
What Muriel Spark Knew About Childhood
The most recent issue of The Atlantic taught me that the Scottish author Muriel Spark had, according to Judith Shulevitz, 'a steely command of omniscience,' and frequently played with 'selective disclosure, irony, and other narrative devices.' I knew that Spark was funny, and that her work was highly recommended by people whose taste I respect. But I quickly realized I had very few other facts at my disposal. Most important, I'd never read her writing. So before I'd even finished Shulevitz's review of a new biography of the novelist, I downloaded The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie —Spark's best-known work—from my local library.
First, here are four new stories from The Atlantic 's Books section:
How not to fix American democracy
'Surface Support,' a poem by Michael D. Snediker
Literature's enduring obsession with strange sisters
Why so many MIT students are writing poetry
The novella's title character works at an Edinburgh school for girls in the 1930s; she's an outré teacher who has marked a special group of pupils as 'hers.' She cares very little for teaching the approved curriculum. Instead, she takes her students to the theater; she walks them through Edinburgh's Old Town; she regales them with tales of her former loves; she praises the fascist regimes of Mussolini and Hitler. Her girls, she notes, will benefit far more from the artistic education provided by Brodie 'in her prime'—unmarried and pushing 40, she is entirely aware of her sexual and intellectual power, which are both at their peak.
But the story, while named for Brodie, is not actually about her; it is primarily told through the recollections of the girls, and one in particular: Sandy, who in her adulthood has become a nun. The book's main question is not what will become of Brodie—we know from the early pages that she will be fired from the school, 'betrayed' by one of her chosen girls. Instead, it investigates the heady, hormonal days of adolescence, and the moral education of the students.
That last theme is where Spark's 'central concern,' as Shulevitz puts it, becomes clear. The author was a Catholic convert, and her writing is full of characters searching for, asking about, and turning to God. For the girls, whom Brodie begins shaping when they're barely tweens, their teacher is something like a deity: at times hard to understand, often capricious, but ultimately fascinating, beautiful, and never wrong. As they grow up, most of the kids simply become who they were always going to be, shaking off Brodie's rules and stipulations and following their own whims. But Sandy feels her teacher's authority for the rest of her life. Her entanglement with Brodie, which continues into her late teens, leads her down a winding path that culminates in her own conversion to Catholicism. Her act of submission to the Church, which requires her to shed her individuality, is actually her final moment of separation from her former mentor: She has allowed God to dethrone her teacher.
But even though Sandy's conversion mirrors Spark's own, I was surprised and pleased to see that the author doesn't make Sandy a perfect nun, devoted solely to the Church, free of Brodie's shadow. Instead, Spark is realistic about the effect a particularly magnetic figure can have on a young, impressionable person. Many years later, when Sandy is asked who or what most influenced her, it's Brodie's name on her lips. Similarly, Spark's is on mine. I've now got Memento Mori and Loitering With Intent, two of her other novels, waiting for me on my e-reader.
The Judgments of Muriel Spark
By Judith Shulevitz
The novelist liked playing God—a very capricious one.
What to Read
The Backyard Bird Chronicles, by Amy Tan
Tan coped with the political tumult of 2016 by returning to two of her childhood refuges: nature and art. Drawing was an early hobby of hers, but she'd felt discouraged from taking it seriously. At 65, she took 'nature journaling' lessons to learn how to depict and interpret the world around her—most notably the inter-avian dramas of the birds behind her Bay Area home. The Backyard Bird Chronicles is a disarming account of one year of Tan's domestic bird-watching, a book 'filled with sketches and handwritten notes of naive observations,' she writes. That naivete is endearing: The accomplished novelist becomes a novice, trying to improve through eager dedication. Over the course of this engaging book, her illustrations grow more sophisticated, more assured—leaving readers with a portrait of the hobbyist as an emerging artist. — Sophia Stewart
Out Next Week
📚 Baldwin: A Love Story, by Nicholas Boggs
📚 Where Are You Really From, by Elaine Hsieh Chou
📚 Dominion, by Addie E. Citchens
Your Weekend Read
The Logic of the '9 to 5' Is Creeping Into the Rest of the Day
By Julie Beck
Over the past couple of years, the vloggers of social media have taken to documenting their routines from 5 to 9 p.m. Some creators also make a morning version, the '5 to 9 before the 9 to 5,' starting at 5 a.m. These routines are highly edited, almost hypnotic, with quick cuts, each mini-scene overlaid with a time stamp. Hours pass in just a couple of minutes, and the compressed time highlights a sense of efficiency. The videos have big to-do-list energy; the satisfaction they offer is that of vicariously checking boxes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
38 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Martin Short's secrets to staying spry for ‘Only Murders in the Building'
From the mad sprite Ed Grimley to Oliver Putnam, the flamboyant, forever failing Broadway director he plays in Hulu's 'Only Murders in the Building' — for which he's nominated for an Emmy — Martin Short has a gift for playing colorful characters who take up a lot of space. This summer he's become eligible for a different category of Emmy as well, as host of ABC's 'Match Game.' (Also big, also colorful.) 'You reach a point where you've done everything,' Short, 75, said by Zoom recently, about taking that job. 'But you haven't done that. It could be fun — or it could be a big mistake. And that kind of challenge is still provocative to me.' You were nominated as lead actor in a comedy this year, but your co-star Steve Martin wasn't. Did that occasion any interesting conversations between you? Oh, yeah. Steve called me up midafternoon and said, 'I've been out all day and I've been hiking and hiking. Heard anything about the Emmys yet?' But I think Steve's pretty confident in who he is, what he does. In 1982, you won an Emmy for writing on 'SCTV.' As a Canadian, did an American award mean something special to you? Absolutely. Being in Canada, you weren't in an igloo somewhere; you were living 50 miles from the border. You got CBS, NBC, ABC — my whole world from the time I was born was watching American television. I knew every show that was on in every hour or half-hour of prime time, on all three networks. And of course, the family in those days watched one show together, so usually parents dictated anyway. Did any of that find its way into your own work? When I was in my 20s, I'd put in a circle beside some script 'DVD' or 'SL' — 'Do Dick Van Dyke' or 'Stan Laurel.' You're not going to do your own style. You don't have one. I had a lot of 'JL,' Jack Lemmon. There was a kind of rhythm, a fast staccato he could get. You were just delighted to see him. When I was 12 and 13, television was mainly variety shows, Jackie Gleason, Red Skelton, Danny Kaye. And you respond to the sketches and you're influenced by them. I mean, I was most influenced by Nichols and May; they had a Broadway show that was basically variety, and they played sketches. When did you first feel you wanted to be part of that world? Oh, very late. In my mid-20s, I would say. Before then? I was in social work. I was about to do a master's [degree], and I took a year off to explore this interest I had in theater — 'cause I was doing plays, Shakespeare and all these things, with [future 'SCTV' co-stars] Eugene Levy and Dave Thomas at McMaster University in Hamilton [Ontario]. And in the course of this year I gave myself, I got the show 'Godspell,' and that begat other things. But I thought of myself as musical performer, an actor — maybe I'd be Sinatra someday. That's where I was thinking. Not, 'I want to be Jerry Lewis.' What are the pleasures of being in a double act with Steve Martin, and a triple act with Selena Gomez? Well, even when I was a cast member at 'SNL' and having a relatively successful year, I was in two pieces a show. So I think less is more. What's great about sharing a stage or sharing a television show is that the camera is not always on you. And then when they see you, they kind of like to see you again — hopefully. I came from Second City improv; to me, the reaction was as powerful as the action. You look at a film like 'The Philadelphia Story,' and Cary Grant is dealing with a drunken Jimmy Stewart, just reacting. But Cary's just as funny. What's it like working with Selena, who's from a different generation? She's a different generation, but she's also just a sweet, lovely person — you can be lovely at 80, lovely at 20, or the opposite. But also she's a pro, she knows her lines, she's on time. I think the thing that's been most beneficial to the success of the show is that the three of us work in a similar way — loose, fun, laughs on the set, mistakes laughed at, no tension. Because that's the only thing you can control. You don't know if the film's going to be any good, but you can control the working situation. You're very physical in 'Only Murders.' Do you have any sort of regimen to stay in shape? I think a lot of that's DNA and luck. But I always have done Pilates, which is all about stretch and core. Is there also a psychological element to how you fly through the world? I think it all goes to health. I remember when I was turning 30 I decided to get into the best shape I'd ever been in in my life. And I was going to the gym and working out, and two days before turning 30 I pulled my back lifting weights and could barely walk, and felt like I was 90. But I have great health; I don't get up [and] go, 'Oh that's right, I'm not spry anymore.' That might affect my behavior. But I don't put an age on myself, because I don't feel restricted by age.


Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Culture War Over Nothing
'You know the LIBS are seething over this,' Joe Kinsey, an editor at the sports website OutKick, wrote on X while reposting a video of sorority girls doing a choreographed dance. Many of the girls were wearing red-white-and-blue outfits, though some were dressed as hot dogs. They waved American flags in front of a banner that read We Want You Kappa Delta. 'Credit to these ladies for pumping out patriotism to kick off the 2025 school year,' Kinsley wrote. It wasn't only the display of patriotism that supposedly made liberals seethe. 'The purple hair lesbians have to be furious that SEC sororities ARE BACK,' Kinsey wrote while reposting another sorority-dance video. This one had no clear Americana element aside from the matching trucker hats all of the dancing girls were wearing. Kinsey's two posts were viewed nearly 40 million times. Many other such videos have been shared on X in the past couple of weeks, as sororities have begun recruiting for the new school year. The videos come from TikTok, where sorority dance videos have long been popular. But they've been presented on X with a new gloss: Democrats, liberals, and leftists are enraged by pretty, mostly white young women who are dancing happily. It drives them up the wall when a woman is blond! Do not let a liberal see a woman smiling while wearing a short denim skirt. The only thing that is missing is evidence of seething libs. Search around social media, and you might be surprised how difficult such reactions are to find. In fact, I couldn't find a single one. When I asked Kinsey where he got the idea that people were angry about the sorority-recruitment videos, he didn't point me to any specific examples. He noted that many people replied to his posts saying that they weren't mad about the TikTok dances. But, he said, 'I don't believe that.' By now, this is all familiar. Recall the recent controversy over an American Eagle ad starring Sydney Sweeney, in which the actress hawked denim jeans by making a pun about her genes. A small number of people on social media did get very angry, and posted about how the ad sounded like a eugenics dog whistle. Their reaction was then amplified by right-wing commentators eager to make the point that the left hates hot women. The fact that the situation involved Sydney Sweeney, a celebrity who had already been evoked in culture-war debates in the past, drove even more attention. It turned into a full-blown news cycle. (I am confident my grandmother heard about this.) In both cases, this burst of bizarre posting is less a story about American politics than it is a story about social media and, specifically, X. Whatever else you may say about Elon Musk's platform, it is the best place to watch a fake drama unfold. Both of the videos that Joe Kinsey shared—of the girls with the flags and the girls with the trucker hats—were originally posted on their respective sororities' TikTok accounts. But the versions he shared had been uploaded to X by what appears to be an account called 'Calico Cut Pants,' which seemingly exists to move short-form videos from one platform to another. The account follows no one and is named after a sketch from the Tim Robinson Netflix show I Think You Should Leave. Other sorority dance videos have been pulled from TikTok and posted by an account called 'Big Chungus,' which also posts almost nothing but videos from other sites, paired with incendiary rhetoric. Accounts like these can bring in money by driving engagement on X, thanks to a revenue-sharing program that debuted after Musk took over the site. Both Big Chungus and Calico Cut Pants have Premium badges, which means they can get paid for generating activity, including likes and replies. According to X's Creator Revenue Sharing guidelines, the company maintains some discretion in calculating the true 'impact' of posts. For instance, engagement from other paid accounts is worth more than engagement from an unpaid account. It stands to reason that the best way to make money is to elicit some reaction to your content from the people who enjoy X enough to pay for it. Social media is replete with political outrage, and playing to either a liberal or conservative audience is likely to draw attention. (Certainly, plenty of accounts decrying MAGA values, real and exaggerated, exist.) But X, in particular, is a much more right-coded platform than it was a few years ago, and it makes sense to pander to the home crowd. Consider 'non aesthetic things,' an account that has 4.9 million followers on X, all from posting short-form videos—sometimes relatable, sometimes nostalgic, generally just mind-numbing. Its bio links to an Instagram page that is full of ads for the gambling company Stake. (None of these accounts responded to requests for an interview.) The non aesthetic things account shared a video of sorority girls at Arizona State University who were performing in jean shorts, most of them quite short, and cowboy boots. The X caption makes reference to 'their JEANS'—a subtle nod to the Sydney Sweeney panic. This pairing of footage and wink was a solid bet to produce a big reaction. Given all the attention the Sweeney dustup received, returning to it is logical for engagement farmers. 'BREAKING,' wrote a pro-Trump account called 'Patriot Oasis' that almost exclusively posts short-form videos, 'Sorority at the University of Oklahoma wearing 'Good Genes' is going VIRAL showcasing pure American beauty. Liberals are OUTRAGED online.' The caption suggested that the sorority is participating in some kind of activist response to the villainization of Sydney Sweeney, though there is no reason to believe that. The girls in the video never say anything about politics, Sydney Sweeney, genes, or even jeans. The sorority has been making similar dance videos for years. Nevertheless, the right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk reposted Patriot Oasis to his 5.1 million followers and asked, 'Do you see the difference between conservative and liberal women?' Underneath his post, a Community Note generated by other users pointed out that the video doesn't reveal whether the women are conservative or not. But that hardly mattered. Many others made the same argument in the replies to Kirk's post, driving up engagement. Although the original post has since been deleted, Kirk's repost has more than 3.8 million views. Sorority dances worked well on social media even before they were inserted into a fake culture-war debate, because they are briefly hypnotic due to the weirdness of so many people moving in the same way while wearing such similar outfits. They offer the muted thrill of a flash mob. But plucked from their original context, they offer more. Someone finds them and puts them on X with just a phrase or two of framing and they blow up. People watch the videos of young women dancing and gleefully share them, writing, for example, 'nothing is more triggering to leftists,' and 'at what point do you just give up if you're a lib?' and 'America is BACK and Democrats hate it.' There is no need to point to an actual instance of a leftist or lib or Democrat being triggered. It is easy enough to imagine how triggered they are.


UPI
4 hours ago
- UPI
Famous birthdays for Aug. 18: Kaitlin Olson, Christian Slater
1 of 2 | Kaitlin Olson arrives for the 76th annual Primetime Emmy Awards at the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles on September 15. The actor turns 50 on August 18. File Photo by Chris Chew | License Photo Aug. 18 (UPI) -- Those born on this date are under the sign of Leo. They include: -- Virginia Dare, first English settler born in the American colonies, in 1587 -- Explorer Meriwether Lewis in 1774 -- Entrepreneur Marshall Field in 1834 -- Entrepreneur Max Factor in 1904 -- Actor Shelley Winters in 1920 -- U.S. first lady Rosalynn Carter in 1927 -- Filmmaker Roman Polanski in 1933 (age 92) -- Baseball Hall of Fame member Roberto Clemente in 1934 File Photo by Pat Benic/UPI -- Olympic decathlete Rafer Johnson in 1935 -- Actor Robert Redford in 1936 (age 89) -- Actor Martin Mull in 1943 -- Musician Dennis Elliott (Foreigner) in 1950 (age 75) -- Actor Patrick Swayze in 1952 -- Actor Denis Leary in 1957 (age 68) -- Actor Madeleine Stowe in 1958 (age 67) -- TV journalist Bob Woodruff in 1961 (age 64) File Photo by Serena Xu-Ning Carr/UPI -- Musician Zac Maloy (Nixons) in 1968 (age 57) -- Musician Everlast (House of Pain) in 1969 (age 56) -- Musician Masta Killa (Wu-Tang Clan) in 1969 (age 56) -- Actor Edward Norton in 1969 (age 56) -- Actor Christian Slater in 1969 (age 56) File Photo by Derek French/UPI -- Actor Malcolm-Jamal Warner in 1970 -- Actor Kaitlin Olson in 1975 (age 50) -- Actor Dar Salim in 1977 (age 48) -- Actor Andy Samberg in 1978 (age 47) -- Musician Brad Tursi (Old Dominion) in 1979 (age 46) File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI -- Musician Mika in 1983 (age 42) -- Actor/comedian Anna Akana in 1989 (age 36) -- Actor Richard Harmon in 1991 (age 34) -- Actor Maia Mitchell in 1993 (age 32) -- Actor Madelaine Petsch in 1994 (age 31) -- Actor Josephine Langford in 1997 (age 28) File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI