Handshake confusion as UK PM Keir Starmer meets South Korean President at G7
An awkward moment unfolded at the G7 summit when UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer appeared to greet a South Korean interpreter instead of the President himself. The confusion occurred at the beginning of a formal meeting with South Korea's newly elected President Lee Jae-myung.The PM, seemingly unaware that the President had walked in behind him, shook hands with the translator before turning to greet Lee, who assumed office just two weeks ago.advertisementThe incident happened during the opening stages of the G7 summit, held at a mountain resort in Canada. As the leaders prepared for official talks, Starmer also seemed momentarily unsure of where to stand for the customary photographs, leading to a few seconds of further confusion. However, Downing Street dismissed reports of a handshake mix-up as inaccurate.
Once the brief disruption passed, Starmer reiterated the UK's intent to build deeper ties with South Korea. 'We have a good strong relationship with South Korea and want to strengthen it even further,' he said, pointing to areas like defence cooperation and enhancing the UK-South Korea free trade agreement. President Lee, who is attending the summit as part of the G7's outreach engagement, agreed with the need to modernise their trade deal.This encounter came a day after another moment of awkwardness involving Starmer and former US President Donald Trump. During a separate bilateral meeting, Trump dropped documents related to a proposed transatlantic trade deal, prompting Starmer to crouch and retrieve them. Explaining the moment to reporters later, Starmer said he acted quickly because he feared anyone else approaching Trump might be intercepted by his security detail.advertisement'There weren't many choices with the documents and picking it up,' Starmer said. 'As you probably know, there were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president. I was deeply conscious that it wouldn't have been good for anybody else to step forward.'Meanwhile, Trump made a factual error during his comments, mistakenly claiming the US had signed a trade agreement with the European Union instead of the UK. When asked if concerns should be raised about the former President's health following the incident, Starmer declined to comment, suggesting there was no reason for alarm.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US student visas: Applicants' online activity to be reviewed
The US State Department said on Wednesday it is restarting the suspended process for foreigners applying for student visas but all applicants will now be required to unlock their social media accounts for government review. The department said consular officers will be on the lookout for posts and messages that could be deemed hostile to the United States, its government, culture, institutions or founding principles. In a notice made public Wednesday, the department said it had rescinded its May suspension of student visa processing but said new applicants who refuse to set their social media accounts to 'public' and allow them to be reviewed may be rejected. It said a refusal to do so could be a sign they are trying to evade the requirement or hide their online activity. The Trump administration last month temporarily halted the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in the US while preparing to expand the screening of their activity on social media, officials said. Students around the world have been waiting anxiously for US consulates to reopen appointments for visa interviews, as the window left to book their travel and make housing arrangements narrows ahead of the start of the school year. On Wednesday afternoon, a 27-year-old PhD. a student in Toronto was able to secure an appointment for a visa interview next week. The student, a Chinese national, hopes to travel to the US for a research internship that would start in late July. 'I'm really relieved,' said the student, who spoke on condition of being identified only by his surname, Chen, because he was concerned about being targeted. 'I've been refreshing the website a couple of times every day.' Students from China, India, Mexico and the Philippines have posted on social media sites that they have been monitoring visa booking websites and closely watching press briefings of the State Department to get any indication of when appointment scheduling might resume. In reopening the visa process, the State Department also told consulates to prioritise students hoping to enroll at colleges where foreigners make up less than 15 per cent of the student body, a US official familiar with the matter said. Foreign students make up more than 15% of the total student body at almost 200 US universities, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal education data from 2023. Most are private universities, including all eight Ivy League schools. But that criteria also includes 26 public universities.
Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
Huge blow to diplomacy: Cong on Trump-Munir lunch
The Congress on Thursday attacked the government after US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir for lunch, saying it is a 'huge blow' to Indian diplomacy. Congress general secretary in-charge of communications Jairam Ramesh said Field Marshal Asim Munir is not the Head of State or Head of government of Pakistan and is the Chief of Army Staff, yet he gets invited by Trump for lunch and receives much praise. 'This is the same man whose atrocious and inflammatory remarks formed the immediate backdrop to the brutal Pahalgam terror attacks orchestrated by the establishment over which he presides,' Ramesh said on X. 'It is a huge blow to Indian diplomacy (and huglomacy too),' he said, taking a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Congress has been taking swipes at Modi, giving 'hugs' to foreign heads of state during his meetingas with them at international or bilateral engagements, using the term 'huglomacy' for it. Meanwhile, Trump has said the two very smart leaders of India and Pakistan decided not to continue a war that could have turned nuclear, a first in weeks, he did not claim credit for stopping hostilities between the two neighbouring nations. Trump made the remarks while speaking to the media in the Oval Office after hosting Munir for lunch at the White House. Trump also said he was honoured to meet Munir. When asked if Iran was discussed in his meeting with Munir, Trump said: Well, they know Iran very well, better than most, and they're not happy about anything. It's not that they're bad with Israel. They know them both, actually, but they probably, maybe they know Iran better, but they see what's going on, and he agreed with me. 'The reason I had him here, I want to thank him for not going into the war, ending the war. And I want to thank, as you know, Prime Minister Modi just left a little while ago, and we're working on a trade deal with India. We're working on a trade deal with Pakistan,' the president said. 'They were both here, but I was with Modi a few weeks ago. He was here actually, but now we speak to him. And I'm so happy that two smart people, plus you know, people on their staff too, but two smart people, two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war,' he said.
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Can Keep Using Troops in LA for Now, Appeals Court Says
President Donald Trump can continue to use National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles as a legal challenge over his use of the military proceeds, a federal appeals court ruled. In a win for the White House, a three-judge panel in San Francisco on Thursday said the Trump administration can keep using California National Guard troops to respond to the situation. In effect, it doesn't change the situation on the ground in Los Angeles, where the federal government has been deploying the military for more than a week. Thursday's decision isn't the final ruling on the matter and is likely to be immediately challenged. California could appeal the ruling to the US Supreme Court, or a bigger panel in the same appeals court. The lower court that had ordered the federal government to return control of the troops to the state will also hold a hearing on Friday. California and the Trump administration have been sparring over the federal government's response to the protests, including the deployment of thousands of the state's National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines. California and its Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, have blasted Trump's deployment as a 'power grab' and an unnecessary intrusion on the work of local officials to police the protests. Lawyers for the state also have said it's 'terrifying' that Justice Department lawyers said the presidents actions can't be second-guessed by the courts, and argue that the deployment sets a dangerous precedent. The Trump administration has maintained that the president has the power to unilaterally federalize National Guard troops when he determines there is a 'rebellion' or 'invasion' that necessitates military intervention. And presidents are permitted to call up the state troops when 'regular forces' are unable to enforce federal law. The appeals court judges said Trump likely acted lawfully when he federalized the National Guard, but they objected to arguments raised by Justice Department lawyers that his decision cannot be reviewed by the courts. 'We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority,' the appeals court said in a unanimous ruling late Thursday. The judges also stressed that the decision is limited to whether Trump was allowed to call for the deployment, but does not address 'the nature of the activities in which the federalized National Guard may engage.' The appeals court panel, which heard arguments Tuesday by lawyers from both the Justice Department and California, is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump and one by former President Joe Biden. The court stepped in last week at the administration's request to pauses US District Judge Charles Breyer's order declaring that Trump's deployment without California's consent was 'illegal.' Trump issued a proclamation authorizing their deployment on June 7 and said protests in the city against his deportation initiative represent a form of 'rebellion' against the authority of the federal government. In court filings, lawyers for the administration cited reports of violence and threats against federal property and officers conducting immigration enforcement. Breyer said in his June 12 ruling he was troubled by the idea that a protest against the federal government on its own could 'justify a finding of rebellion.' The case is Newsom v. Trump, 25-3727, US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
