Hawaii set to pay $750,000 in wrongful death settlement
COURTESY PHOTO Delmar Espejo : The 28-year-old was shot by a sheriff's deputy at the state Capitol in 2019 The state Legislature is expected to approve a $750, 000 settlement in the 2019 wrongful shooting death of an unarmed, disabled, homeless man by an on-duty state deputy sheriff, who was not criminally held responsible but since faces scrutiny in the deaths of two more people in 2021 and 2022 while a police officer in San Diego.
Delmar Espejo, 28, was shot in the back at close range and killed on Feb. 18, 2019, at the state Capitol rotunda by former Deputy Sheriff Gregory Bergman.
The victim's family filed a civil wrongful death lawsuit against the state and Bergman on Feb. 17, 2021. A jury awarded $2.27 million to Espejo's mother, Cresencia Espejo, including $1.52 million in punitive damages.
The shooting of Espejo was the 12th in a string of 16 shootings by Oahu law enforcement officers from 2018 to March 2019, eight of them deadly. The fatal shootings by Bergman and a second by a prison guard in March 2019 were the first fatal shootings in at least the previous 10 years by Department of Public Safety officers.
The state sought to overturn both the jury's verdict and a judge's findings and conclusions against the state and Bergman, who left Hawaii shortly after Espejo was killed. He became a police officer in San Diego, where he was involved in the shooting of a suicidal man ; the other, a man shot in the back, on his knees allegedly surrendering.
Bergman was never held criminally responsible for Espejo's death. The Department of the Attorney General in September 2019 cleared him, saying there was insufficient evidence to charge him, despite the Honolulu Police Department having opened a second-degree murder case after an autopsy revealed Espejo was shot in the back at close range.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
The AG spokesperson at the time said the Attorney General's Office reached its conclusion by relying on HPD's preliminary findings and did not conduct its own investigation.
After the verdict in the civil case, the state and Bergman, who claimed self-defense, had filed a motion for a new trial, but instead a closed settlement conference was held Feb. 6. The parties reached a confidential agreement.
The state's $750, 000 portion was made public when it sought approval by the Legislature in House Bill 990 with other judgments against the state and settlement of claims.
The Department of the Attorney General did not respond to requests for comment.
On the evening of Feb. 18, 2019, Bergman was making his rounds and encountered Espejo, who had been drinking alcohol at about 8 :20 p.m. at the Ewa-makai corner of the state Capitol rotunda.
At a news conference the following day, then-Public Safety Director Nolan Espinda told the public the shooting resulted from an 'extreme struggle ' between a deputy sheriff and Espejo, who refused to dispense of his drink container, was combative and failed to obey numerous commands to stop fighting.
Instead of waiting for backup, the deputy got up close enough to Espejo so that according to Espinda's narrative, Espejo wrapped his arms around the deputy sheriff who, at over 6 feet 2 inches tall and 205 pounds, towered above the 5-foot-3, 117-pound shooting victim.
Espinda said that's when the deputy's gun discharged and killed Espejo.
Espejo walked with a limp and had withered legs from congenital polio as a child, which required surgery, his family and his family's attorney, Myles Breiner, said.
Espinda said there was no surveillance footage of the shooting at the state Capitol, despite numerous security cameras there.
Circuit Court jurors, in an overwhelming majority—11 to 1—found Nov. 29 that punitive damages in the amount of $1.52 million should be awarded to Espejo's mother and against Bergman.
Jurors found that compensatory and /or general damages of $750, 000 should also go to Espejo's mother.
The majority of jurors, 10 to 2, found Bergman was negligent in his use of force.
But a majority did not find that, based on the evidence, Bergman used excessive /
unreasonable force, and none found he committed battery on Espejo.
The jury unanimously found the state breached its duties to properly train and /or supervise Bergman.
Circuit Judge Dean Ochiai, in his Jan. 10 findings of fact and conclusions of law, awarded $750, 000 in general damages to Cresencia Espe jo, 'in which Bergman and the State of Hawaii are jointly and severally liable.'
The judge found Bergman violated training, department policy on use of force, failed to wait for backup, failed to remain 6 feet away, and shot Espejo in the back while pushing him down onto his stomach.
The lawsuit was initially filed against the state, Public Safety Department, Sheriff Division, Bergman in his individual capacity and Public Safety Director Nolan Espin da individually and in his official capacity.
The judge found Bergman, who had been a deputy sheriff for less than two years, called but failed to wait for backup.
He confronted Espejo for drinking alcohol, a petty misdemeanor, and ordered him to pour out the drink.
'From the time Bergman reached toward Espejo to force him to pour out the bottle in less than 1 minute, (he ) had shot Espejo in his upper back, ' the judge said.
An Internal Affairs investigator and Bergman testified he had at least six opportunities to call for backup and maintain a 6-foot distance and use a baton or pepper spray, but instead rushed to tackle Espejo for refusing to pour out the drink.
'While pushing Espejo down onto his stomach, Bergman discharged one round into the unarmed Espejo's back, ' the judge found.
The judge quoted Bergman's testimony as to why he did not follow the department's crisis intervention training that avoids injury to officer and citizens and the need to deescalate and wait for backup.
Bergman said, 'I thought I could take him, ' according to the Internal Affairs investigator's testimony.
The court also found that numerous items of evidence, which should have been in the state's custody and control, were lost. They include footage from eight HPD body cameras, Bergman's interview with HPD and video footage from the state Capitol.
The San Diego Police Department confirmed with the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Bergman was hired in 2019 shortly after the Hawaii shooting, but would not respond to questions concerning the San Diego shootings, nor whether he is in good standing.
The California Department of Justice is investigating Bergman and another officer in the Dec. 8, 2022, shooting of John Ray Romero, the Office of the Attorney General's website shows.
In that case, Romero had a gun pointed to his own head when police arrived, according to news reports. He asked police to shoot him. Bergman and another officer reportedly did.
In a July 23, 2021, case, Bergman was one of two officers involved in the shooting death of Jesus Veleta, a 22-year-old armed man who was shot in the back.
The Veleta family filed a $20 million legal claim against San Diego County, alleging Veleta was in the process of surrendering and was on his knees with his back turned when he was shot. The complaint accuses the officers of using excessive and lethal force.
The San Diego County District Attorney's Office had previously cleared Bergman and the other officer of criminal liability.
The DA's report said Veleta stumbled and fell, and officers ordered him to drop the gun. He 'raised it up behind him back towards the officers.'
Officers fired and struck him in the back.
'Veleta threw his handgun in front of him as the officers discharged their weapons, ' the report said.
The DA concluded Veleta ignored multiple commands to drop the gun and made no indications he was going to surrender, and that the officers reasonably believed he would shoot them unless they fired.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
15 hours ago
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
CONCORD, N.H. -- An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.
San Francisco Chronicle
17 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
9/11 victims' fund architect slams changes to New Hampshire abuse settlement program
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — An attorney who helped design and implement the 9/11 victims' compensation fund says New Hampshire lawmakers have eroded the fairness of a settlement program for those who were abused at the state's youth detention center. Deborah Greenspan, who served as deputy special master of the fund created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, recently submitted an affidavit in a class-action lawsuit seeking to block changes to New Hampshire's out-of-court settlement fund for abuse victims. She's among those expected to testify Wednesday at a hearing on the state's request to dismiss the case and other matters. More than 1,300 people have sued the state since 2020 alleging that they were physically or sexually abused as children while in state custody, mostly at the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. Most of them put their lawsuits on hold after lawmakers created a settlement fund in 2022 that was pitched as a 'victim-centered' and 'trauma-informed' alternative to litigation run by a neutral administrator appointed by the state Supreme Court. But the Republican-led Legislature changed that process through last-minute additions to the state budget Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed in June. The amended law gives the governor authority to hire and fire the fund's administrator and gives the attorney general — also a political appointee — veto power over settlement awards. That stands in stark contrast to other victim compensation funds, said Greenspan, who currently serves as a court-appointed special master for lawsuits related to lead-tainted water in Flint, Michigan. She said it 'strains credulity' to believe that anyone would file a claim knowing that 'the persons ultimately deciding the claim were those responsible for the claimant's injuries.' 'Such a construct would go beyond the appearance of impropriety and create a clear conflict of interest, undermining the fairness and legitimacy of the settlement process," she wrote. Ayotte and Attorney General John Formella responded by asking a judge to bar Greenspan's testimony, saying she offered 'policy preferences masquerading as expert opinions' without explaining the principles beyond her conclusions. 'Her affidavit is instead a series of non sequiturs that move from her experience to her conclusions without any of the necessary connective tissue,' they wrote. The defendants argue that the law still requires the administrator to be 'an independent, neutral attorney' and point out that the same appointment process is used for the state's judges. They said giving the attorney general the authority to accept or reject settlements is necessary to give the public a voice and ensure that the responsibility for spending millions of dollars in public funds rests with the executive branch. As of June 30, nearly 2,000 people had filed claims with the settlement fund, which caps payouts at $2.5 million. A total of 386 had been settled, with an average award of $545,000. One of the claimants says he was awarded $1.5 million award in late July, but the state hasn't finalized it yet, leaving him worried that Formella will veto it. 'I feel like the state has tricked us,' he said in an interview this week. 'We've had the rug pulled right out from underneath us.' The Associated Press does not name those who say they were sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly. The claimant, now 39, said the two years he spent at the facility as a teenager were the hardest times of his life. 'I lost my childhood. I lost things that I can't get back,' he said. 'I was broken.' Though the settlement process was overwhelming and scary at times, the assistant administrator who heard his case was kind and understanding, he said. That meeting alone was enough to lift a huge burden, he said. 'I was treated with a lot of love,' he said. 'I felt really appreciated as a victim and like I was speaking to somebody who would listen and believe my story.' Separate from the fund, the state has settled two lawsuits by agreeing to pay victims $10 million and $4.5 million. Only one lawsuit has gone to trial, resulting in a $38 million verdict, though the state is trying to slash it to $475,000. The state has also brought criminal charges against former workers, with two convictions and two mistrials so far. The 39-year-old claimant who fears his award offer will be retracted said he doesn't know if he could face testifying at a public trial. 'It's basically allowing the same people who hurt us to hurt us all over again,' he said.
Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
Texas Democrat Defies GOP Law Enforcement Escort
Texas state representative Nicole Collier spent last night on the floor of the statehouse. Collier was one of more than 50 Texas Democrats who left the state earlier this month in protest of Republican-led redistricting that would likely flip five national House of Representatives seats from Democrat to Republican. Texas Democrats have described the plan as "gerrymandering," which means dividing up the district map strategically for the purpose of political gains. Now that Collier and her fellow Democrats have returned to Texas, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said Monday that representatives who had warrants issued against them during their absence would not be allowed to leave the chamber without agreeing to one very specific condition. "Members who have not been present until today, for whom arrest warrants were issued, will be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated [Department of Public Safety] officer appointment under the rules of the house." Collier, however, refused the escort, which led to her spending the night in the Texas statehouse. In a statement to the Fort Worth Report, Collier wrote, "I don't know how long I will be here. Instead of DPS officers looking for pedophiles, they have been assigned to follow Democratic state representatives around only to ensure their return to the Capitol on Wednesday (when the House reconvenes). I sure hope the public feels safe without those officers on beat." According to Republican Rep. Charlie Geren, Collier may stay in the chamber or go to her office, but she is not allowed to leave the state capitol grounds. She is the only Democrat who refused a law enforcement escort, but other members have reportedly visited her. Online, people have a lot of thoughts about the situation. "They have a duly elected lawmaker locked in the Texas Capitol because she refused her Republican-assigned police babysitter," one person wrote. In a tweet, Representative Jasmine Crockett called it "beyond outrageous," and wrote, "That's some old Jim Crow playbook. Texas Republicans have lost their damn minds." Some are calling it "kidnapping." And others are calling it "authoritarianism." But others are applauding Collier for taking a stand, like this Arizona state senator who wrote simply, "American hero." As one Twitter user put it, "Not all heroes wear capes. Some wear bonnets!"
