logo
Does the president want to fix Harvard or destroy it?

Does the president want to fix Harvard or destroy it?

Mint7 days ago

Donald Trump has made the Harvard man his whipping boy, and academia certainly had it coming. Still, what is the president's objective?
The administration announced Tuesday that it is seeking to cancel all remaining federal contracts with the school, which are worth an estimated $100 million. That's on top of the billions of dollars in grants to Harvard that Mr. Trump has already frozen. He's also threatened to revoke the university's tax-exempt status and wants to increase the levy on its $53 billion endowment.
In a social-media post on Memorial Day, the president mused about rescinding $3 billion in grant money awarded to Harvard for scientific and engineering research and redirecting it to trade schools. But to what end? Does Mr. Trump think trade schools have the infrastructure and resources to do the research done at Harvard?
The president is upset that Harvard and other elite institutions didn't do enough to protect Jewish students on their campuses who were being harassed and intimidated by anti-Israel demonstrators. He's likewise annoyed by the leftward political tilt of academia, where social-justice advocacy is dominant and competing perspectives are discouraged and seldom engaged. Those are fair criticisms, but they don't give Mr. Trump license to trample over academic freedom and First Amendment rights, or to tell private universities whom they can hire and what they can teach.
Mr. Trump's recent move to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students is as shortsighted and counterproductive as his effort to disrupt research projects. Citing a need to protect Jewish students, the Department of Homeland Security announced last week that Harvard is losing its certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which allows international students to attend U.S. colleges. 'Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country," Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a press release.
A federal judge has issued a restraining order that temporarily halts the administration's foreign-student ban, and anyone who cares about higher education should hope the White House drops the issue. Mr. Trump accuses Harvard of withholding the names of its international students. 'They refuse to tell us who the people are," he told reporters. But the federal government already has that information.
As the Harvard Crimson explained, schools that accept students on foreign visas 'report extensive records to the Student Exchange and Visitor Information System database, including names, places of birth, and countries of origin." The administration wants additional information on foreign students, including protest activities, but Harvard says that goes beyond what the law requires and raises privacy concerns.
The problem is that the government's demands are overly broad and almost certainly pretextual. Compliance is near-impossible because the administration has already determined that Harvard is to be punished. What's less clear is what Mr. Trump hopes to accomplish by inflicting as much pain as possible on one of the world's most prestigious universities. Is the goal to fix what's wrong with higher education—and much needs fixing—or to destroy it?
Mr. Trump likes to talk about his crackdown on illegal immigration, and he deserves high praise for fulfilling his campaign promise to restore order on the southern border. The president also complains, however, about companies that hire foreign nationals who are here lawfully, suggesting that he has a problem with immigrant workers regardless of their legal status.
Citing a memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Politico reported Tuesday that the administration might soon require 'all foreign students applying to study in the United States to undergo social media vetting." In preparation, it is 'ordering U.S. embassies and consular sections to pause scheduling new interviews for such student visa applicants." For the White House, banning foreign students could be another way to reduce legal immigration.
If that's the goal, Mr. Trump should understand the trade-offs. One of the reasons that U.S. higher education is the gold standard is the presence of international students. A disproportionately high number of doctorates at American universities are awarded to foreign students—especially in the more demanding fields of science, mathematics and engineering. 'International students accounted for more than 40 percent of the roughly 500,000 doctoral degrees awarded by U.S. universities between 2000 and 2019," according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
Mumbai and Beijing—by way of Harvard and other elite schools—supply the talent that keeps our high-tech sector competitive. These are among the best minds in the world, and they want to live and work in America. They boost employment and productivity. They generate wealth. Nothing is gained by forcing our leading universities to turn them away.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China tells US envoy Washington must get ties back on 'right track'
China tells US envoy Washington must get ties back on 'right track'

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

China tells US envoy Washington must get ties back on 'right track'

BEIJING -The U.S. should create the necessary conditions for bilateral relations to get back onto "the right track," China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the U.S. ambassador to Beijing on Tuesday, according to a ministry statement. After trade talks last month in Geneva, China has "conscientiously and strictly" implemented the consensus reached by both sides, but it is "regrettable that the U.S. recently introduced a series of 'negative' measures", which China firmly opposes, Wang told Ambassador David Perdue. Bilateral relations are at a critical juncture, and dialogue and cooperation are "the only correct choice," Wang said. Perdue said in an X post after the meeting that he had emphasized U.S. President Donald Trump's priorities on trade, fentanyl, and illegal immigration, adding that "communication is vital" to U.S.-China relations. Trump on Friday accused China of violating a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions,and the U.S. has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China. The Geneva truce to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Senior U.S. officials have said this week that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak soon to iron out trade issues, including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a regular news briefing on Tuesday the Trump administration "is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement," and added that "there will be a leader to leader talk very soon."

Meme fest on 'robotic Joe Biden' begins after Trump's new portrait is out
Meme fest on 'robotic Joe Biden' begins after Trump's new portrait is out

Time of India

time19 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Meme fest on 'robotic Joe Biden' begins after Trump's new portrait is out

Daunting. Expressionless. Almost uncanny. The newly released official portrait of President Donald J. Trump—the 47th President of the United States—is now public, and while it's a striking departure from presidential portrait tradition, it has unintentionally reignited one of the strangest online conspiracy theories of the decade. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Unveiled by the White House in an eight-second video on Monday, June 2, the portrait shows Trump in a navy blue suit and red tie, staring straight into the camera against a pitch-black background. With a furrowed brow and tight-lipped stare, the image is intense, darkly lit, and unusually close up—designed, perhaps, to project power and focus. But instead of drawing commentary on presidential decorum or style, the internet's attention veered off course—fixating instead on his predecessor. In a bizarre twist, the portrait has reignited a conspiracy theory recently amplified by Trump himself: that Joe Biden was 'executed in 2020' and replaced by a robotic clone. Now, in the hours following the portrait reveal, the phrase 'robotic Biden' has flooded timelines, meme pages, and group chats—reviving a fringe fantasy with fresh visual fuel. One user said, 'Donald Trump: 'Joe Biden died in 2020 & robotic clones replaced him.' Why isn't this the #1 headline everywhere? Because if it's true… everything unravels.' Another user posting a video of a robot said, 'This Robot sure walks a lot like the Fake Biden. It's not like the proof is not out there.' A third user posted an image showing the statues of US Presidents and said, 'You can't tell which of these ex-presidents are human and which are not. This is the technology used to create the Joe Biden robot.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Credit: X/@Hedge_Reborn Where is the new portrait installed? The newly unveiled official portrait of President Donald J. Trump has now been installed in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building and has replaced the previous photograph on the White House's biography page for the 47th president. Just a week after Trump's inauguration, the White House also released an official portrait of First Lady Melania Trump. While the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C. holds the only complete collection of American presidential portraits outside the White House, it remains unclear whether Trump's new portrait will be added to the exhibit. The timing has raised some eyebrows, as the portrait's release follows Trump's May 30 announcement that he was firing the gallery's director, Kim Sajet, citing her alleged support for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions
Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions

Mint

time21 minutes ago

  • Mint

Oil climbs 2% to 2-week high on geopolitical tensions

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high as persistent geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine, and the U.S. and Iran looked set to keep sanctions on both OPEC members Russia and Iran in place for longer. Brent crude futures rose $1, or 1.5%, to settle at $65.63 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose 89 cents, or 1.4%, to close at $63.41. "Risk premium has ramped up this week as the prospect of a Russia/Ukraine ceasefire as well as an Iranian nuclear deal now appear to have been pushed back for weeks if not months," analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note. Russia said work on trying to reach a settlement to end the war in Ukraine was extraordinarily complex and that it would be wrong to expect any imminent decisions but that it was waiting for Ukrainian reaction to its proposals. Russia is a member of the OPEC group that includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, and was the world's second biggest producer of crude in 2024 behind only the U.S., according to U.S. energy data. OPEC member Iran, meanwhile, was set to reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that would be key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer. Iran was the third biggest producer of crude in OPEC behind Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 2024, according to U.S. energy data. In Canada, wildfires burning in Alberta have affected more than 344,000 barrels per day of oil sands production, or about 7% of the country's overall crude output, according to Reuters calculations. In Europe, Euro zone inflation eased below the European Central Bank's (ECB) target last month on surprisingly benign services costs, underpinning expectations for further policy easing even as global trade tensions fuel longer-term price pressures. Central banks like the ECB use interest rates to keep inflation in check. Lower interest rates can spur economic growth and demand for oil by reducing consumer borrowing costs. But, in the U.S., Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said higher inflation from U.S. import tariffs could become evident quickly, but he said it would take longer to see a tariff-induced economic slowdown. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), however, revised down its forecast for global economic growth as the fallout from U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy. U.S. job openings increased in April, but layoffs posted their biggest rise in nine months, suggesting that labor market conditions were softening amid a dimming economic outlook because of tariffs. The U.S. has asked countries to make their best offers on trade negotiations by Wednesday as U.S. officials ramp up efforts to deliver multiple agreements to Trump before a self-imposed deadline just five weeks away. WEEKLY US CRUDE DRAW SEEN Analysts forecast energy firms pulled about 1.0 million barrels of crude from U.S. stockpiles last week, reducing inventories for a second week in a row. That compares with an increase of 1.2 million barrels during the same week last year and an average decrease of 2.3 million barrels over the past five years (2020-2024). The American Petroleum Institute (API) trade group and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) release weekly U.S. oil inventory data on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, respectively. [EIA/S] [API/S] (Reporting by Scott DiSavino and Alex Lawler; Additional reporting by Michele Pek and Anjana Anil; Editing by Marguerita Choy and David Gregorio)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store