Digital ‘one stop shop' for NHS will speed up care for patients, Government says
The aim, set out in this week's 10-year plan for the NHS, is to get technology into the hands of NHS staff and patients quicker than before.
Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'For too long, Britain's leading scientific minds have been held back by needless admin that means suppliers are repeatedly asked for the same data in different formats by different trusts – this is bad for the NHS, patients and bad for business.
'These innovator passports will save time and reduce duplication, meaning our life sciences sector – a central part of our 10-Year Health Plan – can work hand-in-hand with the health service and make Britain a powerhouse for medical technology.
'Frustrated patients will no longer have to face a postcode lottery for life-saving products to be introduced in their area and companies will be able to get their technology used across the NHS more easily, creating a health service fit for the future under the Plan for Change.'
The passport will be introduced over the next two years and will mean technology that has been robustly assessed by one NHS organisation can easily be rolled out to others.
The Department of Health said this would remove 'needless bureaucracy' and create a 'dynamic best buyer's guide', while also helping boost economic growth.
In on example, special wound dressings which are already cutting infections after surgery by 38% at Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals could be adopted across the country, the Department said.
Meanwhile, at Barts Health Trust in London, the use of antimicrobial protective coverings for cardiac devices have cut infections and saved more than £103,000 per year.
The Department of Health also said rapid flu testing at University Hospitals Dorset has cut the time patients spend in hospital alongside antibiotic use – something that could benefit other hospitals.
MedTech Compass aims to make these innovations, and the evidence underpinning them, clearer to buyers within the NHS.
Dr Vin Diwakar, clinical transformation director at NHS England, said: 'We're seeing the impact improvements to technology are having on our everyday lives on everything from smartwatches to fitness trackers – and we want to make sure NHS patients can benefit from the latest medical technology and innovations as well.
'The new innovator passports will speed up the rollout of new health technology in the NHS which has been proven to be effective, so that patients can benefit from new treatments much sooner.'
Chief executive of NHS Providers, Daniel Elkeles, said: 'We welcome any measures which cut red tape and help trusts get proven and effective technology onto the frontline faster to boost patient care and free staff from time-consuming admin.'
Professor Peter Bannister, medtech expert and fellow at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), said: 'This centralisation and simplification of adoption across the NHS will be welcomed by industry – including both large corporates and innovative UK small businesses – as well as by patients and clinicians.
'However, there must be clear evidence standards for manufacturers that recognise the diversity and health inequalities of the UK population, while the variation in digital readiness and workforce skills between different healthcare providers must also be factored in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
11 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
GPs using fewer physician associates, survey suggests
A new survey, conducted by the GP magazine Pulse, found that 21% of 425 GP networks in England said they had reduced PA numbers in the last year. It comes after the Government-ordered Leng Review found PAs have been used as substitutes for doctors, despite having significantly less training. One of the 18 recommendations in the review was that PAs be banned from seeing patients whom a medic has not reviewed to prevent the risk of 'catastrophic' misdiagnoses. Pulse said that the main reasons GPs gave for cutting back on PAs included: guidance from professional bodies; supervision demands; patient safety concerns and rising complaints. One GP told Pulse: 'We had a PA but now don't use them because of the change in guidance. 'We can't afford to pay someone with such limited scope.' On Friday, the union representing PAs and anaesthesia associates (AAs), United Medical Associate Professionals (UMAPs), lost a High Court bid to temporarily block NHS England from implementing recommended changes from the Leng Review. More than 3,500 PAs and 100 AAs are working in the NHS, and there have been previous calls for an expansion in their number. But their roles were reviewed following high-profile deaths of patients who were misdiagnosed by PAs, with six patient deaths linked to PAs recorded by coroners in England. The Leng Review gives a thorough assessment of the safety and effectiveness of physician and anaesthesia associates in the NHS. We welcome the independent review into these roles, which exist to support medical teams and not as substitutes for doctors or anaesthetists. — NHS England (@NHSEngland) July 16, 2025 They include 30-year-old Emily Chesterton, who died from a pulmonary embolism after being misdiagnosed by a PA on two occasions and told she had anxiety. In her report, Professor Gillian Leng concluded there were 'no convincing reasons to abolish the roles of AA or PA' but there was also no case 'for continuing with the roles unchanged'. She said more detail was needed on which patients could be seen by PAs, and national clinical protocols will now be developed in this area. Commenting on the Pulse survey, UMAP general secretary Stephen Nash said: 'Physician associates are highly trained medical professionals who play a vital role in improving patients' access to primary care, particularly in underserved parts of the health service.' He added: 'According to this survey the vast majority of primary care networks are retaining their PA staff. 'This is a testament to PAs' hard work and expertise.'
Rhyl Journal
12 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Children more likely to engage with junk food posts from influencers
Cancer Research UK said that ministers must do more to protect young people from 'harmful marketing that could increase their risk of obesity and cancer in the future'. New laws, which come into force next year, will end paid-for advertising, including online, of specific foods which are high in fat, sugar and salt. The charity said that it is important for the implementation of the legislation to go ahead as planned after repeated delays. And it warned that not all exposure to junk food will end when the new laws come into place as there will still be online advertising loopholes. The charity surveyed 4,000 children and young people aged 11 to 21 across the UK and found: – Half (52%) saw unhealthy food and drink products from either businesses or influencers on social media in the last month. – Almost four in 10 (39%) said they engaged with these posts by commenting, liking or sharing. – They were more likely to interact with a post from an influencer compared to a business. Some reported that seeing content about food high in fat, salt and sugar made them feel tempted or hungry. 'A giant cookie bowl keeps showing up, when I see it, I feel like ordering a dessert and I feel really hungry,' an 11 year-old told the charity. A 15-year-old said: 'I'd say at least every two minutes that I'm on Instagram I'd see at least one food-related post.' Liv Cheek, prevention policy manager at Cancer Research UK, said: 'Being overweight or obese is the second biggest cause of cancer in the UK after smoking, and rates among young people are rising. 'Our survey shows more than half of young people regularly see unhealthy food and drink content online, often promoted by influencers. 'Advertising can shape what children eat, so the UK Government must help create an online environment that empowers, rather than undermines, healthy changes. 'Planned restrictions on junk food advertising online are a vital step to protect young people's health. 'However, these measures must be properly enforced and strengthened by closing any remaining gaps in the online marketing rules. 'We urge the UK Government and regulators to take bold action to shield young people from harmful marketing that could increase their risk of obesity and cancer in the future.' Next month, experts will meet at the The International Food Addiction and Comorbidities Conference in London to discuss growing health concerns about food addiction. The Daily Express reported organisers believe that some 10 million people in the UK are hooked on junk food including pizza, chocolate, crisps, biscuits and ice cream. A Government spokesperson said: 'Obesity robs children of the best start in life and sets them up for a lifetime of health problems, which costs the NHS billions. 'The junk food advertising restrictions on TV and online are a crucial part of our Plan for Change to raise the healthiest generation of children ever. 'By reducing children's exposure to junk food advertising, we will remove up to 7.2 billion calories from UK children's diets each year and deliver around £2 billion in health benefits.'
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Patients fined in error for parking at GP surgery in Leigh
Two patients who were wrongly fined for parking at a community health centre despite being registered to leave their cars there have said they had to fight to get them rescinded. Debbie Harrison and Jenny Soppelsa both received penalty charge notices after visits to NHS Leigh Health Harrison told BBC Radio Manchester she received one letter demanding payment on the day of her husband's funeral, and Leigh and Atherton MP Jo Platt stepped in to support those raising concerns.A spokesperson for Community Health Partnerships, which manages the health centre, apologised to those affected and said the fines had been cancelled after being issued in error. Ms Harrison said she received a letter on the day of her husband's funeral warning her that the £20 fine would increase to £100 if not paid within seven days."I thought I'm going to have to pay it because I can't deal with this. I've got so much going on in my head and I've got so much admin to do," she said."Then I thought no, this isn't right, I'm not paying it, I'm going to fight this." 'Tried appealing' Ms Harrison and Ms Soppelsa said they had both correctly registered their car details in the reception at the health Soppelsa said she had received three fines for three visits to her GP when she had registered her said she had "thought nothing of it and then I've received penalty charge notices, one of which is already at £100 and the other two at £60"."I've tried appealing them, I've tried ringing them and there's no human you can talk to," she added."At the end of the day we're people and they should realise that not everybody has £100 spare to pay for a parking ticket that they shouldn't have had in the first place."A Community Health Partnerships spokesman said they were aware of "a limited number of patients" who had received parking fines incorrectly/He said the parking system was operated by UK Parking Control (UKPC) and "immediate action" had been taken to investigate what went wrong. UKPC has confirmed all fines issued on the identified dates, including those under appeal, would automatically be cancelled and any visitors who had already paid an incorrect fine would receive a full refund."We would like to apologise for any inconvenience or distress this may have caused," the spokesman added. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
