Bangladesh's Yunus says will step down after polls
LONDON: Bangladesh interim leader Mohammed Yunus said Wednesday that there was 'no way' he wanted to continue in power after elections he has announced for April, the first since a mass uprising overthrew the government.
The South Asian nation of around 170 million people has been in political turmoil since a student-led revolt ousted then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in August 2024, ending her 15-year rule.
Speaking in London, Yunus, asked if he himself was seeking any political post, the 84-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner said there was 'no way,' waving his hands in the air for emphasis.
'I think none of our Cabinet members would like to do that, not only me,' he said.
Yunus was answering questions after speaking at London's foreign policy think tank Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
He also said he wanted to unveil a 'big package' of proposals next month that he dubbed a 'July Charter' — one year on since the students launched the demonstrations that toppled Hasina.
The aim of the package, he added, was to overhaul democratic institutions after Hasina's tenure.
'We want to say goodbye to the old Bangladesh and create a new Bangladesh,' Yunus said.
The charter is being drafted by a government 'consensus commission,' talking to political parties to 'find that which are the recommendations they will accept,' he added.
Yunus has long said elections will be held before June 2026, but says the more time the interim administration had to enact reforms, the better.
But after political parties jostling for power repeatedly demanded he fix a timetable, he said earlier this month that elections would be held in April 2026.
'Our job is to make sure that the transition is managed well, and that people are happy when we hand over power to the elected government,' he said.
'So we want to make sure that the election is right, that is a very critical factor for us. If the election is wrong, this thing will never be solved again.'
Yunus is also expected to meet in London with Tarique Rahman, acting chairman of Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which is widely seen as likely to sweep the elections.
Rahman, 59, the son of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, has lived in London since 2008 after being sentenced in absentia under Hasina — convictions since quashed.
He is widely expected to return to Dhaka to lead the party in polls.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Is Lebanon Irreformable?
In a normal country, political life is structured around a constitution that outlines its system of governance. Recent developments, however, have shown that Lebanon has not yet reached this stage. Disappointment has prevailed once again after the inauguration of President Joseph Aoun raised citizens' expectations. The optimism heightened with Nawaf Salam's appointment as the head of the first government of Aoun's term, as his previous role as a judge at the International Court of Justice raised hopes for reform. It was only natural for the country to be swept up in optimism, especially given Aoun's inauguration speech and cabinet's ministerial statement, which echoed citizens' deep-seated aspirations for reform and transparency. However, the contrast between the rhetoric and policy decisions being made is stark, particularly at the highest levels. Key political appointments in this country that had been deliberately looted and impoverished- and are now in a foundational phase- have left the public disillusioned. The ruling class has not taken a single step toward dismantling the sectarian-quota-based spoil-sharing system. As a result, the country's political trajectory has not changed, failing to break with the disastrous practices of the past. Under the Aoun–Salam duo, deviations from the paths set by the Constitution continue, with many of the decisions and appointments blatantly violating constitutional principles. When Michel Aoun was president, constitutional loopholes were a constant theme of the public discourse. Disputes over each branch's authority revolved around the notion that the country's top offices are sectarian in nature, with the state and its constitutional institutions reduced to fiefdoms. It is worth noting, that the constitution, which reserves the oath of office for the president, does not stipulate the president represents the Maronite community, nor does it say that the speaker represents the Shiite community or the prime minister represents the Sunni community. The idea of a "troika" gained traction under the Syrian occupation. It was used to undermine the constitutional authority of the president as a neutral arbiter on the one hand; on the other, it allowed the hegemon to tighten its grip on the country's decisions and resources. Several parties have defended the supposed need to maintain sectarian balance at the top. However, precedents show that their real objective is not to uphold the balance created by the constitution but to ensure that individual sectarian leaders maintain their privileges and tighten their grip on politics under the pretext of representing their respective communities. The outcome of this approach is obvious: it has been profoundly negative, preventing the establishment of a state built on institutions and the rule of law. Today, there is no shortage of figures eager to promote this approach through manipulative rhetoric. With regard to the president, their argument is built on that 'strong mandate' that he enjoys given his broad international and regional backing, as well as his near-unanimous domestic support for him to fill the longstanding vacuum born of the political system's dysfunction. Some have argued that the president is entitled to implement his own interpretation of how to expand his role, irrespective of constitutional boundaries. Let us pause here and look over the 1991 constitutional amendments introduced after the Taif Agreement. The executive authority that had been given to the president was transferred to the Council of Ministers as a collective body. However, the coup against the Taif Accord and the Republic prevented the implementation of the constitution and enabled the former Syrian regime to seize control of the executive branch. To paper over this breach, large shares of power were granted to leaders (under the pretext that they represented their sects) who owed their power to militias or wealth. Their power would broaden and narrow depending on the interests of foreign powers, pushing Lebanon into a transitional phase that came to be known as the 'confederation of sects.' After 1991, Lebanon nominal adopted a classic parliamentary political system. In reality, however, actual power was seized by sectarian factions. The state was undermined and oversight was ignored as a result. The subjugation of the judiciary ultimately dragged the country into the abyss. Many hoped that the new president would break with this dismal era. The inaugural speech and ministerial statement drew a lot of attention, with some linking the moment to the Shihabist era of reform. Those in power failed, however, to meet the expectations of the people. The president's calls for citizens to report cases of corruption and misconduct directly to the presidency has raised questions: Where about the government? Concerns heightened when the president unilaterally took on the task of resolving Hezbollah's weapons. Many Lebanese were also alarmed by the appointment of former minister Ali Hamieh (who represented Hezbollah in the previous government) as a presidential advisor for reconstruction. It was surprising to see Hamieh named to a 'presidential committee tasked with drafting a comprehensive plan for the reviving regions devastated by the war.' He had represented a party held responsible for the very catastrophe that befell Lebanon! Lebanon is not inherently resistant to reform, change, or transparency. However, Lebanon needs strong reformist elites with strong popular support that can seize this historic opportunity to lift its people out of poverty and alleviate their fears. It needs elites who can break with the logic of sectarian quota-sharing and reject evasive tactics, to finally reach safe harbor.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Islamabad police make history with appointment of first woman SHO at men's station
ISLAMABAD: Sub-Inspector Misbah Shehbaz has been appointed the Station House Officer (SHO) at Phulgran Police Station, becoming the first woman to head a general (men's) police station in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. The appointment was announced in an official press statement issued by the Foreign Media Cell of Islamabad Police on Thursday. According to the statement, the appointment was made through formal orders issued by Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) Muhammad Jawad Tariq, who said the move was intended to 'end gender discrimination within the Islamabad Police.' 'This initiative will continue and more female officers will be given the opportunity to lead police stations,' Tariq was quoted as saying in the press release. The post of SHO is one of the most visible and operationally significant leadership roles in Pakistan's police hierarchy, responsible for crime investigation, public safety, and station-level administration. Until now, female SHOs in Islamabad had only led women police stations. By assigning a female officer to a mixed or general police station, Islamabad Police is signalling its intent to challenge long-standing norms. Observers say the move also aligns with broader reforms encouraged by both domestic policymakers and international partners such as the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), which have pushed for gender-sensitive policing frameworks in Pakistan. While Shehbaz's appointment is a welcome development, it also highlights the structural barriers that female officers continue to face in entering Pakistan's law enforcement sector. According to the National Police Bureau (NPB) and UN Women Pakistan, as of 2023, women made up only 3.2% of Pakistan's total police force — that is 15,509 female officers out of 489,645 nationwide. In Islamabad, female representation was slightly higher at 5.04%, based on official NPB data published in 2023. Between 2019 and 2023, 11,398 women joined various police organizations in Pakistan, but the vast majority were not placed in command or operational leadership roles, as per a UN Women & NPB joint assessment report from 2023. Experts say the absence of women in decision-making and field leadership reduces institutional responsiveness to gender-based violence and community trust in law enforcement.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan ranks last among 148 nations in WEF global gender gap index
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ranked last among 148 countries in the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report 2025, underscoring persistent gender disparities in political and economic representation despite modest gains in female literacy. The annual report, released this week, assesses gender parity across four key dimensions: economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment. 'Occupying the bottom rank of the index (148), Pakistan sees its overall parity score decline from last year's edition from 57 percent to 56.7 percent,' the report said, marking the second consecutive annual decline in parity. While Pakistan recorded improvements in education, the report noted that broader gender equality remained elusive. The country showed a 1.5 percentage point gain in educational attainment, raising its parity in this area to 85.1 percent, driven partly by a rise in female literacy from 46.5 percent to 48.5 percent, according to WEF. 'Part of the shift is driven by an increase in female literacy rates from 46.5 percent to 48.5 percent,' the report said. However, it cautioned that the improvement at the university level was partially due to a decline in male enrollment, rather than a significant surge in female participation. In contrast, the country's economic participation and opportunity index fell by 1.3 percentage points, amid a widening income and wage gap. The report noted a marginal increase in income disparity and a four-percentage-point rise in perceived wage inequality. Women continue to make up a small share of Pakistan's labor force — just 22.8 percent, according to a 2024 World Bank report — and few hold leadership or managerial positions. Pakistan also saw a notable regression in political empowerment, with parity dropping from 12.2 percent in 2024 to 11 percent in 2025. While women's representation in parliament rose slightly by 1.2 percentage points, the share of women in ministerial positions dropped from 5.9 percent to zero, according to the WEF. 'Overall Pakistan has closed +2.3 of its gender gap since 2006,' the report noted. 'However, this year's results are a second consecutive drop from the economy's best score of 57.7 percent achieved in 2023.' Pakistan has consistently ranked near the bottom in past editions of the Global Gender Gap Index and the 2025 report underscores the country's ongoing struggle to create equitable opportunities for women, particularly in the political and economic spheres. Progress in education, while encouraging, remains insufficient to offset broader systemic inequalities.
