The Harsh Truth Behind Yemen's Death Penalty And What Awaits Nimisha Priya Now?
Yemen, governed by Sharia law in Houthi-controlled Sana, employs brutal methods for capital punishment, reflecting a legal system shaped by cultural and religious norms.
Nimisha Priya, a 37-year-old nurse from Kerala, faces execution on July 16 in Yemen's Sana Central Prison for the 2017 murder of Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mahdi.
Yemen, a conflict-ridden country on the southwestern tip of the Arabian Peninsula, follows a legal system based heavily on Sharia law. One of its most severe and controversial aspects is the method of capital punishment.
In light of the Nimisha Priya's case, the brutal nature of executions in the country has come under international scrutiny. Let us examine how executions are conducted in Yemen, and what makes the process exceptionally harsh by global standards.
What Are Yemen's Execution Methods?
Yemen, governed by Sharia law in Houthi-controlled regions like Sana, employs brutal methods for capital punishment, reflecting a legal system shaped by cultural and religious norms.
Execution by Shooting: The most common method, used in 60% of 1,485 executions from 2015–2023, per a 2024 Amnesty International report, involves a firing squad in a public or prison setting. The condemned, often handcuffed and face-down, is shot in the head or heart, typically with five bullets, ensuring rapid death but causing significant distress. It is not customary to give a prisoner any special food or fulfill any special wishes before being executed by the firing squad in Yemen. The execution process in Yemen is very strict, with religious and legal procedures followed. Nimisha Priya faces this method on July 16, with reports indicating a public execution at Sana Central Prison, per a Hindu report. The public spectacle aims to deter crime but amplifies psychological trauma, as noted by human rights groups.
Stoning: Rare and used for adultery, stoning involves burying the condemned —men up to their waists, women to their chests — and pelting them with stones until death. Only 5% of executions used this method, per Amnesty, due to its logistical complexity and international criticism. It is irrelevant to Nimisha's case but highlights Yemen's punitive spectrum.
Crucifixion & Post-Execution Display: In extreme cases, executed bodies are displayed publicly, sometimes crucified, to maximise deterrence. A 2021 Sana execution of three men for child rape saw bodies hung post-shooting, per posts on social media platform X. While not confirmed for Nimisha, this practice reflects Yemen's harsh judicial ethos.
Yemen's penal code, under Article 12, mandates death for crimes like murder, drug trafficking, and apostasy. Houthi authorities, controlling Sana (Yemen's capital) since 2014, enforce these without centralised oversight, complicating appeals. Nimisha's execution by shooting aligns with murder convictions, where public visibility reinforces social order, per a 2023 Middle East Journal study.
Involvement of the Victim's Family: Qisas & Blood Money
Under Yemen's interpretation of Sharia, the concept of 'Qisas' (retribution) allows the victim's family to demand the execution of the convict. However, they also have the right to forgive the accused in exchange for 'Diyya' or blood money. This principle has come to the forefront in Nimisha Priya's case, where her mother is seeking permission to negotiate and pay the blood money to the deceased's family to save her life.
This process involves complex negotiations and legal documentation, often taking place in courts or under tribal supervision. The amount of blood money is not fixed and may vary depending on the socio-economic background of the victim's family or their willingness to pardon.
What Is Nimisha Priya's Case?
Nimisha, from Palakkad, moved to Yemen in 2008 to support her family as a nurse. In 2015, she opened a clinic with Talal Abdo Mahdi, a mandatory local partner under Yemeni law. Their relationship turned abusive, with Talal allegedly seizing her passport, forging marriage documents, and extorting funds. In 2017, Nimisha sedated Talal to retrieve her passport, but the overdose killed him.
With a colleague, Hanan, she dismembered and hid his body in a water tank, leading to her arrest. Convicted in 2018, she was sentenced to death in 2020, upheld by Yemen's Supreme Judicial Council in 2023 and approved by President Rashad al-Alimi in December 2024, per an India Today report.
Her only reprieve lies in 'diyya" (blood money), where Talal's family could pardon her for compensation. The Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council raised $1 million (Rs 8.5 crore), but negotiations stalled when Talal's family rejected the offer, citing honour, per Hindustan Times. Her mother, Prema Kumari, who is in Sana since April 2024, faces emotional collapse, having sold her Kochi home to fund legal efforts.
What Has Been India's Diplomatic Struggle?
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has engaged since 2018, but Houthi control over Sana, where India lacks diplomatic ties, limits intervention. The Supreme Court, on July 14, 2025, heard a plea from the Action Council, but Attorney General R. Venkataramani cited Yemen's sovereignty, stating, 'There's nothing much we can do," per The Hindu.
Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi for urgent action, but tribal negotiations remain the last hope, with activist Samuel Jerome leading efforts in Sana.
Nimisha Priya's case reflects the plight of India's 200,000 nurses in the Gulf, 30% of whom face exploitation, per a 2023 International Labout Organization (ILO) study.
With 18 million migrants sending $125 billion in remittances in 2024, their safety is critical to India's $3 trillion economy.
Solutions to Prevent Future Tragedies
To avert cases like Nimisha Priya's, the following measures can be followed.
Strengthen Diplomacy: India must engage tribal leaders via informal channels, as suggested by activist Samuel Jerome, to secure diyya deals.
Migrant Protections: Pre-departure training for 1 million annual migrants, per the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, can flag risks like abusive partnerships.
Legal Advocacy: Push for fair trials with translators, as Nimisha Priya's 2018 trial lacked one, per her lawyer Subhash Chandran.
tags :
Capital punishment kerala nurse yemen
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 15, 2025, 10:20 IST
News india The Harsh Truth Behind Yemen's Death Penalty And What Awaits Nimisha Priya Now?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court sets August 21 to hear case
A civil court in Chandausi on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) deferred to August 21 the ongoing Shahi Jama Masjid-Harihar temple dispute owing to the strike of the local bar association members. The matter was listed for hearing before civil judge (senior division) Aditya Singh. Also Read | Excavation of well near Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal begins The Muslim side has challenged the maintainability of the case in the Allahabad High Court, but on May 19, the High Court upheld the subordinate court's order permitting a court-monitored survey and directed the trial court to proceed with the hearing. Advocate Shri Gopal Sharma, appearing for one side, said, 'Due to the bar association strike today, the court has fixed August 21 as the next date of hearing.' Advocate Shakil Ahmad Warsi, who represents the other side, told PTI that due to the rains, the bar association was on strike due to which the matter was posted for another date. The High Court's previous stay was vacated on May 19, and the documents related to that order were submitted in the trial court. The dispute dates back to November 19 last year, when Hindu petitioners, including advocates Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain, filed a suit in the Sambhal district court claiming the mosque was built over a pre-existing temple. A court-ordered survey was conducted on the same day (November 19), followed by another on November 24. The second survey on November 24 led to significant unrest in Sambhal, resulting in the death of four persons and injuries to 29 police personnel. The police booked SP MP Ziaur Rahman Barq and mosque committee head Zafar Ali in relation to the violence besides registering an FIR against 2,750 unidentified persons.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Marriage can't be dissolved over trivial allegations': Pune family court rejects woman's claim of husband's impotency
A family court in Pune recently rejected the claim of a woman that her husband was impotent, citing a lack of evidence, and directed her to go back to his house within two months. The couple got married in 2020, and work as software engineers in Pune. 'Marriage is a sacrament and cannot be dissolved over trivial or unproven allegations. As the wife's accusations remain unsubstantiated, the husband's petition is granted,' Judge Ganesh Ghule said in his order, which was made available on the public domain on August 1. The court said that while the wife's accusation could constitute a valid reason for refusal to cohabit, it must be proven. 'Mere unsubstantiated claims cannot be accepted. The wife failed to demonstrate that her husband's conduct endangered her life or made living with him intolerable,' the judge noted in his order in June. According to the lawyers representing the husband, the woman, who is from Pune, had left her husband after accusing him of being incapable of physical relations. 'After the marriage, the couple went on a honeymoon. After returning, the woman opposed staying with in-laws. So the couple started living separately. After that, she got a job. After six months of living with her husband, she started living separately as a paying guest,' the advocate said. The woman's husband then filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking restitution of conjugal rights, arguing that his wife had abandoned him without any valid reason and should be ordered to return and resume marital cohabitation. In her written response to her husband's petition, the woman claimed that her husband had a suspicious temperament and was incapable of physical relations, stating that they had never consummated the marriage and that he suffered premature ejaculation. She had alleged that when she had asked her husband to consult a doctor, he insulted her, and his family drove her out of the house. She also noted having filed a separate petition for annulment in another court. However, the husband rejected all accusations in the court and asserted that he was fully capable and that they enjoyed a healthy sexual relationship during and after their honeymoon. The court concluded that she had abandoned her husband without sufficient cause. It further observed that because she had filed an annulment petition elsewhere, it was inappropriate to delve deeper into the husband's capacity in this proceeding. Advocate Ajinkya P Salunke, appearing for the husband, said that the family court's ruling has made it clear that the decision upholds respect for the institution of marriage. 'According to Hindu law, marriage is a sacred rite. It should not be broken over trivial reasons or unproven allegations. Both spouses are expected to make efforts to maintain their relationship. In short, this judgment transcends a private dispute and highlights the importance of trust, responsibility, and harmony in marriage,' the lawyer said. Advocate Mayur P. Salunke, also representing the husband, stated that the court reiterated that its primary aim is to reunite spouses who have separated and to guide them through counselling. 'Judicial processes should not be invoked for every minor issue or unsubstantiated ones. When one party levels serious allegations—such as questioning the husband's physical capacity—the burden of proof lies entirely on the accuser. Unsubstantiated accusations cannot withstand legal scrutiny,' Mayur P. Salunke said. Court finds inconsistencies in woman's statements The family court examined both parties' arguments and evidence. Although the wife raised serious questions about her husband's physical capacity, she produced no medical proof or expert testimony. The court found inconsistencies in her statements, claiming that the marriage was never consummated and that he suffered premature ejaculation, Advocate Ajinkya Saluke said. In family matters, decisions rest on the preponderance of probabilities rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The wife's inability to substantiate her allegations meant she had no valid reason to refuse cohabitation, Advocate Ajinkya Salunke said.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Israel intercepts Houthi missile fired from Yemen
Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for firing a missile at Israel's main airport on Tuesday (August 5, 2025), as the Israeli military said it intercepted it. The Iran-backed rebels targeted Ben Gurion airport "using a 'Palestine 2' hypersonic ballistic missile" in support of Palestinians in Gaza, their military spokesman Yahya Saree said in a video statement. The Israeli military posted on X that "a missile that was launched from Yemen was intercepted by the Israeli air force". Since the start of the war in the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023, the Houthis have repeatedly fired missiles and drones at Israel. Most of them have been intercepted but they have prompted Israeli air strikes on rebel targets in Yemen. The rebels have also attacked commercial shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden alleged to be linked to Israel, prompting several rounds of US-led air strikes.
