Perplexity AI now available as a search option in Firefox: Here's how to use it
Google still accounts for the majority of search queries on the internet, but lately, the tech giant has been losing its market share to competitors and AI-powered search engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, which reportedly account for around for about one per cent of search queries. And while most browsers are yet to get support for these AI search engines, Mozilla seems to be jumping on the bandwagon by adding Perplexity AI to its popular internet browser, Firefox.
As part of the Firefox 139 update, Mozilla has added an option that lets users switch to Perplexity AI to make searches directly from the address bar via the unified search button. While the non-profit organisation did not make a formal announcement, but has confirmed the news in a thread on its 'Connect' community forum.
Compared to traditional search engines like Google, which present a list of URLs you can click on, AI-powered search engines like Perplexity can summarise multiple search results in a visually appealing format. Also, these search engines are pretty accurate when it comes to identifying typos and grammatical mistakes.
Mozilla says Perplexity search offers direct and conversational answers, similar to Google's AI Overviews feature. While the test is currently limited to the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany, users can also add Perplexity AI, users can easily add the AI-powered search assistant using a simple workaround.
If you are interested in using Perplexity as a search engine, open Firefox and head over to 'Perplexity.ai'. Now, type in your search query in the address bar, but instead of hitting enter, select 'Search with Perplexity' from the dropdown suggestions. When you make a few searches using this method, Firefox will automatically ask if you want to add Perplexity as a search engine. One added, you will also be able to use the @perplexity keyword shortcut to search more quickly.
According to Windows Report, Mozilla says that if the experiment is positively received by users, they may add more AI-based answers or search options to Firefox. If you are interested in trying out AI-powered search engines like Perplexity and ChatGPT in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge, here's how to do it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Godfather of AI' Geoffrey Hinton warns AI will take most jobs, only a few careers might survive
Geoffrey Hinton, one of the world's top minds in artificial intelligence, has shared a fresh warning about the future. Known as the Godfather of AI, Hinton believes that artificial intelligence will likely take away most jobs within the next 30 years. In a new episode of the Diary of a CEO podcast, he said that AI could soon surpass human workers in nearly every field. That means the job market could change forever, and millions may lose their jobs unless they adapt to new roles or skills. Physical labour jobs may be the safest Hinton said that while AI is improving fast, it still struggles with tasks that need physical skill. He believes that jobs like plumbing, domestic work, and similar hands-on roles may be safe for a longer time. Geoffrey Hinton needed financial security for his family, so at 65 he sold his neural net company to Google. His former student Ilya Sutskever left Google to co-found OpenAI, where he built ChatGPT. Now Hinton warns about AI risks while OpenAI leads the revolution he sparked. He joked that being a plumber might be one of the best choices right now because AI is not yet good at handling real-world tools or fixing things with its hands. So while many office jobs and digital work may be at risk, people working with their hands might still have a place in the future. One person could soon do the job of ten Hinton warned that relying on AI could lead to major job cuts. With smart systems handling large workloads, fewer people will be needed in many industries. He also questioned the common belief that AI will create new jobs to replace the ones it removes. According to him, the kind of work AI takes over might not leave enough room for people to stay employed unless they are highly skilled or in roles AI cannot perform. Hiring of youth is already dropping Hinton's warning matches what is already happening in the job market. A recent report from the venture firm SignalFire showed that tech giants like Google and Meta have been hiring fewer fresh graduates since 2023. This is ScaryIn 2015, he warned that AI would learn faster than 2018, he predicted it could develop its own 2022, he said we might not be able to stop it (AGI).Now Geoffrey Hinton the 'Godfather of AI' has left Google to speak are his 7… In 2024, only 7 percent of new hires at these companies were freshers, a big drop from the previous year. This is because AI is already doing many of the tasks that entry-level workers used to handle. AI may not replace everyone, but it will reshape everything Hinton said that in some jobs, humans might work alongside AI rather than be replaced by it. But this would still mean fewer people are needed to do the same amount of work. He added that many desk-based jobs, like those in customer service, law, and writing, could disappear. The warning is clear. People need to learn new skills and stay ready for change. AI is growing fast, and only those who adapt may find their place in the future.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'Like sabzi market': Indian techie blasts 'disrespectful' HR after botched salary negotiations
A frustrated Indian techie sparked a debate on social media over salary expectations after he accused a company's HR department of 'disrespectful' salary negotiations, comparing the experience to haggling in a sabzi market. The post, made in the r/developersIndia subreddit, struck a chord with many in the tech community who say they've experienced similar treatment. The techie, a data specialist with four years of experience, said that the hiring process ended in a lower salary offer than what was initially discussed. The techie said that the NCR-based firm required relocation and in-office presence, prompting him to quote ₹19 LPA during salary negotiations. discussions. However, after all interviews were complete, the company returned with a final offer of just ₹16 LPA. 'This doesn't make sense,' the user wrote, explaining that the new offer would barely result in a meaningful salary increase once taxes and living expenses were considered. 'I hate negotiating like in a sabzi market,' he added. The post quickly attracted comments from fellow tech professionals, many of whom shared the sentiment. "No matter what, always ask for more than you need because HR will always lowball. I have not encountered any HR who gave an offer based on expected compensation," suggested one of them. Another shared, "I have experience with these HRs. They don't have any professional expertise from which they can distinguish good candidates from bad ones. They usually end up choosing low-skilled candidates. Seriously, I hate applying for jobs." A third user suggested, "I have been in a similar situation before. During the first offer, you won't get much hike. So you basically need to stack up multiple offers to get a 100% hike. I followed the same approach a couple of days back." (Also read: Google techie in Bengaluru says moving to 2BHK is the best decision: 'Big chunk of salary goes into rent')
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Pope Leo takes on AI
VATICAN CITY—Two days into his reign, the new American pope spoke softly to a hall full of red-capped cardinals and invoked the digital-age challenge to human dignity he intended to address with the power of his 2,000-year-old office: artificial intelligence. The princes of the Catholic Church listened intently as Pope Leo XIV laid out his priorities for the first time, revealing that he had chosen his papal name because of the tech revolution. As he explained, his namesake Leo XIII stood up for the rights of factory workers during the Gilded Age, when industrial robber barons presided over rapid change and extreme inequality. 'Today, the church offers its trove of social teaching to respond to another industrial revolution and to innovations in the field of artificial intelligence that pose challenges to human dignity, justice and labor," Leo XIV told the College of Cardinals, who stood and cheered for their new pontiff and his unlikely cause. Over the past decade, many of Silicon Valley's most powerful executives have flown to Rome to shape how the world's largest Christian denomination thinks and speaks about their innovations. The leaders of Google, Microsoft, Cisco and other tech powerhouses have debated the philosophical and societal implications of increasingly intelligent machines with the Vatican, hoping to share the benefits of emerging technologies, win over the moral authority and potentially steer its influence over governments and policymakers. While the dialogue has been friendly, the two sides have views that only partly overlap. The Vatican has been pushing for a binding international treaty on AI, which some tech CEOs want to avoid. A number of companies support voluntary ethical guidelines, preferring them to legally binding regulation of AI, which the European Union is gradually rolling out. The Trump administration has rescinded Biden-era AI regulations and has attacked Europe for trying to impose binding rules. Some tech executives reject even broad guidelines. Pope Francis said early in his reign that he barely knew how to use a computer. Yet the more familiar he became with AI, the more concerned he grew. He became a leading global voice on the potential dangers it could pose to humanity, increasingly meeting tech executives to discuss the matter. 'Leo XIV wants the worlds of science and politics to immediately tackle this problem without allowing scientific progress to advance with arrogance, harming those who have to submit to its power," said Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, who has known Leo well for many years. This week, the Vatican is hosting executives from Google, Meta, IBM, Anthropic, Cohere and Palantir in its grand Apostolic Palace, as part of a two-day international conference in Rome on AI, ethics and corporate governance co-chaired by David Berger, a partner at law firm Wilson Sonsini that advises some of the largest tech companies, and Pierluigi Matera, a partner at Libra Legal Partners, who works with the Vatican. The pope is expected to deliver a written message to the conference participants, but has yet to have meetings with tech CEOs so early in his papacy. Microsoft President Brad Smith is slated to meet with Vatican officials in Rome this month and Google has been in touch with the Vatican about a potential meeting with Leo, people familiar with the matter said. The encounters could give the companies powering the rise of AI a glimpse of whether Leo will offer friendly counsel or a firm challenge. To understand the roughly decadelong dialogue between the Catholic Church and Silicon Valley's leading lights, the Journal spoke to nearly 30 tech executives, clergymen and the historians and futurists they have consulted. These people described their detailed conversations, often held in secret, over the future of AI. The American pope's invocation of the 1890s is the latest chapter in the Catholic Church's ambivalent relationship with capitalism. Whereas President Trump sees the Gilded Age as a golden era to which the U.S. should return, Pope Leo views it as a warning from history. Leo XIII, who reigned in the late 19th century, was the first pope to systematically confront the social impact of the industrial revolution. Nicknamed 'the Pope of the Workers," Leo pressed governments to pass laws to protect laborers from the ruthless capitalists of the era. Leo XIII's views were profoundly influenced by an American prelate, Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore, who told him about the plight of factory workers in the U.S., many of them Catholic immigrants from European countries such as Italy and Ireland. If the Church didn't help labor, Gibbons warned the pope, then godless Communists would fill the void. In a groundbreaking 1891 encyclical called Rerum Novarum—Latin for 'Of New Things"—Leo XIII backed calls for labor unions, living wages and safer working conditions. But he also affirmed the right to private enterprise and property. 'The hiring of labor and the conduct of trade are concentrated in the hands of comparatively few; so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself," Leo XIII wrote. Rerum Novarum laid the foundation for modern Catholic social teaching, inspiring Catholic labor movements. It also influenced a powerful brand of moderate conservative politics in Europe after World War II, which believed in capitalism but with strong guardrails. In recent times, the Catholic Church has become increasingly vocal about inequality and the need for a more inclusive economy. Tech ethics weren't immediately a central concern for Francis—who worried, at times, that the global poor lagged behind in their access to social media. He embraced Twitter, and became known within the Vatican as the 'Snapchat Pope" for the selfies he took with visitors and Catholic faithful. In 2016, the Vatican hosted some of Silicon Valley's biggest names, including Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Tim Cook of Apple and Google's Eric Schmidt to discuss how technology could be used for good. Francis mentioned to Schmidt that he could use some help with a new Vatican YouTube channel aimed at youth, according to people familiar with the meeting. Schmidt sent a cadre of Googlers to the Vatican for several weeks to assist, but they became frustrated by the slow pace of Vatican bureaucracy, and the channel never materialized. Bishop Paul Tighe, from Ireland, helped organize a series of closed-door conversations between Vatican hierarchy and tech leaders known as the Minerva Dialogues, after a Dominican church in Rome. At first, the conversation was mainly about the promise of growing digitization, but as time went by, the participants began to discuss their concerns about the rising political polarization that came with it, according to people familiar with the meetings. During these years, Francis also began expressing concern over the massacres of the Rohingya people in Myanmar, which had in part been fueled by viral Facebook posts. Over time, tech leaders talked increasingly about coming breakthroughs in AI. 'People were saying to us, 'Look, this is going to raise questions about the future of humanity…and we're interested in talking to all the traditional sources of wisdom,'" said Tighe. In early 2019, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, then head of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Life, said Microsoft reached out about a meeting with the company's president, Brad Smith, to discuss the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Paglia was intrigued but also wary of Microsoft's intentions. 'In my office people were telling me: This guy wants the Vatican's stamp of approval. Maybe it's about sales," said Paglia. But he agreed to meet Smith, and they hit it off. 'It was almost love at first sight. There was a mutual understanding of the vital importance of this issue," said Paglia. Soon after, the archbishop met the pope with Smith. There was no time for a full briefing. 'Tell me, who is this guy?" Francis asked Paglia as he prepared to greet Smith. To pique the pontiff's interest, the archbishop said Smith was a lawyer who helped immigrants in the U.S. (Smith co-founded a nonprofit that gives migrant children legal assistance.) 'OK, let's go then," Francis replied. 'I couldn't just say, 'He is the president of Microsoft.' I needed to make an emotional impact," explained Paglia. Microsoft had a yearslong relationship with Vatican officials but not at this level. Smith told Francis at length about his vision for AI. 'We see this technology as in service of humanity, not as a successor to it," Smith said in an interview. Paglia and Smith laid the groundwork for guidelines known as the Rome Call for AI Ethics, published in 2020, which corporate signatories including IBM and Cisco pledged to follow. The 12-page pledge committed AI-makers to not violate the privacy or human rights of users or to further discrimination, and proposed that 'those who design and deploy the use of AI must proceed with responsibility." Some AI pioneers, including Google and OpenAI, so far haven't signed up. Paglia hopes to get them on board. The Vatican recognized the potential of AI to do good in areas such as healthcare, education and spreading the faith. There were clearly ethical quandaries to consider. The hope was that clergy and tech leaders could team up to set out principles. In subsequent years, meeting the pope became a rite of passage for rising tech CEOs, including Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Cohere's Aidan Gomez and Markus Pflitsch of Terra Quantum, who called his meeting with Francis the 'Holy Grail." 'There was a more positive sentiment or more or less consensus that we will be able to organize and use classical AI for the good…but we need to put the right governance structures in place," said Pflitsch. Often, the visitors debated with the pope about the nature of technology and the divine, said Father Eric Salobir, a Dominican priest who attended some of the meetings. In one meeting, Francis compared AI's dependency on web content produced in a few languages—largely English—to the story of the Tower of Babel, in which overconfident humans, speaking a single tongue, attempted to build a tower to heaven, prompting God to scatter them and sabotage their creation. During another meeting, the pope warned tech leaders against believing that they understood humans just because their data could predict human behavior: 'You miss their humanity because you cannot reduce the human being to its data," Father Salobir recalled. In 2023, an AI-generated image of Pope Francis wearing a stylish white puffer jacket became one of the first deepfakes to go viral. Many people around the world fell for it. Later that year, Francis warned of a 'technological dictatorship" and called on governments to develop a legally binding international treaty to regulate AI. Addressing the 2024 summit of G-7 leaders, he called AI 'fascinating and terrifying." He said humanity faced a future without hope if 'choices by machines" replaced people's decisions about their lives. In January this year, the Vatican warned in a document on AI that even if the technology had constructive uses, a handful of tech companies could gain wealth and power at the expense of the many. Militaries might race to develop autonomous weapons, lacking in human judgment or morality. Children risked growing up in a dehumanized world, with chatbots as their guides. After Francis died in April, AI was a big topic of discussion among cardinals arriving in Rome to elect his successor. Several European prelates warned that AI was crowding out the space for God in modern life. Some of their colleagues from Africa expressed misgivings about the tech industry's bottomless appetite for minerals buried beneath their soil. They're now waiting to see how Leo will use the church's moral authority to push for strong rules on AI. 'These tools shouldn't be demonized, but they need to be regulated," said Cardinal Versaldi. 'The question is, who will regulate them? It's not credible for them to be regulated by their makers. There needs to be a superior authority." Write to Margherita Stancati at Drew Hinshaw at Keach Hagey at and Emily Glazer at
