logo
To ESG or not to ESG? Britain's ‘Big Four' banks buck the trend of DEI retreat

To ESG or not to ESG? Britain's ‘Big Four' banks buck the trend of DEI retreat

Finextra6 hours ago

0
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.
A counterbalance to claims of trans-Atlantic ESG de-prioritisation, Finextra's investigation into the UK's top financial institutions prove that some industries are keeping ESG front of mind.
On Sunday 6 June 2025, The Observer published an article in its business and economics section which revealed how leading British firms had 're-written' their yearly surveys, 'in the wake of Donald Trump's corporate crusade against diversity, equity, and sustainability.'
The investigation – which compared the 2023 and 2024 annual reports of 85 FTSE 100 companies for instances of terms related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as environment, social, and governance (ESG) – found that 'total mentions of DEI, along with the number of pages containing the phrase and variations on it, both declined by more than 16% on average.' The mentions of ESG, it added, declined by 22%.
The reporters – Barney Macintyre and Joe White – pointed to the 'large orange cloud' that has blown across the Atlantic, as the reason for this rather bleak regression in Britain's boardroom policies. Indeed, Amazon, Bank of America, Blackrock, Citigroup, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, Meta, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo have all been flagged by Forbes as having rolled back their DEI policies, in various ways. According to Macintyre and White, the US administration's hostile position on DEI and ESG – having sought to purge official documents of hundreds of 'woke' terms, and touted the 'drill baby, drill' agenda – may be legitimising similar moves in the UK.
The ESG pulse of UK banks
While the revelations of The Observer report are a concerning development for our FTSE 100, the outlook becomes quite different if we focus our sights on specific industries – especially the UK's financial services industry. Indeed, it appears that recent developments are a (far from insignificant) glitch in a broader upward trend.
To gain an insight into the health of DEI policy in our top institutions, Finextra conducted its own investigation, limiting the methodology to the 'Big Four' banks: HSBC, Lloyds, Barclays, and NatWest. These institutions collectively hold a sizable share of the retail banking market – with estimates ranging from 68% to 85%, depending on the source consulted. Owed to their stature, these banks act as a bellwether for how the industry's position on DEI and ESG is moving.
For a contextualised view of this issue, Finextra's investigation looked at differences between the 2020 and 2024 annual reports of the Big Four. The year 2020 marked the commencement of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, as triggered by the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis police department. This was the cultural tipping point, when businesses all over the world rushed to champion diversity initiatives. In the Big Four's annual reports of 2020 and 2024, Finextra tallied the mentions of 'ESG', as well as several terms related to DEI, including 'DE&I,' 'DEI,' 'diversity,' 'equality,' 'inclusion,' and 'fairness'.
The results suggest a brighter picture than that painted by The Observer, of the FTSE 100. The Big Four averaged a 361% increase in mentions of 'ESG' between 2020 and 2024. This average was brought up in large part by Barclays, which mentioned 'ESG' 17 times in 2020 and 187 times in 2024 (an increase of 1,000%). NatWest's increase was the second highest, at 275%, though it mentioned 'ESG' the least number of times in both years. HSBC's increase came in at 181%, though it mentioned 'ESG' more times in both years than any of the other Big Four. Our research shows Lloyds may have mentioned ESG the least, with a reduction of 11%. However, this could fall within the margin of error.
On the DEI side, average mentions of related terms rose by 82% between 2020 and 2024, leaving some room for improvement – though still a significantly better outlook than other FTSE firms. Bringing the average up significantly was NatWest, having mentioned DEI-related terms around 28 times in 2020, and 118 times in 2024 (a 321% increase). The second highest increase was by Lloyds, at 24% – though it mentioned DEI-related terms more times than NatWest in both years. Barclays and HSBC reduced their mentions by 7% and 11%, respectively. Once again, these figures could fall within the margin of error.
Each of the Big Four were contacted for comment.
The link between a mention and an action
Of course, mere mentions of DEI and ESG do not always result in concrete policy – and sometimes even amount to greenwashing or ESG-washing. Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and NatWest have each been accused of some form of greenwashing in the last several years – some cases were more substantial than others. On 17 June 2025 HSBC was accused by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) of breaching its own coal phase-out policy by helping to raise $2.4bn in 2024 for companies expanding their coal operations.
As Pavita Cooper, UK chair of the 30% club (a global campaign to increase gender diversity at board and senior management levels), put it in The Observer: 'Many organisations made declarations of public support in the days following the murder of George Floyd – very few made meaningful change.'
While use of the terms 'DEI' and 'ESG' are not (quite) legally binding, there may be a correlation between their acceptance into the public consciousness and the rollout of progressive policy in the long-term. This is the very reason Trump 2.0 aims to curtail the use of these phases.
In their 2024 annual reports, Barclays dedicates over 50 pages to describing its specific, target-bound climate strategy, and NatWest highlights ongoing initiatives around recruitment and attraction; leadership and retention; employee-led networks; as well as ethnic, gender, socio-economic, and neuro-diversity. In many of these cases, mentions of 'ESG' and 'DEI' are correlated with action – seeking to improve the institutional relationship with the environment, and make offices in the city more equitable.
In some areas, positive change has already filtered through. The World Economic Forum (WEF)'s recent report on the global gender pay gap, for example, reveals it is closing at its fastest rate since the pandemic – currently sitting at 68.8%. The WEF puts this down to 'economic and political advances', with women outpacing men in higher education.
As ever, there is still work to do, and the hope is that these trends continue in the long-term, rather than recede as a result of the US administration's policies.
Securing tomorrow's talent
It would seem that, at least within the banking community, the UK is carrying forward the torch of environmental and societal responsibility – as are only a clutch of storied US institutions of academia. But the DEI and ESG mission is not just music to consumers' and investors' ears; it helps firms mitigate transitional risk, keeps assets secure, and helps to engage the pipeline of future talent.
Cooper rounded off The Observer piece by pointing out that by 2034, Gen Z will overtake millennials in number within the workforce. This makes it even more important that institutions don't simply name-drop DEI and ESG-related terms in their annual reports. According to a recent survey, 43% of employees said they would quit their jobs if their employer rolled back on DEI policy. Clearly, the crusade against DEI is not entirely welcomed in the UK – particularly among specific subgroups, such as women, Gen Z, and millennials.
To counter the 'orange cloud', firms must offer more transparency around their ESG projects; stand as an example for smaller businesses; and show how progressive policies will serve the incoming wave of employees – none of whom have forgotten the lessons learned from the tragic case of George Floyd and the protests his death inspired.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'
Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'

Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Times

Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'

The Conservative Party has claimed that grooming gangs are a 'border security issue' after a landmark report found that many suspects in live cases were foreign or claiming asylum. Baroness Casey of Blackstock recorded the observation in her review on child sexual exploitation after seeing details from a dozen investigations. She said more effort was required to identify the nature of grooming and understand whether the profile of offenders was changing. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said the finding showed the issue of grooming gangs went 'beyond criminal justice' and 'into borders'. The shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, added: 'It is a border security issue. This year so far has been the worst in history for illegal immigration across the English Channel. The government has no idea who the people coming are, what their previous records are … the vast majority are men. The lack of control of the border is fuelling the risk here.'

MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales
MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

Sky News

time36 minutes ago

  • Sky News

MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales. The amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, abolishing the prosecution of women for terminating their pregnancy at any stage, passed by 379 votes to 137. It represents the biggest shake-up in reproductive rights for almost 60 years. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who tabled the so-called "New Clause One" (NC1), said it would ensure women do not face investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment in relation to any pregnancies. She said the current "Victorian" laws had been used against vulnerable women, citing cases such as Nicola Packer, who was prosecuted on suspicion of having an illegal abortion. She was found not guilty in May. "Nicola's story is deplorable, but there are many others," Ms Antoniazzi said. Abortion in England and Wales is currently a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider for up to 24 weeks after conception. The procedure is allowed after this time in very limited circumstances. It is also legal to take prescribed related medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Ms Antoniazzi said NC1 was "a narrow, targeted measure" that would not change how abortion services were provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act. She said: "The 24 [week] limit remains. Abortions still require the approval of signatures of two doctors, and women would still have to meet the grounds laid out in the Act." The MP said that meant healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now." She added: "This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help. "As I have said before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end." 16:48 The change will not come into effect immediately as the Crime and Policing Bill is still making its way through Parliament. A separate amendment, put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy, went further with a measure to "lock in" the right of a person to have an abortion while protecting those who help them. However, her amendment was not voted on because Ms Antoniazzi's passed, as expected. Conservative MP Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as "not pro-woman" and argued they "would introduce sex-selective abortion". How did MPs vote? MPs were given a free vote on the amendment, as is typically the case with so-called matters of conscience. A breakdown of the vote showed it was passed overwhelmingly by Labour and Lib Dem MPs. Just eight Conservative MPs voted in favour, while all Reform UK MPs opposed the amendment, with the exception of the party's leader Nigel Farage, who abstained. Sir Keir Starmer was not present for the vote as he is currently in Canada for the G7 summit, but said earlier that his "longstanding in-principle position is that women have the right to a safe and legal abortion". The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has been in the spotlight due to several recent high-profile cases. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine at home when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks. In the Commons, Ms Antoniazzi cited another case of a young mother who was jailed for two years after she was forced to take illegal abortion medication by her abusive partner. He was never investigated.

Government to announce another delay to HS2
Government to announce another delay to HS2

Sky News

time40 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Government to announce another delay to HS2

The government will announce another delay to the beleaguered HS2 project on Wednesday, saying the latest target is now impossible. Sky News understands that Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will announce that the London to Birmingham line will no longer be ready to open by 2033. It is not clear what the new target date will be. Ms Alexander is expected to blame the Tories for a "litany of failure" that drove the costs up by £37bn since 2012, when the high-speed rail network was approved by the coalition government. As first reported by The Telegraph, she is also expected to raise concerns that taxpayers may have been defrauded by subcontractors and pledge that "consequences will be felt". Ms Alexander's announcement will come alongside the findings of two reviews into HS2, looking into what went wrong and how and when to construct the rest of it. She will tell MPs: "Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management. "It's an appalling mess. But it's one we will sort out." HS2 was originally planned to cut journey times and improve connectivity between London and the Midlands and the North. It was given the go-ahead in 2012 with the aim of operating by 2026, but has since been mired in setbacks and spiralling costs. 3:09 The initial plan was to build the first phase connecting London and Birmingham, followed by adding two branches to Manchester and Leeds. However, Boris Johnson scrapped the leg to Leeds in 2021, while Rishi Sunak pulled the plug on the remainder of the second phase to Manchester in 2023 because of spiralling costs. The latest time scales give an opening date of between 2029 and 2033 for the London to Birmingham leg, which is under construction. The most recent cost estimate was £49bn to £56.6bn (in 2019 prices), according to a House of Commons research briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store