logo
‘How can I help one of my grandchildren buy a house without making the others jealous?'

‘How can I help one of my grandchildren buy a house without making the others jealous?'

Telegraph24-05-2025

Dear Sam,
I want to help my granddaughter buy a house. She is in the police force, and is currently living in subsidised shared accommodation because it is too far for her to commute from home.
My financial adviser told me that I can afford to be generous with my family over the remainder of my life without running out of money. I even have a significant 'just in case' pot which would pay for care at home if I preferred that to selling the house and going residential. I feel very well provided for.
My granddaughter has found a place in Kent that makes the commute tolerable. If she can get a 20pc deposit organised, she can raise a mortgage for the rest. She has saved some, but needs another £25,000 to be sure she can cover the deposit and costs of buying her first home.
I can easily afford to give her this, but I do have two other grandchildren. They are younger, and not ready for homeownership.
I have two dilemmas. Firstly, is there a way I can treat them all equally? I don't know when the other two will buy homes, but the prices will be different, so I will probably need to give them more to achieve the same result.
The second dilemma is that I would want them to use the money to become homeowners. I am a strong believer in getting on the property ladder and securing their housing position, but I don't want them to end up with boyfriend/girlfriend who benefits from my money if they buy something together and then have a bust up.
How can I make sure I can help them all, encourage them to buy homes and ensure what I give my grandchildren can't be claimed by anyone else?
– Margaret
Dear Margaret,
I know your financial adviser, which is how you were encouraged to write in with your dilemma – and it doesn't surprise me that because of good planning and well-managed personal finances, you find you have the means, and the heart, to support your family in a deeply meaningful way.
Your granddaughter's determination, joining the police force and saving diligently, is also admirable. It's no wonder you feel moved to help her take that next step on to the property ladder. Your instincts are generous and wise, but I can see why you're feeling torn.
The first of your concerns – fairness – is one many grandparents share. You want to help now, but without disadvantaging your other grandchildren later.
The truth is, equality doesn't always mean sameness. Property prices will change, your grandchildren's lives will unfold at different paces, and needs will vary. Rather than trying to make identical gifts at different moments in time, it might help to shift focus toward the principle of 'equitable intention', offering similar opportunities to each grandchild, even if the financial outlay isn't exactly equal.
To manage this, you could keep a simple record of gifts made, clearly noting the purpose and value. If you give £25,000 now to your eldest granddaughter, record it as such with the understanding that, when the time is right, the younger grandchildren will receive a comparable leg-up, whether for property, education, or another major life goal.
If circumstances change, you'll still have the flexibility to adjust accordingly. Keeping a note like this in your will or letter of wishes (which is not legally binding, but can guide your executors) helps communicate your values and intentions without tying your hands or forcing premature decisions.
The second dilemma – protecting the gift from partners or relationship breakdowns – is trickier, but it can be approached sensibly.
If you were to gift the money outright and your granddaughter buys jointly with a partner, that partner could acquire a beneficial interest in the property, especially if they contribute financially or live there long-term. If the relationship were to end, your gifted money could be caught up in a dispute or division.
One way to reduce the risk of this outcome is to give the money on the understanding that it will be documented as a loan, even if it is never repaid. A formal declaration of trust or a loan agreement can establish your granddaughter as the sole legal owner of the money, protecting it in the event of a relationship breakdown.
This approach gives her full use of the money but creates a legal separation from her partner's financial rights. It also preserves some flexibility, allowing you to later forgive the loan if the circumstances still feel right, for example, once she's married or well-established.
However, there's a trade-off here that your financial adviser may already have highlighted. From an inheritance tax perspective, gifts rather than loans, begin the clock on the seven-year rule. Provided you survive for seven years after making the gift, the amount falls outside your estate for tax purposes.
Loans, by contrast, remain assets on your balance sheet and are counted in full, even if they are never repaid. So, if reducing a future inheritance tax bill is one of your objectives, a straightforward gift may be the more efficient route. Just be sure to keep good records and be open with your adviser about your intentions. As advisers we can be inclined to overweight the tax outcome in a decision-making process – forgive us.
Some grandparents prefer to buy a stake in the property as a way of protecting their contribution, but you've indicated that this doesn't appeal. That's entirely understandable. Another alternative is to place the money in a trust, but this can be complex and costly to manage, and is rarely necessary for modest sums.
Ultimately, the path forward may involve a combination of open communication and light-touch legal planning. Speak with your granddaughter, she will likely understand your desire to help all the grandchildren equally and to protect your gift from risk.
Working with a solicitor to draw up a simple loan agreement or deed of trust can keep things clear, fair, and future-proofed without casting any doubt over your generosity.
Your instincts to support your granddaughter now, to avoid unintentional unfairness later, and to encourage home ownership as a foundation for a secure life are deeply thoughtful. With some careful structuring and honest conversation, you can honour those instincts and give your granddaughter a wonderful start, while keeping options open for your other grandchildren too.
Warm wishes,
– Sam

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move
Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move

The Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move

A CHAIN of popular cafe bars will close for 24-hours next week. The closure will affect more than 250 branches countrywide on Monday June 9. 4 4 Loungers opened their first store in 2002 in Bristol and have since expanded across the country. They are known for their wide range of food, cocktails and coffees, as well as each lounge having its own unique decor - with some customers not realising it's even a chain. The closure is so that it's staff can enjoy a grand celebration, which they call LoungeFest. Beginning in 2013, the event celebrates the company's 9,000 staff. In an announcement on Facebook, the company wrote: "Attention Loungers! "All of our Lounges will be closed on Monday, 9th June, as we will be heading to our annual staff party - Loungefest! "We do this every year to celebrate everybody's hard work. "Regular Lounging will resume on Tuesday, 10th June." Photos of the event show an exciting mix of music, fairground rides, and a healthy dose of partying. Guy Youll, Loungers' Chief People Officer told Wales Online: "Back in 2013, Loungers was one of the first in the hospitality industry to host a party like this and I'm delighted we've kept close to our roots by continuing every year getting bigger and better. Most popular treats for Brits on holiday "Our teams work incredibly hard all year round so LoungeFest is our way of celebrating them and showing how much we appreciate the dedication and care they put in every day at all our sites to deliver great hospitality. It's going to be quite a party!" Facebook commenters were pleased to see the company showing appreciation for their staff. One wrote: "Well done for treating your staff I hope the staff and you have a brilliant time." While another commented: "Oh that's a lovely thing to do for all the hard working staff." This year's LoungeFest will take place at Ragley Hall in Warwickshire. Its theme is 'at the movies' as the event will be equipped with funfair attractions, DJ sessions, music stages featuring live bands and performances by Loungers' employees - as well as games, activities and complimentary food and drink. 4 4 Loungers was founded in 2002 by a group of three friends on North Street in Bristol. They also run the popular Cosy Club chain of restaurants, as well as the roadside eatery Brightside. As of March 2025, the company operates 291 sites in England and Wales across the three brands. Its 250th Lounge - Pionero Lounge - opened in Rochdale in January 2024. With plans to expand with 10 more restaurants, loyal customers have been begging the company to come to their town. The company won the employer of the year award at the Casual Dining Awards 2025.

Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers

Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers

Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper.

Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents
Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents

A £5m project aiming to encourage sustainable transport methods is not suitable for a market town, residents have claimed. Suffolk County Council was awarded funding from the government's Active Travel England scheme in 2022 to look at ways of making walking and cycling journeys easier in Woodbridge. Changes proposed include widening of some pavements and creating a one-way system for traffic toward Market HillA recent public consultation saw 433 responses as the council now looks to review the plans over the next year but some residents said the consultations were handled "poorly". Chris Mapey runs the Angel pub, just off Market Hill and said while on the face of it the project was a "cracking idea", he was believed it was for the wrong town."The problem we've got with any small market town is it's a fine balancing act - we want to try and preserve the town as much as we can but we also want to have decent levels of footfall," he said."If you make Woodbridge too closed off, we're right on the doorstep of Martlesham [Retail Park]... so you end up losing, conceivably, a lot of footfall."It's been very frustrating for business owners to know where to turn." Woodbridge resident Neil Armstrong Boast similarly felt the council's consultation was "poor"."They hid road closures by the use of buzzwords and people lost faith when at the public meeting held in the community hall, the councillors wouldn't state what their preference was," he residents have spoken in favour of road and pavement improvements but some feared the project would negatively affect those who rely on cars and buses. "Wider pavements are a lovely idea but at what cost to free and efficient movement around the town for the less mobile," fellow resident Alison Parish said."I envisage that this will create more traffic hold-ups, longer journeys - time wise and distance - and people will avoid going into the town to shop and socialise." Ruth Leach, Lib Dem county councillor for Woodbridge, said she initially believed the project would be difficult to implement but felt progress had been made."The project has changed shape from what was initially proposed but I am very confident that we are getting closer to something that is going to perfect for Woodbridge," she said."With a budget of £5m I am very keen to work tirelessly on it to make sure it is something that stays in Woodbridge and we can benefit from it."She stressed the project did not seek to remove cars from Woodbridge. A spokesperson for the county council said the project aimed to give people better choice in how they travel for local, shorter journeys and the level of response for the consultation process had been "higher than expected".They said people had been provided options to fill either an online or paper survey and there had been drop-in events during both weekdays and weekends to "maximise people's ability to attend", while local businesses and key stakeholders had been engaged with to "ensure that all voices" were heard. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store