Government to consider changes to gas appliance ban
The government has received submissions from industry, environmental advocates and other groups.
Victorian Automotive Chamber of Commerce chief executive Peter Jones told The Age that the building electrification proposal 'threatens the foundation' of the industry.
'With approximately 4800 automotive businesses across the state relying on gas for their daily operations, this policy could force many of our members to either relocate interstate or shut down entirely,' he said.
'We're looking at the real possibility of vehicle parts, trailer manufacturing and other industry moving offshore permanently – taking Victorian jobs with them.'
Victorian Trades Hall Council, Environment Victoria and the Victorian Council of Social Services have all made submissions supporting the plan.
In March, VCOSS chief executive Juanita Pope said electric homes were better for people's health and that renters and low-income earners would need help to make the transition.
'Prioritising support for these households will mean that all Victorians can enjoy the health benefits and bill savings of electrification,' she said at the time.
Loading
Laundry Association of Australia chief executive Luke Simpkins said if the electrification program was implemented as proposed, it would eventually lead to higher costs.
'Everything will get passed through where possible,' he said.
The debate comes as information provided by ExxonMobil to the Australian Energy Market Operator in April, as part of regular communication on the state of its assets, shows its Turrum Phase 3 project has revised its estimated capacity upwards.
The project, which features a series of new Bass Strait wells, was announced in March, and the data shows it could now deliver 229 petajoules of gas over its lifetime starting from 2027, up from 137 petajoules originally expected.
The numbers are preliminary and will require more work to determine precisely how much gas will be delivered from the project.
But the upgrade raises the prospect that forecast shortages of gas in Victoria and New South Wales could be further delayed.
When the project was announced, it factored into AEMO's calculations that pushed looming gas shortfalls back from 2025 to 2028.
Energy and climate ministers have been meeting for months to map out a way to shore up supply in Australia, with discussions including giving AEMO the power to be a long-time buyer of gas through import terminals.
AEMO's executive general manager of system design, Merryn York, said AEMO was waiting for further information on the Turrum project to see if it should update its advice for the national gas system.
'Additional information has been provided to AEMO's Gas Bulletin Board on gas reserves at the Turrum gas field, part of the Gippsland Basin Joint Venture (GBJV) between Esso Australia and Woodside Energy,' she said.
'We're awaiting on further analysis from both parties to determine when the additional reserves could be produced and the impact this may have on other GBJV fields and projects.'
An Esso spokesperson said their anticipated production remained consistent with AEMO's road map.
Loading
'Esso Australia regularly reviews remaining gas reserves and periodically updates the Australian Energy Market Operator of any material changes,' they said.
'While depletion of the Gippsland Basin is inevitable, projects like Turrum Phase 3 will ensure Bass Strait continues to produce gas for the domestic market past 2030.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
33 minutes ago
- Herald Sun
Whitehorse City Council voted Victoria's best performing council
Don't miss out on the headlines from Victoria. Followed categories will be added to My News. Whitehorse has received the tick of approval from rate payers being judged as the best performing council in Victoria. The area in the city's east, topped the list for the entire state when it came to rate payers satisfaction with a score of 66.8 per cent, and was deemed the third best in Australia, behind the City of Mandurah in Western Australia (67.4 per cent) and the City of Port Adelaide Enfield in South Australia (67 per cent). It was identified as the top performer in the 2025 Community Satisfaction Index coming ahead of other Victorian local governments including Manning Council and the City of Melbourne. Interestingly, Melbourne was the only major metropolitan centre to make it in to the top 10 Australia-wide. Danny Gorog, Snap Send Solve CEO said the data used a mix of incident reports as well as a survey of 13,700 ratepayers to gauge satisfaction on a range of factors including roads, parking, footpaths, waste and graffiti. 'Whitehorse has high ratings for communication, and satisfaction. The residents at Whitehorse said they were happy with the service and happier than other councils so that's why they are at the top of the ranking,' he said. 'The amazing thing about Melbourne City Council is they are in the top 20 Australia-wide, and they are the only major metropolitan city council in the list and they are number 10 on 65.5 per cent versus the average of 61.2 and the state average of 60.9 per cent, so well above the average and that's really impressive given they are area big metro council.' The survey also showed a trend of growth corridor councils performing well. 'You have also got councils like Wyndham, a fast growing council, which is fourth on the list which is very impressive,' Mr Gorog added. In terms of regional areas, the data shows Ballarat and Bendigo were among the best performing, but the regions clearly had different priorities. Out of the city roads were the most important factor while in the city cycling lanes and graffiti rated higher. Roads was rated the highest priority particularly in the Mornington Peninsula, Hume, Geelong, Ballarat, Warrnambool and Southwest, Bendigo and Latrobe. Rubbish and bins was nominated by the biggest priority in North West Melbourne. Other councils to make the top 20 list in Australia included Latrobe City Council and Moonee Valley City Council. The survey comes as councils across Victoria are trying hard to impress residents despite being constrained by rate caps and working around massive planning changes. A new report developed as part of Melbourne Lord Mayor Nick Reece's M2050 Summit includes a plan to make Melbourne 'the most optimistic city' with 'KPIs for happiness'. 'If we're serious about creating a happier, more liveable city by 2050, we need to listen to young Melburnians – the future leaders of our city,' Mr Reece said. In Frankston the council is currently consulting on a 24-hour cat curfew and changes to the off-leash and on-leash dog to better suit residents needs when it comes to their furry companions. Many inner and outer city councils are also currently working with the Allan Government's massive planning changes as part of their housing policy to create 800,000 more homes over a decade. The move will have big impacts on council satisfaction in the future when it comes to amenities, footpaths, rubbish collection and park and recreation.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
‘Nuisance tariffs': Chalmers' shot at Trump
Jim Chalmers has blasted tariffs as a 'tax on the workers and families of the country that levies them' while flagging further action on 'nuisance tariffs'. Nuisance tariffs are import taxes that, while generating some government revenue, are considered inefficient and burdensome. The Treasurer last year removed some 500 duties on a range of everyday items, including toothbrushes, women's health products and fridges. In a thinly veiled shot at Donald Trump, he said on Sunday 'there are good reasons to swim against the tide a bit when it comes to tariffs'. Treasurer Jim Chalmers is mulling further action on 'nuisance tariffs'. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'Some of these nuisance tariffs in our economy risk doing more harm than good, and tariffs are essentially a tax on the workers and families of the country that levies them,' Mr Chalmers told Sky News. 'So we've made a heap of progress abolishing 500 nuisance tariffs, working closely with (Trade Minister) Don Farrell and other colleagues to do that.' He went on to say the Albanese government was 'very proud of that progress that we've been able to make unilaterally, because tariffs push up compliance costs on business'. 'They risk pushing up prices for workers and families as well,' Mr Chalmers said. 'If I can build consensus and momentum to go further on that, I would like to, but I'll do that in a way that works closely with Don Farrell, conscious of the negotiations that he has under way. 'But I think we've shown a willingness and enthusiasm to cut those nuisance tariffs. 'I would like to go further, if I can. They do often do more harm than good, and so we approach the challenge in that light.' His comments come as trade talks with the US drag on. While Australia managed to avoid an increase in US tariffs earlier this month, exports are still subject to blanket 10 per cent levies. Some sectors, such as steel and aluminium, have rates of up to 50 per cent. The US President has also threatened to slap imposts of 250 per cent on foreign pharmaceuticals – a move that would hit Australian producers hard. The Albanese government has repeatedly labelled tariffs 'economic self-harm'. Mr Chalmers did not specify which products he considered slumped with nuisance tariffs, but he did say 'there's hundreds'. 'In those first 500 that we abolished, there were a lot of instances where it costs more actually to levy the tariff than to the benefit that we get from it,' he said. 'So I'm not prepared to put a number on any additional steps that we might be prepared to take, but this has been a pretty constant interest of mine.'
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Some auto brands will leave Australia, predicts Suzuki Queensland boss
The boss of Suzuki Motor Corporation's distributor in Queensland and northern New South Wales predicts some automotive brands will withdraw from the Australian market, including some of the newer Chinese entrants. "I think there'll definitely be brands that don't make it [in Australia]. I think there'll be brands in China that won't last – they're cutting each other's throats over there at the moment already," the general manager of Suzuki Auto Co, Paul Dillon, told CarExpert. "If you talk to [Pitcher Partners automotive analyst] Steve Bragg, somebody like that in that part of the industry, their advice to dealers is just to be very careful about which Chinese brands they take on and spend money developing their dealership for. Are they going to be there in the future? "We've already seen Chinese brands come in and go previously." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Indeed, the first wave of Chinese brands from 2009 into the 2010s saw various brands come but eventually go, including JMC and ZX Auto. That wave also included the first attempts in the Australian market by Chery and Geely, both of which left but have re-entered this decade with factory-backed operations. And as Mr Dillon notes, some Chinese brands have even failed or appear close to death in their own market, including HiPhi, Hycan and Weltmeister, and the Evergrande Group-owned Hengchi. The latest deluge of Chinese brands into Australia has far surpassed that of this earlier era in our market's, however. In 2023, Chery returned to the Australian market to join existing existing players BYD, GWM and MG. Above (clockwise from left): Geely EX5, GAC GS3 Emzoom, Leapmotor C10, Chery Tiggo 4 Leapmotor, Deepal, JAC, Xpeng and Zeekr followed in 2024, with Geely and Omoda Jaecoo commencing deliveries this year, and Foton soon to give it another crack after having previously exited our market. GAC is also set to enter the Australian market this year, and even more brands are expected to come. That will see well over 60 brands competing for a market that, compared to more populous nations like the US, is small fry – around 1.2 million vehicles were sold here last year. Almost all of the new brands entering our market come from China, with automakers from that nation eager to enter the fray here. They're doing so in many cases not only to eke out a share of the Australian market, but also to use our market as a test bed for other markets (as Chery has confirmed) and to help bolster their global presence – something particularly crucial as competition among Chinese brands in their home market becomes ever more brutal. They're also typically coming here with sharp pricing that undercuts established brands from Japan, South Korea and other countries. Many of those Chinese brands "undoubtedly" pose a threat to legacy brands like Suzuki, said Mr Dillon. "The legislation's almost leaning towards them, isn't it?" he added, referring to the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) emissions scheme, which he argued was poorly thought-out. "When you see if the NVES has the impact that it probably will have, does that mean everything else other than the Chinese stuff starts getting more expensive? "It doesn't mean that over the next two years there's going to be a dip in the national sales of cars. Do we go from 1.1 million to a number less than that, once the shock of price increases? "That said, looking at the recent VFACTS, some of their brands are certainly rapidly increasing in volume but the overall Chinese share of the national market isn't increasing that quickly I don't think. "There are still some people that prefer to stay with a legacy brand." Sales of vehicles built in China were up by 8.6 per cent in 2024, after having overtaken sales of Korean-built cars in 2022. But while brands like BYD and Chery have soared, overall sales growth for Chinese-built cars isn't as impressive as it was in 2023, when their sales increased by 57.5 per cent, or in 2022 when they rose by 61 per cent. And since 2021, Suzuki has managed to maintain a total share of our market of between 1.4 and 2.0 per cent, though this year it may struggle thanks to interrupted supply of key vehicles like the Jimny. Suzuki finished 16th overall in our market in 2024 with 21,278 deliveries, finishing behind Chinese brands MG (seventh place, 50,592 deliveries) and GWM (10th, 42,782 deliveries) and just ahead of BYD (17th, 20,458 deliveries). So far this year, Suzuki is behind all three of those brands, plus Chery. It's sitting at 9653 deliveries, down 21 per cent year-to-date, while Chery has overtaken it with 17,272 deliveries, up 235.2 per cent. Moving forward, Suzuki will also need to keep an eye on rapid risers like Geely in its rear-view mirror, while new entrants like GAC will be competing in some of the same segments as the Japanese brand. Suzuki Australia, which manages the sale and distribution of Suzuki vehicles everywhere in Australia bar Queensland and the Northern Rivers region of NSW, says it won't start a price war with purveyors of affordable Chinese vehicles. "We offer products that are good value for money that can be applicable to most buyer types around the world. And that's part of Suzuki's philosophy: to produce a car for everybody," Suzuki Australia general manager Michael Pachota told CarExpert. "With that said, there's no compromise ever on quality, so you get what you pay for. "With respect to that, I don't think it's a race to the lowest price if a competitor is down there. It's based on producing a vehicle that's right for the consumer, and it's a quality product without any compromise. "We own our lane. We're good in it. We're the small-car specialists, and we deliver – and I keep saying it – undeniably reliable, quality product." MORE: Australia's new emissions regulations are poorly thought out, says local car brand boss MORE: Suzuki Australia won't start price war with Chinese rivals Content originally sourced from: The boss of Suzuki Motor Corporation's distributor in Queensland and northern New South Wales predicts some automotive brands will withdraw from the Australian market, including some of the newer Chinese entrants. "I think there'll definitely be brands that don't make it [in Australia]. I think there'll be brands in China that won't last – they're cutting each other's throats over there at the moment already," the general manager of Suzuki Auto Co, Paul Dillon, told CarExpert. "If you talk to [Pitcher Partners automotive analyst] Steve Bragg, somebody like that in that part of the industry, their advice to dealers is just to be very careful about which Chinese brands they take on and spend money developing their dealership for. Are they going to be there in the future? "We've already seen Chinese brands come in and go previously." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Indeed, the first wave of Chinese brands from 2009 into the 2010s saw various brands come but eventually go, including JMC and ZX Auto. That wave also included the first attempts in the Australian market by Chery and Geely, both of which left but have re-entered this decade with factory-backed operations. And as Mr Dillon notes, some Chinese brands have even failed or appear close to death in their own market, including HiPhi, Hycan and Weltmeister, and the Evergrande Group-owned Hengchi. The latest deluge of Chinese brands into Australia has far surpassed that of this earlier era in our market's, however. In 2023, Chery returned to the Australian market to join existing existing players BYD, GWM and MG. Above (clockwise from left): Geely EX5, GAC GS3 Emzoom, Leapmotor C10, Chery Tiggo 4 Leapmotor, Deepal, JAC, Xpeng and Zeekr followed in 2024, with Geely and Omoda Jaecoo commencing deliveries this year, and Foton soon to give it another crack after having previously exited our market. GAC is also set to enter the Australian market this year, and even more brands are expected to come. That will see well over 60 brands competing for a market that, compared to more populous nations like the US, is small fry – around 1.2 million vehicles were sold here last year. Almost all of the new brands entering our market come from China, with automakers from that nation eager to enter the fray here. They're doing so in many cases not only to eke out a share of the Australian market, but also to use our market as a test bed for other markets (as Chery has confirmed) and to help bolster their global presence – something particularly crucial as competition among Chinese brands in their home market becomes ever more brutal. They're also typically coming here with sharp pricing that undercuts established brands from Japan, South Korea and other countries. Many of those Chinese brands "undoubtedly" pose a threat to legacy brands like Suzuki, said Mr Dillon. "The legislation's almost leaning towards them, isn't it?" he added, referring to the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) emissions scheme, which he argued was poorly thought-out. "When you see if the NVES has the impact that it probably will have, does that mean everything else other than the Chinese stuff starts getting more expensive? "It doesn't mean that over the next two years there's going to be a dip in the national sales of cars. Do we go from 1.1 million to a number less than that, once the shock of price increases? "That said, looking at the recent VFACTS, some of their brands are certainly rapidly increasing in volume but the overall Chinese share of the national market isn't increasing that quickly I don't think. "There are still some people that prefer to stay with a legacy brand." Sales of vehicles built in China were up by 8.6 per cent in 2024, after having overtaken sales of Korean-built cars in 2022. But while brands like BYD and Chery have soared, overall sales growth for Chinese-built cars isn't as impressive as it was in 2023, when their sales increased by 57.5 per cent, or in 2022 when they rose by 61 per cent. And since 2021, Suzuki has managed to maintain a total share of our market of between 1.4 and 2.0 per cent, though this year it may struggle thanks to interrupted supply of key vehicles like the Jimny. Suzuki finished 16th overall in our market in 2024 with 21,278 deliveries, finishing behind Chinese brands MG (seventh place, 50,592 deliveries) and GWM (10th, 42,782 deliveries) and just ahead of BYD (17th, 20,458 deliveries). So far this year, Suzuki is behind all three of those brands, plus Chery. It's sitting at 9653 deliveries, down 21 per cent year-to-date, while Chery has overtaken it with 17,272 deliveries, up 235.2 per cent. Moving forward, Suzuki will also need to keep an eye on rapid risers like Geely in its rear-view mirror, while new entrants like GAC will be competing in some of the same segments as the Japanese brand. Suzuki Australia, which manages the sale and distribution of Suzuki vehicles everywhere in Australia bar Queensland and the Northern Rivers region of NSW, says it won't start a price war with purveyors of affordable Chinese vehicles. "We offer products that are good value for money that can be applicable to most buyer types around the world. And that's part of Suzuki's philosophy: to produce a car for everybody," Suzuki Australia general manager Michael Pachota told CarExpert. "With that said, there's no compromise ever on quality, so you get what you pay for. "With respect to that, I don't think it's a race to the lowest price if a competitor is down there. It's based on producing a vehicle that's right for the consumer, and it's a quality product without any compromise. "We own our lane. We're good in it. We're the small-car specialists, and we deliver – and I keep saying it – undeniably reliable, quality product." MORE: Australia's new emissions regulations are poorly thought out, says local car brand boss MORE: Suzuki Australia won't start price war with Chinese rivals Content originally sourced from: The boss of Suzuki Motor Corporation's distributor in Queensland and northern New South Wales predicts some automotive brands will withdraw from the Australian market, including some of the newer Chinese entrants. "I think there'll definitely be brands that don't make it [in Australia]. I think there'll be brands in China that won't last – they're cutting each other's throats over there at the moment already," the general manager of Suzuki Auto Co, Paul Dillon, told CarExpert. "If you talk to [Pitcher Partners automotive analyst] Steve Bragg, somebody like that in that part of the industry, their advice to dealers is just to be very careful about which Chinese brands they take on and spend money developing their dealership for. Are they going to be there in the future? "We've already seen Chinese brands come in and go previously." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Indeed, the first wave of Chinese brands from 2009 into the 2010s saw various brands come but eventually go, including JMC and ZX Auto. That wave also included the first attempts in the Australian market by Chery and Geely, both of which left but have re-entered this decade with factory-backed operations. And as Mr Dillon notes, some Chinese brands have even failed or appear close to death in their own market, including HiPhi, Hycan and Weltmeister, and the Evergrande Group-owned Hengchi. The latest deluge of Chinese brands into Australia has far surpassed that of this earlier era in our market's, however. In 2023, Chery returned to the Australian market to join existing existing players BYD, GWM and MG. Above (clockwise from left): Geely EX5, GAC GS3 Emzoom, Leapmotor C10, Chery Tiggo 4 Leapmotor, Deepal, JAC, Xpeng and Zeekr followed in 2024, with Geely and Omoda Jaecoo commencing deliveries this year, and Foton soon to give it another crack after having previously exited our market. GAC is also set to enter the Australian market this year, and even more brands are expected to come. That will see well over 60 brands competing for a market that, compared to more populous nations like the US, is small fry – around 1.2 million vehicles were sold here last year. Almost all of the new brands entering our market come from China, with automakers from that nation eager to enter the fray here. They're doing so in many cases not only to eke out a share of the Australian market, but also to use our market as a test bed for other markets (as Chery has confirmed) and to help bolster their global presence – something particularly crucial as competition among Chinese brands in their home market becomes ever more brutal. They're also typically coming here with sharp pricing that undercuts established brands from Japan, South Korea and other countries. Many of those Chinese brands "undoubtedly" pose a threat to legacy brands like Suzuki, said Mr Dillon. "The legislation's almost leaning towards them, isn't it?" he added, referring to the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) emissions scheme, which he argued was poorly thought-out. "When you see if the NVES has the impact that it probably will have, does that mean everything else other than the Chinese stuff starts getting more expensive? "It doesn't mean that over the next two years there's going to be a dip in the national sales of cars. Do we go from 1.1 million to a number less than that, once the shock of price increases? "That said, looking at the recent VFACTS, some of their brands are certainly rapidly increasing in volume but the overall Chinese share of the national market isn't increasing that quickly I don't think. "There are still some people that prefer to stay with a legacy brand." Sales of vehicles built in China were up by 8.6 per cent in 2024, after having overtaken sales of Korean-built cars in 2022. But while brands like BYD and Chery have soared, overall sales growth for Chinese-built cars isn't as impressive as it was in 2023, when their sales increased by 57.5 per cent, or in 2022 when they rose by 61 per cent. And since 2021, Suzuki has managed to maintain a total share of our market of between 1.4 and 2.0 per cent, though this year it may struggle thanks to interrupted supply of key vehicles like the Jimny. Suzuki finished 16th overall in our market in 2024 with 21,278 deliveries, finishing behind Chinese brands MG (seventh place, 50,592 deliveries) and GWM (10th, 42,782 deliveries) and just ahead of BYD (17th, 20,458 deliveries). So far this year, Suzuki is behind all three of those brands, plus Chery. It's sitting at 9653 deliveries, down 21 per cent year-to-date, while Chery has overtaken it with 17,272 deliveries, up 235.2 per cent. Moving forward, Suzuki will also need to keep an eye on rapid risers like Geely in its rear-view mirror, while new entrants like GAC will be competing in some of the same segments as the Japanese brand. Suzuki Australia, which manages the sale and distribution of Suzuki vehicles everywhere in Australia bar Queensland and the Northern Rivers region of NSW, says it won't start a price war with purveyors of affordable Chinese vehicles. "We offer products that are good value for money that can be applicable to most buyer types around the world. And that's part of Suzuki's philosophy: to produce a car for everybody," Suzuki Australia general manager Michael Pachota told CarExpert. "With that said, there's no compromise ever on quality, so you get what you pay for. "With respect to that, I don't think it's a race to the lowest price if a competitor is down there. It's based on producing a vehicle that's right for the consumer, and it's a quality product without any compromise. "We own our lane. We're good in it. We're the small-car specialists, and we deliver – and I keep saying it – undeniably reliable, quality product." MORE: Australia's new emissions regulations are poorly thought out, says local car brand boss MORE: Suzuki Australia won't start price war with Chinese rivals Content originally sourced from: The boss of Suzuki Motor Corporation's distributor in Queensland and northern New South Wales predicts some automotive brands will withdraw from the Australian market, including some of the newer Chinese entrants. "I think there'll definitely be brands that don't make it [in Australia]. I think there'll be brands in China that won't last – they're cutting each other's throats over there at the moment already," the general manager of Suzuki Auto Co, Paul Dillon, told CarExpert. "If you talk to [Pitcher Partners automotive analyst] Steve Bragg, somebody like that in that part of the industry, their advice to dealers is just to be very careful about which Chinese brands they take on and spend money developing their dealership for. Are they going to be there in the future? "We've already seen Chinese brands come in and go previously." CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Indeed, the first wave of Chinese brands from 2009 into the 2010s saw various brands come but eventually go, including JMC and ZX Auto. That wave also included the first attempts in the Australian market by Chery and Geely, both of which left but have re-entered this decade with factory-backed operations. And as Mr Dillon notes, some Chinese brands have even failed or appear close to death in their own market, including HiPhi, Hycan and Weltmeister, and the Evergrande Group-owned Hengchi. The latest deluge of Chinese brands into Australia has far surpassed that of this earlier era in our market's, however. In 2023, Chery returned to the Australian market to join existing existing players BYD, GWM and MG. Above (clockwise from left): Geely EX5, GAC GS3 Emzoom, Leapmotor C10, Chery Tiggo 4 Leapmotor, Deepal, JAC, Xpeng and Zeekr followed in 2024, with Geely and Omoda Jaecoo commencing deliveries this year, and Foton soon to give it another crack after having previously exited our market. GAC is also set to enter the Australian market this year, and even more brands are expected to come. That will see well over 60 brands competing for a market that, compared to more populous nations like the US, is small fry – around 1.2 million vehicles were sold here last year. Almost all of the new brands entering our market come from China, with automakers from that nation eager to enter the fray here. They're doing so in many cases not only to eke out a share of the Australian market, but also to use our market as a test bed for other markets (as Chery has confirmed) and to help bolster their global presence – something particularly crucial as competition among Chinese brands in their home market becomes ever more brutal. They're also typically coming here with sharp pricing that undercuts established brands from Japan, South Korea and other countries. Many of those Chinese brands "undoubtedly" pose a threat to legacy brands like Suzuki, said Mr Dillon. "The legislation's almost leaning towards them, isn't it?" he added, referring to the federal government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) emissions scheme, which he argued was poorly thought-out. "When you see if the NVES has the impact that it probably will have, does that mean everything else other than the Chinese stuff starts getting more expensive? "It doesn't mean that over the next two years there's going to be a dip in the national sales of cars. Do we go from 1.1 million to a number less than that, once the shock of price increases? "That said, looking at the recent VFACTS, some of their brands are certainly rapidly increasing in volume but the overall Chinese share of the national market isn't increasing that quickly I don't think. "There are still some people that prefer to stay with a legacy brand." Sales of vehicles built in China were up by 8.6 per cent in 2024, after having overtaken sales of Korean-built cars in 2022. But while brands like BYD and Chery have soared, overall sales growth for Chinese-built cars isn't as impressive as it was in 2023, when their sales increased by 57.5 per cent, or in 2022 when they rose by 61 per cent. And since 2021, Suzuki has managed to maintain a total share of our market of between 1.4 and 2.0 per cent, though this year it may struggle thanks to interrupted supply of key vehicles like the Jimny. Suzuki finished 16th overall in our market in 2024 with 21,278 deliveries, finishing behind Chinese brands MG (seventh place, 50,592 deliveries) and GWM (10th, 42,782 deliveries) and just ahead of BYD (17th, 20,458 deliveries). So far this year, Suzuki is behind all three of those brands, plus Chery. It's sitting at 9653 deliveries, down 21 per cent year-to-date, while Chery has overtaken it with 17,272 deliveries, up 235.2 per cent. Moving forward, Suzuki will also need to keep an eye on rapid risers like Geely in its rear-view mirror, while new entrants like GAC will be competing in some of the same segments as the Japanese brand. Suzuki Australia, which manages the sale and distribution of Suzuki vehicles everywhere in Australia bar Queensland and the Northern Rivers region of NSW, says it won't start a price war with purveyors of affordable Chinese vehicles. "We offer products that are good value for money that can be applicable to most buyer types around the world. And that's part of Suzuki's philosophy: to produce a car for everybody," Suzuki Australia general manager Michael Pachota told CarExpert. "With that said, there's no compromise ever on quality, so you get what you pay for. "With respect to that, I don't think it's a race to the lowest price if a competitor is down there. It's based on producing a vehicle that's right for the consumer, and it's a quality product without any compromise. "We own our lane. We're good in it. We're the small-car specialists, and we deliver – and I keep saying it – undeniably reliable, quality product." MORE: Australia's new emissions regulations are poorly thought out, says local car brand boss MORE: Suzuki Australia won't start price war with Chinese rivals Content originally sourced from:
