Clerk who denied same-sex marriage licenses in 2015 is still fighting Supreme Court's ruling
The Kentucky county clerk who became known around the world for her opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage is still arguing in court that it should be overturned.
Kim Davis became a cultural lightning rod 10 years ago, bringing national media and conservative religious leaders to eastern Kentucky as she continued for weeks to deny the licenses. She later met Pope Francis in Rome and was parodied on 'Saturday Night Live.'
Kim Davis denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples
Davis began denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015.
Videos of a same-sex couple arguing with Davis in the clerk's office over their denial of a license drew national attention to her office.
She defied court orders to issue the licenses until a federal judge jailed her for contempt of court in September 2015. Davis was released after her staff issued the licenses on her behalf but removed her name from the form.
The Kentucky Legislature later enacted a law removing the names of all county clerks from state marriage licenses.
Davis cited her Christian faith
Davis said her faith forbade her from what she saw as an endorsement of same-sex marriage. Faith leaders and conservative political leaders including former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and then-Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin rallied to her cause.
After her release from jail, Davis addressed the media, saying that issuing same-sex marriage licenses 'would be conflicting with God's definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. This would be an act of disobedience to my God.'
Davis declined a request for an interview from The Associated Press for this story.
A man who was denied a license ran for her office
In 2018, one of the men who had confronted Davis over her defiance ran for her office. David Ermold said he believed people in Rowan County were sick of Davis and wanted to move on.
When he went to file his papers for the Democratic primary, Davis, a Republican, was there in her capacity as clerk to sign him up. Sitting across a desk from each other, the cordial meeting contrasted the first time they met three years earlier.
Both candidates lost; Ermold in the primary and Davis in the general election. She has not returned to politics.
10 years later, Davis wants the Supreme Court to reconsider same-sex marriage
Davis' lawyers are attempting again to get her case before the Supreme Court, after the high court declined to hear an appeal from her in 2020.
A federal judge has ordered Davis to pay a total of $360,000 in damages and attorney fees to Ermold and his partner.
Davis lost a bid in March to have her appeal of that ruling heard by a federal appeals court, but she will appeal again to the Supreme Court. Her attorney, Mat Staver of the Liberty Counsel, said the goal is affirm Davis' constitutional rights and 'overturn Obergefell.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
World Braces for Iran's Response After US Attack
Good morning. The world braces for Iran's response after the US strikes. Satellite images question Donald Trump's claim that nuclear sites were destroyed. And Apple executives consider acquiring AI startup Perplexity. Listen to the day's top stories. The US airstrikes on Iran have set traders and governments on edge, as the Islamic Republic warns of retaliation and Israel shows no sign of letting up. Oil climbed and US futures fell as trading got underway. The US issued a 'Worldwide Caution' alert for American citizens, flagging the potential of travel disruptions and demonstrations following the strikes.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran after strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities
US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy. Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, raising the risk of a wider war in the Middle East amid warnings from his MAGA base and allies and foes from abroad. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.' Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons. But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Vice President JD Vance also spoke at news outlets. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program. Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and put out a coordinated message and strategy on the US involvement or plan, Trump himself has made a series of intimidating statements, even as he has simultaneously called to restart negotiations. Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Related US operation against Iran in detail: Bombs, planes and missiles used Can Iran attack the US now and how (and where) can it do it? Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing the country's intelligence chief, Mohammad Kazemi, and his deputy, Hassan Mohaqiq. Ten nuclear scientists were also killed. Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers. At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, according to figures from a Washington-based group, Human Rights Activists, and 27 people have died from Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Oakland group pushing to get new charter amendment on 2026 ballot
A group in Oakland is working to change the way the city government operates. The Oakland Charter Reform Project is in the process of trying to get a charter amendment on the ballot in 2026. Steven Falk is one of the leaders of the project. He's lived in Oakland throughout his adult life and plans to call the city home for the foreseeable future. "This is my city," exclaimed Falk. "I love Oakland." But he knows it's not perfect. He's worked for Oakland as a city manager, as well as five other cities over the past nearly 40 years. "My experience was Oakland is more dysfunctional than the other cities I had worked for," Falk explained. "And I tried to figure out why. If it wasn't the people, what was it? I concluded it was the system. It's the organization chart. It's the way the city is organized that holds it back." A charter is the constitution of the city, outlining how it functions. In Oakland, the charter dictates that the mayor does not attend city council meetings, they have no voting power on the council, and they do not supervise department heads. "That is not the case in 97% of California's cities, but Oakland is built differently and that needs to change," Falk said. Newly elected Mayor Barbara Lee agrees. It's in her first 100-day plan. She lists 10 things she wants to accomplish, number five says, "appoint a taskforce of League of Women Voters, ethics, and good government experts to modernize Oakland's Charter and strengthen government accountability." Falk is ready to help with that. "We're working with her and hope to have this task force up and running by mid-August in order to meet her self-imposed deadline," Falk said. A charter amendment would need to be voted on during a general election. The next one is one year away, in June of 2026. That means they need to have their ballot measure written for review by the city attorney by January, February at the latest. Falk is out talking with Oaklanders about what they want to see. "We're hearing that they want better government, in the most recent poll by the Oakland Chamber of Commerce, 75% of Oaklanders say they feel the city is on the wrong track," Falk said. "That number is too high; that has to change and we don't think it can change until the charter is changed." So far, he's talked with hundreds of people. He said many want faster, more centralized decision-making and a council and mayor that have real authority over city staff. Falk believes a new charter could be a game-changer for Oakland. "Oakland has the arts, the culture, the history; it should be the center of the Bay Area," said Falk. "It should be the crown jewel of the Bay Area, but I think most people recognize that it's not. I'm passionate about helping Oakland reach its potential and be as good as it can be."
