Trump says Russia to face new US sanctions unless it ends Ukraine war by August 8
'Ten days from today,' Trump told reporters when asked what the exact deadline would be.
Trump – flying back from Britain to Washington – had already said on Monday that he was reducing a previous ultimatum of 50 days to between 10 and 12 days, but his latest comments indicated an apparently firm date at the end of next week.
Trump said that he had not heard from Russian President Vladimir Putin on his threat. 'I haven't had any response. It's a shame,' he said.
And the Republican appeared to play down the effect of his planned actions.
'We're going to put on tariffs and stuff,' he said, but 'I don't know if it's going to affect Russia because obviously he wants to keep the war going.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
18 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Suez Canal Chief: No Fee Exemptions, Even for US Ships
The head of Egypt's Suez Canal Authority (SCA) has dismissed US President Donald Trump's call to allow American ships to transit the vital waterway for free, insisting that Egypt remains committed to international treaties that prohibit preferential treatment. Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, SCA Chairman Osama Rabie said Egypt 'respects international maritime conventions,' referencing the 1888 Constantinople Convention, which guarantees free navigation through the canal under equal terms for all nations. 'There can be no distinction between ships in terms of services or commercial and financial preferences that favor one country over another,' Rabie said. 'This is not a stance against the United States, but rather a reflection of Egypt's commitment to impartiality — a principle that assures all nations of fair treatment.' Trump, who is seeking a return to the White House in November, argued in an April post on his Truth Social platform that US military and commercial vessels should be granted free access to both the Suez and Panama Canals. 'These canals wouldn't exist without the United States,' he wrote. The Suez Canal, a key source of foreign currency for Egypt, has suffered a sharp downturn in revenue and traffic since Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi group began targeting ships in the Red Sea in late 2023, prompting many shipping lines to reroute via the longer and costlier Cape of Good Hope. 'We're facing a major crisis,' Rabie said, noting that daily transits have dropped to 30–35 vessels from more than 65 a day before the escalation. Annual canal revenue plunged 61% to $3.9 billion in the first half of 2024, down from $10.2 billion in 2023, Rabie added. A total of 13,213 ships passed through the canal in 2024, compared to 26,434 in 2023, before the outbreak of war in Gaza. Despite mounting pressure to safeguard maritime routes, Egypt has refused to join any military coalition targeting the Houthis. 'It is not Egypt's policy to engage in military alliances or attack an Arab country — after all, Yemen is a fellow Arab state,' Rabie said. Since November, the Houthis have carried out more than 150 missile and drone attacks on vessels they say are linked to Israel, in retaliation for the war in Gaza. The assaults have sunk four ships, damaged several others, and killed at least 10 seafarers. The Iran-backed group also hijacked the Galaxy Leader vessel in a high-profile act of piracy. In April, a US-led operation launched in December 2023 under the name 'Operation Prosperity Guardian' began leading strikes on Houthi targets from the northern Red Sea. Egypt declined to join both that initiative and Trump's earlier campaign, 'Operation Rough Rider,' unveiled in March. Rabie expressed frustration at the ongoing war in Gaza, warning that continued violence would prolong the canal's downturn. 'A few months ago, traffic showed slight improvement following a ceasefire, but then the Houthis resumed attacks — hitting two ships in the past fortnight alone,' he said. 'Now, with conditions in Gaza deteriorating, our situation is worsening as well.' On Monday, the Houthis declared a 'fourth phase' of their maritime blockade against Israel, vowing to target all ships linked to Israeli ports 'regardless of their nationality or destination.' Still, Rabie remains optimistic that shipping through the Suez Canal will rebound once the war ends. 'If the fighting stops, the Houthis will have no justification to attack vessels in the Red Sea. We're hopeful that peace comes soon,' he said. 'Major ships have diverted to the Cape of Good Hope because it's currently safer, despite the higher costs and longer transit times,' he added. 'They've told us they'll return as soon as the war ends because no alternative can match the Suez Canal's advantages. Global shipping firms know this.' Rabie urged international insurance companies to reduce premiums for vessels transiting the Red Sea, arguing that soaring insurance costs have contributed to the diversion of large ships away from the canal. 'Today, the total cost of passing through the Red Sea — including insurance — has exceeded the cost of the longer Cape route, driving many vessels to abandon the canal despite the longer journey,' he said. To lure shipping traffic back, Egypt has introduced incentives, including up to 15% discounts on transit fees for container ships weighing 130,000 tons or more, whether laden or empty. 'We're doing all we can,' Rabie said. 'But until the security situation stabilizes, we're facing an uphill battle.'
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Breaking: India will buy Russian oil despite Trump's threats: Report
Indian officials have said they would keep purchasing oil from Russia despite the threat of penalties that US President Donald Trump said he would impose, the New York Times reported on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Columbia University deal with Trump admin sets dangerous precedent, academics warn
Columbia University's $200 million agreement with President Donald Trump's administration marks the end of a months-long showdown, but academics warn it is just the first round of a government 'assault' on higher education. Academics from Columbia and beyond have expressed concerns that the deal -- which makes broad-ranging concessions and increases government oversight -- will become the blueprint for how Trump brings other universities to heel. The New York institution was the first to be targeted in Trump's war against elite universities, for what the US president claimed was its failure to tackle antisemitism on campus in the wake of pro-Palestinian protests. It was stripped of hundreds of millions of dollars of federal funding and lost its ability to apply for new research grants. Labs saw vital funding frozen, and dozens of researchers were laid off. But Columbia last week agreed to pay the government $200 million, and an additional $21 million to settle an investigation into antisemitism. According to Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, the lack of due process -- with the government slashing funding before carrying out a formal investigation -- left Columbia in an 'untenable position.' Columbia law professor David Pozen agreed, saying the 'manner in which the deal was constructed has been unlawful and coercive from the start' and slamming the agreement as giving 'legal form to an extortion scheme.' Federal oversight The deal goes beyond addressing antisemitism and makes concessions on international student admissions, race and ethnicity considerations in admissions and single-sex spaces on campus, among other issues. Columbia also agreed to appoint an independent monitor to implement the deal, share ethnicity admissions data with the government and crack down on campus protests. Many of the provisions 'represent significant incursions onto Columbia's autonomy,' said Pozen. 'What's happened at Columbia is part of a broader authoritarian attack on civil society,' he said, pointing to similar pressures on law firms and media organizations to fall in line. According to the law professor, the deal 'signals the emergence of a new regulatory regime in which the Trump administration will periodically and unpredictably shake down other schools and demand concessions from them.' In the coming weeks, Pozen said he expected the 'administration will put a lot of pressure on Harvard and other schools to follow suit.' Harvard University has pushed back against the government, filing a lawsuit in a bid to reverse sweeping funding cuts. But Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard, said that 'in terms of academic freedom and in terms of democracy, the (Columbia) precedent is devastating.' 'First round' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said she hoped the Columbia deal would be a 'template for other universities around the country.' On Wednesday, McMahon announced a deal with Brown University to restore some federal funding and end ongoing investigations after the Ivy League school agreed to end race considerations in admissions and adopt a biological definition of gender. Brown President Christina Paxson admitted 'there are other aspects of the agreement that were not part of previous federal reviews of Brown policies' but were 'priorities of the federal administration.' Harvard is reportedly considering forking out $500 million to settle, according to the New York Times. Others have made smaller concessions to appease the government, with Trump's alma mater the University of Pennsylvania banning transgender women from competing in women's sports, and the University of Virginia's head resigning after scrutiny over its diversity programs. Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who researches the history and governance of higher education, said government interference in universities 'has not happened at scale like this, probably ever in American history.' While some university staff see striking an agreement as the quickest way to reopen the federal funding spigot, Cantwell warned that concessions such as sharing ethnicity data from admissions could be 'weaponized' and provide fodder for future probes. Levitsky agreed, saying: 'Extortionists don't stop at the first concession. Extortionists come back for more.' 'There's a very high likelihood that this is just the first round,' he said. Pozen noted that it will be harder for 'major research universities to hold the line' compared to smaller colleges which are less reliant on federal funding. But Levitsky still urged Harvard to stand its ground and 'fight back,' including in the courts. 'Fighting an authoritarian regime is costly, but that's what we have to do,' he said. 'This is an unprecedented assault, and universities need to work together.'
