&w=3840&q=100)
Brazilian judges accept charges against Bolsonaro allies in coup plot
Last month, the panel unanimously accepted charges against Bolsonaro and seven close allies over the alleged coup plot following his loss to current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, and ordered the former right wing leader to stand trial.
When Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet accused Bolsonaro and 33 others of attempting a coup, he divided them into five different groups, based on their roles and positions in the alleged plot.
Bolsonaro and his closest allies, including running mate Gen. Braga Netto, were placed in the core group, according to the charges. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court panel reviewed charges against the second group, which Gonet said held managerial roles.
The second group includes former presidential foreign affairs adviser Filipe Martins, retired Gen. Mario Fernandes, former Federal Highway Police director Silvinei Vasques, former presidential aide Col. Marcelo Camara and two federal police officers, Fernando Oliveira and Marilia Alencar.
These individuals coordinated actions planned by the core group, Gonet said in the indictment. These included mobilising police officers to support the alleged coup, monitoring authorities and drafting a document intended to justify a state of emergency.
Bolsonaro and his allies have repeatedly denied wrongdoing. The former president says that he's being politically persecuted.
Bolsonaro has been hospitalised for more than a week, recovering from bowel surgery. On Monday, from his hospital bed in Brasilia, he gave an interview to local television network SBT and said that his trial wasn't technical, but political.
Under Brazilian law, a coup conviction alone carries a sentence of up to 12 years, but when combined with the other charges, it could result in a sentence of decades behind bars. The former president is expected to stand trial in the next few months at Brazil's Supreme Court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Supreme Court upholds Madras HC order to remove political flagpoles from public places
NEW DELHI: In an important decision, the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal and upheld the order of the Madras High Court directing political parties and other organisations to remove permanent flagpoles erected by them in public places, including national highways and government lands. A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi pronounced the order recently after hearing an appeal filed by Kathiravan challenging the HC's judgment. The petitioner's counsel challenged the direction and argued that the HC had passed a variety of directions, though the relief sought in the underlying case was limited. After hearing his submission, Justice Maheshwari asked, 'How can you use government land for political benefits?' The court also stressed that the scope of High Court jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is wide in nature, and dismissed the appeal. The root of the litigation is the order passed by Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on January 27, 2025, to remove flagpoles installed by political parties, communal organisations and others in public places within 12 weeks. 'After removal of flagpoles, the authorities concerned are directed to recover the cost of removal of flagpoles from the respective political parties,' the judge had said.
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
KCR to challenge ‘victimisation' by Ghose Commission in SC
Hyderabad: Taking a serious note of Justice P C Ghose Commission's findings against him, former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) has reportedly decided to challenge the findings in the Supreme Court. The probe panel has alleged irregularities in the construction of Kaleshwaram project and the damage caused to three barrages – Medigadda, Sundilla and Annaram. The BRS chief held an emergency meeting with senior party leaders, including T Harish Rao and B Vinod Kumar, in his farmhouse. The Ghose commission report, the pending court judgment on the disqualification of 10 BRS legislators, who defected to the ruling Congress party, and a proposed public meeting in Karimnagar on the BC quota issue were discussed in the meeting. Party leaders pointed out that KCR was taking exception to the Ghose Commission targeting him. The BRS party will file a petition in the Supreme Court and challenge the panel for giving its findings without cross examining the statements of Irrigation officials that were recorded during the open hearing, when it was binding on the Commission to bring out all facts pertaining to every recorded statement. Instead, the panel held KCR responsible without any evidence, whatsoever. The BRS leaders said that the apex court's intervention would help to counter the commission's 'unsubstantiated' findings. Rao has reportedly instructed the party's legal team to fight for the disqualification of all their defected MLAs by filing additional petitions in the apex court. It may be recalled that the Supreme Court has already directed the Assembly Speaker to act against the BRS MLAs for switching over to the Congress within three months. As KCR is apprehensive about the Speaker's actions, he has decided to challenge the issue in the court seeking disqualification of the 10 legislators. Rao has also given specific instructions to the party leaders to make the ensuing public meeting on BC quota a big success by mobilizing many people from the BC community. He intends to send across a strong message to the ruling Congress besides sounding a warning about an impending political unrest if the state government fails to fulfil the promise of providing 42 per cent quota to BCs in the local body elections.
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Pet-police force and sterilisation: How Bhutan, Netherlands resolve the stray dog issue
At a time when government agencies in Delhi-NCR are scrambling to come up with plans to accommodate stray dogs following the Supreme Court order, a few countries have managed to fix the issue. In 2023, India's neighbour Bhutan recorded 100% sterilisation of its stray dog population under its 'Nationwide Accelerated Dog Population Management and Rabies Control Programme'. While the programme was introduced in 2021, the initiative to sterilise and vaccinate strays was spread over 14 years. Starting 2021, a total of 61,680 dogs were sterilised, of which 56,251 (91%) were free-ranging dogs and the rest were pets. During the campaign 58,581 (95%) dogs were vaccinated against rabies and 32,544 pet dogs were microchipped and registered. In all, over 150,000 strays were sterilised. The programme was implemented with a total budget of Rs 29 crore and was carried out by 12,812 personnel. Netherlands, meanwhile, is among the first European countries with no stray dog population. The country was dealing with a large stray population in the late 1800s and early 1900s. A research paper, 'How Holland became free of stray dogs' says that when the stray dog population in the country started to rise as a result of people abandoning pets, the first response from authorities was to cull them. Mandatory leash and muzzle laws were also established. Later, a 'dog tax' was introduced. This proved to be counterproductive since people started to abandon more dogs as they were unable to pay taxes. At the end of the 20th century, the country passed a law against animal abuse. What changed the game, however, was the implementation of three simple measures. First, the government imposed a heavy tax on store-bought dogs, which pushed the potential dog owners to adopt from the shelters. Second, it carried out the 'CNVR' programme which stands for Collect, Neuter, Vaccinate and Return. Third, authorities launched a pet-police force that imposes fine and jail time for animal abuse and neglect, while also rescuing animals in violation of this law is considered a criminal offence where the person can get a maximum prison sentence of upto three years and a fine of around €16,000. Monday's Supreme Court order also goes against India's ABC Rules 2023. The rules, notified in March 2023, state: 'Dogs from only one area shall be brought for sterilisation, immunisation at a given time in the Animal Birth Control Center and effort must be made to avoid bringing into contact dogs from different areas. All the dogs caught shall be identified with a numbered collar immediately upon arrival at the Animal Birth Control Center and the number shall correspond to capture records to ensure that each dog is released, in the same area from where it was captured, after sterilisation and immunisation.' This means that the present rules do not provide for any provision to capture dogs and relocate them.
