Appeals court overturns San Marcos' marijuana decriminalization ordinance
A Texas appellate court Thursday ruled that San Marcos' marijuana decriminalization ordinance was unenforceable and issued a temporary injunction.
The ordinance passed in 2022 with nearly 82% of voters voting in favor of decriminalization.
Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the city, saying the ordinance violated state laws.
SAN MARCOS, Texas - A Texas appellate court ruled that a voter-passed ordinance that decriminalized small amounts of marijuana in San Marcos is unenforceable under state law.
What we know
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals issued the ruling Thursday saying the ordinance, which passed in 2022, was in violation of a state law that prohibits local governments from adopting policies that will not fully enforce state drug laws.
The ordinance overwhelmingly passed in 2022 with nearly 82% of voters in favor of the measure.
Proposition A decriminalized possession of up to four ounces marijuana and ended citations and arrests by San Marcos police unless it was part of a larger investigation involving violence or felony-level narcotics.
The ordinance also ended citations for drug residue or paraphernalia, prohibited the use of city funds to test the level of THC, and stopped police from using the smell of marijuana as probable cause to search a vehicle or home.
What they're saying
"All of these Ordinance prohibitions are barriers to the full enforcement of Texas drug laws and thus conflict with Local Government Code Section 370.003," Judge April Farris said in the ruling.
In a release, representatives from Mano Amiga Action and Ground Game Texas, two of the groups that spearheaded the ordinance, called the court's decision a "deeply troubling move for local democracy."
"Texans have made their voices heard at the ballot box again and again: they don't want their money going towards unnecessary arrests," Catina Voellinger, Executive Director of Ground Game Texas, said. "This ruling is proof that the state isn't working to make communities safer—it's working to crush people-powered movements."
The backstory
In 2022, San Marcos was one of five cities in Texas that voted to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana. The other cities were Denton, Elgin, Killeen and Harker Heights.
Attorney General Ken Paxton sued San Marcos, along with Austin, Killeen, Elgin and Denton in 2024 over the policies.
A Hays County district judge dismissed Paxton's lawsuit saying the attorney general's office lacked jurisdiction and denied the state's request to prevent the ordinance from being enforced.
Thursday's ruling from the appeals court allows a temporary injunction to go into effect and establishes that the attorney general has jurisdiction to file suit against the city and city officials.
The Fifteenth Circuit Court of Appeals was created in 2023 to have jurisdiction over appeals involving disputes brought by or against the state and challenges to state stautes.
Mano Amiga Executive Director Eric Martinez called the court's decision "judicial gerrymandering."
"Let's be clear—this decision didn't come from a court grounded in community," Martinez said. "It came from a court manufactured by the same state officials bringing the lawsuit, with the express goal of silencing progressive policies that Texans are voting for at the local level."
The Source
Information in this article comes from court documents filed in the Fifteenth Circuit Appeals Court, a release from Mano Amiga Action and Ground Game Texas and previous FOX 7 reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Texas AG expands order to halt Beto O'Rourke's group fundraising efforts
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Saturday he secured a 'modified' temporary restraining order that will halt former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke and his political group, Powered by People, 'from removing any property or funds out of Texas.' ActBlue, who also partners with Powered by People, is included in that order, per a news release from Paxton's office. 'In Texas, lawless actions have consequences, and Beto's finding that out the hard way,' Paxton said in the release. Ken Paxton opens investigation into Beto O'Rourke-backed PAC that supports Democratic candidates This all comes after Paxton first secured the temporary restraining order last week against Powered by People for alleged 'unlawful fundraising activity' for Democrats who broke quorum during the Texas special session, a news release from his office states. A district judge from Tarrant County also sided with Paxton by temporarily blocking the organization from fundraising for 'Democrats or financially supporting the quorum break.' 'This is the guy that we're talking about, who was twice indicted on securities fraud charges. And ladies and gentleman, he was impeached by the Texas Legislature — which is a Republican majority institution — on charges of bribery himself. And he's accusing us of some kind of fraud as we try to stop the theft of these five congressional seats. Well you know what? We welcome his investigation, we welcome his attack, we welcome their hatred right now. Because it proves that we're doing the right thing,' O'Rourke said while speaking to a crowd in Oklahoma last week. The first special session ended Friday after it did not have quorum for the sixth consecutive time, as the House failed to reach the 100 member quorum needed to conduct business. Additionally, Gov. Greg Abbott announced a second special session just minutes after the first special session ended, which will include the 18 original items announced in the first one. On Saturday, O'Rourke announced Powered by People donated more than $1 million to Texas Democrats during the special session, according to The Texas Tribune. He added 'more than 55,000 donations' came from people across the country since the start of the first special session. Earlier this month, O'Rourke filed his own lawsuit against the attorney general after he was sued. He asked a judge to block Paxton's investigation into Powered by People, alleging he engaged in a 'fishing expedition, constitutional rights be damned,' according to the Tribune. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
a day ago
- CNN
How Ken Paxton keeps pushing the legal envelope
The morning after news broke that Texas House Democrats planned to return to the state, effectively ending their efforts to block Republicans from redrawing the state's congressional maps, Attorney General Ken Paxton took a victory lap. The firebrand conservative ally of President Donald Trump had used his office to wage several legal battles against the absent Democrats at once, drawing outsized attention as he challenges Sen. John Cornyn in next year's Republican Senate primary. Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to expel 13 of them from office. He asked an Illinois court to help enforce the Texas House speaker's civil arrest warrants for the Democrats who had holed up outside Chicago. And he obtained a court order preventing former Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke's political action committee from raising money to assist those boycotting Democrats. Then, he claimed O'Rourke violated that court order and sought his arrest. On Wednesday morning, Paxton said his strategy worked: Democrats planned to end their quorum-breaking effort faster than they had in previous standoffs, including 2003 and 2021. 'The idea of putting pressure on them from different angles — I think it got to them. Because they certainly came back faster than they have in the past,' Paxton told conservative talk radio host Mark Davis. Paxton's actions, and his comments in the radio interview, offered a window into how one of the nation's most controversial attorneys general has long operated. He has pushed legal boundaries — riling up conservatives and using the courts to place himself at the center of political fights with national consequences, even when his lawsuits have little chance of success. The three-term attorney general's willingness to wage those battles has earned him deep support among conservatives — including those in the state Senate who acquitted him two years ago, after the Republican-dominated House had impeached him over allegations of corruption and bribery. It has also alienated many Democrats and some moderate Republicans — and it's why Democrats believe the state's Senate race could become competitive next fall if Paxton ousts Cornyn in the GOP primary. The swirl of controversy surrounding Paxton intensified last month, when his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, filed for divorce, alleging infidelity. Still, as his primary against Cornyn looms, Paxton has effectively silenced his Republican critics as the party waged a pressure campaign to return the absent House Democrats to Texas. And he did so using tools unavailable to Cornyn — who asked US Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the source of the Democrats' funding, but could not launch his own probe. Paxton is 'one of the most innovative AGs in terms of using his office for advancing his political vision,' said Paul Nolette, a professor and the director of Marquette University's Les Aspin Center for Government who has written extensively about attorneys generals' use of their offices to influence national policy. 'What's new and unusual is that he's really been the one who has modeled how to use tools that don't, on their face, seem partisan, for greater partisan effect,' Nolette said. Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said that among legal experts, 'I think everyone views Paxton the same way — as someone who will stop at nothing to use and abuse his office to advance whatever he views as the partisan political imperative of the moment.' 'He views himself less as the attorney general of Texas than as the attorney general of the Republican Party,' Vladeck said. 'And that may endear him to the folks who vote for him and who his actions benefit, but it certainly isn't consistent with his constitutional, statutory and ethical duties and obligations to all of the people of Texas.' After 12 years in the Texas legislature, Paxton was elected attorney general in 2014. During his first two years in office — the last two years of Barack Obama's presidency — Paxton filed 27 lawsuits against the Obama administration. He initiated a lawsuit seeking to have Obama's signature domestic achievement, the Affordable Care Act, declared unconstitutional — an effort the Supreme Court rejected. Paxton was more successful battling Obama's immigration reforms, blocking the implementation of a policy that would have granted deferred action to undocumented immigrants who have lived in the United States since 2010 and have children who are American citizens or lawful permanent residents. He also fought Obama's administration over environmental protections, water regulations, overtime policy, hiring rules for felons and more. He led 13 states that won an injunction halting the Obama administration's guidance for schools on transgender students' bathroom access. Perhaps Paxton's most audacious legal move came in 2020, when he filed a post-election lawsuit against four presidential battleground states — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — where President Joe Biden had defeated Trump. He alleged in a statement that those states' actions to expand voter access during the coronavirus pandemic had cast 'a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election.' The Supreme Court quickly denied the lawsuit, ruling that Texas lacked standing. During Biden's term, Paxton again regularly challenged the Democratic administration in court. His office bragged in a November 2024 news release that it had filed its 100th lawsuit against Biden's administration. Paxton said in a statement at the time that 'the federal government has been ruthlessly weaponized against the American people. But Texas stood in their way.' He challenged Biden's immigration policies, including winning a ruling blocking Biden's 'parole in place' policy that gave legal status to certain undocumented individuals who are married to US citizens. He unsuccessfully challenged the Biden administration's coronavirus vaccine mandate and later launched investigations into the pharmaceutical drug makers who manufactured vaccines. With Trump back in office, Paxton has continued to wage cultural battles by targeting blue states. In December, Paxton sued a New York doctor for prescribing abortion pills to a woman near Dallas — one of the first challenges to shield laws enacted by Democratic-controlled states to protect doctors in the wake of Roe v. Wade's overturning. Then, in July, he sued a New York county clerk for failing to levy a fine imposed in Texas when that doctor did not show up for court. The suits are ongoing. He has also returned to an issue Trump raised constantly during the 2024 campaign: allegations of voter fraud. Paxton's office said in a news release last month it had 'launched a sweeping investigation into more than 100 potential noncitizens who cast over 200 ballots in the 2020 and 2022 election cycles.' Nolette said Paxton has 'used the very ample tools of the AG's office to maximum effect.' He pointed to Paxton's targeting of a migrant shelter in El Paso by demanding its client records, his use of consumer protection laws to probe pharmaceutical drug-makers, hospitals that provided gender-affirming care to minors and more. 'He's really been a leader in using those almost bread-and-butter tools of the office, which are typically for run-of-the-mill cases at the state level or noncontroversial, bipartisan issues, and using those in a more sharply partisan way,' Nolette said.
CNN
a day ago
- CNN
How Ken Paxton keeps pushing the legal envelope
The morning after news broke that Texas House Democrats planned to return to the state, effectively ending their efforts to block Republicans from redrawing the state's congressional maps, Attorney General Ken Paxton took a victory lap. The firebrand conservative ally of President Donald Trump had used his office to wage several legal battles against the absent Democrats at once, drawing outsized attention as he challenges Sen. John Cornyn in next year's Republican Senate primary. Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to expel 13 of them from office. He asked an Illinois court to help enforce the Texas House speaker's civil arrest warrants for the Democrats who had holed up outside Chicago. And he obtained a court order preventing former Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke's political action committee from raising money to assist those boycotting Democrats. Then, he claimed O'Rourke violated that court order and sought his arrest. On Wednesday morning, Paxton said his strategy worked: Democrats planned to end their quorum-breaking effort faster than they had in previous standoffs, including 2003 and 2021. 'The idea of putting pressure on them from different angles — I think it got to them. Because they certainly came back faster than they have in the past,' Paxton told conservative talk radio host Mark Davis. Paxton's actions, and his comments in the radio interview, offered a window into how one of the nation's most controversial attorneys general has long operated. He has pushed legal boundaries — riling up conservatives and using the courts to place himself at the center of political fights with national consequences, even when his lawsuits have little chance of success. The three-term attorney general's willingness to wage those battles has earned him deep support among conservatives — including those in the state Senate who acquitted him two years ago, after the Republican-dominated House had impeached him over allegations of corruption and bribery. It has also alienated many Democrats and some moderate Republicans — and it's why Democrats believe the state's Senate race could become competitive next fall if Paxton ousts Cornyn in the GOP primary. The swirl of controversy surrounding Paxton intensified last month, when his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, filed for divorce, alleging infidelity. Still, as his primary against Cornyn looms, Paxton has effectively silenced his Republican critics as the party waged a pressure campaign to return the absent House Democrats to Texas. And he did so using tools unavailable to Cornyn — who asked US Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the source of the Democrats' funding, but could not launch his own probe. Paxton is 'one of the most innovative AGs in terms of using his office for advancing his political vision,' said Paul Nolette, a professor and the director of Marquette University's Les Aspin Center for Government who has written extensively about attorneys generals' use of their offices to influence national policy. 'What's new and unusual is that he's really been the one who has modeled how to use tools that don't, on their face, seem partisan, for greater partisan effect,' Nolette said. Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said that among legal experts, 'I think everyone views Paxton the same way — as someone who will stop at nothing to use and abuse his office to advance whatever he views as the partisan political imperative of the moment.' 'He views himself less as the attorney general of Texas than as the attorney general of the Republican Party,' Vladeck said. 'And that may endear him to the folks who vote for him and who his actions benefit, but it certainly isn't consistent with his constitutional, statutory and ethical duties and obligations to all of the people of Texas.' After 12 years in the Texas legislature, Paxton was elected attorney general in 2014. During his first two years in office — the last two years of Barack Obama's presidency — Paxton filed 27 lawsuits against the Obama administration. He initiated a lawsuit seeking to have Obama's signature domestic achievement, the Affordable Care Act, declared unconstitutional — an effort the Supreme Court rejected. Paxton was more successful battling Obama's immigration reforms, blocking the implementation of a policy that would have granted deferred action to undocumented immigrants who have lived in the United States since 2010 and have children who are American citizens or lawful permanent residents. He also fought Obama's administration over environmental protections, water regulations, overtime policy, hiring rules for felons and more. He led 13 states that won an injunction halting the Obama administration's guidance for schools on transgender students' bathroom access. Perhaps Paxton's most audacious legal move came in 2020, when he filed a post-election lawsuit against four presidential battleground states — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — where President Joe Biden had defeated Trump. He alleged in a statement that those states' actions to expand voter access during the coronavirus pandemic had cast 'a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election.' The Supreme Court quickly denied the lawsuit, ruling that Texas lacked standing. During Biden's term, Paxton again regularly challenged the Democratic administration in court. His office bragged in a November 2024 news release that it had filed its 100th lawsuit against Biden's administration. Paxton said in a statement at the time that 'the federal government has been ruthlessly weaponized against the American people. But Texas stood in their way.' He challenged Biden's immigration policies, including winning a ruling blocking Biden's 'parole in place' policy that gave legal status to certain undocumented individuals who are married to US citizens. He unsuccessfully challenged the Biden administration's coronavirus vaccine mandate and later launched investigations into the pharmaceutical drug makers who manufactured vaccines. With Trump back in office, Paxton has continued to wage cultural battles by targeting blue states. In December, Paxton sued a New York doctor for prescribing abortion pills to a woman near Dallas — one of the first challenges to shield laws enacted by Democratic-controlled states to protect doctors in the wake of Roe v. Wade's overturning. Then, in July, he sued a New York county clerk for failing to levy a fine imposed in Texas when that doctor did not show up for court. The suits are ongoing. He has also returned to an issue Trump raised constantly during the 2024 campaign: allegations of voter fraud. Paxton's office said in a news release last month it had 'launched a sweeping investigation into more than 100 potential noncitizens who cast over 200 ballots in the 2020 and 2022 election cycles.' Nolette said Paxton has 'used the very ample tools of the AG's office to maximum effect.' He pointed to Paxton's targeting of a migrant shelter in El Paso by demanding its client records, his use of consumer protection laws to probe pharmaceutical drug-makers, hospitals that provided gender-affirming care to minors and more. 'He's really been a leader in using those almost bread-and-butter tools of the office, which are typically for run-of-the-mill cases at the state level or noncontroversial, bipartisan issues, and using those in a more sharply partisan way,' Nolette said.
