This Los Angeles city official testified for four days so Karen Bass wouldn't have to
Good morning, and welcome to L.A. on the Record — our City Hall newsletter. It's David Zahniser, with an assist from Noah Goldberg and Laura Nelson, giving you the latest on city and county government.
If Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass manages to hold on to her power to oversee the city's homelessness programs, she may well have one person to thank: City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo.
Szabo, a fixture in the administrations of the past three mayors, was effectively the city's star witness in its legal battle against the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights, the nonprofit group that sued the city in 2020 over its handling of the homelessness crisis.
During a seven-day hearing that concluded Wednesday, the alliance pressed U.S. Dist. Judge David O. Carter to take authority over homeless services away from Bass and the City Council and give it to a to-be-determined third party overseen by the court.
On four of those seven days, Szabo sat in the witness chair, defending the city's decisions and occasionally offering cutting remarks about the city's critics. Above all, he insisted the city would meet its obligation to provide 12,915 additional homeless beds by June 2027, as required under a settlement agreement with the alliance.
Szabo, who reports to both Bass and the council, is well known within City Hall for his work preparing the city budget, negotiating with city unions and providing policy recommendations on homelessness and other issues. During his time in Carter's courtroom, he was also a human shield, taking the brunt of the hostile questions and helping to ensure that Bass and others would not be called to testify.
Throughout the proceedings, the city's lawyers lodged hundreds of objections to the alliance's questions, sometimes before they had been fully asked. Carter cautioned them that the rapid-fire interruptions could make things difficult for inexperienced witnesses.
He also made clear that the group did not include Szabo.
'Mr. Szabo,' the judge said, 'certainly is used to the stress.'
The alliance had placed not just Bass but also Councilmembers Monica Rodriguez and Traci Park on its witness list, saying all three had made public statements criticizing the response system. Bass herself called the system 'broken' during her State of the City address in April, a fact highlighted by Matthew Umhofer, an attorney for the alliance.
Those statements, Umhofer said, only reinforce the alliance's argument that the city's homelessness programs are beyond repair and must be placed into receivership.
'The city is not fixing that broken system,' he said during closing arguments. 'It's simply doubling down on that broken system.'
Bass spokesperson Zach Seidl, asked to explain the mayor's use of the word 'broken,' said she was referring to a number of obstacles, including 'an urge from many to return to the old way of doing things that allowed homelessness to explode.'
'But change is happening,' he said. 'Under the Mayor's leadership, we are moving forward.'
The city's newly hired legal team from Gibson Dunn, the law firm that persuaded the Supreme Court to uphold laws barring homeless encampments on public property, sought to amplify that message. They also claimed the mayor and council members were shielded by the 'apex doctrine,' which bars high-level, or apex, government officials from testifying except in extraordinary circumstances.
The city's lawyers offered up just two witnesses of their own: Szabo and Etsemaye Agonafer, Bass' deputy mayor for homelessness programs, saying they were the most familiar with the issues. The alliance initially sought 15.
Agonafer testified for about four hours, highlighting progress made by the mayor's Inside Safe program, which moves people out of encampments and into hotels and motels.
Umhofer ultimately withdrew his subpoenas targeting Bass and the others, saying he didn't want to incur additional delays. But he called Bass cowardly for failing to show up. By then, he said, his team had enough evidence to show that the city's elected officials should no longer control homeless programs.
'We have quite literally put the homelessness response system in Los Angeles on trial,' said Elizabeth Mitchell, another alliance attorney, on the final day of proceedings.
The alliance used much of the questioning to highlight problems at the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, also known as LAHSA. That agency, overseen by a board of appointees from the city and county, has been criticized repeatedly in audits dating back to 2001 — documents highlighted by the alliance during the proceedings.
Szabo acknowledged that LAHSA has faced issues with data collection. But he insisted that the city is closely tracking the beds required under its settlement with the alliance. 'We have taken steps to ensure that the data we are reporting is accurate,' he told the court.
Carter, who has yet to rule in the case, did not sound as confident in the city's attention to detail. On Wednesday, he demanded that the city turn over records regarding its compliance with another agreement in the case — this one known as the 'roadmap.' The roadmap agreement, which expires June 30, required the city to produce 6,700 beds.
In his order, Carter raised questions about whether city officials had double counted 'time-limited subsidies' — money used to help homeless people move into apartments and pay their rent — by applying them both to the roadmap requirements and to the obligations within the alliance settlement agreement.
Szabo said city officials are collecting the records for the judge.
Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez, whose district includes Hollywood, voiced confidence in Szabo. He also praised Bass for taking on the issue of homelessness, pointing out that LAHSA reported that the city had made progress last year.
'We're doing things that are showing results,' said Soto-Martínez, whose office has participated in 23 Inside Safe encampment operations. 'Is it perfect? No. But we're working through it.'
— ICE RAID OUTRAGE: L.A.'s elected officials voiced their anger on Friday over a series of federal immigration sweeps in Westlake, Cypress Park and other parts of the city. L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis said the individuals detained were 'hardworking Angelenos who contribute to our local economy and labor force every day.'
Bass issued her own statement, saying: 'We will not stand for this.'
'As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' she said. 'These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.'
— WELCOME, AECOM: Nearly five months after a firestorm laid waste to a wide swath of Pacific Palisades, Bass announced that the city has hired the global infrastructure firm AECOM to develop a plan for rebuilding the area and reconstructing utilities and other infrastructure. The firm will work alongside both the city and Hagerty Consulting, which Bass tapped as a recovery contractor in February, according to the mayor's office.
— SWITCHING HORSES? Businessman and gubernatorial candidate Stephen J. Cloobeck offered praise for L.A.'s mayor last year, commending her for her work addressing homelessness. He even said he had donated $1 million to LA4LA, an initiative promoted by Bass during her 2024 State of the City address, an event he attended. But last weekend, while making the rounds at the California Democratic Convention, he told The Times he wasn't so keen on Bass' leadership. 'I would support Rick Caruso in a heartbeat over Mayor Karen Bass, and that's a quote,' he said.
— MISSED MESSAGES: Bass has come under heavy scrutiny for deleting text messages she sent during the January firestorms. But she wasn't the only one. L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the area devastated by the Eaton fire, has an iPhone that 'auto deletes' messages every 30 days, her spokesperson said.
— ENGINE TROUBLE: Earlier this year, then-Fire Chief Kristin Crowley cited disabled engines, and a lack of mechanics, as one reason why fire officials did not dispatch more personnel to Pacific Palisades before the Jan. 7 fire. But a Times analysis found that many of the broken engines highlighted by department officials had been out of service for many months or even years — and not necessarily for a lack of mechanics. What's more, the LAFD had dozens of other engines that could have been staffed and deployed in advance of the fire.
— SAYONARA, CEQA: State lawmakers are on the verge of overhauling the California Environmental Quality Act, which has been used for decades to fight real estate development and public works projects in L.A. and elsewhere. One proposal would wipe away the law for most urban housing developments.
— PADRINOS PAYOUT: L.A. County has agreed to pay nearly $2.7 million to a teenager whose violent beating at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall launched a sprawling criminal investigation into so-called 'gladiator fights' inside the troubled facility. Video of the December 2023 beating, captured on CCTV, showed Jose Rivas Barillas, then 16, being pummeled by six juveniles as probation officers stood idly by.
— EVADING EVICTION: A 70-year-old homeless man who illegally moved into a state-owned house in the path of the now-canceled 710 Freeway extension is fighting his eviction. Benito Flores, who seized a vacant residence in El Sereno several years ago, recently holed up in a tree house he built in the backyard — and so far has warded off attempts by sheriff's deputies to lock him out.
— AIRPORT AHEAD: The long-awaited LAX/Metro transit center at Aviation Boulevard and 96th Street finally opened on Friday, bringing commuters tantalizingly close to Los Angeles International Airport. For now, free shuttle buses will run every 10 minutes along the 2.5-mile route between the transit center and LAX.
— BREAKING BARRIERS: The first transgender captain in the Los Angeles Fire Department died last month at age 80. Michele Kaemmerer joined the LAFD in 1969, retiring in 2003. She transitioned in 1991 and later led Engine 63 in Marina del Rey. In a 1999 interview with PBS, Kaemmerer said that some firefighters who knew her before she transitioned refused to work with her. Despite those hardships, she 'always had a good attitude,' said her widow, Janis Walworth.
That's it for this week! Send your questions, comments and gossip to LAontheRecord@latimes.com. Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Saturday morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In Morro Bay, the decision to fly — or not fly — the Pride flag is political
June is Pride Month, a time when we dust off our rainbow flags and don our regalia in celebration of decades of triumph over adversity. We commune with our siblings and allies to mark progress and honor those who came before us in brave elegance and hearty aspiration. There are moments of great joy and celebration, but also times of marked solemnity. Pride is a time of family and remembrance, but also a time to regroup and map the work that still needs to be done. When news broke that Morro Bay planned its final Pride flag raising, we shared a message on our business website encouraging folks to attend the proclamation earlier this week. Almost immediately, someone left a crude and loathsome response. Over the past calendar year in San Luis Obispo County, we have witnessed an alleged anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime death, along with several assaults and acts of vandalism rooted in queer hate. In the Southern U.S., we've heard preachers openly calling for the execution of LGBTQ+ individuals. And now, the current president has re-centered focus on making LGBTQ+ people once again targets of scorn and contempt. This is the backdrop that makes it clear: The decision to rescind Morro Bay's Pride flag ordinance did not happen in a vacuum. When City Councilmember Jeff Eckles publicly called for the removal of the ordinance that allows the Pride flag to fly, he offered scant and misleading justifications. Those justifications rang hollow as speaker after speaker faced the dais and systematically dismantled every point. Attempting to persuade the audience that his actions were rooted in the rosy ideal of 'neutrality,' the council member's words failed to resonate with the packed room of LGBTQ+ individuals and allies. It was a shameful insult to recast the rainbow Pride flag — a symbol that has stood for inclusion, affirmation and acceptance for nearly 50 years — as something divisive or exclusionary. Calling it a step toward 'tribalism' is disingenuous at best. It is intellectually dishonest to argue that allowing three council members to decide whether a symbol of unity and inclusion may fly is somehow a 'gross overreach of government.' If so, wouldn't removing it by that same process also constitute overreach? What is the point of representative government if not to represent all the people? While cities across the state and country are expanding Pride visibility, how is it that our small town of 10,000 cannot find the courage to take a principled stand in support of roughly 10% of its population? The Pride flag pushes back against the long history of violence, exclusion and discrimination that LGBTQ+ people have endured — and still endure. The claim that this decision affects all commemorative flags, not just the Pride flag, falls apart under scrutiny. No other flag has been requested to fly. And we've heard the same tired false dilemmas: 'What if someone wants to fly the Nazi or Confederate flag?' Well, there is a process, and the council votes on each request. If the council cannot distinguish between a flag that honors inclusion and one that glorifies violence and genocide, we have a much deeper problem than flag policy. We are not asking for rainbow crosswalks or high-dollar lighting displays. We are simply asking that the Pride flag continue to fly for one month out of the year to show that our town supports and represents all of its residents and visitors. The council has now rescinded the ordinance and chosen to limit flags to the Morro Bay flag, the state flag and the American flag. Some who spoke in favor of the decision said they wanted to return to 'unity under the American flag.' But here is the rub: the Stars and Stripes have not always symbolized unity. For many, they have represented prejudice, bullying and violence. Now, more than ever, the U.S. flag divides in new ways. Over the past decade, it has increasingly come to represent one political party. Often, it flies alongside banners promoting a leader who has actively worked to strip away protections and freedoms from the LGBTQ+ community — freedoms that should be guaranteed under that very flag. Unity under one banner sounds like a noble idea. But until we have a shared definition of liberty and equality, the Rainbow Pride flag must continue to fly. It is not a substitute for the American flag, it is a bridge that spans the divide between our country's promises and the lived reality of many of its people. Until the Stars and Stripes can fulfill their promise for everyone, the rainbow must remain. Aimee Brantley is a resident and business owner in Morro Bay.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Los Angeles Mayor Bass signs city budget to preserve services, bolster police force
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass signed the city budget on Friday. The newly signed budget will preserve city services like street repair, traffic management and parks and library programming maintenance. It will also help to bring new jobs to the Los Angeles Police Department, according to the mayor's office. 'City Council leadership will identify funds for an additional 240 recruits within 90 days,' Bass' office said in a press release. 'The money will be used after LAPD fulfills hiring 240 officers.' Funding for vital services such as street repair, traffic management and parks and library program maintenance is also included in the budget, which according to the mayor herself, was not easy to put forward. $150K Camaro stolen from influencer during Southern California event 'This budget has been delivered under extremely difficult conditions–uncertainty from Washington, the explosion of liability payments, unexpected rising costs and lower than expected revenues,' said Mayor Bass. 'This budget continues to aggressively combat the homelessness crisis and invest in emergency response and vital city services like street repair, parks and libraries. I want to thank the City Council for coming together on this deal as we work together to make Los Angeles safer for all.' According to Mayor Bass' office, the city budget includes: Restoration of more than 1,000 city positions at risk of layoff to ensure delivery of vital services like pothole repair, traffic management, positions that support future housing development and more New investments in the Los Angeles Fire Department with more positions, funding for more paramedics and other resources and support Funding for all sworn officers and firefighters Continued funding for 9-1-1 emergency dispatchers to lower wait times Protection for homeless funding Resources to continue driving the Palisades Fire recovery forward with urgency Maintenance of library and Parks and Recreation facility hours maintained Support for capital infrastructure projects, including staff for the planning and coordination of the LA Convention Center, funding for Sepulveda Basin improvements and recreation facilities in San Fernando Valley & South L.A. Measures to preserve of all positions within the Emergency Management Department with a priority to expand with future funding Continued funding for RepresentLA to provide legal representation to Angelenos Funding to keep all animal shelters open and add strategic additional staffing support More information on the city's budget can be found here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Help us settle a debate: What do you call the middle lane on the Sevens?
Phoenix leaders recently commissioned a study to examine commuting patterns on Seventh Avenue and Seventh Street where reversible lanes are used in rush hour. City traffic engineers also will look at the effects of those lanes on the major arterials within a mile and a half to the east and west of them. The City Council's decision last month came as a citizen petition that garnered 4,000 signatures demanded the removal of the reverse lanes along the two heavily trafficked corridors, commonly referred to as the Sevens. For years, people have raised safety concerns with Phoenix's reverse lanes, which have been used for nearly a half-century. City officials argue they are needed to mitigate traffic during peak hours. The report, which is planned to be completed by December 2026, will study the city's streets and the potential impacts of removing a portion of the reverse lanes, notably through the Melrose District. It's the second time the city has studied the question in four years and follows the second resident petition in three. After the last petition, in 2023, The Arizona Republic asked readers to let us know how they felt about the reverse lanes. In our non-scientific poll, two-thirds of readers said Phoenix should stop using reverse lanes. We want to see if readers' thoughts on the matter have changed since then. Let us know by answering the poll question below. While the debate continues over whether the reverse lanes are helpful, the issue as prompted another debate within The Republic newsroom and among its readers. Many longtime Phoenix residents use the colloquial term 'suicide lanes" to describe the reverse lanes on the Sevens. But traffic engineers do not use that term; they call them reversible lanes. Many people use "suicide lanes" to describe any center lane where cars can face each other head-on, such as on McDowell or Thomas roads. So, which is it? What should the lanes on the Sevens be called? We're asking readers to help settle this dispute. First, here's what we know about the lanes, their definitions and how they're meant to be used: This is an easy question to answer, as traffic engineers in Phoenix and around the country agree on their definition and description. They're center two-way left turn lanes, or TWLTL, to the engineers. Simply put, they're center turn lanes. The lanes are marked with solid yellow lines on the outside, and inner broken yellow lines. Drivers traveling in both directions along major streets like Indian School and McDowell roads or the Sevens can hop into the center lane to turn across traffic down a side street, or into a driveway or shops. Reverse, or reversible, lanes, like the ones along Seventh Street and Seventh Avenue, are converted center turn lanes. They're designed to expedite traffic flow during morning and afternoon rush hours, and only between McDowell Road and Dunlap Avenue on Seventh Street. On Seventh Avenue, the lane ends at Northern Avenue. What are flex lanes? New lanes introduced on Interstate 17 to alleviate traffic congestion On weekdays in Phoenix, those center turn lanes on the Sevens can be used as southbound through-traffic lanes for drivers heading into downtown from 6 to 9 a.m. They flip to northbound through-traffic lanes from 4 to 6 p.m. as drivers head away from downtown. During all other times of the day, the lanes can again be used as left-hand turn lanes, just like those on Thomas Road. This is the crux of the debate. 'Suicide lane' is not an official term that traffic engineers and transportation departments use. It's hardly found in official documents and government reports. The term is purely colloquial, and depending on who you're talking to, it can have slightly different meanings and uses. Here in Phoenix, many use it interchangeably with reverse lanes to denote the safety concerns and confusion associated with the lanes. Elsewhere, 'suicide lane' is the term used to describe all center turn lanes, not just those used for reverse lanes. A study on U-turns and intersections that the North Carolina Department of Transportation commissioned noted that some people described the two-way left turn lane as a 'suicide' lane. According to Wikipedia, the term has historically been used to describe the center left turn lane, as well as center passing lanes that are sometimes found along highways. Here's where you, the reader, can weigh in and help settle — or fuel — the debate. What do you call Phoenix's reverse travel lanes? Cast your vote in the poll below. Shawn Raymundo covers Phoenix and Scottsdale. Reach him at sraymundo@ or follow him on X @ShawnzyTsunami. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: 'Suicide' or 'reverse' lane? What to call center lanes on the Sevens?
