Ghana minister of defence dies in helicopter crash
Chief of Staff Julius Debrah, who addressed the nation, has directed the country's flags to fly at half-mast.
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Gordon Brown's intervention shows Rachel Reeves is out of ideas
What exactly is Gordon Brown up to? Having largely kept his counsel in recent years, the former prime minister took to the airwaves on Thursday morning to set out what was effectively an alternative budget. Among the ideas he was pushing were ramping up tax on the gambling industry to pay for lifting the two-child benefit cap; ignoring fiscal rules when it comes to defence spending, and teaming up with other European countries to keep procurement costs down. If you understand the way Westminster works, it would be tempting to think this was Rachel Reeves using an elder statesman to 'pitch roll' her own ideas – in other words using a stooge to test the public's reaction so she could deny all connection with it if it went down badly. If anything though, the opposite is true. Ms Reeves did not ask Mr Brown to put the proposals out there, and his intervention was largely unhelpful. Mr Brown may have been a controversial prime minister but he was broadly respected as chancellor, the role he filled for 10 years. His favourite word was prudence, a word no one associates with Ms Reeves as she taxes the economy towards oblivion. The problem, then, for Ms Reeves is that having a predecessor coming up with novel ideas reminds voters how few she has of her own, and just how little room she has for manoeuvre after killing off growth with her jobs tax. Mr Brown did not spring his media appearance on Ms Reeves – he is far too polite to do that. I'm told they spoke at the weekend, when Mr Brown set out what he was going to say, and that Ms Reeves did not try to dissuade him. Ms Reeves has enormous respect for Mr Brown, who is something of a political idol for her, but the Treasury's private response to his appearance on BBC Radio 4's Today programme and a column in The Guardian is telling. Treasury insiders have questioned the figures quoted by Mr Brown in his miracle cure for child poverty. Mr Brown used figures from a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which said that the betting industry only paid £2.5bn in tax, and that another £3bn could be raised by 'taxing it properly', in Mr Brown's words (money that could be spent on lifting the two-child benefit cap). A betting industry source told The Telegraph the true amount of tax paid is £4bn, and one government insider questioned whether the IPPR's figures were 'credible' and suggested think tanks needed better scrutiny. Ms Reeves has launched a consultation on gambling taxes and on child poverty and Mr Brown, a lifelong campaigner for reducing child poverty, has submitted detailed proposals to both. Ms Reeves does not, however, see the two issues as inextricably linked. One Treasury source said that no government could be expected to indulge in a game of 'whack a mole' – the phrase that irritated politicians tend to reach for when they are asked how the Treasury is going to solve this problem or that. The same source said: 'We have done breakfast clubs, free school meals, there is a child poverty taskforce later in the year and we are not going to pre-empt that.' On the issue of putting defence spending outside of Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, the same source pointed out that while Germany has made such a move, it can afford to do so because it has much lower levels of debt, and that however Ms Reeves tries to raise money for increased defence spending, 'borrowing is still borrowing'. As for Mr Brown's suggestion that European members of Nato should use their combined spending power to bring down the costs of procurement, a source close to Ms Reeves said: 'Rachel has been leading the work in Europe on how European countries can do more together.' Ms Reeves and Mr Brown are 'close and speak a lot', but that is not the same as saying they are on the same page. The brutal truth is that every time Mr Brown offers up ideas about how Labour could solve society's problems, a comparison is automatically made in the public's minds that only makes Ms Reeves look feebler.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Move defence budget outside fiscal rule, says Gordon Brown
'Exceptional' defence spending should be moved outside of the government's fiscal rules to free up billions in headroom, Gordon Brown has suggested. The former Labour prime minister said Britain should negotiate a joint borrowing scheme with other countries, rather than counting its contribution as part of day-to-day spending. Such a move would alleviate the need for cuts in the upcoming budget while enabling Britain to spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2035, he said. Brown told Today on BBC Radio 4: 'This is a Nato initiative. This is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. We should either jointly issue bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the Continent. 'And that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules, and that would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves should exempt defence pledge from budget rules, says Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown has said Chancellor Rachel Reeves should exempt the Government's defence spending pledge from her borrowing rules to help free up economic headroom. The former prime minister said the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035 should be dealt with jointly as a ' Nato initiative', with costs shared across Europe. Leading economists have warned the Chancellor will likely have to raise taxes in the autumn budget to plug a £51 billion black hole in the public finances. Ms Reeves is currently on track to miss one of her borrowing rules by £41.2 billion and needs to rebuild a fiscal buffer of nearly £10 billion that has been wiped out, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). Mr Brown, who served as chancellor for a decade in Sir Tony Blair's Labour administration, said on Thursday that the rise in defence spending should be treated as 'exceptional', as it has been in Germany. 'When you come to the fiscal position, look, there's one thing that's happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented – to spend 5% on defence expenditure as we want to spend by the 2030s,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. 'We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules. 'That would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Germany has exempted some defence spending from its strict borrowing rules – the so-called 'debt brake' – to allow an increase in expenditure. When she entered the Treasury, Ms Reeves set out two key fiscal restrictions which she has said are 'non-negotiable'. The first rule is to ensure that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues so the Government only borrows to invest, and the second is to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Ministers have already announced a cut to overseas aid to fund a boost in defence spending but economists have said the new Nato target of 5% by 2035 could increase expenditure by a further £38.6 billion. The Treasury has been contacted for comment.
