
Reeves hands herself ‘dangerous' powers to control pension pots
Rachel Reeves has granted herself 'dangerous' new powers to direct where millions of savers' pension cash is spent.
The Government's Pensions Bill includes sweeping provisions that will allow the Chancellor to force pension funds to invest in private equity, debt and land in an attempt to boost the UK economy.
Details of the new legislation were published on Thursday.
The Government has insisted that savers' interests will always be put first, with mandating powers only serving as a backstop to ensure investment in British assets.
However, Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, said: 'Legislating to allow governments to tell pension schemes how to invest is a very dangerous precedent.
'Whilst ministers offer assurances that this is just a backstop power that they hope not to use, the precedent has been set. This Government or a future government could use a power of this sort to promote their own political agendas, potentially to the detriment of pension savers.'
Sir Steve, who is now a partner at Lane, Clark and Peacock (LCP), said the law left the door open to sweeping changes that could destabilise the market.
The former Liberal Democrat MP said the powers could be used by a future Reform government to instruct funds to abandon 'woke' investments, including net zero, for example.
Sir Steve said: 'We already have trustees whose job is to make sure that the member interest is protected, based on expert advice over things like investment strategy, and these decisions should be beyond the reach of politicians – of whatever party'.
'Very bad precedent'
A so-called sunset clause in the Bill means the power to mandate investment expires at the end of 2035. However, Sir Steve pointed out that this still left the door open for a new government to instruct pension funds to invest in a whole range of assets.
While a separate clause suggests a review of the powers 'must be conducted before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which the regulations come into force', Sir Steve said this would still be well into the next Parliament.
'As long as the sunset clause hasn't set, as it were, it is a power sitting there on day one. So a new government could come in, it doesn't need to consult, it doesn't need to draft legislation, and it doesn't need to spend nine months getting it through parliament. It's there and ready to run,' he said.
The Bill, published on Thursday, hands the Government powers to 'prescribe' investments in 'private equity', 'private debt', 'venture capital' and 'interests in land', which it continues to say are just 'examples' of asset classes.
The Government can also instruct whether those investments 'link an asset to economic activity in the United Kingdom' or even more directly are 'located in the United Kingdom'.
Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform, has repeatedly said he will scrap 'net stupid zero' policies if the party forms the next government. Sir Steve said the party could use the Pensions Bill to partly reshape the investment landscape in the UK.
He said: 'The Government has just given themselves powers to tell pension schemes how to invest. And these powers appear to run for at least five years from the passing of the Bill. So Nigel Farage may get to use them, right?
'So just imagine we have a Reform government that's not big on woke. And they say: oh we've got an act of parliament that already allows us to tell pension schemes they can't invest in net zero.
'The Government giving itself power to tell schemes how to invest, is just a very, very bad precedent.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour battles over housing budget as experts warn crisis will get worse
Experts warn of a deepening of the UK's housing crisis due to potential government spending cuts, with funds expected to be stretched by 2026. A struggle is reportedly occurring between the Treasury and housing minister Angela Rayner over budget plans, as Rachel Reeves prepares to outline spending plans until the next election. The Local Government Association reports that over half of councils are running deficits on their housing budgets, while homeless charities warn that new social housing supply cannot keep up with demand. Housing associations are struggling with the cumulative effects of austerity budgets, the Grenfell fire tragedy, and the economic impact of Brexit, Covid-19, and the war in Ukraine, leading to a shortage of funds for new projects. Homeless charities are calling for 90,000 new social housing homes to be built per year, while Labour MPs express concern that cuts to social housing will undermine the party's housing pledge and negatively impact councils.


Sky News
22 minutes ago
- Sky News
Government struggles to slash foreign aid spent on asylum hotels
The government is struggling to cut the billions of pounds of foreign aid partly used to house asylum seekers in hotels, according to new figures. The £2.2bn Home Office estimate to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) in this financial year is only slightly less than the £2.3bn spent in 2024/25. The vast majority is used for the accommodation for asylum seekers who have arrived in the UK, with recent figures showing more than 32,000 were being housed in hotels at the end of March. Labour has pledged "to end the use of asylum hotels" and the government says it has reduced the overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds, including £200m in ODA savings, which had been passed back to the Treasury. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he will cut the overall ODA from its current level of 0.5% of gross national income (GNI) to 0.3% in 2027. Foreign aid is supposed to be spent on providing humanitarian and development assistance in other countries, but the UK is allowed to count refugee-hosting costs as ODA under internationally agreed rules. Labour MP Sarah Champion previously said a "scandalously large amount" of ODA has been diverted to the Home Office and has called for a cap on how much can be spent supporting asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. A Home Office spokesperson said: "We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure, and are urgently taking action to restore order, and reduce costs. "This will ultimately reduce the amount of Official Development Assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. "We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4bn by 2026."


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Russia has been ‘menacing the UK' for years, top military advisor warns
Dr. Fiona Hill, a strategic defence review author and former White House advisor, warns that the UK is already at war with Russia, and has been 'menaced' by the country for years, citing poisonings, cyber-attacks, and sabotage operations. The government's strategic defence review (SDR) revealed that the UK's armed forces are not adequately prepared to combat opponents like Russia or China due to insufficient weapons, medical services, and personnel. Defence Secretary John Healey stated that the British army needs to become "10 times more lethal" due to the immediate threat from Russia and the rise of China, while General Sir Richard Barrons warned of the short time it would take a cruise missile to reach the UK. Sir Keir Starmer pledged to make Britain a "battle-ready, armour-clad nation" by increasing army personnel to 100,000, adding 12 new submarines, and investing in drones and AI, but he did not commit to spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2034. Dr. Hill cautioned that the UK can no longer depend on the US as a reliable ally, particularly under a potential second Trump administration, and expressed concerns about the rise of populist right-wing politics in both the US and UK.