Weedkiller ban could help swifts, starlings and toads thrive, says MP
Banning toxic weedkillers could support swifts, starlings and toads in towns and cities, an MP has said ahead of a debate in Parliament.
The Green Party's Sian Berry has proposed a public sector ban on the chemicals, which councils can currently use to destroy 'undesired plants' in areas which they manage.
Ms Berry told the PA news agency that the Government had demonstrated 'worrying attitudes to nature from the Government in quite a few of their policies', but added the ban is a move that lawmakers can 'genuinely do for nature to make up for that slightly'.
MPs are due to debate Ms Berry's Plant Protection Products (Prohibition on Public Sector Use) Bill on Friday which, if agreed, would block English town halls from using certain professional-grade chemicals on land such as verges and parks after 2028.
It would extend to other public authorities in England after 2031.
'We are taking steps towards solving the nature crisis in the UK,' Ms Berry said.
'We're trying to make sure that, at the very least, local authorities, town and cities don't use the really bleakly effective and quite toxic chemical glyphosate in our towns and cities where people might come into contact with it, and where it's going to have a really dramatic effect on the biodiversity of streets and parks and council estates and other areas that local authorities manage.'
The MP said an ongoing 'nature crisis' was 'a lot to do with insects but then also the other species that insects support, so you've got birds that depend on having insects well supported within cities'.
She warned that cities feature 'vast areas where there are no biodiversity, there are no links between the biodiverse areas'.
The MP for Brighton Pavilion said: 'Swifts are in huge decline. They do nothing all day but fly around eating insects.
'Starlings, other birds that really do need that biodiversity in order to thrive.
'In Brighton, we've got a twitten (a Sussex narrow lane) that runs between two streets on a steep hill, that is known as the 'toad road' because it's literally where the amphibians will migrate between gardens in order to spread out and be biodiverse throughout the city.
'Getting them to stop spraying that is really, really important because the plants that grow up around the edges of that are exactly where those amphibians will hide when they're migrating, so there's lots of different ways in which a small amount of plants growing in sensible places around the city streets is a really, really good idea for biodiversity.'
Ms Berry added: 'From going to war on bats and newts, which is very harsh – bats and newts are great – to talking about parts of the green belt as grey belt, as denigrating areas that might be overgrown or scruffy, when actually those are incredibly biodiverse areas.
'And if we're going to be developing them, we have to be very, very careful.'
She warned that councils 'have been horrendously squeezed and manual weeding can take some budget up in terms of paying people to do a bit more work than if they just wander down the street spraying chemicals everywhere', but called for 'dedicated funding' to help authorities fund the move.
Some authorities have already stopped using glyphosate.
South Kesteven District Council in Lincolnshire agreed to reduce its use of the chemical last month.
Councillor Rhys Baker, the authority's environment and waste cabinet member, said in a statement that the authority would 'strive for viable alternatives to minimise its use for the future which would best protect our biodiversity and ecology', at the same time 'balancing aesthetics, safety, cost and biodiversity'.
But Brighton and Hove City Council in East Sussex brought in a 'controlled-droplet application of glyphosate' last year, after 'relying solely on manual weeding' for five years.
The authority's environment committee chairman councillor Tim Rowkins vowed at the time not to use the chemical on wildflowers 'unless they are presenting a hazard'.
According to the council, roots broke up footpaths and weeds blocked drains.
Richard Benwell, chief executive of the Wildlife and Countryside Link, said Ms Berry's Bill is 'an excellent proposal that would help free our urban environment from harmful and unnecessary chemical use'.
He added: 'When they are sprayed around towns and cities, chemicals like glyphosate can kill off habitats and food sources for wildlife and add to the toxic cocktail polluting our rivers.
'Many public authorities in the UK and around the world have realised that this trigger-happy approach to chemical use is at odds with a green future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves hands herself ‘dangerous' powers to control pension pots
Rachel Reeves has granted herself 'dangerous' new powers to direct where millions of savers' pension cash is spent. The Government's Pensions Bill includes sweeping provisions that will allow the Chancellor to force pension funds to invest in private equity, debt and land in an attempt to boost the UK economy. Details of the new legislation were published on Thursday. The Government has insisted that savers' interests will always be put first, with mandating powers only serving as a backstop to ensure investment in British assets. However, Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, said: 'Legislating to allow governments to tell pension schemes how to invest is a very dangerous precedent. 'Whilst ministers offer assurances that this is just a backstop power that they hope not to use, the precedent has been set. This Government or a future government could use a power of this sort to promote their own political agendas, potentially to the detriment of pension savers.' Sir Steve, who is now a partner at Lane, Clark and Peacock (LCP), said the law left the door open to sweeping changes that could destabilise the market. The former Liberal Democrat MP said the powers could be used by a future Reform government to instruct funds to abandon 'woke' investments, including net zero, for example. Sir Steve said: 'We already have trustees whose job is to make sure that the member interest is protected, based on expert advice over things like investment strategy, and these decisions should be beyond the reach of politicians – of whatever party'. 'Very bad precedent' A so-called sunset clause in the Bill means the power to mandate investment expires at the end of 2035. However, Sir Steve pointed out that this still left the door open for a new government to instruct pension funds to invest in a whole range of assets. While a separate clause suggests a review of the powers 'must be conducted before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which the regulations come into force', Sir Steve said this would still be well into the next Parliament. 'As long as the sunset clause hasn't set, as it were, it is a power sitting there on day one. So a new government could come in, it doesn't need to consult, it doesn't need to draft legislation, and it doesn't need to spend nine months getting it through parliament. It's there and ready to run,' he said. The Bill, published on Thursday, hands the Government powers to 'prescribe' investments in 'private equity', 'private debt', 'venture capital' and 'interests in land', which it continues to say are just 'examples' of asset classes. The Government can also instruct whether those investments 'link an asset to economic activity in the United Kingdom' or even more directly are 'located in the United Kingdom'. Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform, has repeatedly said he will scrap 'net stupid zero' policies if the party forms the next government. Sir Steve said the party could use the Pensions Bill to partly reshape the investment landscape in the UK. He said: 'The Government has just given themselves powers to tell pension schemes how to invest. And these powers appear to run for at least five years from the passing of the Bill. So Nigel Farage may get to use them, right? 'So just imagine we have a Reform government that's not big on woke. And they say: oh we've got an act of parliament that already allows us to tell pension schemes they can't invest in net zero. 'The Government giving itself power to tell schemes how to invest, is just a very, very bad precedent.'
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Holidaymakers to Portugal can now use airport e-gates, says Labour
Faro airport in Portugal has begun to let British passengers use e-gates, the UK Government has announced. Downing Street expects British holidaymakers will be able to use the technology in their 'millions' after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer struck an agreement with EU leaders last month. Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, whose brief includes EU relations, said at the despatch box on Thursday that the deal 'makes life easier for holidaymakers'. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'Yesterday, Portugal opened e-gates at Faro airport to British citizens, which will mean millions more Brits going to the Algarve will be able to use e-gates in time for the summer holidays.' He added: 'We're obviously continuing to work with other countries and other airports to ensure Brits can use more e-gates as soon as possible, and that work continues. 'It's obviously good news to see a very significant airport, I think, for British holidaymakers, opening e-gates to British citizens yesterday.' When he unveiled the deal last month, Sir Keir said that 'for holidaymakers wanting to get out this summer, they will want to know that they can do so easily and without delay and chaos'. The Prime Minister called on 'all EU member states to help make this a reality without delay'. Since Brexit, UK nationals have been unable to use e-gates in most Schengen Area countries. Passengers from the UK face warnings that passport controls on arrival to Portugal ' may take up more time, as the passport will have to be stamped and there are additional questions that may be asked by the border control officers', according to the Faro airport website. The Government has said the deal will smooth over 'legal barriers to e-gates use for UK nationals', once a new stamp-free biometric Entry/Exit System launches, due in October this year. Taking a question about steps 'to improve relations with the EU', Mr Thomas-Symonds told the Commons: ' The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests – good for bills, borders and jobs. 'It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. 'Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week.'
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
MP: Grenfell-style mistakes could be repeated over battery storage regulation
The Government risks repeating the mistakes of Grenfell unless safety regulations on battery storage units are brought forward, an MP has warned. Liberal Democrat John Milne said there were 'alarming parallels' with the systemic failure which led to the west London tower block fire. Currently there are no laws which specifically govern the safety of battery energy storage systems (Bess), according to the House of Commons library. However, individual batteries could be subject to product safety regulations. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Milne accused the Government of being 'too complacent' as he called for enforceable regulations for the design and construction of the storage systems. The MP for Horsham said: 'The Grenfell disaster was the end result of many failings by both individuals and companies, but at its heart it was a failure of regulation. 'The rules left things wide open for exploitation by cost-cutting developers, and that is exactly what happened. 'Just as with lithium-ion batteries, a new technology, in this case cladding, was being used at scale for the first time without proper understanding of the risks. The time to act is now.' He continued: 'The Government itself has responded to all questions from myself and others to say that it considers the present regulatory regime to be robust. I am tempted to say pride comes before a fall. 'In the last few weeks a Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman has stated that battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK, we already have high standards in place that require manufacturers and industry to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan. 'This is just too complacent. 'Fires as a result of cladding were also incredibly rare, but that did not save 72 lives at Grenfell.' Mr Milne said the industry would benefit from clear guidance, before adding: 'Any guidance needs to cover-off a number of areas, including transport of batteries to the site, design and construction, fire-fighting, ongoing inspection and decommissioning. 'In the short term, if the Government is for any reason still reluctant to regulate, perhaps it could issue clear national guidelines which are capable of being updated annually. 'Enforcement might then take place through the insurance industry, who would be likely to insist that any new applications followed such guidelines, as no project can go ahead without insurance, it is enforcement by the back door. 'Grenfell was a wholly predictable tragedy. A similar fire at Lakanal House in Camberwell, which killed six people, should have made us understand the risk, but the warning wasn't heeded and history took its course. 'We can't go back in time to stop Grenfell, but we can act now to avoid making the same mistake again with battery energy storage systems.' Elsewhere in the debate, Conservative MP for Mid Buckinghamshire Greg Smith said there should be minimum distances between battery storage sites and housing. Mr Smith said: 'This is not a debate about the principle of energy storage, although I am in principle opposed to such schemes taking agricultural land and challenging our food security, but today's debate, which is deeply concerning, and what this House must urgently address, are the real, growing, and too often overlooked safety implications of these installations, particularly when placed in close proximity to villages, and rural road networks ill-equipped to support them.' He added: 'At the very least the Government should introduce clear national guidelines on the siting of Bess installations, including minimum separation distances from residential properties, fire resilience standards, mandatory site-specific risk assessments and restrictions on placing these facilities on, or near, rural roads.' SNP MP for Aberdeen North, Kirsty Blackman, said developers should pay towards fire mitigation measures. She said: 'If we're saying to those organisations that are creating the battery storage sites, you will need to pay for the fire safety assessment, you will need to consult the local fire and you will need to pay for the training of those local fire teams in tackling fires at battery energy storage sites, I think that would be the most reasonable way forward. 'Ask them to pay for that training, because it's them that are going to be making a huge profit off it.' Energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said: 'It is often claimed that there is no regulation in this sector because there is no specific law addressing battery safety. This is simply untrue. 'The safety and standards of batteries are assured throughout their life cycle. The Government is therefore confident that the safety risks posed by grid-scale batteries are relatively small and well managed.'
