ED questions Anil Ambani in Rs 17,000-cr loan fraud probe
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Tuesday questioned Reliance Group chairman Anil Ambani in connection with its money laundering probe into an alleged ₹17,000 crore bank loan fraud case Ambani reached the ED office at 11 am and the questioning lasted more than nine hours, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Ambani has sought seven days to furnish documents pertaining to the queries posed to him by the ED, they said.The agency will summon the 66-year-old industrialist again after recording the statements of credit committee members, according to the people.The ED will question Amitabh Jhunjhunwala, a former close aide of Ambani, on Wednesday. On Thursday, it will question another close aide, Sateesh Seth of Reliance Group.ET was the first to report on August 1 that the ED had summoned Anil Ambani for questioning in connection with the alleged bank loan fraud case.ET was the first to report on Monday that the ED would summon officials of private and public sector banks which had given loans to Reliance Group for questioning. The agency will seek details from the bank officials on the action initiated by them, if any, against Anil Ambani's companies which failed to repay the loans, ET had reported."We want to ascertain what action did banks take against the companies which failed to repay the loans taken from them (banks). Did they complain to the police, seek registration of an FIR (first information report) against the companies or not?" a senior official had told ET on the condition of anonymity.Nearly 20 private and public sector banks had given loans to Anil Ambani's entities over a period of time which eventually turned into non-performing assets. Three entities of Reliance Group - Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL), Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. (RCFL) and Reliance Communications (RCom) - were given a total of about ₹17,000 crore by the banks.According to data available with the ED, RHFL has an outstanding loan of more than ₹5,901 crore, while the amount in the case of RCFL is about ₹8,226 crore and RCom owes nearly ₹4,105 crore.Besides YES Bank , the other banks which had given loans to Reliance Group include State Bank of India Bank of India and Punjab and Sind Bank A look out circular (LOC) has also been issued against Anil Ambani at the request of the ED. Minutes after issuing summons to Ambani last Thursday, the agency sent a request to issue an LOC against the industrialist.The ED last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group over 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Please don't bring up IT jobs' : Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu calls for end to English as a status symbol, advocates teaching in local language
Zoho's Sridhar Vembu is advocating for the revival of Indian languages, criticizing the use of English as a status symbol. He believes this mindset creates a talent pool waste and cultural alienation. Vembu proposes education in native languages for all children, citing Zoho's success with Tamil-speaking teams and drawing parallels with other multilingual countries. Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein. More
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Reliance Infra to recover $2.44 billion in unpaid power dues from Delhi consumers
Reliance Infrastructure said on Friday (August 8, 2025) that its power distribution companies in New Delhi will recover 214.13 billion rupees ($2.44 billion) in unpaid dues, following a Supreme Court ruling earlier this week that upheld their claims. The dues stem from historical tariff shortfalls, where electricity prices approved by regulators did not fully cover the cost of supply. Reliance Infra is part of the Anil Ambani-run Reliance Group. Under a court-approved mechanism, the amount will be recovered from consumers over four years , likely through higher electricity tariffs. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ordered electricity regulators across India to clear deferred costs and unpaid dues owed to power distribution companies. The Court also instructed state regulators to conduct audits and submit recovery roadmaps. In New Delhi alone, three distribution companies — including a unit of Tata Power — had accumulated 272 billion rupees in unpaid dues by March 2024, according to the court document. The Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission will oversee the recovery process, which is expected to result in increased electricity bills for consumers in the national capital.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Supreme Court slams ED, questions low conviction rate in PMLA cases
The Supreme Court on Thursday criticised the Enforcement Directorate (ED) during hearings in two separate cases, questioning its low conviction rate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) as well as its functioning and extensive powers. One SC bench remarked that the agency 'cannot act like a crook' and must operate within the boundaries of law, The Times of India reported. SC questions ED in BPSL insolvency case In the first matter, a Bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai heard review petitions related to the Bhushan Power & Steel Limited (BPSL) insolvency case. The court had earlier recalled its May 2 verdict that had directed the liquidation of BSPL, in which it had invalidated a resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel, calling it unlawful and in violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). During the hearing, the ED's role and investigation in the BPSL case came under scrutiny. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the probe agency. 'What is the conviction rate?' asked Justice Gavai. Mehta responded that conviction rates were low even in other penal offences, attributing this to delays and procedural inefficiencies. 'Even if they are not convicted, you have been successful in sentencing them almost without a trial for years together,' Justice Gavai observed, referring to prolonged pre-trial custody and stringent bail conditions under the PMLA. Mehta pleaded that the agency had recovered and returned nearly ₹23,000 crore to victims of financial crimes. 'You cannot act like a crook': SC' rebukes In a separate hearing, a three-judge Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, while considering review petitions against the 2022 judgment in the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case, expressed concern over the ED's functioning. In July 2022, the Supreme Court upheld all the challenged provisions of the PMLA in the case. The court had affirmed the wide-ranging powers granted to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), including restrictive bail conditions and the authority to investigate and arrest. The SC bench observed that the agency could not act like a crook and had to operate within the four corners of the law. Justice Bhuyan said that there is a 'difference between law-enforcing authorities and law-violating bodies'. 'See what I observed in one of the cases… it came true in what a minister said in Parliament. After 5,000 cases, less than 10 convictions… That's why we insist on improving your investigation, witnesses… we are talking about liberty of people,' said Justice Bhuyan.
