Senate Majority Leader John Thune dismisses calls for Iran war powers resolution: ‘Getting the cart ahead of the horse'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) argued Tuesday that it's too early for Congress to consider legislation that aims to prevent President Trump from using military force against Iran.
'I think we're getting the cart ahead of the horse here,' Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill when asked if he would allow a war powers resolution to come up for a vote on the Senate floor.
'This is something that's happened the last few days,' the South Dakota Republican said of the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel. 'I think the president is perfectly within his authority in the steps that he has taken.'
Advertisement
Thune argued it was too early to debate a war powers resolution in Congress.
ZUMAPRESS.com
Should the conflict 'extend for some period of time,' Thune added, 'there could be a more fulsome discussion about what the role of Congress should be and whether or not we need to take action.'
Thune indicated that his preferred outcome would be for Iran to accept Trump's demand that it scrap its nuclear program.
Advertisement
'Let's hope and pray for the best outcome, the best solution, and in my view that would be Iran coming to the negotiating table and agreeing to end their nuclear program,' he said.
The Trump administration maintains that it has not been helping Israel carry out its latest military operations against Iran, but the president's rhetoric against the Islamic Republic and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei notably heightened on Tuesday, and he's reportedly being urged by Israel to assist in destroying Tehran's below-ground Fordow nuclear facility.
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced legislation on Monday that he hopes will 'prevent war with Iran.'
'It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States,' Kaine, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement. 'I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict.'
Advertisement
'The American people have no interest in sending servicemembers to fight another forever war in the Middle East,' he added. 'This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress.'
Several Democratic lawmakers put forward legislation to prevent Trump from going to war with Iran.
BERNO/SIPA/Shutterstock
In the House, members of the far-left 'Squad' of Democratic lawmakers have endorsed companion legislation being sponsored by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.).
'The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally commit an act of war against a sovereign nation that hasn't attacked the United States,' Massie said in a statement. 'Congress has the sole power to declare war against Iran.'
Advertisement
'The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war,' the Kentucky Republican added. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.'
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Summer Lee (D-Pa.) and Ayanna Presley (D-Mass.) are among more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers backing Massie's war powers push.
No Republican members of Congress have co-signed Massie's legislation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump meets with military leaders over Iran, after PM insists he wants peace
Donald Trump met with top military advisers over Israel's conflict with Iran, just hours after Sir Keir Starmer insisted the US President was interested in de-escalating the fighting. Mr Trump met with his National Security Council in the White House's situation room shortly after a series of sabre-rattling social media posts, and following his abrupt exit from the G7 summit in Canada. After the high-level meeting, news reports soon followed that the US President was considering joining in Israel's strikes on Iran. Sir Keir earlier said 'nothing' he had heard from the US president suggested Washington was poised to get involved, as western leaders continue to press for de-escalation between the two, long-time foes. But Mr Trump then suggested Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was an 'easy target' whom the US could 'take out' if it chose. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump said: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. 'But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' Without further explanation he also wrote 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' on the platform. And he suggested the US had 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran'. Mr Trump spoke to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, according to a White House official. Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said strikes were taking place around Tehran early on Wednesday after planes had targeted missile launch and storage facilities on Tuesday night. Air raid sirens have been heard in parts of Israel while the US State Department announced it was closing the embassy in Jerusalem for the rest of the week. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said the latest attacks included the use of a hypersonic Fatah missile, while Israel claimed it had killed General Ali Shadmani who it described as Iran's most senior remaining military commander. Mr Trump left the G7 conference in Canada a day early to deal with what he called 'big stuff' and urged Iranian citizens to evacuate from Tehran, which triggered speculation that American forces might join Israeli strikes. Asked whether the US could get involved as the conflict threatens to spiral into all-out war, Sir Keir told reporters with him at the conference in Kananaskis: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict. On the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation.' In a statement on Monday, before Mr Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. In Westminster, not long after the American president's social media posts, Defence Secretary John Healey suggested Mr Trump was 'leading the calls' for a diplomatic solution to the conflict. Speaking at the Royal United Services Institute's land warfare conference in central London, Mr Healey said British Typhoon fighter jets could be used to help the UK's allies in the region. He said: 'The deployment of Typhoons and other military assets the Prime Minister has announced are part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies.' Elsewhere, Israel's ambassador to the UK, Tzipi Hotovely, told LBC her country is 'absolutely not' intending to institute regime change in Iran. 'We are in this military operation for one reason, to defend Israel, to defend the region, to defend the world and to make sure that Iran won't have nuclear capabilities,' she added.
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Israel's war against Iran is America's war, too
Israel's Operation Rising Lion has so far unfolded brilliantly. Within two days, Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The goal of Israel's military campaign is to disable Iran's illicit nuclear weapons program once and for all. It waited to strike until after the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, reported that Iran Advertisement But it isn't only Israel that has an overwhelming justification to act against Iran. The United States does, too. Advertisement The radical and apocalyptic Islamists who rule Iran hate America as much as they hate Israel. They have been waging war against the United States for 45 years, a war that began when they invaded the US embassy in Tehran and abducted dozens of American diplomats. In the decades since, the Iranian regime has killed many Americans, attacked US targets, and repeatedly proclaimed its aspiration of ' Start with the body count. Iran is responsible — directly or through proxies — for the deaths of many hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans. In 1983, Iran-backed terrorists During the Iraq War, Tehran armed Shiite militias, training them to attack US troops with devastating roadside explosives that, Advertisement These weren't random acts of violence. They were the fruit of a long-standing Iranian strategy to sap American willpower and intimidate its allies. And they have been accompanied, time and again, by explicit calls from Iranian leaders to attack and destroy America. In the 1980s, the speaker of Iran's Parliament, Hashemi Rafsanjani, On at least a dozen occasions, Iranian government spokespersons or media outlets have Given that history of hatred, fanaticism, and slaughter, can anyone disagree with Trump's repeated declarations this week that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon'? Some voices not with a cease-fire but rather a 'real end' to Iran's nuclear-weapons quest — or with the regime 'giving up entirely.' He's right. The brilliance of Israel's operation has handed the president the chance to achieve a permanent solution to one of the longest-festering sores in international affairs. He must not squander it. Advertisement Trump likes to describe himself as a peacemaker. At this hour, the best hope for peace lies in shattering Iran's nuclear threat — for good. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump debates bombing Iran in pivotal moment for presidency
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump's current posture could rebound in unpredictable ways. If he succeeds in wresting concessions from Iranian leaders to dismantle their nuclear program or destroys it by military force without provoking major retaliation, he could be hailed as a president whose unpredictable approach to foreign policy yields results. Mishandling the situation could pull Washington into a major conflict, with dangerous and unpredictable consequences for U.S. citizens. And it could also lead to a nuclear-armed Iran, if strikes fail and the government resolves to develop the nuclear weapon that it has long declared it does not seek. Advertisement 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'' Trump said Tuesday, before meeting with his advisers in the Situation Room for 80 minutes. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' Advertisement Leaders who met with Trump at a Group of Seven summit of like-minded industrial democracies in Canada on Monday said that the U.S. leader had floated the possibility of joining Israeli strikes against Iran - an extraordinary departure after months in which he had pushed for a diplomatic solution to Tehran's nuclear program, sometimes over the objections of Netanyahu. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who accompanied Trump to Canada, was calling counterparts on Monday to discuss the situation, but he told some of them that the United States did not intend to join the Israeli attack on Iran, according to three officials familiar with the calls who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about the private discussions. By Tuesday, those officials said they believed the U.S. position had changed and that Trump was considering joining the attack. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), long one of the GOP's most vocal Iran hawks, said he spoke to Trump on Monday night and believes Trump wants to help Israel to 'finish the job' in destroying the country's nuclear program, including a key facility in Fordow, south of Tehran. 'I think he's very calm, very resolved,' Graham said. 'I don't think Israel can finish Fordow without our help, and it's in our interest to make sure this program is destroyed, as much as it's Israel's. And so if there's something you need to do to help Israel, do it.' Advertisement Trump was supposed to remain in Canada on Tuesday, but he dashed back to Washington a day early, saying that he needed to be in Washington to monitor the situation in the Middle East. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who met with Trump in Canada, expressed gratitude on Tuesday for Israel's attack on Iran, saying that Israel was doing 'the dirty work … for all of us.' 'We are also affected by this regime,' Merz told Germany's ZDF broadcaster on the sidelines of the summit. 'This mullah regime has brought death and destruction to the world.' While some of Iran's nuclear facilities have been attacked in recent days by Israel, the most significant is the Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground and inside a mountain. U.S. officials have said the center can be effectively attacked only with massive, 'bunker-busting' bombs, including the GBU-57, a 15-ton round known as the 'massive ordnance penetrator,' or MOP. The 20-foot-long bomb is carried by the B-2 Spirit, the bat-wing-shaped stealth bomber. The fleet is based at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri and previously has been deployed for global bombing runs in which they rely on aerial refueling to fly to and from targets without stopping. Should the Pentagon use other kinds of bombs to attack Iran, it could rely on an array of other aircraft, including fighter jets already in the region and B-52s. The Pentagon temporarily relocated some of these aircraft recently to Diego Garcia, an island with a joint U.S.-British military base in the Indian Ocean. Advertisement Trump's claim of control over Iran's skies may be an indication that U.S. officials have assessed that most of Iran's air defense have been destroyed by Israel in recent days. Since Israel launched the attack on Iran late last week, U.S. officials have bolstered their extensive presence in the region but have repeatedly stressed that they are doing so for defensive purposes only. Trump has contradicted that messaging, however, warning Iranians in Tehran, a city of about 10 million people, that they should evacuate. While the U.S. military had not launched any strikes on Iran as of Tuesday afternoon, defense officials said, it has assisted Israel in other ways, including using Navy destroyers off the coast and fighter jets to shoot down Iranian munitions fired toward Israel. Gen. Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the top U.S. commander overseeing operations in the Middle East, who has advocated a hawkish approach toward Tehran, told the House Armed Services Committee last week that he has presented a 'wide array of options' to Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth if they choose to pursue military force against Iran. Kurilla told lawmakers that the United States 'now stands in a strategic window of opportunity to secure its national interests' in the Middle East - including preventing a nuclear-armed Iran. Most experts assess that Iran would need a week to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a bomb. But they say that it would take months, up to a year, to turn the uranium into a weapon. In Canada, while Merz backed Israel, other leaders were less outspoken or spoke in thinly veiled disagreement. Advertisement French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters in Canada on Tuesday that a ceasefire and ongoing negotiations were the only solution. 'I think that people are sovereign, they change their leaders by themselves and all those who have wanted in the past to change regimes through strikes or military operations have made strategic errors,' he said. Kaja Kallas, the top European Union diplomat, said that E.U. foreign ministers who held an emergency virtual meeting Tuesday morning were united in their call for de-escalation. 'When it comes to the United States getting involved, then it will definitely drag the region into a broader conflict, and this is in nobody's interest,' Kallas said. Rubio, in a telephone call Monday night, 'emphasized that it is also not in their interest to be drawn into this conflict,' she said. Elsewhere in the Middle East, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty urged de-escalation and negotiations in phone calls Tuesday with both Araghchi and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. In Qatar, Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said his government was one of many in the region exerting efforts to 'reach calm that spares the region the repercussions of this dangerous escalation of the Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran.' Israel continued to pummel Iran Tuesday, using about 60 fighter jets to target 12 missile launch and storage sites, many in western Iran, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Effie Derfin said Tuesday night. Israel's military also claimed Tuesday to have killed Ali Shadmani, whom it described as Iran's wartime chief of staff. Israel did not present evidence of the assassination, and Iran did not immediately confirm his death. Iran's supreme leader appointed Shadmani to his position four days ago after his predecessor, Gholam Ali Rashid, was killed in Israeli attacks on Friday. Advertisement Iranian media reported explosions and heavy air defense fire in Tehran and explosions in the northwestern city of Tabriz on Tuesday. Iranian civilians streamed out of the capital overnight and into Tuesday. Israeli strikes also appear to have made 'direct impacts' on the underground section of Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said Tuesday, citing analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery. It was the International Atomic Energy Agency's first assessment that the centrifuge halls buried deep underground may have been damaged. Iran's retaliatory barrages against Israel carried on for a fifth day, triggering Israel's air defenses on an 'hourly basis,' the military official said. The Iranian attacks have killed 24 people in Israel and injured more than 600, the Israeli government said Tuesday. Iranian authorities said that 224 people had been killed by Israeli strikes as of Sunday, the most recent figures available. They did not differentiate between military and civilian casualties. Parker reported from Cairo. Susannah George in Doha, Qatar, Ellen Francis in Brussels, Kate Brady in Berlin, Yeganeh Torbati, Joshua Yang, Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv, Abbie Cheeseman and Mohamad El Chamaa in Beirut, Annabelle Timsit in London, Evan Hill in New York, Gerry Shih in Jerusalem, Cat Zakrzewski in Calgary, Alberta, and Abigail Hauslohner, Matt Viser, Natalie Allison and Nilo Tabrizy in Washington contributed to this report.
