Homeland Security hits back at claims ICE agent at Martha's Vineyard has ‘white supremacist' tattoo
The Department of Homeland Security has hit back at claims that an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent has a 'white supremacist' tattoo after footage circulated online during an arrest operation in Martha's Vineyard.
An ICE officer was spotted on the Massachusetts island last week with what appeared to be a Valknot tattoo, a Nordic symbol of the god Odin.
Charlie Giordano confronted the ICE agents and posted the footage on Instagram, the Martha's Vineyard Times first reported.
'When reviewing the images I made of 'ICE Agents' on Martha's Vineyard yesterday, I noticed several had the 'Valknot' tattooed on their arms,' Giordano posted on Instagram. 'It's a symbol often used by white supremacy groups.'
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin characterized the claim as a 'smear' in a post on X Tuesday and said the officer was 'a combat veteran.'
'His tattoo is a tribute to fallen warriors —a pretty common tattoo in the military among combat veterans who embrace the Nordic Viking warrior culture,' McLaughlin said.
'Attempting to smear this ICE officer and pretend his tattoo is meant to be a tribute to White Supremacy is false, pathetic, and insulting to veterans.'
The symbol has been appropriated by white supremacists, the Anti-Defamation League says on its website. 'Some white supremacists, particularly racist Odinists, have appropriated the Valknot to use as a racist symbol.'
However, the organization also noted that 'non-racist pagans may also use this symbol,' so it should be 'carefully examine[d] it in context rather than assume that a particular use of the symbol is racist.'
Jacob Chansley, dubbed the 'QAnon Shaman' for his role in 'spearheading' the January 6 Capitol riot, has the symbol tattooed on his chest.
ICE acknowledged the symbol had been 'co-opted by racist organizations,' according to the Martha's Vineyard Times, but a spokesperson said that the agent is 'absolutely not connected with white supremacism in any way.'
According to the outlet, an ICE spokesperson said that the officer had the tattoo before joining the agency, and that he was a combat veteran.
Last week agents arrested 40 people on the popular vacation island, which has a large Brazilian population.
The incident surrounding the agent's tattoo follows previous concern over Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's 'Christian motto' tattoo, which some perceived as a white nationalist dog whistle.
Hegseth, an Army National Guard veteran, has the words 'Deus Vult' tattooed on his bicep, which has been associated with white supremacist groups. 'Deus Vult' is a Latin phrase meaning 'God Wills It,' and was a rallying cry for Christian crusaders in the Middle Ages.
Vice President JD Vance said the uproar over the tattoo was 'disgusting anti-Christian bigotry' at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Community rallies in Tacoma, WA for release of detained green card holder Maximo Londonio
The Brief Supporters rallied for the release of Maximo "Kuya Max" Londonio, a detained labor union leader and green card holder. Londonio was detained after returning from the Philippines, with advocates highlighting systemic failures in immigration detention. The Tacoma ICE facility is reportedly over capacity, with worsening conditions and frequent deportation flights. TACOMA, Wash. - Supporters gathered outside the Northwest ICE Processing Center on Friday afternoon, calling for the release of Maximo "Kuya Max" Londonio — a longtime labor union leader, U.S. green card holder, and father of three. The rally, organized by immigrant rights groups and family members, drew dozens demanding immediate action from immigration authorities. Advocates say Londonio's detention highlights broader systemic failures and worsening conditions inside the facility. "Max is an amazing father and dedicated husband, selfless friend who deserves to be released.," his wife, Crystal Londonio said as she addressed the crowd, her voice full of emotion. Londonio, 42, was detained by Customs and Border Protection after returning from a trip to the Philippines. The visit was to honor his late mother and celebrate his wedding anniversary with Crystal. "He is not a threat, he is one of us, he is our brother," one protester shouted, as chants of solidarity echoed outside the detention center. Crystal shared her husband has a past – which they believe led to his detention. However, she said Max accepted responsibility for the mistakes he committed decades ago. "Max has taken accountability for his actions that he made more than 25 years ago, which was satisfied by all requirements set by the judicial system," Crystal said. Now, she says, he's been abandoned by both governments. "In response to being told we will just wait to see what the U.S. decides, then we will decide," Crystal said. Crystal has found support in Tanggol Migrante, a migrant advocacy network, and is now working with the organization to raise awareness about the effects of immigration detention on families. "This has impacts on the economy alright, and it's the downfall of it," said Jo Faralan of Tanggol Migrante. "Our migrants are what create our livelihood across the U.S." Advocates say Londonio's case is far from isolated — and they're demanding systemic change. "I want my husband home, my daughters want their father home now," Crystal said. The family has joined several immigrant advocacy organizations and labor unions fighting for every detainee to be released. During the rally, a bus, unclear how many passengers, entered the facility as Crystal joined the crowd chanting, "Free them all." La Resistencia, another advocacy group, reports that the Tacoma facility is currently over capacity, holding more than 1,600 detainees. The group says conditions inside are deteriorating, even as deportation flights continue at a pace of two to three per week. The Source Information in this story came from Tanggol Migrante, La Resistencia, and original FOX 13 Seattle reporting and interviews. Travis Decker manhunt: 'Remote' areas of 5 WA counties told to lock doors Former Army squadmate shares insight into Travis Decker's military past Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial Rochester dog training facility owner accused of killing employee during video shoot To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Religion cases spark both unanimity and division at Supreme Court
Religious rights are sparking both unanimity and deep divisions on the Supreme Court this term, with one major decision still to come. On Thursday, all nine justices sided with Catholic Charities Bureau in its tax fight with Wisconsin. But weeks earlier, the court's 4-4 deadlock handed those same religious interests a loss by refusing to greenlight the nation's first religious charter school. Now, advocates are turning their attention to the other major religion case still pending this term, which concerns whether parents have the First Amendment right to opt-out their children from instruction including books with LGBTQ themes. 'The court has been using its Religion Clause cases over the past few years to send the message that everything doesn't have to be quite so polarized and quite so everybody at each other's throats,' said Mark Rienzi, the president and CEO of Becket, a religious legal group that represents both the parents and Catholic Charities. The trio of cases reflect a new burst of activity on the Supreme Court's religion docket, a major legacy of Chief Justice John Roberts' tenure. Research by Lee Epstein, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis, found the Roberts Court has ruled in favor of religious organizations over 83 percent of the time, a significant jump from previous eras. The decisions have oftentimes protected Christian traditions, a development that critics view as a rightward shift away from a focus on protecting non-mainstream religions. But on Thursday, the court emerged unanimous. The nine justices all agreed that Wisconsin violated the First Amendment in denying Catholic Charities a religious exemption from paying state unemployment taxes. Wisconsin's top court denied the exemption by finding the charity wasn't primarily religious, saying it could only qualify if it was trying to proselytize people. Catholic Charities stressed that the Catholic faith forbids misusing works of charity for proselytism. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored Thursday's majority opinion finding Wisconsin unconstitutionally established a government preference for some religious denominations over others. 'There may be hard calls to make in policing that rule, but this is not one,' Sotomayor wrote. The fact that Sotomayor, one of the court's three Democratic-appointed justices, wrote the opinion heightened the sense of unity. 'She's voted with us in several other cases, too, and I think it just shows that it is not the partisan issue that people sometimes try to make it out to be,' said Rienzi. However, Sotomayor's opinion notably did not address Catholic Charities' other arguments, including those related to church autonomy that Justice Clarence Thomas, one the court's leading conservatives, endorsed in a solo, separate opinion. Ryan Gardner, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, which filed a brief backing Catholic Charities, similarly called the unanimity an 'encouraging' sign. 'If they can find a way to do that, they want to do that. And that's why I think you have the opinion written the way that it was. It was written that way so that every justice could feel comfortable signing off on it,' said Gardner. Supporters and critics of the court's decision agree it still poses repercussions on cases well beyond the tax context — and even into the culture wars. Perhaps most immediately, the battle at the Supreme Court will shift from unemployment taxes to abortion. The justices have a pending request from religious groups, also represented by Becket, to review New York's mandate that employers' health care plans cover abortions. The regulation exempts religious organizations only if they inculcate religious values, meaning many faith-based charities must still follow the mandate. And for the First Liberty Institute, it believes Thursday's decision bolsters its legal fights in the lower courts. It represents an Ohio church that serves the homeless and an Arizona church that provides food distribution, both embroiled in legal battles with local municipalities that implicate whether the ministries are religious enough. Thursday's decision is not the first time the Supreme Court has unanimously handed a win to religious rights advocates. In 2023, the First Liberty Institute successfully represented a Christian U.S. Postal Service worker who requested a religious accommodation to not work on Sundays. And two years earlier, the court in a unanimous judgment ruled Philadelphia violated the Free Exercise Clause by refusing to refer children to a Catholic adoption agency because it would not certify same-sex couples to be foster parents. 'People thought that was a very narrow decision at the time, but the way it has sort of been applied since then, it has really reshaped a lot of the way that we think about Free Exercise cases,' said Gardner. It's not always kumbaya, however. Last month, the Supreme Court split evenly on a highly anticipated religious case that concerned whether Oklahoma could establish the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school. The 4-4 deadlock meant the effort fizzled. Released just three weeks after the justices' initial vote behind closed doors, the decision spanned one sentence. 'The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court,' it reads. Though the deadlock means supporters of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School are left without a green light, they are hoping they will prevail soon enough. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump's third appointee to the court, recused from the St. Isidore case, which many court watchers believe stemmed from her friendship with a professor at Notre Dame, whose religious liberty clinic represented St. Isidore. But Barrett could participate in a future case — providing the crucial fifth vote — that presents the same legal question, which poses consequential implications for public education. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court still has one major religion case left this term. The justices are reviewing whether Montgomery County, Md., must provide parents an option to opt-out their elementary-aged children from instruction with books that include LGBTQ themes. The group of Muslim, Roman Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox parents suing say it substantially burdens their First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise Clause. At oral arguments, the conservative majority appeared sympathetic with the parent's plea as the court's three liberal justices raised concerns about where to draw the line. 'Probably, it will be a split decision,' said Gardner, whose group has filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of parents in California. But he cautioned, 'you never know where some of the justices will line up.'
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
California Democrat Reacts as ICE Reportedly Held Detainees in Basement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Representative Jimmy Gomez called reports of immigrants being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the basement of a federal building in his Los Angeles district "scary," telling Newsweek he has "concerns that this facility is not meant to hold individuals overnight, and that it can actually cause harm to the people that are being held there." An ICE spokesperson rejected reports of people being held in the basement, telling Newsweek in an email statement on Friday: "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." Why It Matters The California Democrat represents parts of Los Angeles, including the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown L.A., where CBS first reported that dozens of immigrants have been detained in the basement by ICE. The reported detentions come amid an immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, during which people with valid documentation—including green cards or visas—have been detained and face legal jeopardy. President Donald Trump has pledged the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history and in the initial months of his second term his administration has deported about 100,000 illegal immigrants, many as a result of his invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which grants the president authority to deport non-citizens without appearing before a judge, among other wartime authorities. What To Know Immigration lawyers and impacted families told CBS News that their clients and relatives went to ICE check-in appointments at the federal building this week and were taken into custody and held in the basement. Some people were reported to have spent the night in the basement. A CBS report cited an attorney who said one of her clients—a couple and their two children—spent the night in a room without beds with limited access to food and water. The woman was later released because of medical concerns related to her high-risk pregnancy. Other reports include detainees being held without food or water for hours. In its statement to Newsweek, ICE added: "ICE takes very seriously it's [sic] mandate to care for people in their custody with dignity and as mandated by law." It continued: "Inaccurate statements pushing a false narrative do nothing but put ICE law enforcement personnel and our communities at risk while distorting our mission of public safety and secure borders." Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/AP Gomez told Newsweek in a video interview that the reports are "scary because a lot of these folks are people who had followed the asylum process, doing the normal check-in, and that they had deportation stays and then they were held anyways." He said his office is concerned about whether detainees are being fed, receiving necessary medical care and held in appropriate conditions, as the facility is "not meant to have overnight detainees." The building has an immigration court, Gomez explained, saying that people checked in and "then they were detained and sent to the basement." He said the rise in detentions at ICE appointments is "not normal." Across the country, there have been numerous reports of people being taken into custody during scheduled check-ins with the agency. He noted the increase in these types of detentions may be tied to the rollback of a previous policy that discouraged arrests at sensitive locations such as churches, hospitals and schools. Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order revoking those protections. Gomez told Newsweek that the consequences of making arrests in these sensitive locations "are severe," saying, "if you can grab somebody at a hospital, then they're less likely to get the healthcare that they people stop showing up. "I think people are scared. They're feeling that the process that they knew was in place is being upended. That fear leads people not going to work," as well as not engaging in social life and addressing their health care needs, he said. What People Are Saying Juan Proaño, chief executive officer of the League of United Latin American Citizens, told CBS News: "They're having to literally house these immigrants in a makeshift detention center, which on its face is illegal. It is beyond inhumane treatment for any immigrant and in this particular case, you're talking about Trump administration, DHS, ICE have gotten way ahead of themselves. They haven't necessarily planned this properly and don't have the capacity required in order to continue with large-scale deportation." What Happens Next Gomez told Newsweek that he hopes to visit the facility on Saturday, noting that as a member of Congress, he has the right to "visit any facility that's detaining migrants." He said on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday: "@DHS—I demand to go in to get answers. We need to know why law-abiding asylum seekers are being detained, separated, and treated like criminals." He told Newsweek: "I think it's just going to get worse before it gets better. But we're going to fight back as much as we can through the courts, through Congress, through the public, and try to get people to understand the consequences of Trump's immigration policies."
