logo
Des Moines firefighters win holiday time dispute

Des Moines firefighters win holiday time dispute

Axios19 hours ago
An arbitrator recently ruled in favor of Des Moines firefighters in a compensation dispute, concluding that the city must provide extra time off to those who work overtime on holidays.
Why it matters: The decision could greatly influence the fire department's funding and staffing choices.
It comes at a time when budgets are tight, with city officials last month discussing the idea of removing a rig from service.
Catch up quick: The case focuses on firefighter Nathan Jones, who worked a 24-hour shift on July 4, 2024.
He received double-time pay for 17 hours considered overtime, but he did not additionally accrue those hours for future time off, unlike the seven hours that were part of his regular shift.
Zoom in: The city argued that the union contract didn't entitle Jones to both double pay and time off for overtime hours, with fire chief John TeKippe saying that at least one instance where another firefighter was paid for both on a Christmas Day shift may have been "an error in an entry."
Yes, but: Arbitrator Marsha Ternus, a former Iowa Supreme Court justice, ruled on July 25 that the contract's language does not support the city's interpretation, determining that Jones — and others in similar roles — are eligible for the extra holiday hours.
What they're saying: Joe Van Haalen, president of Des Moines Professional Firefighters IAFF Local 4, told the City Council this month that the arbitration cost the union more than $30,000 in legal fees that were avoidable.
"At best, it was a gross misjudgment. At worst, it represents a pattern of hostility toward the workforce that should concern every member of this council," Van Haalen said during an Aug. 4 City Council meeting.
The other side: The city believes that the ruling does not reflect the intent of the union agreement, city manager Scott Sanders wrote in an Aug. 5 email to council members.
Axios' request to speak to TeKippe about the issue was denied, with city spokesperson Devin Perry saying the city's legal department prefers employees not to comment on litigation or labor matters.
Between the lines: The city did not spend money on outside counsel during the arbitration process but was still gathering information Tuesday to estimate costs associated with the decision, Perry said.
The intrigue: A separate legal battle is unfolding in West Des Moines, where a group of firefighters is suing the city, claiming they were misclassified under federal law and denied proper overtime pay, the Iowa Capital Dispatch reports.
What's next: The overtime time-off calculations begin immediately for Labor Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Memorial Day and Independence Day.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Isleton City Council structure shaken up, meeting turns to chaos
Isleton City Council structure shaken up, meeting turns to chaos

CBS News

time10 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Isleton City Council structure shaken up, meeting turns to chaos

There's political drama in the Delta, after the Isleton City Council ousted the mayor as part of a reorganization, naming a new mayor and vice mayor from within the council. Tensions were high at a chaotic meeting on Tuesday, where CBS Sacramento's camera was rolling. As the meeting went on, insults, opinions, and frustrations were shared by councilmembers, city staff, and members of the public who were in attendance in a packed city hall. Expletives were regularly thrown into comments and grievances from all sides. At the center of one of the most contested items was the now-former mayor, Iva Walton. Walton was accused of continuing to operate an outdoor dining area at her bar, Mei Wah Beer Room, after her encroachment permit was denied. At one point, Walton said: "It feels like dumping when her [councilmember Aleida Suarez] wife calls me a 'bad dog.' " Suarez responded: "You call us coffee b-----," adding, "this isn't about he said she said. This is about code of conduct." At times, other members of the public blurted out expletives as councilmembers spoke to each other, at times, outlining negative or untrue social media posts made about each other. Isleton has a $4.7 million debt, and a recent grand jury report outlined systemic issues that put the city on the brink of bankruptcy. Tuesday night, before chaos erupted, the council voted to send a letter of request to the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors requesting an $800,000 loan to address some of their immediate debts. Members of the public expressed concern amid the tense exchanges and council upheaval that the perception of their city may be impacted if they receive the county loan. "We just have to look at the future and how the person that's going to give us a loan and looks at what you guys are doing now. There's a TV camera here, there's a reporter here. How do you want to look to the public?" one speaker said. CBS Sacramento took the concerns about the impacts of the meeting to the city's acting finance director, who said on Wednesday that the city manager spent most of the day doing "damage control." "Change is going to be painful. This city has operated for one way for decades. To put them on the right path, it's going to look really rocky," said Jessica Bigby, acting finance director of Isleton. The now-mayor, David Kent, told CBS Sacramento it was good to get all of the thoughts, feelings, and opinions out in the open. "A bit of a deviation of sort of the standard session you would expect, but it was healthy and necessary in my opinion," said Kent. In a statement to CBS13, Walton said she believed the proper procedure was not followed, "and the complaints were largely personal attacks and had nothing to do with the leadership I brought to the chair/mayor council position."

Christmas Planning Starts Now: Inside Retail's Real Holiday Rush
Christmas Planning Starts Now: Inside Retail's Real Holiday Rush

Forbes

time3 hours ago

  • Forbes

Christmas Planning Starts Now: Inside Retail's Real Holiday Rush

Anyone who thinks Christmas begins in December is likely not in the business of delivering it. For retailers and supply chain professionals, the festive season kicks off long before any stockings are hung or wish lists written. In fact, the summer months are when the groundwork is laid—and missed opportunities begin to pile up. 'Christmas always comes as a surprise, but it really shouldn't,' says a supply chain executive from a major U.S. retailer. 'If you're just getting started now, you may already be behind.' According to the National Retail Federation (NRF), U.S. holiday sales for 2024 are expected to rise between 2.5% and 3.5%, reaching up to $989 billion. But that projection hangs in the balance as geopolitical tensions and trade policy changes threaten to throw a wrench into even the best-laid logistics plans. With a new 30% U.S. tariff on imports from the EU and Mexico taking effect August 1, and ongoing uncertainty in U.S.-China trade relations, the path forward is anything but smooth. A reintroduction of tariffs over 100%—especially on goods like toys, electronics, and decorations—could significantly disrupt holiday inventory flows. The companies that fail to plan early may soon find themselves scrambling for inventory, transport capacity, or pricing leverage. 'Those that delay will likely be forced to improvise—and that usually comes at the expense of margin, customer satisfaction, or both,' warns the NRF. Many U.S. retailers have already moved up their orders to capitalize on a temporary tariff reprieve, reducing some Chinese import duties from 145% to 30%. But this front-loading strategy isn't without risk, especially in a high-interest-rate environment where inventory ties up capital, and social media drives fast-changing consumer trends. As supply chains grow more complex, companies are turning to AI-powered planning models and real-time data to stay agile. These tools help forecast demand shifts and manage capacity more effectively during critical windows like Black Friday and Cyber Monday. 'Human expertise and operational flexibility remain key success factors,' says one logistics leader. 'You can have the data, but you also need the instinct to know when to act.' Beyond procurement, logistics remains a pressure point. With peak season transport demands rising and potential delays from China's Golden Week in October looming, experts advise locking in capacity now. 'It's a seller's market for freight in Q4,' one analyst notes. Longer term, many companies are reassessing not just when they plan, but where they source. Shifting production from China to Mexico or Vietnam is gaining traction—but it's no overnight fix. Meanwhile, private label goods and redesigned products that use fewer tariff-liable materials offer some short-term relief. Whether the goal is resilience, cost-efficiency, or sustainability, one thing is clear: Christmas will arrive on December 24, ready or not.

Mayor Adams vetoes bills boosting NYC grocery delivery worker wages after lobbying by Amazon, Instacart
Mayor Adams vetoes bills boosting NYC grocery delivery worker wages after lobbying by Amazon, Instacart

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mayor Adams vetoes bills boosting NYC grocery delivery worker wages after lobbying by Amazon, Instacart

Mayor Adams vetoed two City Council bills late Wednesday that would boost minimum wages for grocery delivery workers to more than $20 an hour — a move that came after his top aide, Randy Mastro, launched an internal advocacy effort against the measures, according to sources familiar with the matter. The mayor, whose own Department of Consumer and Worker Protection commissioner lauded the bills as recently as late last year, had until midnight Wednesday to veto the measures or they would have lapsed into law. With just over six hours to go until the deadline, Adams announced he had used his veto pen to block both bills, arguing they would result in higher grocery prices — an issue that has become a big focus on this year's mayoral campaign trail. In a statement, Adams argued the increased wage requirements would result in grocery delivery companies jacking up prices on their customers, which he said includes seniors, people with disabilities and SNAP beneficiaries. 'Grocery prices are already too high, so now is not the right time to do anything to drive these prices even higher. Unfortunately, Intro. 1135-A and Intro. 1133-A would do just that at a time when too many working-class New Yorkers are struggling,' the mayor's statement said, using the index numbers for the measures. Sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Daily News that Adams has in recent weeks been advised by Mastro, his first deputy mayor, to use his veto pen to block the bills. The sources said Diane Savino, a senior adviser to Adams at City Hall, has also been involved in the talks with Mastro and the mayor. The internal convos came after Amazon and Instacart, two major grocery delivery companies, launched an aggressive lobbying campaign urging Adams to block the bills. Targeting officials in Adams' office and at the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, Amazon and Instacart have made the same argument that the measures would result in higher grocery prices for their customers and also warned of potential layoffs of delivery workers. 'We thank Mayor Adams for recognizing this reality,' Tom McNeil, Instacart's senior government affairs manager, said after his vetoes. Council Democrats passed the two bills with veto-proof majorities, meaning they could move to override the mayor's attempt to block them. Julia Agos, a spokeswoman for Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, said after the vetoes that the chamber's Dems are 'considering our next steps' and 'will always stand up for workers in our city.' Agos also accused the mayor of 'parroting inaccurate talking points' about increased grocery costs. Supporters of the bills have argued third-party delivery platforms would face increased costs, not grocery stores. 'This veto demonstrates that the mayor's claims to care about working-class New Yorkers and a sustainable delivery industry for New York City are hollow, because he is undermining the workers who make the sector possible,' Agos said. 'Without fair wages and protections for delivery workers, there is no sustainable industry, just exploitation.' One of the two bills, Introduction 1135, would over time require third-party companies like Instacart to pay grocery delivery workers a minimum wage of $21.44. That level matches the minimum wage the city set for restaurant delivery workers earlier this year — a reform that the mayor supported. The second bill, Introduction 1133, would ensure that any companies with 'contracted' workers performing delivery services are protected by the same wage requirements. The 1133 bill was specifically designed to ensure Amazon would be covered by the new wage rules. Amazon owns WholeFoods, the grocery store chain, so their delivery workers could be defined as closer than third-parties, leading the Council to enact the second bill to plug any potential loophole. The vetoes come after a December 2024 Council hearing, in which Adams' Department of Consumer and Worker Protection Commissioner Vilda Vera Mayuga, whose agency oversees wage laws for delivery employees, said she wanted to 'enthusiastically commend' the Council for advancing the bills. 'There are many more New York City delivery workers in need of DCWP protections,' she testified. Adams spokesman Zachary Nosanchuk said the administration's views have changed since the December testimony as grocery prices have continued to increase. Grocery prices, and cost-of-living concerns more broadly, have been hotly debated during this year's mayoral race. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee who's polling as the favorite to replace Adams, has vowed to if elected open city government-run grocery stores to try to bring down costs of essentials. In a press conference before the mayor's vetoes, Mamdani said he hoped he wouln't try to block the bills. 'I think it goes against what so many New Yorkers are calling for, which is a wage they can actually live off of,' he told reporters. To date, the Council has overridden Adams three times on legislative vetoes, including when he tried to block a bill placing new transparency requirements on NYPD officers. The Council is gearing up to override yet another veto Adams issued earlier this month to kill a bill decriminalizing unlicensed street vending. Mastro's involvement in pushing the mayor to veto the grocery delivery bills comes as he has become known at City Hall for his aggressive management style. Since becoming Adams' top deputy this spring, Mastro has pushed to reverse several Adams administration initiatives, including a plan to build affordable housing in Manhattan's Elizabeth Street Garden as well as a new composting fine structure on landlords. (With assistance by Josephine Stratman.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store