Welcome to the neighbourhood — sort of
Opinion
As a matter of right.
It's a simple sentence that continues to stoke fear among some Winnipeggers.
This apprehension is fuelled by a sense that pending zoning amendments will cause serious alteration to Winnipeg's neighbourhoods by allowing, 'as a matter of right,' some forms of multi-family housing to be built in what has otherwise been predominately single-family areas.
City council will debate these words next week as it moves to fast-track housing investment tied to the federal Housing Accelerator Fund. Much of the debate will centre on the fourplex and its potential to disrupt the design and character of older neighbourhoods.
The debate will raise the spectre that swaths of single-family homes will be demolished and replaced by larger duplex, triplex and fourplexes. This will trigger followup questioning regarding height incompatibility, shadowing on lower properties and certainly traffic concerns.
These are legitimate questions property owners have a right to ask. In contrast, the city will argue that 'as a matter of right' does not preclude any proposed project from meeting the highest standard for design.
This includes restrictions on what can replace a single-family home, how tall it can be, how much of the lot it can cover and other considerations.
The outcome of the debate is not likely to satisfy all perspectives.
However, it is critical to point out that these words have also historically limited change to neighbourhood structures, ensuring a neighbourhood can only contain single-family homes. This has resulted in higher density housing, public housing and fourplexes being relegated to only zones that allow such. Furthermore, any application to change or alter zoning in a single-family area often faces a complex path of variances, appeals and hearings to limit the ability of such change.
Thus on one side of the debate, the current model gives residents a voice in shaping how neighbourhoods change over time. In contrast, this approach has been used as a discriminatory tool to push what are considered non-conforming uses to the margins of cities and into less desirable locations.
On a personal note, I grew up in a fourplex in South Osborne.
Our home backed onto a cemetery and faced a busy high school. It was built in 1972 (the year we moved in) during a wave of infill projects intended boost rental properties in Canada throughout the 1970s.
Interestingly, the debate over the location of the 1970s rental housing boom focused on the same rhetoric we hear today, namely, yes, we need such housing, but it needs to be located elsewhere.
Winnipeg has a very distinct pattern of fourplexes built during the 1970s, often in marginal locations or acting as a buffer on busy streets. For example, in my Fort Rouge area, you see a high number of duplex and fourplexes built near the railyards in Lord Roberts.
Incidentally, this is also the location we see infill public housing in the same neighbourhood. Perhaps the thinking was out of sight, out of mind.
Additionally, you see the same vintage of fourplex scattered along very busy thoroughfares in many parts of Winnipeg. I often comment that my childhood home was a cookie-cutter fourplex, right down to the colour of the bricks. It is always fun noting twins of my house while driving throughout Winnipeg.
What we need to understand in the pending debate is that more housing is desperately needed, including a range of types from single-family to larger multi-unit homes.
We also need to understand that the design standards being advanced will offer tools to ensure what is developed proceeds with purpose and control. These tools can also be changed and adjusted as needed.
The interesting part of this debate is growing up in a fourplex was no different than the single-family home I live in now.
It was simply a place in which my parents, who emigrated out of Italy, found as an affordable way to ensure we had a good upbringing. It took me some time to realize that our 1,100 square feet was distinct from a home that did not share a common wall.
Looking back, I think we ended up being good neighbours. My mother, who is 90, remains in the same fourplex we moved into in 1972. Many of the nearby families and others have also been very long-term residents.
Perhaps it's time to say 'welcome to the neighbourhood,' more often.
Jino Distasio is a professor of urban geography at the University of Winnipeg.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Welcome to the neighbourhood — sort of
Opinion As a matter of right. It's a simple sentence that continues to stoke fear among some Winnipeggers. This apprehension is fuelled by a sense that pending zoning amendments will cause serious alteration to Winnipeg's neighbourhoods by allowing, 'as a matter of right,' some forms of multi-family housing to be built in what has otherwise been predominately single-family areas. City council will debate these words next week as it moves to fast-track housing investment tied to the federal Housing Accelerator Fund. Much of the debate will centre on the fourplex and its potential to disrupt the design and character of older neighbourhoods. The debate will raise the spectre that swaths of single-family homes will be demolished and replaced by larger duplex, triplex and fourplexes. This will trigger followup questioning regarding height incompatibility, shadowing on lower properties and certainly traffic concerns. These are legitimate questions property owners have a right to ask. In contrast, the city will argue that 'as a matter of right' does not preclude any proposed project from meeting the highest standard for design. This includes restrictions on what can replace a single-family home, how tall it can be, how much of the lot it can cover and other considerations. The outcome of the debate is not likely to satisfy all perspectives. However, it is critical to point out that these words have also historically limited change to neighbourhood structures, ensuring a neighbourhood can only contain single-family homes. This has resulted in higher density housing, public housing and fourplexes being relegated to only zones that allow such. Furthermore, any application to change or alter zoning in a single-family area often faces a complex path of variances, appeals and hearings to limit the ability of such change. Thus on one side of the debate, the current model gives residents a voice in shaping how neighbourhoods change over time. In contrast, this approach has been used as a discriminatory tool to push what are considered non-conforming uses to the margins of cities and into less desirable locations. On a personal note, I grew up in a fourplex in South Osborne. Our home backed onto a cemetery and faced a busy high school. It was built in 1972 (the year we moved in) during a wave of infill projects intended boost rental properties in Canada throughout the 1970s. Interestingly, the debate over the location of the 1970s rental housing boom focused on the same rhetoric we hear today, namely, yes, we need such housing, but it needs to be located elsewhere. Winnipeg has a very distinct pattern of fourplexes built during the 1970s, often in marginal locations or acting as a buffer on busy streets. For example, in my Fort Rouge area, you see a high number of duplex and fourplexes built near the railyards in Lord Roberts. Incidentally, this is also the location we see infill public housing in the same neighbourhood. Perhaps the thinking was out of sight, out of mind. Additionally, you see the same vintage of fourplex scattered along very busy thoroughfares in many parts of Winnipeg. I often comment that my childhood home was a cookie-cutter fourplex, right down to the colour of the bricks. It is always fun noting twins of my house while driving throughout Winnipeg. What we need to understand in the pending debate is that more housing is desperately needed, including a range of types from single-family to larger multi-unit homes. We also need to understand that the design standards being advanced will offer tools to ensure what is developed proceeds with purpose and control. These tools can also be changed and adjusted as needed. The interesting part of this debate is growing up in a fourplex was no different than the single-family home I live in now. It was simply a place in which my parents, who emigrated out of Italy, found as an affordable way to ensure we had a good upbringing. It took me some time to realize that our 1,100 square feet was distinct from a home that did not share a common wall. Looking back, I think we ended up being good neighbours. My mother, who is 90, remains in the same fourplex we moved into in 1972. Many of the nearby families and others have also been very long-term residents. Perhaps it's time to say 'welcome to the neighbourhood,' more often. Jino Distasio is a professor of urban geography at the University of Winnipeg.
Global News
6 days ago
- Global News
Manitoba pledges $2.5 million to Place of Pride in downtown Winnipeg
The Manitoba government is kicking off Pride month by investing in affordable housing for LGBTQ2 Winnipeggers. Premier Wab Kinew and families minister Nahanni Fontaine announced $2.5 million in funding to Place of Pride in downtown Winnipeg, which houses 30 seniors and offers space for programming and events. This latest round of funding — which is intended to go toward a kitchen, an arts hub, a rooftop patio, and other common spaces — brings the province's total investment in the space to $5.5 million. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'All Manitobans deserve a place where they feel safe and welcome, which is why this investment greatly benefits the seniors and community members who access the space,' Kinew said. Rainbow Resource Centre's executive director said Place of Pride is the culmination of decades of work toward a permanent site for members of the community. Story continues below advertisement 'Place of Pride is a centre for every kind of activity, from support groups and community feasts to educational programs, celebrations, memorial services and art exhibitions.'
Winnipeg Free Press
22-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Unregistered properties behind confusion over missing homeowners rebate on city tax bills
After a promised school tax credit didn't show up on some city property tax bills this year, the provincial government is laying out options for people to claim the money. The missing Manitoba Homeowners Affordability Tax Credit on some Winnipeggers' bills — which were mailed out May 8 — sparked confusion and complaints. Many appeared unaware that new homeowners must officially register their home with the city as a principal residence to get the credit, as must anyone not previously registered. Those who didn't register did not receive the credit, which deducts $1,500 from most bills. Those who missed out were initially told they could claim it on their income taxes next year. On Wednesday evening, a provincial spokesperson told the Free Press the Manitoba government has now directed the city to let the money flow sooner. 'We will ensure anyone who should get the credit, gets the money they are entitled to,' the spokesperson said in an email. A bulletin sent to the city notes the provincial government is extending the time frame for principal residence owners in the city to declare they are eligible for the credit in order to receive it this year. If the credit doesn't appear on a property tax bill, the owners have until Nov. 15 to declare the property to be a principal residence, the memo notes. Affected homeowners who make monthly tax payments would then receive payment adjustments or a cheque to account for the credit, while those who pay annually would receive a cheque or a credit. 'A notice to potentially impacted property owners will be sent by the City of Winnipeg and questions can be directed to the City of Winnipeg's Assessment and Taxation Department,' the memo states. On Wednesday morning, Winnipeg city council's finance chairman said initial feedback indicated thousands of Winnipeggers didn't understand what was required to get the rebate on their initial bill. Coun. Jeff Browaty said the city and province were working to ensure refunds and/or bill adjustments would be offered, noting some Winnipeggers need the money even more now, amid rising prices. '(It) is a fair amount of money, considering this replaces the (education tax) credit that was there last year…. Getting the $1,500 now (would help),' said Browaty (North Kildonan). In an email, a provincial spokesperson said Winnipeg and Brandon are the only cities that administer their own taxes, while the province handles taxation for other municipalities. The statement said Brandon offered multiple proactive notices of the registration requirement. Browaty said the province is responsible for ensuring homeowners know how to apply for the rebate. 'It's their credit. They should be the ones who communicate how you're eligible for it,' he said. To help sort through the confusion, the Free Press sought answers Wednesday to spell out how education tax rebates have changed and why some people have yet to receive the latest one, including the following key questions: A: Municipal property taxes and school division taxes are noted in separate charges on the same tax bill. The city is required to collect taxes on behalf of school divisions but the municipality neither sets the rate nor keeps the revenue. To calculate municipal tax, the assessed value of a home is multiplied by a taxable portion, which the province currently has set at 45 per cent for residences. That 'portioned value' is then multiplied by the sum of a mill rate divided by 1,000. The same process applies to school division taxes, which have separate mill rates set by each school division. A: For the 2025 tax year, a former 50 per cent school tax rebate has been eliminated for residential properties. A separate education property tax credit, set at up to $350 in 2024, was replaced with the new Homeowners Affordability Tax Credit, which will rise 'to a maximum of $1,500,' according to the Manitoba Finance website. The new rebate applies to principal residences only, not rental properties, secondary homes/cottages or commercial properties. The website notes the actual credit provided 'is the lesser of $1,500 and the gross school taxes on your principal residence.' RUTH BONNEVILLE / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES Those who buy a home must officially register it as their principal residence with their municipality to get the credit, as must anyone who hasn't registered in the past. Those who didn't register did not receive the credit on their recent bill. Those who did should see the credit noted in the school tax portion of the bill. The registration step has been required to qualify for some school tax credits since 2018. A: Initially, residents were told they can apply for a credit to get the rebate when they file income taxes next year. The late-Wednesday update notes they can now skip that wait. Browaty urged all Winnipeggers who have not done so to register their principal residence now at: The city says that form needs to be submitted only once. Browaty said those who didn't get the credit this year may also be missing some past education property tax credits. He urged residents who did not previously register properties as principal residences to check with a tax expert on whether they can claim a $350 rebate for each of 2023 and 2024, as well as $437.50 rebate for 2022. A: Each overall tax levy is affected by an individual home's assessed value, the tax rate applied by the city and a separate tax rate applied by their local school division. In March, a report to Winnipeg city council noted some school divisions imposed significant tax increases this year. For example, the owner of a $371,100 sample home in the Louis Riel School Division was set to pay $316 more in school taxes this year, the report noted. Since each division's rate varies, the tab can be several hundred dollars more in one division than in another, Browaty said. He said homeowners with higher-than-average home values may also pay significant education tax increases, since the 50 per cent education tax rebate has ended. A: In the City of Winnipeg, residents can file an application to the Board of Revision, a quasi-judicial body, to have the assessed value of their home revised but cannot appeal the tax bill itself. Assessment review applications to alter this year's tax bill were due by July 2, 2024. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. Board of revision decisions on assessed value can be appealed to the Manitoba Municipal Board within 21 days of the board's decision. Those questioning whether a property should be taxed can appeal board decisions to the Court of King's Bench. A: Browaty said his North Kildonan ward residents are welcome to send questions to him directly. City of Winnipeg tax bills note those with school tax credit questions can call 1-866-626-4862 or visit X: @joyanne_pursaga Joyanne PursagaReporter Joyanne is city hall reporter for the Winnipeg Free Press. A reporter since 2004, she began covering politics exclusively in 2012, writing on city hall and the Manitoba Legislature for the Winnipeg Sun before joining the Free Press in early 2020. Read more about Joyanne. Every piece of reporting Joyanne produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
