Government blocked streaming sites for public servants as a 'people management issue,' documents show
Last December, the agency responsible for IT services, Shared Services Canada (SSC), blocked access to paid subscription streaming sites, including Netflix, Hulu, Apple TV+, Prime Video, Disney+ and Crave for 45 government departments and agencies.
At the time, a spokesperson for SSC said "streaming services are not considered work tools and offer no business value for the Government of Canada."
Documents released as part of an access to information request provide more insight on how the decision was made.
In an October 2024 email, SSC president Scott Jones wrote to officials at the Treasury Board, saying he wanted to "raise a couple of issues," including the use of personal phones and streaming services among bureaucrats.
He wrote about a recent meeting of deputy ministers, where they discussed the use of streaming services in federal buildings — and voiced his support to block them.
"While streaming may ultimately impact the bandwidth available to the [Government of Canada], it is also more importantly a people management issue," he wrote.
"In the current context and with public perception of the public service as it is … there is value in engaging [deputy ministers] on these issues and in committing SSC to take some action."
Soon after, SSC moved to block the streaming services.
This email and others were obtained via an access to information request made by Matt Malone, an assistant professor at the University of Ottawa, and shared with CBC News.
Thousands of hours of streaming
The request, which sought documents detailing the rationale behind the decision to ban streaming services on government networks, includes a report on traffic to the streaming sites in September 2024, broken down by department.
The report shed a more fulsome light into how much streaming was being done on government networks, compared to the agency's official statement when the sites were banned.
In a November 2024 statement, Shared Services Canada said that "network traffic monitoring shows limited traffic to these sites from government systems."
The report on streaming is presented as a bar chart, showing total volume of streaming per terabyte (TB).
The amount of data used depends on the quality of video streamed. As an example, Netflix offers four data usage settings — ranging from low quality to ultra-high definition.
If users were streaming on standard definition, one terabyte would equal at least 1,000 hours. If they were streaming on high definition, then one terabyte equals at least 340 hours of video.
The departments with the highest streaming included the Department of National Defence at over three terabytes, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) with almost three terabytes and the Privy Council Office with about 1.5 terabytes of volume per month.
The report includes the "top 10" departments with highest traffic to streaming websites in September 2024, including Global Affairs Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (East), Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada Revenue Agency and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.
All of those departments reported about 0.75 TB of streaming volume in one month.
Given the number of civil servants employed by the government, this volume is fairly minimal. For instance, PSPC alone has about 19,000 employees.
Cybersecurity expert Eric Parent says the numbers presented just by volume of data don't paint a full picture.
"The metric we're missing is how many users, how many users are actively on [streaming] and for how long," he said.
The report also shows almost 10 TB of streaming done on the federal government's guest Wi-Fi.
In a letter to colleagues, a director with SSC said the streaming numbers across the government could have been relatively low in part because they used a program that throttles the speed of streaming to prioritize different internet traffic on government networks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CT council member in garbage business pledges $500K of his own money on congressional run
Jack Perry admits that he does not have the normal pedigree for a member of Congress. After spending a career in the garbage hauling business, Perry said that he is running as a Democrat against 77-year-old U.S. Rep. John B. Larson in a potential multi-candidate primary in 2026. Perry, 35, also gained attention by pledging to spend $500,000 of his own money against Larson, using part of the proceeds from selling his family-owned garbage business that he started in 2008. 'I'm not a typical politician. I mean, seriously, how many can drive a garbage truck?' Perry asked. 'I'm a working-class guy who is unafraid to take on big challenges and stand up for people. I'm not trying to climb a political ladder for myself. I want to make sure everyone has ladders to climb and can afford to live and retire comfortably in Connecticut. I'll fight for the people, not the powerful.' As a Democratic member of Southington's Republican-controlled town council, Perry is not well known statewide. But he gained additional name recognition in his hometown when running for state Senate in 2020 against conservative firebrand Rob Sampson of Wolcott. Sampson won by 54% to 46% in the year that incumbent President Donald Trump ran strongly in the district despite losing in Connecticut and nationwide to Democrat Joe Biden. CT US congressman in seat for decades might have a Democratic challenger Perry spent 16 years in the family business, HQ Dumpsters and Recycling, before it was sold last year to trash hauler CWPM in Plainville. While no longer the owner, he still oversees the daily operations for the new owner, the Manafort family, in a position he says is far less stressful. As a relative political newcomer, Perry understands it will be difficult running against veteran Democrats with high name recognition like Larson and former Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin, who is seriously considering joining the race. 'It's a heavy lift, and that's where I'm trying to make it viable and showing people how passionate I am,' Perry told The Courant in an interview. 'Anyone that knows me knows that when my heart's in it, I will work endless hours, and that's just who I am as a person. Passion is everything. That's how I was able to build a successful garbage business. I started in 2008 during the Great Recession. It was passion, determination and work ethic. Nothing I've gotten in life has been easy, but it's very rewarding.' Perry added, 'I'm looking to be a fresh voice with new energy and advocate for the working class, the middle class, and those that are retiring that can't afford to stay in our state because of the cost. It goes back to inflation, grocery bills, electric costs, housing — all those things. It's hard.' With a mother who was an immigrant from Poland and a biological father who was absent from his life, Perry was raised with the help of his stepfather. He started working in the family's landscaping business at the age of 13, and has continued working ever since. Through the years, he has watched housing costs skyrocket, along with food and many other items. 'I was reading the other day in the paper that the average age for a first-time homebuyer is 38 years old,' Perry said. 'I'm 35. I bought my first home at 25 on a single income. It was hard for me, and it was a fixer-upper. But you can't do that in Southington on a single income of $60,000. It's just not doable. In 2015, it was.' He added, 'Inflation is hurting people, and they're now picking and choosing what they can afford to buy. Over the years, I've seen employees struggle. As an employer, I was able to help my employees. I remember an employee couldn't afford his insulin. This was before they made insulin affordable. We got him a different plan and coverage to be able to afford his insulin. I'm the type that, when I see issues, I stand up, regardless of how big the fight may be and regardless of what the obstacles are to get there.' Larson's campaign spokesman, Charles Perosino, said that democracy ensures that anyone seeking to run can do so, adding that the voters will make the final decision on their representative. 'John is proud to have secured billions in federal funding for the First District, including over $34 million for the town of Southington, and remains focused on taking on the Trump Administration as they raise the cost of living for working families by attacking access to health care, imposing cost-raising tariffs, and threatening Americans' hard-earned benefits,' Perosino said. 'When Democrats take the majority in 2026, John will serve as chair of the Social Security committee, and has been recognized as a national leader to protect and expand benefits, so that all Americans can retire — as FDR intended — with dignity.' Perry's entrance into the race comes as the political dam has broken in the battle against Larson. As more opponents step forward, there is little downside in challenging an established incumbent because others have already jumped into the race. The first official opponent was Hartford school board member and attorney Ruth R. Fortune, who filed official paperwork with the Federal Election Commission to run against Larson. After emigrating to the United States at age 12 from Haiti, Fortune grew up in the Nassau County town of Westbury on Long Island. She graduated from Baruch College in Manhattan and later received a law degree from the University of Connecticut. A Hartford resident since 2012, she has two children attending the Hartford public schools and a younger sibling starting pre-K this year. A former financial advisor at Merrill Lynch, she now works at the law firm of Wiggin and Dana in the trust and estates department. The best-known opponent is Bronin, who is seriously considering running and has been talking to fellow Democrats about the possibility. Larson, who turned 77 on Tuesday, personally told Bronin during an hour-long, face-to-face meeting that he is running again. Bronin would be the highest profile challenger in years for Larson, who has won 14 consecutive elections. As a graduate of Yale Law School, a Rhodes Scholar and a former U.S. Navy intelligence officer in Afghanistan, Bronin has a wide range of contacts and has shown his fundraising prowess when he won the Democratic primary for mayor in Hartford by unseating incumbent Pedro Segarra. State Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a West Hartford Democrat, told The Courant on Tuesday that she is considering running but does not have a timeframe on when her final decision will be made. 'I think I would be great holding that seat in Congress,' said Gilchrest, who serves as co-chair of the state legislature's human services committee. 'While the sitting Congressman is still in the race, there's a sense that some respect should go his way, but with more and more people getting in, it's hard not to want to be a part of it if you think you're qualified to do the job.' Among the top issues in the race, she said, are wages, public education, access to health care, and concerns about the environment, among others. 'For Democrats, they're looking for voices who will be speaking about the issues that impact them and not waiting to feel out how best to say something,' Gilchrest said. 'They want to hear from leaders who are direct and listen to them and then speak on the issues of importance that impact their daily lives.' Larson's family, which has supported him in all races since even before he won a key primary for Congress in 1998, is already gearing up for another race. Arianna Larson, a Manchester resident who is one of Larson's nieces, sent an email to multiple supporters to rally support for the incumbent. 'I'm writing to say one thing loud and clear: it's game on,' she wrote in the email obtained by The Courant. 'This is not a fundraising email. It's a rallying cry. A call to action. A moment to get off the sidelines and get behind our candidate. For the first time in a long time, my Uncle John may be facing a more competitive primary challenge. And while I respect the value of new voices and fresh ideas — believe me, I'm part of the next generation of Democrats eager to make change — I also know that this is not the moment to be testing the bench.' She added, 'This election is happening in the second half of a Trump presidency. The stakes are enormous. We don't need a reset — we need results. And no one delivers like John Larson. He's a lifelong public servant who knows this district, knows how to lead, and never forgets who he's fighting for. He doesn't seek the spotlight — he just gets to work and gets things done. … My Uncle John is ready. The campaign is ready. The family is ready. And today, as he celebrates his birthday, and another year of life dedicated to public service, I can't think of a better way to honor that than by showing up for him – just like he's always shown up for us!' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@ Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Protests flare in Ukraine after government curbs corruption watchdogs
KYIV — Mass protests erupted in Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities late Tuesday after the country's parliament passed legislation many fear will neutralize the country's main anti-corruption bodies and roll back reforms introduced after a pro-Western revolution 10 years ago. The government move against the anti-corruption bodies has alarmed former officials, concerned Ukraine's European allies and thrown back into the spotlight an issue long used by the country's detractors to criticize it. It could also affect Ukraine's application to join the European Union.
New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Pesky Details Intruding on Mamdani's Grocery Plan
Zohran Mamdani, New York City's fresh Democratic nominee for mayor, devotes 126 words and a 43-second TikTok on his website to a signature proposal: 'city-owned grocery stores.' This brevity might imply that function will follow form, that the idea is so self-evidently sensible that little needs to be said about it. What this self-assurance shows, though, is that Mr. Mamdani knows nothing about the grocery business, raising broader questions about the practicality of an assertive socialist agenda like his. He claims that 'a network of city-owned grocery stores' would offer cheaper food and dry goods because it would avoid paying rent or property taxes, 'buy and sell at wholesale prices' and 'centralize warehousing and distribution.' These assertions collapse upon the slightest scrutiny. New York City's government does not have a secret stash of large, empty, retail-ready ground-floor spaces conveniently located along major pedestrian and transit corridors. Indeed, the city regularly rents real estate, including retail-style space, from private owners. As for city-owned grocery stores' ability to 'buy and sell at wholesale prices' and 'centralize warehouse and distribution,' the supermarket industry is an intensely intricate business. 'Product doesn't magically appear on store shelves,' says Ron Margulis, who long covered the industry as a journalist and who hails from a family of supermarket operators. 'There is a science that's applied to making sure the product sent to the shelf is actually going to be purchased, and that science costs money.' The price a store or chain pays depends on a number of factors, from size and efficiency — volume discounts — to location to an understanding of the complex supply chain. Whether Mr. Mamdani will have one supermarket in each of the five boroughs, as he originally proposed, or more, as implied by the imprecise term 'network,' the city probably will not be able to get wholesale prices as low as far larger and more efficient supermarket chains. Moreover, some major New York supermarket operators cooperatively own grocery distributors that buy products from manufacturers and share income with the members. They would not allow a nonprofit public entity to join these networks. As for the city creating its own centralized distribution and bulk purchaser, John Catsimatidis, the Republican billionaire who owns the Gristedes and D'Agostino's chains, says such an investment would make sense only if the city operated at least 100 stores. Other pesky details intrude on Mr. Mamdani's plan. Wholesalers offer stores lower prices if they participate in promotions, with in-store coupons and prominent placement. To take advantage of such offers, the city would have to be a marketer of branded products — often, less healthy, higher-margin products. The reward for successfully navigating the science of stocking shelves is an average 2 percent profit for grocery retailers, Mr. Margulis notes. Mr. Mamdani has made no compelling case that the city could engage in such superior negotiation and cost-cutting techniques to overcome this margin and provide less expensive products. This prospect is especially uncertain because the city-owned stores would probably face higher labor costs, including government-scale pension and health benefits. Once Mr. Mamdani has addressed these issues, he and his top staff members would have to confront another question: What products to sell in the stores? His idea of partnering with 'local neighborhoods on products and sourcing' may sound straightforward. But are community board members going to argue over whether to stock Pringles or Lay's potato chips? Should a city-owned store even sell sugary soda? Should vegetarians who are morally opposed to killing animals be forced to subsidize other New Yorkers' steak purchases? And while it would be virtuous for the city to focus on selling fresh produce, retailers need to stock high-margin snacks and processed foods to subsidize fresh produce, meat and fish, which carry lower profit margins. And if city stores would be selling fresh produce for no profit, they would be competing with 1,000 low-priced street vendors, many of them immigrants, who operate carts under a program the Bloomberg administration began. In his TikTok, Mr. Mamdani pledges to work with 'nearby farms.' But as the city's green markets demonstrate, high-quality food from regional sources is expensive, even absent profits for a third-party retailer. Mr. Mamdani is a clever self-marketer and has never come off as a scold. He could be telling New Yorkers: Let's save money by forgoing all the brand name products, like Baleine sea salt from France and Snyder's pretzel sticks, both in the background of his TikTok video. Or he could make videos on cooking whole chickens to save money and eat healthfully. But he wants to give New Yorkers capitalist consumer-brand choice at socialist prices. Mr. Mamdani's brand of socialism is not collective, cooperative sacrifice but individualist, no-cost, no-tradeoff socialism. Even before recent high inflation, New York City grocery stores were expensive. Wages in the city are higher, and logistics are more difficult and expensive. Even electricity is pricier. But Mr. Mamdani offers no solutions for those issues. Government can appear to solve any problem temporarily by throwing money at it. So it's conceivable that Mr. Mamdani will succeed in opening a few pilot supermarkets but probably only with large government subsidies. The larger risk for New York City, though, is that this glib superficiality would infect other aspects of urban governance with a socialist flair. We can have free buses without reducing bus frequency when revenue falls. We can replace some policing with a civilian department of community safety, with no risk to public safety. We can raise taxes on the rich, with no risk that higher taxes would accelerate the relative migration of wealth and population to other states that took place in recent years. 'The job of city government isn't to tinker around the edges,' Mr. Mamdani says in his grocery TikTok. But before casually proposing to disrupt a complex system, it's a good idea to know how that thing works. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
