Estonia's Milrem reveals first look at new war robot
MILAN — Estonia-based Milrem Robotics revealed a first look at its new 8x8 wheeled combat robot, which builds on the company's existing family of unmanned ground vehicles.
A mockup of new hybrid-electric vehicle, dubbed Havoc, is on display here at the IDEX and NAVDEX trade shows that run Feb. 17-21.
The platform shares commonalities with other of Milrem's platforms, including the tracked Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV), enabling reduced procurement and maintenance costs as well as streamlined logistics, according to a company press release.
According to Milrem, the Havoc has a greater operational range and can move nearly silently, an advantage if deployed to congested combat zones.
Milrem, which is owned by Emirati conglomerate Edge Group, appears interested in tapping into the Middle East market as the first potential customers for the ground vehicle, promoting its capabilities to operate in 'open deserts, urban combat zones to high-altitude mountain passes.'
At the 2024 UMEX drone fair in Abu Dhabi, Milrem signed a contract with the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Defense to provide Emirati forces with 20 tracked RCVs and 40 THeMIS unmanned ground vehicles.
For several years, the THeMIS cargo, casualty-evacuation and route-clearance variants have been deployed by the Ukrainian military to provide transport and demining assistance.
Lessons drawn from real-world operations such as these are reflected in the development of the Havoc, a Milrem spokesman told Defense News.
'One major takeaway has been the importance of seamless command and control integration – the Havoc has been designed to operate within a large ecosystem, integrating effectively with both manned and unmanned systems to increase combat efficiency,' spokesman Gert Hankewitz said.
In one picture released of the vehicle, it is seen mounted with the French-made Pilar V acoustic detector produced by Metravib Defense, typically designed to protect heavy and light armored vehicles.
When asked whether Milrem's Emirati owners provided specific elements for the design of the UGV, Hankewitz said that they were actively exploring ways to maximize synergies across platforms, including integrating existing Edge payloads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sustainability platform Watershed launches free global emissions database
This story was originally published on ESG Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily ESG Dive newsletter. Watershed, a sustainability software startup, has launched a free version of its global emissions database, the Comprehensive Environmental Data Archive, to help companies 'address critical gaps in emissions reporting data to inform more impactful climate action.' The startup — which helps companies measure, report and reduce their carbon footprint — unveiled Open CEDA last week and said the database covers 148 countries, 400 industries and 95% of the global gross domestic product. Open CEDA considers 60,000 emissions factors when evaluating a company's footprint, provides annual updates on a company's decarbonization progress and measures emissions in compliance with the GHG protocol, per its website. Watershed's platform takes data directly from companies' systems to create an 'audit-ready' carbon footprint report and supports businesses in understanding their climate disclosure obligations. The sustainability startup currently manages around 1 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent across its portfolio, according to its website, which is almost double the volume it was managing last year. Watershed had reported managing around 479 million tonnes of carbon equivalent in February 2024. The company has a 2030 goal of collaborating with its customers to reduce or remove 500 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from the atmosphere, which accounts for nearly 1% of annual global emissions. Watershed's current client list includes BlackRock, Bain Capital, Carlyle, KKR, Visa, Walmart, FedEx, Etsy, Paramount and others. 'Simply put, better data leads to better decisions,' Watershed Co-Founder Christian Anderson said in a May 22 release. 'By opening up CEDA to the public, we hope to give organizations of all sizes a more accurate foundation from which to make critical choices about their sustainability action.' Watershed said it will continue to offer clients a paid version of CEDA as well. The version includes additional features, such as breakdown of emissions categorized by scopes 1, 2 and 3, and a comprehensive analysis that helps companies understand differences in emission factors, among other offerings. The company said Open CEDA is recommended for 'organizations or companies measuring for the first time,' whereas CEDA is recommended for 'more advanced sustainability programs and service providers,' per its website. Last year, Watershed secured $100 million during a Series C funding round, which it said would allow it to continue developing climate programs for clients and redouble its investments in Europe. The financing was led by San Francisco-based investment firm Greenoaks and raised the company's valuation to $1.8 billion at the time. Recommended Reading Climate software startup Watershed clinches $100M in funding
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
StoneCo vs. Block: Which Fintech Stock is a Smarter Buy for 2025?
Brazil-based StoneCo STNE and U.S.-headquartered Block XYZ are two standout fintech players in 2025. Both companies operate integrated payment and financial service platforms tailored for small- and medium-sized merchants. StoneCo is off to a strong start this year with first-quarter adjusted earnings beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.3% and improving 17.2% year over year. Effective repricing execution and lower average funding spreads fueled a 19% increase in gross profit, reinforcing the company's disciplined approach to profitability. Block, on the other hand, posted a 28% increase in adjusted operating income and a 15% rise in adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of 2025. Its Square segment delivered a 9% jump in gross profit, supported by GPV growth and broader banking product adoption. Strategic investments in AI, upmarket seller acquisition and field sales highlight the company's focus on innovation and scale. So, which fintech stock is better positioned to deliver an upside in 2025, StoneCo with its strong regional execution, or Block with its global innovation strategy? Let's take a closer look. Year to date, StoneCo shares have surged 67.3%, significantly outpacing the Internet-Software industry's 14.7% gain and the S&P 500's 0.8% rise. In contrast, Block shares have declined 27.3% during this period, mainly weighed down by weaker-than-expected Cash App performance. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research StoneCo Displays Strong Growth Momentum, Outpaces 2025 Guidance in Q1: StoneCo reported 19% year-over-year revenue growth in the first quarter of 2025, driven by strong performance across its payments, financial services, and software segments. Repricing initiatives and resilient client demand lifted Financial Services revenues by 20%, while Software revenue rose 11% on the back of a growing client base and larger average ticket sizes. Earnings also reflected solid operational execution, with adjusted EPS up 17.2% and adjusted basic EPS surging 36% year over year. Gross profit climbed 19%, supported by repricing, lower funding spreads, and disciplined cost control, enabling margin expansion despite macroeconomic headwinds. The company has already exceeded key 2025 targets, with first-quarter gross profit and basic EPS growth outpacing full-year guidance, underscoring strong momentum and the effectiveness of its cash sweep funding strategy. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Disciplined Capital Deployment and Robust Shareholder Returns: Having identified R$3 billion in excess capital at the close of 2024, StoneCo has already returned approximately R$1 billion year to date through aggressive share repurchases. In first-quarter 2025 alone, StoneCo repurchased R$843 million worth of shares, contributing to a total of R$2.4 billion in buybacks over the past 12 months, driving a 12% distribution yield. The company also launched a new R$2 billion share repurchase program. Strong Momentum Across Square and Cash App Ecosystems: Square is regaining market share, with gross profit up 9% year over year and gross payment volume growing 8.2% on a constant currency basis. This reflects Block's effective product development and go-to-market strategies, including field sales, upmarket seller acquisitions and strategic partnerships. Cash App is set for network expansion, despite a soft quarter due to temporary tax refunds and spending shifts. Block is focusing on user growth among teens and families, while scaling Cash App Borrow after receiving FDIC approval for nationwide lending — a move expected to drive broader eligibility and better unit economics starting in the third quarter of 2025. Block is also unlocking new revenue streams. 'Cash App Afterpay,' a retroactive BNPL feature launched in February, is gaining early traction. Meanwhile, its Proto division plans to launch Bitcoin mining chips and systems in the second half of 2025, marking a bold step into digital asset infrastructure. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Disciplined Financial Management and Shareholder Return: XYZ continues to demonstrate strong financial execution and discipline, with adjusted EBITDA rising 15% and adjusted operating income increasing 28% year over year. The company generated $1.53 billion in adjusted free cash flow over the trailing 12 months, up from $1.07 billion a year ago. In addition, Block is returning capital to shareholders, having repurchased $600 million in stock through April 2025. Management signaled intentions to continue buybacks. StoneCo is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.75, above its one-year median of 8.20. Block's forward earnings multiple sits at 19.79, below its one-year median of 31.86. Meanwhile, both companies appear undervalued when compared with the industry's forward 12-month P/E of 37.59X. At present, STNE stays discounted compared to both XYZ and the industry. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Given its robust financial momentum, disciplined cost management, and superior earnings execution, StoneCo, a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), presents a more compelling investment opportunity compared to Block, which carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. StoneCo has consistently outperformed its own guidance, with first-quarter gross profit rising 19% year over year, exceeding the company's 14% target. On the other hand, while Block has shown positive signs of product innovation and is regaining momentum in Square, investor sentiment remains mixed due to Cash App's near-term softness and premium valuation. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) : Free Stock Analysis Report Block, Inc. (XYZ) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Forgd Streamlines Token Launch Processes for Crypto Protocols
There's a science to issuing a token. At least that's according to Shane Molidor, the founder of Forgd, a platform that specializes in advising crypto projects on how to launch their own native tokens. 'It's easier now to launch a token than ever, especially with Molidor told CoinDesk in an interview, referring to the Solana-based launch platform favored by memecoin creators. 'But it's harder now than ever to launch a utility token that actually ends up performing well, because there's a finite amount of attention among retail and institutional investors.' 'At the end of the day, everyone seeks a positive return on investment, but if there's a finite pool of capital, you've got a lot of churn,' Molidor added. Forgd provides free-to-use software for blockchain projects to design tokenomics, engage market makers, navigate exchange listings, and underwrite their own valuation at launch. Once they officially launch their token, these projects can keep using Forgd as a data analytics platform to track their market makers, monitor unlocks, and optimize token demand drivers. The company also has an internal advisory practice to help guide large projects to fruition. More recently, Forgd has built out a portal where other token advisory firms can manage their portfolio; additionally, market makers are able to access transparent deal flow, as well as track uptime obligations. The software has been used by more than 1,500 projects, according to Molidor, about half of which have been research-oriented, meaning users played around with the tools to understand how it all works. Most of the time, the more serious projects (which Molidor called 'blue chips') end up using the software while still working with an advisory firm — which could be Forgd itself, or one of its competitors. In Molidor's book, to qualify as a 'blue chip project' means raising significant funding from venture capitalists and offering their token at about $100 million notional or above on major centralized exchanges. Multiple tokens now in the Top 100 in terms of market capitalization have been launched through Forgd, Molidor stated, though he declined to provide any names. 'The goal is to provide transparency and standardize this process of go-to-market,' Molidor said. 'It's always struck me as odd that… protocol innovators are expected to become subject matter experts in all things market microstructure.' 'A lot of the intricacies of this go-to-market process are very much a black box to all but insiders. I used to be one of those insiders, so I know how to navigate the process,' he added. Forgd's recommendations are completely data-driven, according to Molidor. For tokenomics, for example, the firm will look at all the projects that launched recently, identify those that performed well, and analyze things such as token distribution, token emissions, their valuation on launch day, price performance, market capitalization, trading volume, and so on. The analysis also covers market makers — which ones were used, what was their percentage of the total order book, what was the contribution in terms of making or filling orders, the tightness of spreads, et cetera. That way, when a project wants to launch with Forgd, it's able to see a given market maker's historical performance before inking a deal with them. Obviously, markets change all of the time, and what may have worked for a specific project in the fall of 2024 may not work anymore in summer of 2025. But Forgd takes great care in updating its database with every new major launch that goes live. Forgd mostly works with crypto native firms, though Molidor said the firm has had conversations with major, sophisticated institutions interested in learning about the process of launching a token. In Molidor's saying, the current process for launching tokens — with assets trading at multi-billion dollar fully diluted valuations shortly after launch, and with hyperinflationary token emissions over a period of three or four years — is completely unsustainable and needs to change. With such projects, demand is usually limited to the opening days or weeks; afterwards, the investing public's attention moves on to other projects. 'The reality is that, behind the scenes, on big time launches, the opening price and the magnitude of the… pop are hyper manufactured, either by the exchange or market makers, so the project might have very minimal influence as to how high they're trading in the first one minute. Predatory or self-interested actors might influence that,' Molidor said. 'What I think is actually more common is that the project doesn't know how to structure a balanced relationship with strategic partners like market makers, and they unknowingly put themselves in a position where the market maker is incentivized to let the price rip,' he added. The problem could be fixed if mechanisms were put in place to ensure sustained demand in the secondary market, Molidor said. In traditional markets, when a company goes public, it has certain assurances in the book building process from the underwriter that there will be institutional demand, he claimed. Tokens, however, usually can only count on retail speculative demand once they go to market. To remedy that, deal structures could be conducted in such a way that, if an institution wants to invest in the primary market, they are only allowed to invest a small portion of the capital they want to allocate — with the rest earmarked for the secondary market. 'Just as DeFi summer revolutionized the way that we think about liquidity provision, I wouldn't be surprised if we see on-chain mechanisms that incentivize buy-side demand being injected on-chain after a token is launched, that could be with basically yield that's generated in tokens, or maybe stablecoins that effectively lower the cost basis of institutions,' Molidor said. Sign in to access your portfolio
