UN expert asks TotalEnergies to act on human rights concerns
PARIS/LONDON, May 23 (Reuters) - TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab must urgently address fresh allegations of abuses at its contentious oil pipeline project in East Africa, an independent U.N. human rights expert said ahead of the French energy firm's annual shareholder meeting on Friday.
In a statement, opens new tab released late on Thursday, Special Rapporteur on environmental defenders Michel Forst said the company must take immediate action to protect activists linked to the East African Crude Oil Pipeline and connected oilfields.
It followed news that German asset manager Union Investment had dropped the company's bonds and shares from its sustainable investment funds over the issue.
Union Investment said it made the decision after reviewing a fresh report from non-profit Just Finance International citing alleged abuses at the Kingfisher oil site in Uganda, part of the pipeline project.
Forst said TotalEnergies had "failed to take effective steps addressing these abuses," adding it was "deeply troubling" that "it has instead consistently rejected the allegations as mere 'misconceptions' of the projects' impact".
As a French company, it was bound by the international Aarhus Convention to ensure individuals were not penalised or harassed for their opposition to the projects, Forst added.
TotalEnergies said in a statement on Friday that it "does not tolerate any threats or violence against those who peacefully defend and promote human rights" and reminds those it works with of its position on the subject.
The company added that it worked with Ugandan authorities "to stress to the Police the need to ensure that due process is followed, the protesters are treated well, and their rights are respected while in detention".
The security team of its local unit also monitors the wellbeing of anyone arrested and ensures their representatives are able to visit them, it said.
Forst backed a call by Union Investment for an independent investigation into the alleged abuses. As well as making the results public and acting on any shortcomings, he also asked the Total to use its leverage to prevent any further attacks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
French police watch as migrants board dinghies bound for the UK
French police shrugged and claimed that 'it's difficult' as they watched migrants boarding small boats to cross the Channel. In the early hours of Wednesday morning, reporters witnessed dozens of migrants, including children, wading out and boarding a dinghy already loaded with people after coming from an inland waterway. Also watching from the beach in Gravelines, near Calais, were ten French police wearing riot helmets and shields, who were filmed standing by and not intervening. When asked by Sky News why they did nothing, one officer said: 'It's for their safety. There are children there. We're not going to throw grenades at them. It's inhumane. But it's sad.' Another shrugged and told The Sun: 'It's difficult.' It is not the first time British media have captured French police standing by while small boats head for the UK, as the government continues to push for a change to French rules. Once a boat is afloat in the water, it is not within the powers of the gendarmerie to intercept it and bring it back to shore, even if it is safe to do so. In February Bruno Retailleau, the French interior minister, said that he wanted to give the gendarmerie new powers that would allow them to intercept boats within 300m of the coast. Retailleau also said that he hoped to restore the offence of an 'illegal stay' in France, which would allow police to arrest migrants and smugglers before they attempt a crossing. At present, migrants are only considered to have committed an offence when they launch the boat. The Home Office said earlier this month that it was still 'urging the French to make the necessary changes to their operational policy so their maritime forces can intervene in shallow waters as soon as possible'. The French have instead begun a review into 'new operational tactics', although it is unclear what the outcome will be. French police policy is only to intervene if there are enough officers present to safely control the situation.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say
As federal agents rushed to arrest immigrants across Los Angeles, they confined detainees – including families with small children – in a stuffy office basement for days without sufficient food and water, according to immigration lawyers. One family with three children were held inside a Los Angeles-area administrative building for 48 hours after being arrested on Thursday immediately after an immigration court hearing, according to lawyers from the Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), which is providing non-profit legal services in the region. The children, the youngest of whom is three years old, were provided a bag of chips, a box of animal crackers and a mini carton of milk as their sole rations for a day. Agents told the family they did not have any water to provide during the family's first day in detention; on the second day, all five were given a single bottle to share. The one fan in the room was pointed directly towards a guard, rather than towards the families in confinement, they told lawyers. 'Because it was primarily men held in these facilities, they didn't have separate quarters for families or for women,' said Yliana Johansen-Méndez, chief program officer at ImmDef. Clients explained that 'eventually they set up a makeshift tent in an outside area to house the women and children. But clearly, there were no beds, no showers.' They have since been transferred to a 'family detention' center in Dilley, Texas, a large-scale holding facility retrofitted to hold children with their parents that was reopened under the Trump administration. Lawyers, who had been largely blocked from communicating with immigrants arrested amid the ramped-up raids in LA, said family members were able to recount the ordeal only after they were moved out of state. The harrowing details are the first to emerge about the conditions that people are being held in following the immigration raids targeting LA-area businesses and neighborhoods. To quell the widespread protests that followed, Donald Trump sent in military troops despite opposition from California leaders. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has said that it arrested 118 immigrants on Friday and over the weekend. Others were arrested at immigration offices and courthouses in the days prior. ImmDef and other local advocacy groups had compiled a separate list of more than 80 people who were apprehended – though many of them still do not appear in the agency's online databases of detainees. Many of the people arrested were jailed ad hoc, in LA-area courthouses and administrative offices. Over the past several days, attorneys have taken shifts waiting outside federal immigration offices, attempting to speak to the immigrants, but federal agents and national guard troops have largely blocked lawyers and family members from visiting with those who were arrested, citing safety concerns amid widespread protests in the city. On Tuesday, the immigration court in downtown Los Angles had been shut down – and blocked off. DHS did not immediately respond to multiple Guardian queries about where it was holding people arrested in LA, and whether local offices had been given instruction to prepare supplies and facilities to hold immigrants prior to the large-scale raids in the region. Legal aid groups were also largely denied access to immigrants who were transferred to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) processing center and detention center in Adelanto, in the high desert east of LA. 'Ice's excuse was, they're still processing all the new people,' said Johansen-Méndez. Over the weekend and on Monday, her colleagues were only permitted to visit with a handful of clients at the Adelanto detention center, even though they had called ahead to confirm that at least 40 people referred to the organization had been sent there. Several people have already been deported. Luis Angel Reyes Savalza, a deportation defense attorney supporting the affected families in LA, said at least one person who was bused to Mexico almost immediately after his arrest was not provided any paperwork or opportunity to contest his deportation. At least two others who were arrested at LA-area carwashes were deported to Tijuana, according to Flor Melendrez, executive director of the Clean Carwash Worker Center. Another person was told by agents to sign a paper if he wanted to visit an attorney, Johansen-Méndez said – but believes he was tricked into signing some sort of voluntary departure paperwork. 'Within hours, he was across the border to Mexico,' she said. Meanwhile, the family members of workers arrested at a clothing factory in downtown LA, in the parking lot at a Home Depot in the suburb of Paramount, and at a carwash in Culver City were desperately seeking answers about their loved ones' whereabouts. Landi, whose husband was arrested on Friday while he worked a shift at the Ambiance Apparel warehouse, said he had reported to work that day as normal. 'We never imagined he will be kidnapped by immigration,' she said at a news conference on Monday, outside the business's gates. The Guardian is not using her surname to protect her family's privacy and safety. 'The day he was kidnapped, my family went to request information about his abduction, but Ice told us he wasn't at the center,' she said. 'However, after much effort and struggle from our lawyer, Ice simply confirmed that he was there.' Families were not allowed to bring their loved ones jackets or medications, lawyers said. Those who were able to confer with attorneys reported that as holding facilities in the city became crowded with immigrants, families were rushed out to detention centers in California's high desert or in Texas. Agents confiscated belongings and provided little food or water, explaining to immigrants that the facilities had not prepared for the influx of detainees. Conditions in Adelanto were deteriorating as well, lawyers said. One of ImmDef's clients reported that meals were provided late, blankets and clothing were scarce, and some people were sleeping on the floor of a day-use recreational room as beds filled up. One client said he witnessed an older man's health dramatically decline after being denied medication for three days. On Sunday, Democratic US representatives Gilbert R Cisneros Jr, Judy Chu and Derek Tran said they were blocked from entering Adelanto. DHS did not respond to a query asking why lawyers and lawmakers have been denied access. With limited access to immigrants in detention, attorneys are also scrambling to understand the scope of the raids, and the extent to which the Department of Homeland Security has violated immigrants' rights. One of the more unusual aspects of the large-scale militarized raids that began last week was that agents from Ice were joined by Customs and Border Protection officers, who are empowered to conduct warrantless stops – but only within 100 miles (160km) of the US border. Johansen-Méndez believes that the government has justified their presence in Los Angeles – which is more than 100 miles from the US-Mexico border – because the city touches the Pacific Ocean, which the administration could be considering as a 'border'. 'They're counting the entire coastline as a port of entry,' said Johansen-Méndez. 'It felt almost like an urban legend that it could be done. But at this point, it's just they're everywhere, literally.' Lawyers from ImmDef and other legal aid and advocacy groups have also been trying to piece together testimonies to better understand how and why immigration agents chose to sweep certain businesses and neighborhoods, and what justifications officers provided when stopping and apprehending people. 'How do they decide who they're going to ask for their papers and arrest, other than racially profiling?' Johansen-Méndez said. 'Did they just ask everyone in the room for their papers or just some people? Did they skip certain people that didn't fit the profile? We can't get that information because we can't talk to everyone.'
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Barrick Mining removes Mali gold complex from 2025 output forecast, sources say
TORONTO/DAKAR, June 11 (Reuters) - Barrick Mining ( opens new tab has removed its Mali gold complex from its overall output forecast for 2025, four sources told Reuters, adding to fallout from a two-year dispute over new mining legislation aimed at boosting the West African country's revenue. Operations at the Loulo-Gounkoto gold complex, one of the Canadian miner's largest gold assets in Africa, have been suspended since January after the military-led government blocked gold exports by the world's third-largest miner of the precious metal, detained staff and seized three metric tons of stock during separate negotiations over a new mining contract with Barrick. At stake for both sides is the opportunity to realize revenues worth at least $1 billion this year due to record high gold prices . Mali risks repelling potential investors, while Barrick shares have lagged those of its peers. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to speak publicly. Spokespersons for Barrick did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did a spokesperson for Mali's Mines Ministry. Barrick has not made its Mali output forecast public, but Morningstar analysts had predicted Mali would contribute around 250,000 ounces in 2025. Mali's government, a shareholder in the complex, asked a domestic court in May to appoint a provisional administrator to reopen the complex, which would effectively see Barrick lose control over the mines that accounted for 14% of its total output, according to Jefferies. A court hearing on the matter is scheduled for Thursday. Negotiations are ongoing in parallel with the court case. In a significant concession, Mali has agreed to allow Barrick to repatriate 20% of its earnings into an international bank account, an exception that was not made for any other foreign miners who recently renegotiated contracts with the state, two people familiar with the matter said. However, one remaining point of contention between Barrick and Mali is that authorities would like all future disputes to be handled in domestic courts. Barrick said any new mining contract should be covered under an international treaty and, in case of future disputes, be settled through international arbitration, according to one of the people and another source familiar with the matter. While strong gold prices have supported Barrick's global revenue, the threat of a provisional administration worries investors, one of the sources said, noting that even if the miner later regains control of the complex, it could be left with depleted gold reserves. In December, Barrick launched international arbitration proceedings against Mali. In May, it asked the World Bank's arbitration court to halt court proceedings in Bamako over provisional administration. According to two people aware of the development, the tribunal rejected that request. The president of the arbitration tribunal for the case declined to comment. In the first nine months of 2024, production in Mali contributed $949 million to Barrick's revenue. Jefferies, in an analyst report last December, estimated that if the Mali complex remains idle, Barrick would lose 11% of its expected 2025 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation. Mali is Africa's third-largest gold-producing country. Malian authorities, which seized power in coups in 2020 and 2021, say their current agreement with Barrick is unfair. The state has negotiated new agreements with other multinational miners. The chief executive of Australian miner Resolute was detained for more than a week amid negotiations last year.
