
INTERACTIVE: Malaysians have highest grocery bill in South-East Asia
PETALING JAYA: Malaysians are experiencing a heavy burden when it comes to rising food prices, with data showing that they spend more on groceries than any South-East Asian country.
Data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service shows that Malaysia's consumer expenditure on food at home was highest in the region in 2023 at US$1,940 per person per year.
The USDA figures are not adjusted for inflation or differences in living costs between countries.
According to Bank Negara Malaysia's exchange rate in 2023, the US$1,940 figure for Malaysia is equivalent to RM8,848.
However, at current exchange rates, it is equivalent to RM8,286.
Singapore was second at US$1,831, followed by Thailand (US$1,108), Philippines (US$1,070) and Cambodia (US$898).
Experts said several factors explain why Malaysians spend a relatively high amount on food at home compared to other countries in the region.
They include a reliance on food imports, a weaker Ringgit and farm labour shortages.
Other reasons include the rising cost of input in food production such as fertilise and animal feed, monopolies and oligopolies in food production, as well as low farm productivity.
'Malaysia's elevated food cost per person relative to its Asean counterparts points to the need for concerted efforts by the government and private sector to expand food production and raise farm productivity,' said Sunway University economics professor Dr Yeah Kim Leng.
He said other complementary actions include dismantling monopolies and liberalising food markets, reducing transport and storage costs and improving supply chain efficiencies to bring down food prices.
He said Malaysia's higher food expenditure per person at home compared to Asean countries with lower per capita income can also be explained by its higher income level.
'However, despite income per capita that is in multiples that of Malaysia, Singapore's food expenditure per capita is about the same as Malaysia's during the 2017 to 2023 period, with the 2023 figure dipping below Malaysia's in 2023,' he said.
While the data specifically does not take inflation into account, Yeah noted that the food component in Malaysia's consumer price index (CPI) basket has been experiencing higher inflation averaging 3.1% annually between 2020 and 2024 compared to the overall CPI inflation of 1.8%.
Khazanah Research Institute's research associate Dr Teoh Ai Ni said the total amount spent on food consumed at home would vary depending on how frequently individuals spend eating at home.
She said Malaysians also spend a larger portion of their monthly spending for food on food at home compared to Singaporeans.
'Data from the Household Expenditure Survey 2022 shows that Malaysian households spent about 48% of their total monthly food expenditure on food away from home, with 52% spent on food at home.
'In comparison, Singaporean households spent 68% of their food expenditure on food away from home.'
'This is why the consumer expenditures spent on food at home for Singapore is lower than that of Malaysia, and it does not imply that food in Malaysia is more expensive,' she said.
She noted that the use of US dollar in USDA's data as the unit for comparison does not take into account the variations in the current strength or cost of living, nor does it equal purchasing power.
Fellow research associate at KRI, Nik Syafiah Anis said Malaysia is also one of the more food import-dependent nations in Asean, which means its food system is vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions and external price shocks.
She said other Asean countries such as Thailand and Vietnam have transitioned into major agricultural powerhouses, with Vietnam's food exports surging more than 15-fold between 1995 and 2018, driven by rice, seafood, and coffee.
She in comparison, Malaysia's food import bill reached RM75.6 billion in 2022 and it remains a net importer of essential food items, particularly animal or vegetable fats and oils, cereals, and dairy products.
'One key dimension of this dependency is the country's reliance on imported animal feed - particularly corn and soymeal, which are key inputs in poultry, livestock, and aquaculture production.
'For example, Malaysia imports around 95% of its corn needs, largely from Argentina, Brazil, and India. This includes corn for feed and food, seed, and industrial (FSI) use,' she said.
She said over-reliance on imported feed has a trickle-down effect on domestic food prices.
She added that with global disruptions such as geopolitical tensions or poor harvest due to climate change, feed prices can spike, leading to higher prices for chicken, eggs, fish and meat at the consumer level.
Meanwhile, Teoh said the share of income spent on food depends on wages and food expenditure.
Malaysians' portion of food spending is comparatively lower than most other countries in the region.
'The differences are attributable to a combination of factors, including income level, food prices and food consumption patterns.
She said that as income rises, the share spent on basic necessities like food would likely decrease while the share of spending on discretionary items like entertainment and recreation would likely to rise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Asean currencies seen strenghtening this year as US dollar weakens
KUALA LUMPUR: Asean currencies are expected to appreciate further this year as global investors diversify away from heavy US exposures, said Maybank Investment Bank Bhd (Maybank IB) today. The investment bank noted that all major Asean currencies — including the ringgit, Singapore dollar, Indonesian rupiah and Thai baht — are likely to strengthen in 2025. "However, while this may occur, we are not yet convinced there is sufficient evidence of a real structural shift away from the US dollar," the bank said in a research note. Maybank IB said President Donald Trump's protectionist stance, speculated preference for a weaker dollar, and tax proposals have contributed to recent declines in the greenback. Market volatility, which had surged across asset classes, has only recently begun to ease. The bank said Trump's unpredictability may continue to inject volatility into financial markets. Unlike in previous bouts of risk aversion, the US dollar has been most visibly punished, in line with the prevailing 'Sell America' narrative. "We suggest continuing to sell the US dollar on rallies if the US continues to push its agenda of tariffs," it said. Maybank IB said even as the "Sell America" theme fades, the dollar's downtrend could persist well into the second half of 2025, driven by a slowing US economy, expected Federal Reserve rate cuts, and the potential for global growth to exceed currently pessimistic forecasts. "We see a possibility of a virtuous circle for Asian currencies, especially with a bearish US dollar allowing regional central banks to cut interest rates further to boost growth, which could in turn be positive for regional currencies," it added. The investment bank cautioned the market to watch for any signs of trade deals that could be short-term positives for the US dollar and negatives for safe havens such as gold, the Swiss franc, and, to some extent, the Singapore dollar and Thai baht, given the latter's link to gold. "Any bounce in the US dollar should be seen as a short-term unwinding of short positions rather than a bullish reversal to chase," it added. Maybank Investment Bank also noted that Asean's efforts to reduce reliance on the US dollar remain limited. "Adoption of local currencies for trade invoicing remains low, while central banks appear only to have engaged in some diversification of their reserves and assets. "There have been increasing inflows into bonds, but we do not believe this is driven by Asean's own desire to exit the US dollar or US assets," it added.


The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Japan to set up Minister-level meeting to address rice supplies
Japan's minister of agriculture, forestry and fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi (R) poses as he inspects the sales status of rice, released by the government from its reserve under a discretionary contract, at a retail store in Tokyo on June 1, 2025. - JIJI PRESS/AFP TOKYO: Japan will set up a minister-level meeting as early as this week to address the supply of rice, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said in parliament on Monday (June 2), as the government seeks to stabilise the price of the nation's staple grain and quell public anger ahead of a summer election. The government released a further 300,000 metric tonnes of stockpiled rice last week in a bid to bring down prices, which have doubled in the past year. The move came as households struggle with inflation less than two months before an upper house election that could punish a minority government already on the back foot after an underwhelming performance in last year's general vote. "With rice costing twice as much - even 2.5 times as much in some regions - as last year, it's very important to steady that and stabilise the market,' Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said in the same parliamentary session on Monday. Retailers including Aeon Co Ltd. and Pan Pacific International Holdings Corp., the parent company of popular discount store Don Quijote, started selling the stockpiled rice over the weekend, according to statements from both companies. Aeon priced its five kilogramme bag at just under ¥2,000 (US$13.97) before tax, well below the ¥4,200 per bag average consumers are seeing at storefronts. The government auctioned off batches of stockpiled rice starting in February, but prices have continued to hit record highs. Koizumi announced last week that the most recent release would be sold at a fixed price instead of auctioned, and bypass the usual supply chain, which includes rice collection agencies and wholesalers. - Bloomberg


The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
Woman gets S$1 a month in maintenance, after Singapore judge dismisses her appeal for spousal support
SINGAPORE: A High Court judge dismissed a woman's appeal for spousal maintenance of S$2,500 a month, but also reduced her former husband's share of marital assets by ten per cent, given his multiple attempts to undermine the marriage and the woman's welfare. The 39-year-old woman, an administrative assistant who takes home $2,340 (US$1,943) a month, will continue to get a nominal maintenance of $$1 a month, which was earlier awarded by a district judge. The $1 is a symbolic sum which preserves her right to apply for monetary support from her former husband in the future, lawyers told The Straits Times. The woman, who filed for divorce in 2023, was married to a 46-year-old regular serviceman in the Singapore Armed Forces whose net salary is S$5,212 a month. The couple has joint custody of their 12-year-old daughter, but the girl lives with the father. In his judgment on May 7, Justice Choo Han Teck awarded the woman 25 per cent of the matrimonial flat, up from 20 per cent the district judge gave her earlier. She also gets over S$52,000 as her share of the other assets. Justice Choo also agreed with the district judge's decision not to award the woman a larger sum of spousal maintenance. The district judge had said the woman is working and can support herself, and she received a fair share of the marital assets. Besides, the amount she has to contribute to their child's maintenance – S$327 a month – is not high. But the district judge had also noted that the woman is a foreigner who moved to Singapore for marriage and lacked family support here, and hence chose to preserve her right to nominal maintenance of S$1 a month for a transitional period of four years. The woman's lawyer, Russell Thio of Emerald Law, had argued that the district judge did not adequately consider her need for accommodation in awarding her just S$1 in maintenance a month. This is especially since the woman – a former Indian national and Singapore permanent resident – cannot buy an HDB flat on her own, among other factors. But Justice Choo said the wife had not shown that her pay was insufficient to meet her monthly expenses, including housing, or that she has exhausted all means to find accommodation. The man was represented by Sarbrinder Singh Naranjan Singh and Nicholas Say of Sanders Law. In his judgment, Justice Choo said he saw no 'practical distinction' between an order for no maintenance and an order for nominal maintenance of S$1. He said: 'However, as the Court of Appeal has held otherwise, I will leave the S$1 order intact. It is a sum as inconsequential in substance as it is in appearance.' He was referring to another case where the Court of Appeal, which is the apex court, ruled that unless there is a maintenance order made during the divorce – such as a nominal S$1 order – the spouse cannot seek maintenance in the future. Angelina Hing, managing director of Integro Law Chambers, said the S$1 nominal maintenance thus preserves the former spouse's right to apply for a more significant sum of maintenance if there are material changes in her financial situation or needs. In his judgment, Justice Choo was of the view that an order for no maintenance is still a 'subsisting order for maintenance' under Section 118 of the Women's Charter, meaning the order is currently in effect. And this should not prevent a former spouse from applying for maintenance in the future. He also said that under Section 113 of the Women's Charter, the court can order a man to pay maintenance to his former wife even after the divorce judgment has been granted. June Lim, managing director of Eden Law Corporation, said: 'His judgment signals that this area of law might benefit from further consideration, clarification from the higher courts or through legislative reform, but until that happens, the precedent remains binding.' Lawyers interviewed noted that Justice Choo reduced the man's share of the marital assets by 10 per cent to signal the court's disapproval of his conduct. The man received 75 per cent of the flat and 59 per cent of the other assets, with the rest going to the woman. Among other things he did, the man repeatedly denied the wife access to their daughter and he was penalised for contempt of court for having breached court orders. Such penalties involve a fine or a jail term, or both, though his penalty was not stated in the judgment. He also petitioned the HDB to acquire the flat because of his financial difficulties, and tried to send the woman back to India. He refused to let the woman add her name to the title deed of their matrimonial flat or let her repay the housing loan, which led to the forfeiture of the flat due to substantial arrears. At one point, she settled the outstanding arrears and maintained subsequent payments. Justice Choo said the HDB refunded all her payments, as she was not entitled to make such payments without her former husband's consent as the flat's sole owner. The woman was eventually evicted from the flat by the HDB and police officers. The man's actions deprived the woman of a larger sum that an open market sale of the flat would have yielded, Justice Choo said. Edith Chen, a lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences and a consultant with Tan Rajah and Cheah, said marriage should be an equal cooperative partnership of efforts for the mutual benefit of both spouses. She added: 'If one spouse's conduct does not contribute to the partnership, but instead has a negative impact on the partnership, the court may take such negative impact into consideration and may reduce that spouse's share of the assets.' Chen said that if a flat is considered a matrimonial asset under the Women's Charter, it is liable to be divided between the couple. This is even if one spouse fully financed the property, or the flat is under one spouse's name only. - The Straits Times/ANN