Inherited IRA rules: 7 things all beneficiaries must know
Inheriting an IRA can be complex. The rules differ based on your relationship to the deceased, your age and even their age at death. One misstep can trigger hefty penalties or tax bills you can't undo.
Surviving spouses can treat the IRA as their own or remain as the beneficiary, which opens up more options for delaying distributions and maximizing growth.
Most inheritors (especially non-spouses) must empty the account within 10 years, potentially triggering big tax hits if not planned for properly.
An inherited IRA is an individual retirement account opened when you inherit a tax-advantaged retirement plan (including an IRA or a retirement-sponsored plan such as a 401(k)) following the death of the owner. Any type of IRA may be turned into an inherited IRA, including traditional and Roth IRAs, SEP IRAs and SIMPLE IRAs.
It may be one of the most complex issues to handle well when wrapping up an estate. If you've recently inherited an individual retirement account, you could find yourself at the tricky three-way intersection of estate planning, financial planning and tax planning. One wrong decision can lead to expensive consequences, and good luck trying to persuade the IRS to give you a do-over.
Looking for an advisor?: Find a financial advisor near you or online
When it comes to inheriting an IRA, an heir will typically have to move assets from the original owner's account to a newly opened IRA in the heir's name. For this reason, an inherited IRA may also be called a beneficiary IRA.
Importantly, the income tax treatment of the IRA remains the same from the original account to the inherited IRA. So, accounts made with pre-tax dollars (as in a traditional IRA) or after-tax dollars (as in a Roth IRA) are still treated the same way in an inherited IRA.
Anyone can inherit an IRA, but the rules on how you must treat it differ depending on whether you're the spouse or someone else.
Spouses get the most flexibility when inheriting an IRA. You can treat the account as your own or keep it as an inherited IRA, depending on what best fits your financial and tax situation.
If the original account owner died before taking required minimum distributions (RMDs):
Roll the IRA into your own IRA.
Treated as your own IRA.
RMDs not required until you reach age 73.
Remain a beneficiary of the inherited IRA.
Can delay RMDs until the deceased would have turned 73.
Take a lump-sum distribution.
Fully taxable if a traditional IRA.
If the original account owner died on or after starting RMDs:
You must take the deceased owner's RMD for the year of death if it wasn't already taken.
You can then become the owner.
You then begin RMDs at age 73 and they're calculated using your own life expectancy.
Or you can remain a beneficiary of the inherited IRA.
You must begin taking RMDs in the year after the year of your spouse's death.
Non-spouse have fewer choices and the SECURE Act shook up long-standing practices, creating even more confusion. You can't treat the account as your own, and the 10-year rule usually applies.
If the original account owner died before taking RMDs:
Eligible designated beneficiaries (you're chronically ill or disabled, a minor child, or not more than 10 years younger than the original owner) can choose to stretch RMDs over their life expectancy instead of the deceased's expectancy.
Designated beneficiaries (everyone else) must follow the 10-year rule.
Entire balance must be withdrawn by Dec. 31 of the 10th year after death.
If the original account owner died on or after taking RMDs:
You must take the deceased owner's RMD for the year of death if it wasn't already taken.
After that:
Designated beneficiaries
10-year rule applies
Eligible designated beneficiaries
You must continue taking RMDs.
Distributions are based on your life expectancy or the owner's life expectancy, whichever is longer.
Non-individuals — like estates, charities or some trusts — have the least flexibility. If the beneficiary isn't a 'qualified see-through trust,' IRS rules accelerate distribution.
If the original account owner died before taking RMDs:
Five-year rule applies.
Entire account must be distributed within five years.
If the original account owner died on or after taking RMDs:
Five-year rule applies.
If someone inherits an IRA from their deceased spouse, the survivor has a few choices of what to do with it:
Treat the IRA as if it were your own, naming yourself as the owner. You can also roll it over into another account, such as another IRA or a qualified employer plan, including 403(b) plans.
Treat yourself as the beneficiary of the plan.
If you're a surviving spouse, you can roll over the inherited IRA into your own account, but no one else will receive this privilege.
You have other options for taking the money as well, and each course of action may create additional choices that you must make. In addition, your options depend on whether the deceased spouse was under or at least age 73.
For example, if you, as a surviving spouse, are the sole beneficiary and treat the IRA as your own, you may have to take RMDs, depending on your age, or you may have to fully withdraw the money in 10 years. But in the right circumstances, you may have the option of not withdrawing money.
If you were not interested in taking money out at this time, you could let that money continue to grow in the IRA until you reach the age when you must take RMDs, says Frank St. Onge, an enrolled agent at Total Financial Planning, LLC in the Detroit area.
In addition, spouses 'are able to roll the IRA into an account for themselves. That resets everything. Now they are able to name their own beneficiary that will succeed them and be able to deal with the IRA as if it is their own,' says Carol Tully, CPA and attorney at Wolf & Co. in Boston.
The IRS provides further rules around your options, including what you can do with a Roth IRA, where the rules differ substantially from traditional IRAs.
If you've inherited an IRA, you'll need to take action to avoid running afoul of IRS rules.
Your available options as an inheritor depend on whether you're:
An eligible designated beneficiary: Meaning you're chronically ill or disabled, a minor child or not more than 10 years younger than the original owner.
A designated beneficiary: If you're not a spouse or someone in one of the categories above, you're known as a designated beneficiary.
If you're in the first group, you have two options:
You can transfer assets into an inherited IRA in your name and choose to take RMDs over your life expectancy or that of the deceased account holder's.
You can transfer assets into an inherited IRA in your name and choose to take distributions over 10 years. You must liquidate the account by Dec. 31 of the year that is 10 years after the original owner's death.
Your ability to access these options depends on whether the original owner of the IRA was under or at least age 73.
The first option allows most of your funds to grow for potentially decades while you take minimal amounts out each year.
In the second option, the beneficiary is forced to take all the money over 10 years. For substantial accounts, that can add up to a monstrous income tax bill — unless the IRA is a Roth, in which case, taxes were paid before money went into the account.
If you're in the second group — designated beneficiaries group — you can select only the 10-year rule as outlined above. You'll have up until Dec. 31 of the year that is 10 years after the original account owner's death to fully withdraw the account.
When you're considering how to take withdrawals, you'll need to follow the legal requirements while balancing the tax impact of withdrawals and the advantages of letting the money continue to grow over time.
The IRS website has more information on the topic of RMDs.
Learn more: When to get a financial advisor
Another hurdle for beneficiaries of traditional IRAs is figuring out if the benefactor had taken his or her RMD in the year of death.
If the original account owner hasn't done this, it's the responsibility of the beneficiary to make sure the minimum has been met, says Natalie Choate, a retired estate planning lawyer and author of the book 'Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits.'
'Let's say your father dies Jan. 24, leaving you his IRA. He probably hadn't gotten around to taking out his distribution yet. The beneficiary has to take it out if the original owner didn't. If you don't know about that or forget to do it, you're liable for a penalty of 50 percent' of the amount not distributed, Choate says.
Not surprisingly, that can cause a problem if someone dies late in the year. The last day of the calendar year is the deadline for taking that year's RMD.
'If your father dies on Christmas Day and still hasn't taken out the distribution, you may not even find out that you own the account until it's already too late to take out that year's distribution,' she says.
If the deceased was not yet required to take distributions, then there is no year-of-death required distribution.
An inherited IRA may be taxable, depending on the type. If you inherit a Roth IRA, you're free of taxes. But with a traditional IRA, any amount you withdraw is subject to ordinary income taxes.
For estates subject to the estate tax, inheritors of an IRA will get an income-tax deduction for the estate taxes paid on the account. The taxable income earned (but not received by the deceased) is called 'income in respect of a decedent.'
'When you take a distribution from an IRA, it's taxable income,' says Choate. 'But because that person's estate had to pay a federal estate tax, you get an income-tax deduction for the estate taxes that were paid on the IRA. You might have $1 million of income with a $350,000 deduction to offset against that.'
'It's not necessary that you were the person who paid the taxes; just that someone did,' she says.
For 2025, estates worth more than $13.99 million are subject to the estate tax, up from $13.61 million in 2024.
An ambiguous, incomplete or missing designated beneficiary form can sink an estate plan.
Many people assume they filled out the form correctly at one point.
'You ask who their beneficiary is, and they think they know. But the form hasn't been completed, or it's not on record with the custodian. That creates a lot of problems,' says Tully.
If there is no designated beneficiary form and the account goes to the estate and RMDs have not begun, the beneficiary will be forced to withdraw the money from the account over a five-year period.
The simplicity of the form can be misleading. Just a few pieces of information can direct large sums of money.
'One form like that can control millions of dollars, whereas a trust could be 50 pages,' says M.D. Anderson, founder of InheritedIRAHell.com and president of Arizona-based Financial Strategies, which specializes in inherited IRA issues. 'People procrastinate, they don't update forms and cause all kinds of legal entanglement.'
It is possible to list a trust as a primary beneficiary of an IRA. It is also possible that this will go horribly wrong. Done incorrectly, a trust can unwittingly limit the options of beneficiaries.
Tully says that if the provisions of the trust are not carefully drafted, some custodians won't be able to see through the trust to determine the qualified beneficiaries, in which case the IRA's accelerated distribution rules would come into play.
The trust needs to be drafted by a lawyer 'who's experienced with the rules for leaving IRAs to trusts,' says Choate.
Without highly specialized advice, the snarls can be difficult to untangle.
One of the less obvious benefits of the Roth IRA is how it eliminates some tax issues in estate planning. Given the complexity of inherited IRAs, it's valuable when anything simplifies the process.
In general, the Roth IRA allows you to pass assets tax-free to heirs, meaning that later they won't be taxed on the principal. However, the Roth IRA doesn't eliminate all tax issues.
For example, if a spouse inherits a Roth IRA and decides to treat it as their own, any withdrawn earnings from the account will be taxable until the spouse reaches age 59 ½ and the five-year holding period has been met.
Or if you take a lump-sum distribution of the Roth IRA, you'll also enjoy a tax-free withdrawal as long as the five-year holding period on the account was met. If this rule was not met, any withdrawn earnings are taxable.
Of course, there are other ways to treat the Roth IRA that have different implications, and you'll want to explore which one works best for your situation. But the fact that the Roth IRA reduces the tax impact on heirs may make it easier to use that account.
Inherited IRAs are complicated to say the least, and one wrong move can lead to long-lasting financial repercussions. But you have several resources, including some free ones, that can get you going in the right direction so that you can avoid costly mistakes.
Start with the IRS website: It has detailed rules on inherited IRA distributions, RMDs and timelines. It's a solid reference, but don't expect personalized advice.
Talk to your IRA custodian: Your custodian knows the specifics of your plan and can explain your options. But be warned: Some custodians are more versed than others in the complex rules surrounding inherited IRAs. If your custodian messes up, fixing it may require a private letter ruling — which means a $6,000 to $10,000 IRS fee and a six-month wait.
Hire a professional: Look for an estate attorney or financial advisor who specializes in inherited IRAs. Choose a fee-only fiduciary — they're legally required to act in your best interest.
If you're getting conflicting advice or something seems wrong, don't sign anything. It could lead to something irreversible. Get a second opinion from someone with expertise specific to inherited IRAs. It really can be that complicated.
Learn more: Find a financial advisor near you or online
An inherited IRA can be a windfall, especially if you're able to take advantage of decades of tax-advantaged compound growth. But as you're navigating the process, you'll need to avoid the pitfalls, which unfortunately seem all too easy to fall into. While relatively easy questions can likely be answered online, it could be well worth the cost to hire an advisor to help you avoid tax penalties and make sure it's the best option for you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and TSMC pitched $1 trillion AI complex — SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son wants to turn Arizona into the next Shenzhen
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Masayoshi Son, founder of SoftBank Group, is working on plans to develop a giant AI and manufacturing industrial hub in Arizona, potentially costing up to $1 trillion if it reaches full scale, reports Bloomberg. The concept of what is internally called Project Crystal Land involves creating a complex for building artificial intelligence systems and robotics. Son has talked to TSMC, Samsung, and the Trump administration about the project. Masayoshi Son's Project Crystal Land aims to replicate the scale and integration of China's Shenzhen by establishing a high-tech hub focused on manufacturing AI-powered industrial robots and advancing artificial intelligence technologies. The site would host factories operated by SoftBank-backed startups specializing in automation and robotics, Vision Fund portfolio companies (such as Agile Robots SE), and potentially involve major tech partners like TSMC and Samsung. If fully realized, the project could cost up to $1 trillion and is intended to position the U.S. as a leading center for AI and high-tech manufacturing. SoftBank is looking to include TSMC in the initiative, given its role in fabricating Nvidia's AI processors. However, a Bloomberg source familiar with TSMC's internal thinking indicated that the company's current plan to invest $165 billion in total in its U.S. projects has no relation to SoftBank's projects. Samsung Electronics has also been approached about participating, the report says. Talks have been held with government officials to explore tax incentives for companies investing in the manufacturing hub. This includes communication with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, according to Bloomberg. SoftBank is reportedly seeking support at both the federal and state levels, which could be crucial to the success of the project. The development is still in the early stages, and feasibility will depend on private sector interest and political support, sources familiar with SoftBank's plans told Bloomberg. To finance its Project Crystal Land, SoftBank is considering project-based financing structures typically used in large infrastructure developments like pipelines. This approach would enable fundraising on a per-project basis and reduce the amount of upfront capital required from SoftBank itself. A similar model is being explored for the Stargate AI data center initiative, which SoftBank is jointly pursuing with OpenAI, Oracle, and Abu Dhabi's MGX. Melissa Otto of Visible Alpha suggested in a Bloomberg interview that rather than spending heavily, Son might more efficiently support his AI project by fostering partnerships between manufacturers, AI engineers, and specialists in fields like medicine and robotics, and by backing smaller startups. However, she notes that investing in data centers could also reduce AI development costs and drive wider adoption, which would be good for the long term for AI in general and Crystal Land specifically. Nonetheless, it is still too early to judge the outcome. The rumor about the Crystal Land project has emerged as SoftBank is expanding its investments in AI on an already large scale. The company is preparing a $30 billion investment in OpenAI and a $6.5 billion acquisition of Ampere Computing, a cloud-native CPU company. While these initiatives are actively developing, the pace of fundraising for the Stargate infrastructure has been slower than initially expected. SoftBank's liquidity at the end of March stood at approximately ¥3.4 trillion ($23 billion). To increase available funds, the company recently sold about a quarter of its T-Mobile U.S. stake, raising $4.8 billion. It also holds ¥25.7 trillion ($176.46 billion) in net assets, the largest portion of which is in chip designer Arm Holdings. Such vast resources provide SoftBank with room to secure additional financing if necessary, Bloomberg notes Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors should consider this growth stock… it's SpaceX's competition
Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB) is a US-listed growth stock that gives investors rare access to the commercial space sector. As a vertically integrated launch and space systems provider, Rocket Lab is often compared to SpaceX in its ambition and capabilities. But there's one crucial difference: you can actually buy shares in Rocket Lab, while SpaceX remains private. Rocket Lab delivers launch services, builds small and medium-class rockets, and manufactures spacecraft components for a range of commercial, government, and defense customers. With rapid revenue growth, an impressive order book, and expansion into new markets, Rocket Lab offers public market investors a way to participate in the booming space economy. It targets many of the same opportunities as its more famous, privately held peer. Rocket Lab and SpaceX operate in the same commercial space sector but differ significantly in scale, maturity, and valuation. Rocket Lab's market cap is currently $12.85bn, with trailing 12 months (TTM) revenue of approximately $460m. Despite strong growth — revenue nearly doubled from $240m in 2023 — Rocket Lab remains a smaller, earlier-stage player focused on small to medium launch vehicles and spacecraft manufacturing. Its valuation multiples are extremely high, with a forward price-to-sales ratio of 22.3 times, reflecting investor optimism. SpaceX, by contrast, is a far more mature private company valued at about $350bn. It's projected to generate $15.5bn in revenue in 2025. This is driven by its dominant Falcon 9 launch services and rapidly growing Starlink satellite internet business. SpaceX's valuation implies roughly a 22.5 times multiple on forward revenue. This is broadly in line with Rocket Lab. Focusing on Rocket Lab, the company is projected to deliver rapid revenue growth over the next several years, with estimates rising from $573m in 2025 to $889 in 2026, $1.2bn in 2027, and $1.69bn in 2028. This represents annual growth rates consistently above 30%, and even a jump of nearly 77% in 2030. However, the number of analysts providing forecasts declines sharply after 2027, dropping from 11–14 analysts in the near term to just two or one by 2028 and 2030. The one analyst projecting as far as 2030 sees $4bn in revenue for the year. I had the chance to buy Rocket Lab shares at $15 just two months ago. I missed out as unfortunately my attention had been diverted elsewhere. However, I found another entry point. And personally, I see this as an investment to hold for a very long period. The space industry is still in its early innings, with enormous potential as satellite launches, lunar missions, and in-orbit services become increasingly mainstream. And like any investment, there are risks. Rocket Lab remains loss-making. It's expected to turn a profit in 2026, when it will trade at 620 times earnings. And while this moderates to 140 times in 2027, it's still expensive and introduces plenty of execution risk. However, I certainly believe UK investors should consider this one. It could be a real winner going forward. The post Investors should consider this growth stock… it's SpaceX's competition appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has positions in Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gallery owner struggles to let go as he announces shop closure
THE OWNER of a city centre gallery has announced he will be closing his shop after 25 years. Terry Goodwin-Jones, 70, will be closing The King's Gallery on New Street later this year, with Mangojuice Gallery, which shares the same building, also set to close. Mr Goodwin-Jones has taken the decision to close the gallery as he is looking to retire. The gallery has already cut down to just three opening days a week. He said there has been an emotional reaction from customers, with some regulars even shedding a tear. READ MORE: 'A big loss': Major department store House of Fraser confirms closure READ MORE: New steak and seafood restaurant gears up to open in city centre READ MORE: Eastern tea bar plan revealed at old empty shop that was household name "Lots of people are saying how sorry they are," he said. "We've had customers come in and tell us they've cried when they found out. "People will often drop in for a chat or come in with a packet of biscuits for us. We've got lots of regular customers who have become more than customers." The gallery owner admitted he has also struggled with the idea of closing and is yet to confirm a date for closure. "If we had a lease, we'd have a deadline but I have no deadline so it's dragging on a bit," he said. "I've become more accepting of it. I was really struggling with the idea of closing the shop. "I'm not desperate to pack up the shop but I don't want to leave it too late that I'm too old to do anything afterwards." With Mangojuice Gallery also closing, Mr Goodwin-Jones reminisced about the 12 years he has spent working in the same building alongside owner Popi Pribojac. "It's been absolutely brilliant because the two shops complement each other so well. We get on really well and have a good laugh," he said. He said there have also been plenty of memories with other businesses on New Street over the years. "There used to be a shop over the road called Kaos and we've actually had a badminton net across the road and played badminton in the street," he said. "We've had a lot of laughs." A closing date hasn't been set but is expected to be around August.