police officers firing weapons or making commands on the 911 call.
Shriner was taken to the hospital and released after the shooting. No officers were injured.
She is next due back in court on June 18th for a preliminary hearing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homicide investigation underway in Largo; suspect in custody
LARGO, Fla. (WFLA) — The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office said a homicide investigation is underway in Largo. Deputies said they were called to Saunders Avenue around 12:35 p.m. Friday regarding an 'ongoing homicide investigation.' It is unclear how many people were killed or how they died. The sheriff's office said a suspect is in custody and there is no threat to the public. No other details were immediately available. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Road closed and man arrested after violent incident in city street
A man has been arrested following an alleged violent assault in a city street that saw another man taken to hospital. Police officers were called to Lon Camlad in Morriston, Swansea, alongside the Welsh Ambulance Service following reports of a violent confrontation on Friday night. A 35-year-old man from the area was arrested and remained in police custody on Saturday. READ MORE: Boden's glittery and 'gorgeous quality' tank top has almost £50 off READ MORE: Huge buoy breaks loose and drifts onto Welsh beach A 45-year-old man was taken to hospital with injuries that have not been deemed life-changing. Police informed the public that the road had been closed due to a police incident at around 9pm and subsequently issued an update that it had been re-opened at 1am on Saturday. A spokesman for South Wales Police said: "Officers attended Lon Camlad, Morriston, Swansea at around 7.55pm on Friday, June 6, following a report of an assault. "A 35-year-old man from Morriston has been arrested on suspicion of section 18 wounding with intent. He is currently in police custody. "A 45-year-old man was taken to hospital following the incident. His injuries are not thought to be life-changing. "A road closure was put in place during officers' attendance. The road has since reopened." Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are the Epstein files still sealed? Here's what we know
The Brief Elon Musk claimed Donald Trump is named in the Epstein files, reigniting public interest and online speculation. The FBI says it's reviewing tens of thousands of Epstein-related materials but has not confirmed any names or release dates. Only partial records have been made public, and pressure is mounting on the DOJ to release more. LOS ANGELES - After years of speculation and partial disclosures, the Epstein files have returned to the national spotlight — this time because of Elon Musk. In a social media post Thursday, Musk accused former President Donald Trump of being named in the documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose high-profile associations have fueled conspiracy theories across the political spectrum. RELATED: Musk says 'Trump is in the Epstein files' as public feud escalates Musk offered no proof, but his claim immediately reignited public interest in the long-secret files. What exactly is in the Epstein files? Why haven't they been fully released? And is there any truth to the idea that names are being protected? What we know The government has acknowledged ongoing internal reviews of Epstein-related materials, but so far, only select records have been released. The term "Epstein files" refers to thousands of documents, videos, and investigative materials gathered by federal and state authorities across multiple cases tied to Epstein and his associates. Many court documents, particularly from Epstein's 2008 Florida case and the 2019 charges in New York, have been made public, but others remain sealed or redacted. Attorney General Pam Bondi said last month that the FBI is reviewing "tens of thousands" of Epstein-related videos and documents. Bondi said materials will be released once redactions are made to protect victims and ongoing investigations. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino said in a Fox News interview that they've seen the full file and maintain Epstein died by suicide. They also said surveillance video from Epstein's cell will be released in the coming months. What we don't know Despite growing public pressure, key questions about the files — including who is named and when the material will be released — remain unanswered. No official source has confirmed that Trump appears in any Epstein-related documents. Musk did not specify which documents he was referring to or provide supporting material. The timeline for the full release of videos or unsealed documents has not been made public. The total scope of what the FBI or DOJ intends to keep classified — permanently or temporarily — remains unclear. The backstory Donald Trump built much of his political identity on promises to expose the "deep state" and reveal hidden truths — including, at times, alluding to Epstein. As president, he claimed his administration would declassify major troves of government records. While he did release over 63,000 pages tied to the JFK assassination, he has not fully followed through on releasing Epstein-related materials. The skepticism deepened after Trump's own FBI officials dismissed theories that Epstein was murdered. Patel and Bongino both asserted Epstein's death was a suicide, contradicting some of their earlier public skepticism. Online, Trump supporters and critics alike responded with frustration, asking why the administration, which has stacked agencies with loyalists, still hasn't produced answers. What they're saying "You know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was," FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox News. "I have seen the whole file," Bongino added. "He killed himself." Their comments contradicted earlier statements Bongino made as a podcast host, when he suggested the government was covering up Epstein's death. Tucker Carlson echoed that sentiment on his show: "No matter who gets elected… the Epstein videos remain secret." Newsmax host Todd Starnes posted, "They told us for months leading up to the Election that it wasn't suicide. But now they tell us it was suicide. Pardon me, but what the heck is going on at DOJ?" Even some Trump allies questioned the silence. "If it's easy, why hasn't your administration found these criminals already?" one user posted on Trump's Truth Social platform. The other side Elon Musk's accusation came amid a personal and political falling out with Trump, whom he had supported just months earlier. After Musk blasted Trump's federal spending bill as "pork-filled," Trump threatened to pull billions in government contracts from Musk's companies. Musk responded by making the explosive Epstein claim — without documentation — on X. While many saw it as retaliation, the statement pushed the Epstein issue back into public view, and with it, longstanding demands for government transparency. What's next The DOJ has said more releases are coming — including possible surveillance footage from Epstein's jail — but hasn't provided a schedule. Bondi insists the delay is due to the need to protect victims, but some right-wing influencers and Trump supporters view the delay as stonewalling. There are no public plans to unseal the full list of names connected to Epstein's case files, despite repeated calls from across the political spectrum. Until more documents are released or the DOJ directly addresses Musk's accusation, public suspicion is likely to grow. The Source This article is based on reporting from the Associated Press and statements from Elon Musk and Donald Trump on social media. Quotes from FBI Director Kash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino, and Attorney General Pam Bondi were taken from a recent Fox News interview. Additional commentary came from figures like Tucker Carlson and Todd Starnes, as well as publicly available court records and previous DOJ statements regarding the Epstein investigation.