
Building Resilience As A Sustainable Spice Company
Spice company Diaspora Co. and its CEO Sana Javeri Kadri have weathered much turbulence in recent years: from climate-related disruptions to harvests, to the global pandemic and geopolitical flare-ups. Adapting has become a core skill for Kadri; in her words, there is 'a new fire every day' to put out.
This time on April 2nd, the disruption came from the Trump Administration's new tariff policy. Kadri reached out several days later to her customers to explain how the policy would impact Diaspora Co's operations. New import taxes - ranging between 25% to 45% - applied to two key sourcing countries: India, where 93% of Diaspora's spices come from, and Sri Lanka, where the remainder are grown.
The email - and the assurances Kadri made - were astonishing. Diaspora Co. would not pass on any new costs to farmers and consumers. Customers would not see any price increases. There would be no cuts in wages to its regenerative farm partners - they would continue to be paid four times more than the commodity price.
Maintaining these commitments - i.e. 'business per usual' - in the wake of such market upheaval seems infeasible. But as it turns out, Diaspora Co. operates in a unique niche. The NYU Stern Center for Sustainable Business (CSB) reports that products marketed as sustainable have grown every year since 2013, with a significant share increase during the pandemic and recent inflation.
'Sustainably marketed products are growing 2.3 times faster than conventional products and at a 27% price premium on average. So even if a product will be five or 10% more expensive due to tariffs, consumers are willing to pay. It may mean that companies are going to take a little bit less of a premium than they have been taking in the past, but there remains strong demand. Opportunities are there for small companies who have competitive advantages around their sustainability offerings versus more traditional companies,' said Tensie Whelan, Founding Director of NYU Stern's Center for Sustainable Business.
Tins from Diaspora Co.
In their study of what environmental sustainability claims resonate with consumers, CSB found that consumers care most about themselves and their families, especially when buying products that are made without harmful ingredients to human health. In spices, this is especially pertinent as many instances of lead and ethylene oxide, a known carcinogen, have been reported.
In short, sustainability-focused enterprises - like Diaspora Co - enjoy more stable price points. But even then, there are other challenges and complexities to deal with.
Some of these involve geography, traditions, and culture. Case in point: a counterpart once suggested that production of Diaspora's spices be shifted to American soil. For Kadri, that was not only logistically impossible, but also morally unconscionable. An ordinary observer may think Diaspora's spices are like other ordinary food items. But in fact, they have rich and storied histories and require specific growing conditions found only in their regions of origin within the South Asian subcontinent. Locals grow the crops with expertise inherited over thousands of years, across generations of their families. They work the same land their ancestors farmed.
Sirārakhong (also spelled Sira Rakong) chilies drying process.
Sirārakhong (also spelled Sira Rakong) chilies.
'Often when you devalue a product, or you think of it as inherently cheap, you are disconnected from where it comes from. You think it should be able to appear from anywhere. Take, for example, champagne. Would people ever expect champagne to not come from France? They know that the sparkling wine that comes from California is not champagne but there is a certain luxury that is ascribed to something coming from France and coming from England and coming from Europe at large, that is white supremacy and colonialism at work,' said Kadri.
'But when it comes from Asia. There is an intrinsic feeling that we can make that here. And that's not true. We are growing the equivalent of champagne from France. For example, we source black pepper from a region in Kerala -it is vine ripened, sun dried, and then hand processed, like it is the highest grade of pepper one can humanly grow.'
Attempting to replicate this cultivation or these traditions elsewhere at scale isn't just impractical - it is a misunderstanding of what makes these ingredients valuable in the first place. They are indigenous to their specific regions and the knowhow to produce them also is native to those areas.
Take cardamom, another spice that is indigenous to the hills of Kerala and has been growing there for thousands of years. It i's a deeply South Indian crop that eventually found its way to Guatemala where the rainforests are very similar in that they are very wet at high elevations. These are the only two regions globally that, by virtue of geography, grow cardamom at scale.
But Diaspora's farm partner spent 15 years finding a way to grow cardamom in Kerala without pesticides while still maintaining maximum aroma and flavor. Kadri says, 'Even if I wanted to source from Guatemala tomorrow, I don't know if that beautiful, wild variety that our farm partner domesticated and bred to be pesticide free would flourish in Guatemala. I certainly cannot transplant all of that knowledge overnight to Guatemala and, of course, importing into the US from Guatemala would be just as difficult.'
For Kadri, there is an emotional and cultural significance of sourcing from India and Sri Lanka. She is committed to honoring the deep-rooted cultural and agricultural traditions, and ensuring the highest quality ingredients.
Long before the inflationary pressure, Kadri was making hard concessions to the geopolitical conditions of the day. For example, as recently as two years ago, Diaspora Co. would separately import its packaging materials from China and its spices from India. The company would work with different co-packers in California, Colorado, and New York to blend the masalas, and pack the spices into jars.
But in August 2023, Kadri made the decision to shift packaging production from Chinese manufacturers to Indian suppliers. It was a decision rooted not in concerns about quality or reliability, but great-power politics: there was increasing friction between China on one hand and the United States and India on the other.
'We saw the Chinese-American relationship shift towards animosity. If you ask Chinese manufacturers, they will say they have been planning for this for eight years," said Kadri. "The Chinese have been building factories in Vietnam and Bangladesh, and because they are the best, they have alternatives"
Kadri asked Indian manufacturers to see whether they could replicate the Chinese standard of packaging. They were candid about not being able to do so. 'China manufactures the best packaging in the world. And the Indian manufacturers were super frank about it: 'China is operating in the future – in 2050 - we are operating in 2010. There's a 40-year difference.''
Kadri was wary of maintaining supply chains and operations across multiple countries so she decided to focus her company, headquartered in India, on stable supply chains in India and Sri Lanka. The modern Chinese tins were axed.
In 2024, Diaspora Co. expanded globally: they launched in the United Kingdom last year and have plans to expand to Australia next year.
And then there is the current populist atmosphere. Kadri recalls when Diaspora Co.launched tote bags four years ago that were ethically sourced in India. Someone pointedly asked why American cotton was not used. Kadri noted that India ranks as the largest producer of organic cotton globally at 51%, according to the Textile Exchange.
'The larger question of being divorced from where things come from and how things get to you, that is the main problem, and that's what we need to address. If culturally, we can understand that, then as a country, I hope we would not accept these policies from our own government. Right now, there is a lack of understanding and ignorance. And our ignorance allows this stuff to happen, like thinking that we are somehow going to become a spice manufacturing country,' adds Kadri.
Sustainability has been a personally rewarding and fulfilling model. But there are macro challenges. There are high costs to using platforms like Meta, Google, Shopify, and Amazon, and Kadri is now trying to minimize reliance on these platforms. She is not shy about her support for breaking up monopolies, supporting local innovation and resilience in certain parts of the United States, and getting more support from the Small Business Association (SBA).
Despite the success and growth in market share of sustainability-focused ventures, many long-standing companies have not yet embraced it. If any do, they do it for de-risking or ethical reasons. Crucially, many neglect to track the financial benefits of sustainability - which, as it turns out, can be substantial.
Whelan points to the example of McCormick & Company, a global company specializing in spices, flavorings, and baking products. Whelan studied the company and found that it benefited by approximately $6-million when it made its supply chains more sustainable. The company was surprised by the finding. They simply hadn't been examining their work through that lens.
Madhur Jaggery Powder and Garam Masala
Whelan worked on another case study with a smaller company extracting cocoa from West Africa. The findings were a surprise to that company as well: 'We determined that they get out of the commodity business and get more into sustainable, traceable cocoa. They would actually have a better business model. They would attract specialty buyers who were more interested in long term engagements, and who were willing to pay a premium price.'
The demand is there if the quality is there, says Whelan.
During President Trump's 90-day pause - which happens to be during Diaspora Co's harvest season - the company will maximize production while hoping for what Kadri calls wildly optimistic non-local food exemptions, similar to ones coffee lobbyists are also seeking. So far, what she has found is increased customs scrutiny and delays, complex shipping paperwork and confusion amongst customs brokers.
But Kadri is holding fast. For her, it's about the importance of conscious consumption, choosing high-quality options over cheaper but less sustainable alternatives, and the need for systemic changes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Jack Daniel's maker Brown-Forman sees sales fall as Trump trade conflicts weigh on spirits producers
LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- Brown-Forman Corp. reported weaker sales Thursday as the maker of Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey confronts challenging market conditions amid global trade conflicts and pinched consumer spending. The Louisville, Kentucky-based spirits giant said its full-year net sales of nearly $4 billion were down 5% from a year ago, and fell 7% in in the fourth quarter. Net income was down 15% for the full fiscal year and plunged 45% in the fourth quarter ending April 30, the company said. The quarterly drop came as Brown-Forman and other U.S. spirits producers who rely heavily on foreign sales felt the reverberations from President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plans and consumer anxiety about the economy. Brown-Forman also offered a sobering assessment for the coming year. Having steered the company through an 'extremely challenging and uncertain operating environment' in the past year, Brown-Forman CEO Lawson Whiting predicted another challenging year ahead. 'Fiscal 2025 was a year unlike any other that I've seen in the past three decades,' he said during a conference call with industry market analysts. Whiting pointed to industry figures showing that many consumers are purchasing smaller sizes of spirits. He called it unusual and said it reflects a consumer 'who's pinched and just goes to the store with a $10 bill instead of $20 and then they get the smaller size.' 'The consumer and their wallet just doesn't have as much money in it," he said. "They're spending money on things like vacations and lodging, and other things like that. But then when it trickles down and they go to the grocery store, I think in some cases, spirits have fallen out of the basket a little bit.' In its outlook for the next year, the company said the challenges include continued consumer uncertainty and the 'potential impact from currently unknown tariffs.' 'We know it's highly volatile," Leanne Cunningham, the company's CFO, said while fielding a question about tariffs during the conference call. "None of us can predict what's going on." The company believes the market volatility will "create sustained levels of consumer uncertainty, which we believe will lead to another year of below historical total distilled spirits trends,' she said. Trump has often announced changes and pauses to his sweeping tariff plans on his social media platform. Trump hiked nearly all of his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to a punishing 50% on Wednesday in a move that's set to hammer businesses from automakers to home builders, and likely push up prices for consumers even further. Brown-Forman executives said Thursday that American spirits brands mostly remain off store shelves in Canada. Trump has angered Canadians with his trade war and calls to make Canada the 51st state. Spirits makers in Kentucky have expressed fears of becoming "collateral damage' by getting caught up in trade conflicts. 'The uncertainty of the tariffs continues to weigh down distilleries large and small," Chris Swonger, president and CEO of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, said in a statement Thursday. "We are urging the Trump administration to help get the spirits sector back to fair and reciprocal trade with zero-for-zero tariffs with our major trading partners.' Meanwhile, Brown-Forman's full-year results showed that net sales for its whiskey products were flat. Growth from Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey and its Woodford Reserve brand was offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange and declines in other super-premium Jack Daniel's products, it said. The company will launch a new product, Jack Daniel's Tennessee Blackberry, this summer. 'BlackBerry is a globally recognized, well-established flavor trend, and naturally complements the flavor of Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey," Whiting said. In January, Brown-Forman announced it was reducing its global workforce by about 12% and closing its hometown barrel-making plant in Louisville. Whiting reaffirmed Thursday that those actions are expected to produce about $70 million to $80 million in annualized cost savings.

2 hours ago
The implosion of a powerful political alliance: Trump and Musk in their own words
Last Friday, President Donald Trump heaped praise on Elon Musk as the tech billionaire prepared to leave his unorthodox White House job. Less than a week later, their potent political alliance met a dramatic end Thursday when the men attacked each other with blistering epithets. Trump threatened to go after Musk's business interests. Musk called for Trump's impeachment. Here's a look at the implosion of their relationship in their own words. 'Today it's about a man named Elon. And he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation and we appreciate it. Just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.' — Trump, May 30, Oval Office remarks ___ Trump invited cameras into the Oval Office last week to bid farewell to Musk, who said he was stepping away from his government work to focus on his businesses. Trump spoke effusively of Musk and his work with the Department of Government Efficiency for nearly 15 minutes straight. "I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president," Musk said. He marveled at the gold-tinged decorations Trump placed around the Oval Office. 'The oval office finally has the majesty that it deserves thanks to the president,' he said. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' — Musk, Tuesday, post on X. ___ Days after their Oval Office meeting, Musk escalated his previously restrained criticism of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, the president's top congressional priority. Still, he kept his critique focused on their policy disagreement. He did not go after Trump by name, even as he called on Republican lawmakers to vote down the bill and threatened political retribution against those who took Trump's side. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' Musk wrote on X. Uncharacteristically for a man who rarely lets a snub go unanswered, Trump did not respond. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Musk's views on the bill were not a surprise to Trump, and his social media posting 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' Musk continued Wednesday, approvingly sharing social media posts and memes that criticized the budget's price tag and deficit impacts, though still directing his ire at Congress. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." -- Trump, Thursday, Oval Office meeting with the German chancellor. ___ Trump said he was 'very disappointed in Elon" and was surprised by his benefactor's criticism. The war of words escalated rapidly from there. It all played out on their respective social media platforms, with Musk posting on X and Trump on Truth Social. Musk dismissed Trump's criticism. 'Whatever,' he wrote. He shared old Trump social media posts urging lawmakers to oppose deficit spending and increasing the debt ceiling. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted, a reference to Musk's record political spending last year, which topped $250 million. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Trump said Musk had worn out his welcome at the White House and was mad that Trump was changing electric vehicle policies in ways that would financially harm Musk-led Tesla. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. He added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' — Musk, Thursday, X post. ___ In a series of posts, he shined a spotlight on ties between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who killed himself while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Some loud voices in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement claim Epstein's suicide was staged by powerful figures, including prominent Democrats, who feared Epstein would expose their involvement in trafficking. Trump's own FBI leaders have dismissed such speculation and there's no evidence supporting it. 'Yes,' he wrote.

2 hours ago
Trump and Musk break up, and Washington holds its breath
WASHINGTON -- Maybe it was always going to end this way, with two billionaires angrily posting about each other on social media, fingers flying across pocket-sized screens as their incandescent feud burned hotter by the minute. But even if the finale was predictable, that didn't make it any less shocking. After long months when Donald Trump and Elon Musk appeared united in their chaotic mission to remake Washington, their relationship imploded this week like a star going supernova. It began with Musk complaining about the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which the president at first took in stride. Eventually Trump let slip that he was disappointed in his former adviser, prompting Musk to unleash a flood of insults and taunts. He accused Trump of betraying promises to cut federal spending, shared a suggestion that the president should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about his association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most viciously, Musk insisted that Trump wouldn't have won last year's election without his help. Trump, not one to slouch from a fight, could hold back no longer. He posted that Musk had been 'wearing thin,' that he had 'asked him to leave' his administration, that the tech titan had 'gone CRAZY.' Maybe, Trump threatened, he should save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. On and on it went, as liberals savored the spectacle of their most despised political opponents clawing at each other's digital throats and conservatives reeled at the prospect of having to pick sides. Laura Loomer, a right-wing provocateur and conspiracy theorist, saw an opportunity to position herself as the voice of reason. 'This fight should be taken offline,' she said — on social media, of course. The question now is whether Trump and Musk find some way to step back from a battle that is tearing apart one of the most consequential relationships in modern American politics. If they don't, there's little telling how far the fallout could spread from a collision between the world's most powerful man and its wealthiest. At stake are the future of Musk's companies, including electric automaker Tesla and rocket manufacturer SpaceX; government programs that rely on the billionaire entrepreneur's technology; legislation for advancing tax cuts and Trump's other priorities in Congress; Republican chances in next year's midterm elections; and an entire political ecosystem that has orbited around Trump and Musk's deteriorating partnership. 'It's like India and Pakistan,' said Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana, referring to two nuclear-armed nations that recently skirmished along their border. 'It just escalates and neither one of them seem to back down and understand the strength of each other.' Trump and Musk were always an odd pairing, with contrasting world views and deep generational and stylistic differences. Trump, 78, comes from old-school New York real estate and never appears in public without a suit and tie unless he's on the golf course. Before running for president, he became a household name as a reality television star. Musk, 53, is an immigrant from South Africa who struck it rich in Silicon Valley. In addition to running Tesla and SpaceX, Musk owns the social media company X. He's fashioned himself as a black-clad internet edgelord, and his wealth vastly outstrips Trump's. But Trump and Musk are kindred spirits in other ways. They're experts at generating attention who enjoy stirring the pot by riling up their opponents. Each has sought more power to accomplish existential quests. Trump assails the federal 'deep state' that resisted him during his first term, while Musk warns about the country going bankrupt from excessive spending and promotes an interplanetary future powered by his rocket technology. Musk endorsed Trump after the Republican candidate was nearly assassinated in Butler, Pennsylvania, and he began spending millions to support him. His social media megaphone was a powerful addition to Trump's comeback campaign, magnifying his efforts to court tech leaders and young, very online men. Trump rarely tolerates sharing the spotlight, but he seemed enamored with his powerful backer, mentioning him in stump speeches and welcoming him onstage at rallies. After the election, Musk was a fixture around Mar-a-Lago, posing for photos with Trump's family, joining them for dinner, sitting in on meetings. Instead of growing tired of his 'first buddy,' Trump made plans to bring Musk along to Washington, appointing him to lead a cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk tried to establish himself as the president's omniscient and omnipresent adviser. He held court in Cabinet meetings, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and helped himself to caramel ice cream from the White House kitchen. The federal bureaucracy practically trembled before Musk, who oversaw layoffs and downsizing with his team of acolytes and engineers embedded in various agencies. Musk appeared thrilled at his opportunity to tinker with the government and exulted in his bromance with Trump, posting on Feb. 7 that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man.' Trump returned the favor on March 11, allowing Musk to line up Tesla vehicles on the White House driveway as his company was struggling with declining sales. Trump made a show of choosing a cherry red electric car for himself. But cracks were emerging, especially as Trump pursued tariffs that could raise costs for Musk's businesses. Musk said Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, was 'truly a moron" and 'dumber than a sack of bricks" on April 8. The billionaire entrepreneur, who had never before worked in public service, seemed to be souring on government. He suggested there wasn't enough political will, either in Congress or in the White House, to adequately reduce spending. Trump started signaling that it was time for him to leave even though Musk said he would be willing to stay. Shortly before announcing his departure, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by legislation that Trump called the 'big beautiful bill" because it would increase the deficit. The measure includes tax cuts, more money for border security and changes to Medicaid that would leave fewer people with health insurance. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,' Musk said. 'But I don't know if it could be both.' The criticism didn't prevent Trump from giving Musk a send-off in the Oval Office, where he presented his outgoing adviser with a ceremonial key. 'Elon is really not leaving,' Trump said. 'He's going to be back and forth.' Musk said, 'I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president." It's hard to imagine that now. Musk escalated his attacks on the legislation Tuesday, calling it a 'disgusting abomination," and Trump tried to fend off the criticism. 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' the president said Thursday in the Oval Office during a meeting with the German chancellor. It was. Musk quickly took to X to vent his anger at Trump, saying his tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half of this year' and accusing him of lying. He also said it was 'very unfair' that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. Trump fired back in real time as he tried to maintain momentum for his legislation, which faces a difficult debate in the Senate. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' the president posted. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Meanwhile, some of Trump's allies plotted revenge. Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser who hosts an influential conservative podcast, said the president should direct the U.S. government to seize SpaceX. He also encouraged Trump to investigate allegations that Musk uses drugs and 'go through everything about his immigration status" in preparation for potential deportation. 'We'll see how good Elon Musk takes a little of that pressure," Bannon said, "because I happen to think a little of that pressure might be coming.'