Man suffers gunshot wound while cycling in restricted forested area near SAF live-firing activity
SINGAPORE: A man suffered a gunshot wound on Sunday (Jun 15) while cycling in a forested area near a live-firing activity by the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).
The police said they were alerted to the incident by the National University Hospital (NUH) on Sunday at about 11.55pm.
'A bullet slug was lodged in the man's left lower back,' said the police in a news release on Monday.
'The injury is not life-threatening, and the man is currently in a stable condition, after surgery to remove the bullet slug.'
The police said the man had been cycling with his friends in a forested area of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve between Upper Seletar Reservoir and Upper Peirce Reservoir at around 11.40am on Sunday when the incident occurred. He was then taken to hospital by his friends.
'The public is not allowed to access that particular area, which has signages warning against unauthorised entry into a live-firing area," the police said.
'Preliminary investigations found that the Singapore Armed Forces was conducting a live-firing activity at Nee Soon Range during the time of the incident. The forested area where the incident took place is near the range.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: The alarming resurgence of car-ramming attacks worldwide
SINGAPORE: On May 26 in Liverpool, England, a man rammed a car into crowds celebrating Liverpool's Premier League title, injuring 109 people. The attack occurred despite restricted vehicle access and roadblocks in place, leading some experts to raise questions about whether security measures were sufficient. The attacker, believed to be on drugs, managed to tailgate an ambulance that was responding to a medical emergency at the parade. The Liverpool incident highlights the unpredictable nature of vehicle-ramming attacks, which can turn celebratory occasions and moments of pride into ones of anguish and fear. It serves as a reminder for Singapore to be on guard and to continue taking the threat of car-ramming attacks seriously. Potential attackers can exploit gaps even when security measures are tight. DISGRUNTLEMENT AND ISOLATION Though not always terrorism-related, many of these incidents appear to be deliberate. A few common motivations include deep-rooted disgruntlements, social isolation and mental health-related issues. Some cases may even be impulsive acts in high-stress situations. Given the accessibility of vehicles and the relative ease with which such attacks can be executed without much planning, vehicle-ramming attacks are some of the hardest to anticipate and prevent. While car-ramming attacks are a major public safety threat, they can also be a trigger for social unrest and extremist outbursts both online and offline. The UK faced nationwide far-right rioting in August 2024, driven in large part by misinformation about the identity of an attacker who fatally stabbed three girls. To quell speculation about the identity and the motive of the Liverpool vehicle-ramming attacker, the UK police, in an unusual move, revealed that the perpetrator was a 53-year-old white British male from the Liverpool area within hours after the attack. Police also classified the attack as non-terrorism related. Even then, accusations of a cover-up on the real identity of the attacker started spreading online. Car-ramming incidents, especially those that occur at popular spots and with large crowds, have the potential to generate significant amounts of misinformation online, which will need to be managed. While most attacks of recent months were not classified as terrorism-related, vehicle-ramming continues to serve as a viable tactic by terrorists and lone wolf sympathisers of terrorist groups. Vehicle-ramming attacks spiked in 2017, with several carried out by Islamic State and its supporters across the West, but have dropped since. The recent increase in vehicle-ramming incidents could reignite terrorist interest in this tactic, as suggested by a few recent attacks. The January attack in New Orleans, which killed 15 people, was carried out by . In a parliamentary response to a question on measures in place to prevent and mitigate deliberate vehicle-ramming attacks, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam shared some of the measures Singapore deploys. These range from requiring organisers of events that attract large crowds to restrict vehicle entries and erect barriers, incorporating security features in buildings with high footfall such as vehicle bollards, and high-visibility patrols by the Singapore Police Force (SPF) to deter attacks and enable faster response. Mr Shanmugam noted it will not be appropriate to 'set out all the measures that are put in place', presumably to not alert potential attackers with the tools authorities use in managing the threat. The challenge for authorities is striking a balance between preventing potential attackers from using vehicles as weapons, while not unduly restricting movements of people and vehicular traffic. Authorities in Singapore regularly assess the situation to identify potential actors and areas of vulnerability, and enhance security measures accordingly. The role of the public is also key as staying vigilant can go a long way in identifying potential attackers. Some early warning signs include surveillance and test drives, reinforcements on the vehicle and traffic anomalies. The SGSecure movement empowers members of the public to alert law enforcement of suspicious individuals and activities, and equips them with skills to protect themselves and assist others in such situations.
CNA
12 hours ago
- CNA
Man suffers gunshot wound while cycling in restricted area near SAF live-firing activity
A 42-year-old man sustained a gunshot wound about two kilometres away from a live-firing activity conducted by the Singapore Armed Forces yesterday. The police said the man was cycling with his friends near the Nee Soon 500m Open Range, a restricted area that the public does not have access to. He is in a stable condition at the National University Hospital. Under the Military Manoeuvres Act, the public is not allowed to enter gazetted areas meant for live-firing exercises. Investigations are ongoing and foul play is not suspected. Nee Soon Range has suspended live-firing activities as a precautionary measure. Rachel Teng reports.
CNA
15 hours ago
- CNA
Man gets jail after embezzling more than S$194,000 from employer, leaving Singapore
SINGAPORE: A sales agent with a maid employment agency siphoned more than S$194,000 (US$151,600) over a two-year period before leaving Singapore in 2014. Wong Chow Toon was arrested only in 2023 when he returned to Singapore. The 53-year-old was sentenced to one-and-a-half years' jail on Monday (Jun 16) after he pleaded guilty to two charges of criminal breach of trust as a servant. The Singaporean started working at United Home International on Oct 2, 2010. As part of his job, he would collect payments to the company from customers who hired domestic workers. United Home International usually collected fees in two tranches. The first payment would be made at the point of application and the final payment would be collected when the domestic worker began the job. In the same month that he started work as a sales agent, Wong began pocketing money belonging to the company, most of them being the final payments. He would ask customers to pay both fees upfront at the point of application, claiming that this was the company's policy. He would then issue a receipt to customers, which reflected that both fees were paid. However, he manipulated the records in that he would have placed another sheet directly behind the receipt to prevent the carbon copies behind from being imprinted. Then, he wrote separately on the carbon copies to indicate that only the agency fees were paid. He kept one copy in the office and another was given to a driver with the company who would take the fees in cash to the main office. After the company had sourced a domestic worker and the employment had commenced, Wong would use placement fees from other customers to make payment to the company under a new receipt, which would not be given to the customer. Using this method, he collected and embezzled S$87,208 between Jan 13, 2012 and Dec 29, 2012. The following year, between Jan 5 and Dec 29, he siphoned another S$107,156. He spent the money on personal expenses and drinks. Wong left Singapore on Sep 28, 2014 and returned on Jan 9, 2023, when he was arrested at Changi Airport. Of the S$194,364 he misappropriated in total, Wong and his sister made partial restitution of S$74,543.50. Deputy Public Prosecutor Charles How said Wong fled the country for more than eight years, demonstrating a lack of remorse. However, Wong's lawyer, Mr John Koh from Avalon Law Corporation, said this description did not capture the nuances of Wong's situation. He said Wong and his sister had reached an agreement to repay the money in instalments and Wong was supposed to pay a portion of his salary every month to the company. When market conditions took a downturn, Wong's earnings fell from S$3,000 to S$4,000 a month to S$500 to S$600. Wong asked his employer to allow him to resign to seek alternative employment so that he could earn a better salary and return the money he owed, Mr Koh added. His employer refused the request. Several months later, Wong decided to leave for Thailand when he was offered a better job. His employer filed a police report when he left Singapore. Wong's sister continued to contact the company to maintain their intention of returning the money owed, but the employer evaded her correspondence. "It would not be fair to infer that our client had intended to evade justice while also trying to contact his employer for repayment," Mr Koh argued. The prosecution, in turn, pointed to an escalation in criminal behaviour exhibited by Wong as an aggravating factor. He was convicted in 2009 of criminal breach of trust and sentenced to a S$7,000 fine. The prosecution sought 18 to 20 months' jail, while the defence proposed 14 to 16 months' jail.
